Re: binary package version numbers?

1999-09-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Hey, glad to see someone's reading the Developer's Reference closely. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/

Re: binary package version numbers?

1999-09-12 Thread Peter S Galbraith
tony mancill wrote: On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right? I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning a

Re: binary package version numbers?

1999-09-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right? I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning a recompile of -2. I've seen that quite often, don't know how official it

Re: binary package version numbers?

1999-09-11 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right? I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning a recompile of -2. I've seen