Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Please file an ITP on the pseudo package wnpp and reference it via a Closes:
tag in the changelog.
When that is done, remove the tag moreinfo from this bug.
* License : GPL-3.0+
* Vcs : https://gitlab.com/secu-design/usb-imager.git
Section : utils
The source builds the following binary packages:
usb-imager - GUI-Application to write bootable disk images to USB keys
To access further information about this packa
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 00:32 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Any clues out there?
The Debian mentors site only verifies against the OpenPGP keys that
have been registered on the mentors site for each individual user.
So login to your mentors account, update the key there and reupload.
If you st
Dear list,
I have recently become a DM for some packages. In the process I had to
create a new 4096-bits gpg key since the one I have used earlier was
just 2096 bits. So, I have basically one "old" 2096 bits key and a "new"
4096 bits one.
I now need to upload to mentors, a package I'm not
Hi All,
On 12/02/2021 20:08, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Thanks for the tips everyone - it wasn't the silver bullet I was after,
> but that has given me some clues to investigate.
>
Just a quick update on this.
$ gpg --refresh-keys
This gave me an error saying that Tor was not running. Sorr
That command works for me and looks like the correct one according to:
>
> https://keyring.debian.org/
>
>> 6. Today, realise the upload has silently failed due to expired key.
>> 7. Extend expiry date of keys forward two more years.
>
> It is a good idea to set a calendar appointmen
n.org/
> 6. Today, realise the upload has silently failed due to expired key.
> 7. Extend expiry date of keys forward two more years.
It is a good idea to set a calendar appointment or at/systemd-run job
to give you a reminder before the date. I'm doing the expiry update 3
months before my expiry
On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 19:47:47 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote:
> But I get this error:
> $ gpg -v --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-key 'fingerprint'
> gpg: sending key 0x to hkp://keyring.debian.org
> gpg: keyserver send failed: Connection refused
> gpg: keyserver send failed: Connection refused
t;gpg: sending key 0x to hkp://keyring.debian.org
>gpg: keyserver send failed: Connection refused
>gpg: keyserver send failed: Connection refused
>
>So how did I get into this mess?
>
>1. Many years ago followed the riseup.net guide to configure my keys.
>2. Over two years ago se
guide to configure my keys.
2. Over two years ago set the expiry date of my signing/encryption key
forwad two years to about now.
3. Weeks ago, sponsored a package to NEW.
4. Package was rejected.
5. The other day, uploaded a fixed package for my sponsee.
6. Today, realise the upload has silently
Hi Santiago,
On 22.12.20 at 10:03, Santiago R.R. wrote:
I could, if nobody else can respond earlier. given the holidays, I'd have some
delay.
thank you very much, I would appreciate that. Sure, holidays are approaching and I
think we all need some tranquil time.
Best
Philip
Cheers
El 21 de diciembre de 2020 8:39:44 a. m. GMT-03:00, Philip Rinn
escribió:
>Hi,
>
>anyone willing to sponsor this package I think having tools around for
>more
>security keys in Bullseye would be very nice.
>
I could, if nobody else can respond earlier. given the holid
Hi,
anyone willing to sponsor this package? I think having tools around for more
security keys in Bullseye would be very nice.
Thanks & happy hacking
Philip
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 10:03 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "so
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 4:09:59 AM EDT Ansgar wrote:
> If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its
> implementation doesn't matter to users and probably shouldn't be part
> of a package's name
It's both a command-line utility and a library, albeit a library applications
On 03.09.20 at 10:09 Ansgar wrote:
> If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its
> implementation doesn't matter to users and probably shouldn't be part
> of a package's name for the same reason Policy recommends scripts in
> PATH not including a `.sh` or `.py` suffix[1].
Hi,
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 10:03 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> solo-python - command line interface for SoloKeys
I don't have time to review the package, just one small notice:
If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its
implementation
* Initial release (closes: #958565).
My main driver to package this is to have more support for 2FA security keys
available in Debian.
