Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-27 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Freitag, den 17.02.2012, 12:48 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht: Sorry for the late reply, spare time was quite spare the last days... Hi Tobias, As promised, here's my review of your package: - In debian/solarpowerlog.default, you define /etc/solarpowerlog as the default RUNDIR;

Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-17 Thread Benoît Knecht
Tobias Frost wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 15:33 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht: And it doesn't build for me in a clean chroot, I get the following error (full build log attached): well, that's strange... My packages are always pdebuild-checked and I built it successfully on amd64,

Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-17 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi Tobias, As promised, here's my review of your package: - In debian/solarpowerlog.default, you define /etc/solarpowerlog as the default RUNDIR; what files is your program expecting to find there, HTML templates? If so, installing some default templates in /usr/share/solarpowerlog

Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-16 Thread Benoît Knecht
Tobias Frost wrote: I am (still) looking for a sponsor for my package solarpowerlog. As now the boost transition has been completed, it is time to reissue my request. See for http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00012.html for my last request. Changes since my last

Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-16 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 15:33 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht: And it doesn't build for me in a clean chroot, I get the following error (full build log attached): Hallo Benoît, well, that's strange... My packages are always pdebuild-checked and I built it successfully on amd64, i386 and

Bug#659498: RFS: solarpowerlog -- photovoltaic data logging

2012-02-11 Thread Tobias Frost
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am (still) looking for a sponsor for my package solarpowerlog. As now the boost transition has been completed, it is time to reissue my request. See for http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00012.html for my last

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog (improved...)

2012-01-01 Thread Tobias Frost
A happy new year, dear mentors, It seems that the boost thread library contains a bug making the version supplied with this RFS broken (Debian BTS #653922). Upstream version 0.21a addresses this by requiring boost = 1.48. However, due to #653228 I cannot provide an updated debian package at

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog (improved...)

2012-01-01 Thread Fernando Lemos
Hello, On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Tobias Frost t...@coldtobi.de wrote: However, please go forward with the review of the package, and to ease things I'd appreciate if a DD steps forward and indicated his/her will to sponsor this package, to define clear goals and clear actions whats

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-23 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Charles, On 23.12.2011 08:57, Charles Plessy wrote: For projects on Git hubs that do not release tar archives, I am starting to use native formats. This is much more straightforward. just because you opted to ignore all conventions please

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-23 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Tobias, On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:15:17AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 22.12.2011, 19:59 -0200 schrieb Fernando Lemos: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Artur R. Czechowski artu...@hell.pl wrote: If you are also the upstream developer and you are planning to always keep

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-23 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:15:01AM +0100, Arno Töll a écrit : On 23.12.2011 08:57, Charles Plessy wrote: For projects on Git hubs that do not release tar archives, I am starting to use native formats. This is much more straightforward. just because you opted to ignore all conventions

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-23 Thread Tobias Frost
Hallo, I implemented your suggestions and re-uploaded the package. I also eliminated the empty-debian-diff linitian warning by now using a dedicated branch for the debian/ foler. regards, coldtobi Am Donnerstag, den 22.12.2011, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost: Dear mentors, I am

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Tobias, On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the debian files in the git repository I use for development of solarpowerlog. Naturally the diff is empty in this case. If you are also the upstream

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 22 December 2011 13:37:36 Tobias Frost wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package solarpowerlog. * Package name: solarpowerlog Version : 0.21-1 Upstream Author : Tobias Frost t...@coldtobi.de * URL :

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Tobias Frost
Hallo Artur, thanks for your quick response. On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 13:17 +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: Tobias, On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the debian files in the git repository I use

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Donnerstag, den 22.12.2011, 15:41 +0100 schrieb Abou Al Montacir: Mmm, understood. It probably makes sense to keep it non-native. Can you give me some pointer how to do this best? Is it done in debian/rules, but which make target is best for it .. looking at the policy get-orig-source might

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Fernando Lemos
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Artur R. Czechowski artu...@hell.pl wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the debian files in the git repository I use for development of solarpowerlog. Naturally

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Tobias Frost
Hallo George, dbixxx is currently not used and could be removed for the moment -- I only have a feature branch that needs this library, but this feature is quite low priority for the moment. (Probably best I remove it from trunk for the time being...) About ctemplate -- this is unfortunatly I

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 22 December 2011 23:49:36 Tobias Frost wrote: Hallo George, Hoi, (top posting is not preferred:) dbixxx is currently not used and could be removed for the moment -- I only have a feature branch that needs this library, but this feature is quite low priority for the moment.

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Donnerstag, den 22.12.2011, 19:59 -0200 schrieb Fernando Lemos: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Artur R. Czechowski artu...@hell.pl wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the debian files

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 01:20 +0200 schrieb George Danchev: On Thursday 22 December 2011 23:49:36 Tobias Frost wrote: Hallo George, Hoi, (top posting is not preferred:) dbixxx is currently not used and could be removed for the moment -- I only have a feature branch that needs

Re: RFS: solarpowerlog

2011-12-22 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 07:59:36PM -0200, Fernando Lemos a écrit : It's not a matter of choice. If your package is not Debian-specific, it can't and won't be uploaded as a native package. Hello everybody, packages that are not Debian-specific and use a native source format are rare, but can