Re: blocked migrations due to timeout

2020-04-25 Thread Matthew Fernandez
> On Apr 25, 2020, at 00:10, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > Matthew Fernandez wrote (ordering changed): >> I don’t get the same warning for mipsel and armel because the binary built >> fine there. It’s just that the test suite didn’t complete. > > No: by default, failed build-time tests fail

Re: blocked migrations due to timeout

2020-04-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Matthew Fernandez wrote (ordering changed): I don’t get the same warning for mipsel and armel because the binary built fine there. It’s just that the test suite didn’t complete. No: by default, failed build-time tests fail the build (to make sure they get noticed). The "missing build on

Re: blocked migrations due to timeout

2020-04-24 Thread Matthew Fernandez
Hi Andrey, Thanks for your reply. > On Apr 24, 2020, at 08:32, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:29:40AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote: >> The arm64 failure [2] looks legitimate (though I >> don’t understand why excuses also says “arch:arm64 not built yet”), > It says

Re: blocked migrations due to timeout

2020-04-24 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:29:40AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote: > The arm64 failure [2] looks legitimate (though I > don’t understand why excuses also says “arch:arm64 not built yet”), It says it cannot run autopkgtests for arm64 because the binary isn't built yet. > the mipsel failure [3]