Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:05:11 +0100
with message-id <56990aa7.3000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#799813: RFS: snes9x [ITP] -- Cross-platform SNES
emulator
has caused the Debian Bug report #799813,
regarding RFS: snes9x [ITP] -- Cross-platform SNES emulator
to be mar
Hi
wonderful, lets continue :)
you really need to package libretro
as pointed out by ftpmasters before this one
"Depends: retroarch | libretro-frontend,"
this retro stuff is really blocking the sponosrhip from going forward...
also the changelog should mention every notable change from the las
Updated the package, sorry.
Thanks Gianfranco
On 06/11/2015 13:29, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
ping, if you are still interested, please answer and fix the above :)
(or ask about how to fix it)
otherwise I'll close the RFS and unassign my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
ping, if you are still interested, please answer and fix the above :)
(or ask about how to fix it)
otherwise I'll close the RFS and unassign myself, I do not like to
keep RFS bugs open for too long time, and there is no need to upload
if you ar
Control: owner -1 !
Hi:
1) some licenses are missing.
e.g.
macosx/z*.h
win32/* so much stuff.
even if not used, I guess they should be mentioned because in the src packaging.
2) you seem to use both autotools-dev and autoreconf.
autoreconf should be a superset of the first, can you please
Hey Stephen,
Mednafen SNES is based on an old bsnes version (059), it seems it's
faster than the current bsnes version but less accurate (it comes from a
time that there's no performance/balanced/accuracy build). It does not
have some LLE audio updates/improvements (problem with special games
Hi Sérgio,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:44:23 -0300, Sérgio Benjamim
wrote:
> Looking for a sponsor for this package:
>
> * Package name : snes9x
[...]
> * License : non-free/non-commercial
[...]
>
> It's worth to mention that Snes9x is more accurate than ZSNES and use less
> hardware re
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hey dear mentors,
Looking for a sponsor for this package:
* Package name : snes9x
Version : 1.53+git20150819
Upstream Author : Gary Henderson
and others
* URL : http://www.snes9x.com/
* Lic
* Michael Moorman [111010 18:23]:
> I uploaded a new version of the package to mentors just now, which fixes
> the lintian warnings and other issues brought up with my first upload.
>
> It is at
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/s/snes9x/snes9x_1.53-1.dsc
Hello, here is a new revi
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 18:19 -0400, Michael Moorman wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 23:49 +0200, Eshat Cakar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "snes9x".
> >
> > what does snes9x have, that is not provided by zsnes?
> > zsnes, in my opinion, is very stable and does n
(No need to CC me as I am subscribed to the mailing list)
* Michael Moorman [111003 07:30]:
> > zsnes is now available for amd64 too, but you are right that a
> > non-intel port is impossible.
>
> It is? I can't figure out how to build it for the amd64, and Debian
> doesn't build an amd64 packag
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 02:14 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:07:59AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > On 03.10.2011 00:51, Michael Moorman wrote:
> > > Is the non-commercial use clause what
> > > makes it non-free according to the DFSG?
> > >
> >
> > quoting from the license (h
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 01:07:59AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 03.10.2011 00:51, Michael Moorman wrote:
> > Is the non-commercial use clause what
> > makes it non-free according to the DFSG?
> >
>
> quoting from the license (highlighting by me):
>
> > Permission to use, copy, modify and distr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Michael,
On 03.10.2011 00:51, Michael Moorman wrote:
> Is the non-commercial use clause what
> makes it non-free according to the DFSG?
>
quoting from the license (highlighting by me):
> Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute Snes9x
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 00:21 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> Hello, I am the second co-maintainer of zsnes :)
> Let me add the following to what Eshat said :
>
> > ZSNES is fine, fast and highly stable. I happily used it for years. It'd
> > be perfectly acceptable, except for the fact that it uses i
Hello, I am the second co-maintainer of zsnes :)
Let me add the following to what Eshat said :
> ZSNES is fine, fast and highly stable. I happily used it for years. It'd
> be perfectly acceptable, except for the fact that it uses i386 assembly
> and therefore isn't portable. Though I've heard rumo
Hi,
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "snes9x".
> >
> > what does snes9x have, that is not provided by zsnes?
> ZSNES is fine, fast and highly stable. I happily used it for years. It'd
> be perfectly acceptable, except for the fact that it uses i386 assembly
> and therefore isn't po
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 23:49 +0200, Eshat Cakar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "snes9x".
>
> what does snes9x have, that is not provided by zsnes?
> zsnes, in my opinion, is very stable and does not lack a feature or have any
> performance issues (since mostly writte
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "snes9x".
what does snes9x have, that is not provided by zsnes?
zsnes, in my opinion, is very stable and does not lack a feature or have any
performance issues (since mostly written in assembler).
And I do not say this because I maintain the zsnes
19 matches
Mail list logo
