Hi mentors.
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
packages[1] has stopped working.
The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a minor
change could warrant a new upload.
Thanks in advance.
[1]
Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org writes:
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one
of my packages[1] has stopped working.
Which leaves your package with a new bug: a ‘debian/watch’ file that no
longer works. Right?
The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was
Hi!
Andrea Bolognani schrieb:
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
packages[1] has stopped working.
The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a minor
change could warrant a new upload.
IMHO this doesn't warrant an upload; but
Ben Finney wrote:
Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org writes:
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one
of my packages[1] has stopped working.
Which leaves your package with a new bug: a ‘debian/watch’ file that no
longer works. Right?
The fix is a trivial
Felipe Sateler schrieb:
No. The cost of wasting buildd and user time has to be factored in. Not any
bug is worth of making a new release for.
Not to forget bandwidth / transfer volume for our mirror network. Even for
arch: all packages uploads are not always justified.
Best Regards,
On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:11:38 +1000
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org writes:
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one
of my packages[1] has stopped working.
Which leaves your package with a new bug: a
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org wrote:
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
packages[1] has stopped working.
The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a minor
change could warrant a new upload.
On Thu, 14 May 2009 17:22:06 +0800
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org wrote:
Since the upstream website has been redesigned, the watch file for one of my
packages[1] has stopped working.
The fix is a trivial one-line
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org wrote:
Write a test suite and send it upstream.
I won't write a test suite for Beef, or otherwise improve it, since I plan to
rewrite it on top of the Cattle library[1] as soon as said library is mature
enough. The library,
Hi
Dne Tue, 12 May 2009 23:26:40 +0800
Vern Sun s5u...@gmail.com napsal(a):
on 二, 2009-05-12 at 17:02 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
- you should split the library to libcconv0 and rename devel package to
libcconv-dev
- please write useful description, pointing user to url is not a useful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.75-1
of my package fpm2.
The upload would fix those bugs:
#516196 Blowfish selftest failed: At startup password prompt.
Please try again.
Severity: important
#493317 DEFAULTS is
Hi!
William Vera schrieb:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 15.3-2
of my package hwinfo.
Uploaded; many thanks for your contribution!
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
on 四, 2009-05-14 at 18:11 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
- are all those versioned build depends really needed?
as you said cconv man page is obviously generated, you should include it's
sources and generate it during build. most of the depends are used for
generate man page.
- there is no need
Hi
Dne Thu, 14 May 2009 19:19:19 +0800
Vern Sun s5u...@gmail.com napsal(a):
on 四, 2009-05-14 at 18:11 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
- are all those versioned build depends really needed?
as you said cconv man page is obviously generated, you should include it's
sources and generate it during
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 22:47, Alejandro Garrido Mota
garridom...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/13 LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com:
Hello,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:09, Alejandro Garrido Mota
garridom...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-4
of my
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
LI Daobing wrote:
2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same
file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as
memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian
on 四, 2009-05-14 at 19:54 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote:
I'm talking about versions, not about dependencies.
sorry about my poor english.
- are all those versioned build depends really needed?
i am not sure about this, but i have removed the versions.
- static library and libtool script should
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.0-3
of my package drgeo.
It builds these binary packages:
drgeo - An interactive geometry software
This is the Gtk interactive geometry software. It allows one
to create geometric figure plus the interactive manipulation of
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5+svn2078-1
of my package ampache.
I have contacted my usual sponsor and he is unable to sponsor
ampache at this time due to other commitments. Here is a
summary of some of the new features.
- Video Streaming Support
-
Hi
Dne Thu, 14 May 2009 21:09:03 +0800
Vern Sun s5u...@gmail.com napsal(a):
reuploaded. the package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cconv/cconv_0.5.2-1.dsc
Uploaded, thanks.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com |
LI Daobing wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
LI Daobing wrote:
2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same
file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as
memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian
LI Daobing lidaob...@gmail.com writes:
3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file.
Is that a policy/best practice for library packages?
ok, consider there is no conclusion here. you can keep this file there. :)
But there seems to be a preference to remove it if rdepends
Dear reader of debian-mentors,
I read the following, following a discussion on debian-devel, which I
do not understand.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:26:56PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx (14/05/2009):
I've worked on FTBFS-with-new-GCC bugs
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0~beta2-1
of my package krecipes.
It builds these binary packages:
krecipes - recipes manager for KDE
krecipes-data - recipes manager for KDE - data files
krecipes-doc - recipes manager for KDE - documentation
Krecipes is a KDE
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
pts, my qa page) show liferea as having 1 open rc bug.
--
To
Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
pts, my qa page) show liferea as having 1
found 510765 1.4.1-1
found 510765 1.4.23-1
close 510765
thanks
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
the left shows nothing but
Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
pts, my qa page) show liferea as having 1
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
Because it's not -done.
Thanks, I get it now.
Finally, if you don't know why it's not being
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Finally, if you don't know why it's not being fixed, feel free to
ask here or in #debbugs on irc.debian.org; mucking with the
found/fixed versions when the bug was actually found in
Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org writes:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:11:38 +1000
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org writes:
The fix is a trivial one-line patch, so I was wondering if such a
minor change could warrant a new upload.
Many critical
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote:
William Vera wrote:
Hi mentors
some clue about this error?
Thanks
2008/7/11 William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx:
Hello Mentors
I intend update the Build-Depends at nemesis package, libnet0-dev to
libnet1-dev (just
32 matches
Mail list logo
