On Fre, 28 Apr 2006, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
First, you should bump your versioned depends on tex-common to 0.19,
since you need a working dh_installtex.
That means replacing ${misc:Depends} with explicit info.
Hmm.. OK. I've done it, as well as adding it to
Build-Depends-Indep.
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mistake. I meant build-depends, or rather I would have meant had I
thought before writing. I do think, however, that it's correct to
explicitly Build-Depend on tex-common, because you explicitly use
commands from it.
Not explicitly, I
On 4/28/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mistake. I meant build-depends, or rather I would have meant had I
thought before writing. I do think, however, that it's correct to
explicitly Build-Depend on tex-common, because you
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess all necessary issues are covered, including texlive.
If it still needs some more changes, just let me know.
I've now uploaded it. Once texlive is in unstable, you should try to
build with it, and also add it as an alternative
On 4/29/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've now uploaded it. Once texlive is in unstable, you should try to
build with it, and also add it as an alternative build-dependency (or
file a bug against texlive if that doesn't work).
Thank you very much for your sponsoring. And, yes,
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/25/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll not be able to do this today (I think), please remind me if I don't
speak up by tomorrow evening.
I guess all necessary issues are covered, including texlive.
If it still needs some
On 4/28/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I found two more things while testing the upgrade.
First, you should bump your versioned depends on tex-common to 0.19,
since you need a working dh_installtex.
That means replacing ${misc:Depends} with explicit info.
Hmm.. OK. I've
Dear Theppitak!
On Die, 25 Apr 2006, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
Thank you for your comments. I've tried to cover all of them.
Please check the updated package at the old place:
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/debian/source/thailatex/
I, too, took a look (texlive maintainer):
- You can
On 4/26/06, Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, too, took a look (texlive maintainer):
Many thanks. Changes updated.
- You can remove postinst and postrm, the code in there is automatically
generated by dh_installtex (update of the ls-r database, and calling
updmap). The only
Dear Theppitak!
On Mit, 26 Apr 2006, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
- You can remove postinst and postrm, the code in there is automatically
generated by dh_installtex (update of the ls-r database, and calling
Oh, yes, I didn't notice the package.post{inst,rm}.debhelper
that are got
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that it can be backported to woody (sarge already has tetex3).
... on http://www.backports.org/!
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/26/06, Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you need from tetex-bin and tetex-base? Only the latex/tex
binary? Are there any files needed?
Just basic LaTeX and the babel package. And, having peeked
the texlive package descriptions, I think the dependency on
texlive-base-bin
On 4/25/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll not be able to do this today (I think), please remind me if I don't
speak up by tomorrow evening.
I guess all necessary issues are covered, including texlive.
If it still needs some more changes, just let me know.
--
Theppitak
On 4/25/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I have adopted the orphaned thailatex package in the bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/357871
And now the brand new package has been dressed up,
waiting for sponsoring.
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your comments. I've tried to cover all of them.
Please check the updated package at the old place:
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/debian/source/thailatex/
I'll not be able to do this today (I think), please remind me if I don't
On 4/25/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've logged the closing of #344554 separately, but decided
not to close #351501, because the closing in previous change
was simply from the fact that it's gone when I tried installing.
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I have adopted the orphaned thailatex package in the bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/357871
And now the brand new package has been dressed up,
waiting for sponsoring.
I'm willing to look into it and finally sponsor it
Dear mentors,
I have adopted the orphaned thailatex package in the bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/357871
And now the brand new package has been dressed up,
waiting for sponsoring.
Here is the package information:
Package: thailatex
License: BSD-style
Description:
This package provides Thai
18 matches
Mail list logo
