Hi Daniel,
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 03:10:05PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.6.1-1
of my package secpanel.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.6.1-1.dsc
Thanks for stepping up as new maintainer for this package.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.6.1-1
of my package secpanel.
It builds these binary packages:
secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 608314
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-4
of my package secpanel.
It builds these binary packages:
secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 591322
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-1
of my package secpanel.
It builds these binary packages:
secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 175738, 289151, 305134, 305135, 317063
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1
of my package secpanel.
It builds these binary packages:
secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
The upload would fix these bugs: 305135, 317063
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
On Sunday 08 July 2007 13:05, Paul Wise wrote:
On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5?
I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1
Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ?
By debhelper 5, I mean
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Otherwise it looks fine.
One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a
wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a
look at those
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1
of my package secpanel.
It builds these binary packages:
secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
The upload would fix these bugs: 317063
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
On 7/10/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newbie as maintainer : I suppose I can close this bug #305135 once this
package is uploaded to Debian repos by a mentor ?
Usually one would put something like this in the changelog:
* New upstream release (Closes: #305135)
If it
On Saturday 07 July 2007 14:52, Paul Wise wrote:
On 7/4/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.di
ff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
Why the changes from /bin/sh to /usr/bin/wish? The wish manpage says
On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5?
I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1
Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ?
By debhelper 5, I mean debian/compat 5 and debian/control
Build-Depends:
On 7/4/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
Why the changes from /bin/sh to /usr/bin/wish? The wish manpage says
using what upstream has is better.
Might want to
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1
of my package secpanel.
It builds these binary packages:
secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 317063
The package can be found on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4
of my package secpanel.
It builds these binary packages:
secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
The upload would fix these bugs: 317063
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Hi Bruno,
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:01, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4
of my package secpanel.
Thanks for your effort to adopt an orphaned package.
I've taken a look and have the following points:
- Why the strange version
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Otherwise it looks fine.
One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a
wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a
look at those to see whether you can address them?
Thijs
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hi Bruno,
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:01, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4
of my package secpanel.
Thanks for your effort to adopt an orphaned package.
I meet few Debian
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:01:39 +0200
Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41+0.4.2-4
of my package secpanel.
Small typo in debian/control: managining
--
bye
ranf
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 1 July 2007 18:12, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Otherwise it looks fine.
One more thing: there's some bugs open against the package, including a
wishlist bug regarding a new upstream version. Perhaps you want to take a
look at those
19 matches
Mail list logo