I own two of those keys and they are very nice devices for general 2FA but they
can actually do much more e.g. they will gain OpenPGP functionality in the
fu
nots/lltsv
* License : Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/lltsv
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
lltsv - List specified keys of LTSV (Labeled Tab Separated Values)
To access further information about this package, please visit the
Hi,
On 18-04-08 17:29:17, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 08/04/2018 17:10, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> >> I just tried to upload a package to mentors.debian.net and it got
> >> rejected because is is signed with an ed25519 key:
> >>
On 08/04/2018 17:10, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> I just tried to upload a package to mentors.debian.net and it got
>> rejected because is is signed with an ed25519 key:
>>
>> gpg: Signature made So 08 Apr 2018 22:00:14 UTC using ?
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> I just tried to upload a package to mentors.debian.net and it got
> rejected because is is signed with an ed25519 key:
>
> gpg: Signature made So 08 Apr 2018 22:00:14 UTC using ? key ID C18A4F7D
> gpg: Can't check signature:
Hello,
I just tried to upload a package to mentors.debian.net and it got
rejected because is is signed with an ed25519 key:
gpg: Signature made So 08 Apr 2018 22:00:14 UTC using ? key ID C18A4F7D
gpg: Can't check signature: unknown pubkey algorithm
I guess the infrastructure has not been
convention to do that.
Ok, I did.
>> is it possible to do Debian packaging with different gpg keys and email
>> addresses? And how would I do it?
>
> Different from what?
Sorry, the meaning was lost in translation. ;)
"Different" seems to be the wrong word here. "
David Rabel <ra...@b1-systems.de> writes:
> PS: Please CC me, if you answer to this mail, as I am subscribed to
> Debian mentors anymore.
To participate, please subscribe so that we don't all have to violate
convention to do that.
> is it possible to do Debian packaging with dif
Hi there,
is it possible to do Debian packaging with different gpg keys and email
addresses? And how would I do it?
Yours
David
PS: Please CC me, if you answer to this mail, as I am subscribed to
Debian mentors anymore.
--
David Rabel
Linux Consultant & Trainer
Tel.: +49-1511-5908566
--keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-keys your key id
See also: https://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
It appeared that my subkey was expired: the issue was easily solved once
isolated.
Thanks a lot for your replies.
Cheers,
Jerome
Kind Regards,
Bas
. On the other hand, it was renewed a few month
ago.
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x80BFC3820C4B26E3
I suspect you didn't push your updated key to the Debian keyserver.
Make sure to send it to keyring.debian.org:
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-keys your key id
See also
Hello Forum:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
must be deposited somewhere: any idea ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
to use this function will be
cat .ssh/id_rsa.pub | gpg --clearsign | mail chan...@db.debian.org
which will set the authentication key to the identity you are using.
Multiple keys per user are supported, but they must all be sent at
once. Keys can be exported to a subset of machines by prepending
On 20/08/15 00:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 23:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 19/08/15 14:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess
specification is supported, see sshd(8). Probably
the most common way to use this function will be
cat .ssh/id_rsa.pub | gpg --clearsign | mail chan...@db.debian.org
which will set the authentication key to the identity you are using.
Multiple keys per user are supported, but they must
On 19-08-15 23:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 19/08/15 14:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
must be deposited somewhere: any
Your message dated Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:12:07 +
with message-id e1ymhcj-0002ik...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: distkeys/1.0-1 [ITP] -- distribute SSH keys
has caused the Debian Bug report #712787,
regarding RFS: distkeys/1.0-1 [ITP] -- distribute SSH keys
to be marked as done
Ping! Do you still have interest over this package?
Regards,
Eriberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Eriberto,
Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2014, 09:40:27 schrieb Eriberto:
Ping! Do you still have interest over this package?
I already started migrating it to non-native package format on request, but
then was quite busy.
Why do you ask?
Ciao,
Martin
--
Martin Steigerwald
Consultant / Trainer
Hi!
I asked to know about the package state. We have a lot of dead package
and is a good idea remove the trash (dead requests). Note that isn't
your case.
Have a nice day!
Regards,
Eriberto
2014-03-26 9:52 GMT-03:00 Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de:
Hi Eriberto,
Am Mittwoch, 26. März
Hi,
Why you used native for the package? Where is the ITP bug?
Thanks.
