Em 01-01-2018 14:02, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:47:26AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>> On 2018-01-01 at 10:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best can be done
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:47:26AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-01-01 at 10:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best can be done
> >> by who wants to do the job.
> >
> > So
Em 01-01-2018 13:39, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best
>> can be done by who wants to do the job.
>
> So your argument is "the package is not developed anymore (?) and was
> always
On 2018-01-01 at 10:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
>> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best can be done
>> by who wants to do the job.
>
> So your argument is "the package is not developed anymore (?) and
> was
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best
> can be done by who wants to do the job.
So your argument is "the package is not developed anymore (?) and was
always like that, so let's not touch it too much"?
> I honestly
Em 01-01-2018 12:06, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 11:01:59AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> It is impossible that someone has both - duc and duc-nox - installed ?
>
> Using the alternatives system you can have both installed, and the the
> system administrator decides what
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 11:01:59AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> It is impossible that someone has both - duc and duc-nox - installed ?
Using the alternatives system you can have both installed, and the the
system administrator decides what provides /usr/bin/duc (but by default
keep it the -x
Em 01-01-2018 10:56, The Wanderer escreveu:
> On 2018-01-01 at 05:48, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
>>
>>> Well said, I agree 100%.
>>>
>>> I consider both parties to be wrong here:
>>> * Jonathan went very hasty on the NMU
>>> * Herbert refuses a patch for a quite annoying thing, fixing which requires
On 2018-01-01 at 05:48, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
>> Well said, I agree 100%.
>>
>> I consider both parties to be wrong here:
>> * Jonathan went very hasty on the NMU
>> * Herbert refuses a patch for a quite annoying thing, fixing which requires
>> no effort on his side (as the submitter did
> Well said, I agree 100%.
>
> I consider both parties to be wrong here:
> * Jonathan went very hasty on the NMU
> * Herbert refuses a patch for a quite annoying thing, fixing which requires
> no effort on his side (as the submitter did all the work), without
> providing any rationale
>
>
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:38:20PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> > Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
> > an second opinion?
> >
> > [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
> >
> > We disagree when
Em 31-12-2017 15:38, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
>> an second opinion?
>>
>> [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
>>
>> We disagree when an NMU is
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
> an second opinion?
>
> [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
>
> We disagree when an NMU is necessary and how
> important the request is.
wow - wtf.
13 matches
Mail list logo
