> On Apr 25, 2020, at 00:10, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>
> Matthew Fernandez wrote (ordering changed):
>> I don’t get the same warning for mipsel and armel because the binary built
>> fine there. It’s just that the test suite didn’t complete.
>
> No: by default, failed build-time tests fail
Matthew Fernandez wrote (ordering changed):
I don’t get the same warning for mipsel and armel because the binary built fine
there. It’s just that the test suite didn’t complete.
No: by default, failed build-time tests fail the build (to make sure
they get noticed).
The "missing build on
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for your reply.
> On Apr 24, 2020, at 08:32, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:29:40AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>> The arm64 failure [2] looks legitimate (though I
>> don’t understand why excuses also says “arch:arm64 not built yet”),
> It says
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 07:29:40AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> The arm64 failure [2] looks legitimate (though I
> don’t understand why excuses also says “arch:arm64 not built yet”),
It says it cannot run autopkgtests for arm64 because the binary isn't
built yet.
> the mipsel failure [3]
4 matches
Mail list logo