Regards,
Eriberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
* URL : https://www.teamix.org/projects/distkeys
* License : GPL-2+
Section : admin
It builds those binary packages:
distkeys - distribute SSH keys
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https
: GPL-2+
Section : admin
It builds those binary packages:
distkeys - distribute SSH keys
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://www.teamix.org/projects/distkeys
http://people.teamix.net/~ms/debian/new/
Alternatively
Here is a review:
You seem to have sent this RFS bug to debian-mentors instead of
submit@bugs.d.o, please read this:
http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS
I would suggest that a non-native package would be more appropriate
here, please change debian/source/format to 3.0 (quilt) and change the
.
If one is able to run this tool, and thus has access to your DNSSEC keys
and update the DNS files it writes, you have bigger problems already...
In the case that the snprintf()'s actually fail silently as the strings
printed are too long (which is likely a rarish case with the larger
static buffers
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch wrote:
I note your email address puts you in Switzerland, if that is true I
hope you plan to join us at DebConf13:
http://debconf13.debconf.org/
That was done because there is an existing bug[1] and I wanted to avoid
creating a
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package zkt:
Please note that there is an old ITP bug report here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481898
But the intent was never fulfilled, thus, hereby, a fully working
I'm not planning to sponsor this but here is a review:
I wonder if the low-level nvram reading code should be replaced with a
Linux driver?
Please run tagpending from devscripts before uploading to mentors.
Please mention why debian/tpb.devfs is being dropped in the changelog.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
I'm not planning to sponsor this but here is a review:
More review:
You might want to try merging and or forwarding the Ubuntu patch and
the patches in Ubuntu bugs:
http://patches.ubuntu.com/t/tpb/tpb_0.6.4-2.3ubuntu3.patch
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise wrote:
I'm not planning to sponsor this but here is a review:
Thank you so much, It's great reviews and more resources for me. :-)
I see news from upstream it moved from nvram to xevents in version
0.7.0 (svn), I'll consult with upstream and
fix all issues.
Regrads,
--
: utils
It builds those binary packages:
tpb - program to use the IBM ThinkPad(tm) special keys
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/tpb
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using
-ssh.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Authenticate using SSH keys
This PAM module provides single sign-on behavior for SSH.
The user types an SSH passphrase when logging in and is
authenticated if the passphrase successfully decrypts the
user's
Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Authenticate using SSH keys
This PAM module provides single sign-on behavior for SSH.
The user types an SSH passphrase when logging in and is
authenticated if the passphrase
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
debian-de...@lists.debian.org list:
the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
Hello:
On 16/08/12 17:31, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
debian-de...@lists.debian.org list:
the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
[2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
[2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from unstable (Alexander Reichle-Schmehl)
So I guess it must be
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho antti-juh...@kaijanaho.fi (16/08/2012):
There is no ambiguity. The package is present in unstable and thus is not
removed in the sense that word is commonly used without qualifiers. (The
proper way to describe what happened to the package is removed from testing
-
a
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
The situation is ambiguous as I posted before in the
debian-de...@lists.debian.org list:
the package is not orphaned, was removed but it is still present.
There is no
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:41:08PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
What let you think this?
Carelessness in investigating (looked at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html, noticed that the last news
entry was removal from testing and did not read closely enough to notice the
unstable
On 08/16/2012 11:42 PM, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:39:50PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
According to its PTS ( http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-ssh.html ):
[2011-12-03] libpam-ssh REMOVED from testing (Britney)
[2011-12-02] Removed 1.92-14 from
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:19:29 +0200
with message-id 20120408131929.0865f973@x200
and subject line Sponsored this one
has caused the Debian Bug report #661511,
regarding RFS: tpb/0.6.4-8 [ITA] -- program to use the IBM ThinkPad(tm) special
keys
to be marked as done.
This means
: utils
It builds those binary packages:
tpb - program to use the IBM ThinkPad(tm) special keys
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/tpb
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tpb.
It builds those binary packages:
tpb - program to use the IBM ThinkPad(tm) special keys
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/tpb
Alternatively, one
Dear Debian Developers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package screenkey.
It is a screencasting tool to display the pressed keys in a very nice
configurable banner on the screen.
