Hey, glad to see someone's reading the Developer's Reference closely.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onShore.com/
tony mancill wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to
rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right?
I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning a
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to
rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right?
I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning a recompile of -2. I've seen
that quite often, don't know how official it
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to
rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right?
I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning a recompile of -2. I've seen
4 matches
Mail list logo