scripsit Neil Williams:
[...]
No URL, no bug reports, no detail - how do you propose that it gets
sponsored?
There is no duplication involved in an NMU - but you must engage with
the maintainer, explain your proposals, detail your patches and allow
time for the maintainer to either do the
scripsit Cyril Brulebois:
[...]
The Right Thing to do is to contact the maintainers first. And it is not
like the Games Team were totally unresponsive, especially when it comes
to handling copyright-related problems (see Miriam's — in particular but
not only — incredible work bugging upstreams
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:19:09 -0700
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is to do a non-DD NMU and
let the Games Team sponsor it if they want... it seemed silly to
duplicate the work.
No URL, no bug reports, no detail - how do you propose that it gets
sponsored?
Sounds like a request
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:43:35 -0700
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scripsit Cyril Brulebois:
[...]
The Right Thing to do is to contact the maintainers first. And it is not
like the Games Team were totally unresponsive, especially when it comes
to handling copyright-related
scripsit Neil Williams:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:19:09 -0700
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is to do a non-DD NMU and let the Games Team sponsor it if they
want... it seemed silly to duplicate the work.
No URL, no bug reports, no detail - how do you propose that it
gets
scripsit Neil Williams:
(Something I do myself - rough and ready packages that are nowhere
near release, but the patches always go to the BTS.)
The only reason to upload packages to mentors.debian.net is to request
sponsoring - if your changes are just patches and not a request to
take
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:09:55 -0700
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a request for sponsorship to me - and one that was lacking
the most basic information.
Well, I expect if I were requesting sponsorship I would have entitled
the e-mail `RFS: ...'
Not always.
and
I would beg everyone in the thread to keep calm. There seems to have
been a miscomunication among all of us, so lets let it that way and
forget about it, please. It won't do any good for anyone to keep
discissing this. To be honest, when I read the first mail I thought
How can this be? They're
scripsit Miriam Ruiz:
I would beg everyone in the thread to keep calm. There seems to have
been a miscomunication among all of us, so lets let it that way and
forget about it, please.
I like that idea very much. We have better things to do.
[snip]
To be honest, when I read the first mail I
Greetings,
I've put a NMU of the opencity pacakge on mentors. I'm not looking to
hijack the package, just fix some serious policy violations.
The package was breaking FHS, so I rebuilt it for my own system after I
filed a bug. In doing so I noticed a couple of copyright problems and
filed
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:10:25 -0700
Thanasis Kinias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The package was breaking FHS,
Details? Is the breakage RC?
so I rebuilt it for my own system after I
filed a bug.
Number?
In doing so I noticed a couple of copyright problems and
filed those bugs too.
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/09/2007):
The package was breaking FHS,
Details? Is the breakage RC?
Two docs files outside /usr/share/doc. He probably couldn't read
“should” in Policy 12.3.
Number?
#442029
Please note that I didn't reach the retitle[1] when I answered.
1.
[ I bounced the two previous mails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put the list back in the loop with this mail. ]
Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (12/09/2007):
My questions about the exact content of the bug remains, because “FHS
violations” isn't self-explanatory.
For the sake of
13 matches
Mail list logo