You can see it in action, in this video
http://youtu.be/aLtIvEiDD2k?t=2m1s
I just found one other tool
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Eshat Cakar i...@eshat.de, 2012-01-07, 14:26:
mentors.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/screenkey
dget: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/screenkey/screenkey_0.2-1.dsc
In fix_threads_freeze.patch:
- s/programm/program/,
- s/nev/new/,
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
- s/remove threading, to fix these/remove threading to fix these/,
- s/problems with the threading/problems with threading/.
(Though I'm not sure about the last two. Can a native speaker of English
confirm?)
I confirm this.
--
bye,
pabs
(I still :P don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Eshat Cakar i...@eshat.de, 2012-01-07, 14:26:
mentors.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/screenkey
dget: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/screenkey/screenkey_0.2-1.dsc
Are the Python modules supposed to be used by external
Dear Debian Developers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package screenkey.
It is a screencasting tool to display the pressed keys in a very nice
configurable banner on the screen.
You can see it in action, in this video http://youtu.be/aLtIvEiDD2k?t=2m1s
I just found one other tool
This depends on python-gtk2, which has been obsoleted upstream by
python-gobject and the GObject introspection therein:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.gtk%2B.python/15449
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Paul Wise p...@debian.org [111007 16:46]:
This depends on python-gtk2, which has been obsoleted upstream by
python-gobject and the GObject introspection therein:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.gtk%2B.python/15449
Given that python-gobject with gtk support is not yet available
in
Eshat Cakar i...@eshat.de writes:
You can see it in action, in this video
http://youtu.be/aLtIvEiDD2k?t=2m1s
Great video, cheers!
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
While I can't help you with uploading, I glanced over the packaging, and
would like to comment on a few
Thanks for the review Gergely,
Great video, cheers!
Kudos go to upstream(ubuntu) for the video.
* upstream README
You include the upstream README in the packaging, but it does not
contain any useful information for an end-user
removed.
* debian/rules
'tis not a sample file
Language: python/pygtk
It builds those binary packages:
screenkey - Screencast your keys
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/screenkey
You can see it in action, in this video
http://youtu.be/aLtIvEiDD2k?t=2m1s
I have two GPG keys, one for my laptop and one for my desktop. I've probably
got a third for my VPS, but I don't thinkn that's on the public keyservers
yet and I only use it so my local apt repository is signed. But, I digress.
mentors.d.n seems to want a single GPG key. I imagine
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 03:14 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
mentors.d.n seems to want a single GPG key. I imagine that becoming a DD
would probably entail reducing my keys down to one (1) as well.
No, it will require you to nominate one of your keys as the Debian key.
Take a look at my
* Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:14:53 -0600]:
I have two GPG keys, one for my laptop and one for my desktop. I've probably
got a third for my VPS, but I don't thinkn that's on the public keyservers
yet and I only use it so my local apt repository is signed. But, I digress
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:14, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two GPG keys, one for my laptop and one for my desktop. I've probably
got a third for my VPS, but I don't thinkn that's on the public keyservers
yet and I only use it so my local apt repository
Hello James and Adam,
James Westby James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On (12/09/06 13:53), Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package weplab.
* Package name: weplab
Looks good to me.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
I can't I'm
On (12/09/06 13:53), Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package weplab.
* Package name: weplab
Looks good to me.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
I can't I'm afraid, but maybe someone else would like to.
[P.S.
: http://weplab.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Section : net
It builds these binary packages:
weplab - tool designed to break WEP keys
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 384474
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http
these binary packages:
weplab - tool designed to break WEP keys
The package is lintian/linda clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 384474
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/weplab
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:17 +, =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20C=C3=A9cile=20 =20
wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
weplab - tool designed to break WEP keys
How exactly would this package be useful?
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:17:06PM +, =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20C=C3=A9cile=20 =20
wrote..
I am looking for a sponsor for my package weplab.
* Package name: weplab
Version : 0.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Jose Ignacio Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:03:34PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote..
2. No man page. Having a man page would be helpful for a program
like this and is Debian Policy (sec 12.1). The README is quite
extensive and would be a good start for developing a man page.
My mistake. Didn't see the
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:41:12 -0400, Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:03:34PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote..
2. No man page. Having a man page would be helpful for a program
like this and is Debian Policy (sec 12.1). The README is quite
extensive and
: http://weplab.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Section : net
It builds these binary packages:
weplab - tool designed to break WEP keys
The package is lintian/linda clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 384474
The package can be found
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:11:13PM +, =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20C=C3=A9cile=20 =20
wrote..
I removed the NEWS file from docs, sorry for the mistake.
The use of this package is to break WEP key from a wifi dump with
the FMS statisitcal algorythm. It's an altervnative to
aircrack-ng which
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:09:08 -0400, Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:11:13PM +, =?UTF-8?Q?Adam=20C=C3=A9cile=20
=20 wrote..
I removed the NEWS file from docs, sorry for the mistake.
The use of this package is to break WEP key from a wifi dump with
always
echo Let's test if its a version 4 or greater key
VERSION=$(gpg ${GPGOPTS} --with-colons --with-fingerprint --list-keys 0x$KEYID | awk -F :
'$1 == fpr {print length($10)}')
if [ $VERSION -eq 32 ]; then
echo Warning: It looks like this key is an Version 3 GPG key. This is
bad
around a bit on IRC, I got:
- from http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2, Each Applicant
must provide an OpenPGP version 4 public key with encryption
capabilities.
- somebody mentioning that a PGP5 key would be fine.
Searching in keyservers, I see several keys for Daniel
is: 0xDECAB207 with fingerprint
$ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.pgp.com 0xDECAB207
gpg: requesting key DECAB207 from hkp server keyserver.pgp.com
gpg: keyserver timed out
gpg: keyserver receive failed: keyserver error
Please upload your key to a different keyserver, as already mentioned
: key DECAB207 not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
It'd be good to avoid using keyserver.pgp.com - it isn't one of the better
keyservers and could break certain keys. subkeys.pgp.net is a DNS round-robin
of the most up to date keyservers
:
- from http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2, Each Applicant
must provide an OpenPGP version 4 public key with encryption
capabilities.
- somebody mentioning that a PGP5 key would be fine.
Searching in keyservers, I see several keys for Daniel Widenfalk,
but the e
of being signed by a DD? If it
doesn't and test 1 fails, you would be better off with a new key - a gnupg
key.
If test 1 does fail but you have a signature already, ask on gnupg-users about
what is wrong in your PGP key and how to fix it.
I saw somewhere that PGP keys are depreciated as PGP uses
if its a version 4 or greater key
VERSION=$(gpg ${GPGOPTS} --with-colons --with-fingerprint --list-keys 0x$KEYID
| awk -F : '$1 == fpr {print length($10)}')
if [ $VERSION -eq 32 ]; then
echo Warning: It looks like this key is an Version 3 GPG key. This is
bad.
echo
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
Okies! Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Zakame
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux User
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
According to the Applicant's Checklist[1]:
# The applicant's identity needs to be verified.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
Okies! Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Zakame
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux User
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
According to the Applicant's Checklist[1]:
# The applicant's identity needs to be verified.
Hallo Lucas,
* Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 12:05]:
[...]
i dont no the url exactly, but search the debian.org website, there is a
site, where you can search for a dd in your environment.
try to search google for debian key signing program.
that would be the [1]key signing
Hi! Where can I get my GPG public key signed? I'm here in the
Philippines, and some folks from plug-ml asked about this, since we have
quite a few Debian package maintainers now and we want to join the
Debian community... Is there by any chance some DD nearby? ;)
BTW, we're having the Philippine
Hallo Zak,
* Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-30 13:50]:
Hi! Where can I get my GPG public key signed? I'm here in the
Philippines, and some folks from plug-ml asked about this, since we have
quite a few Debian package maintainers now and we want to join the
Debian community... Is there
Nico Golde wrote, On 06/30/2004 09:12 AM:
Hallo Zak,
* Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-30 13:50]:
Hi! Where can I get my GPG public key signed? I'm here in the
Philippines, and some folks from plug-ml asked about this, since we have
quite a few Debian package maintainers now and we
Hi! Where can I get my GPG public key signed? I'm here in the
Philippines, and some folks from plug-ml asked about this, since we have
quite a few Debian package maintainers now and we want to join the
Debian community... Is there by any chance some DD nearby? ;)
BTW, we're having the Philippine
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
