Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-09 Thread Lucas Castro
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm" * Package name: lsm Version : 1.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Mika Ilmaranta * URL :

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

2016-05-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Nicholas, >I agree, however, upstream's official recommendation is to use a >version of btrfs-progs at least as new as the kernel. Every release >fixes some bugs, sometimes serious. For example, btrfs-progs-4.5 >fixes "subvol sync: fix crash, memory corruption", but the whole 4.5 >series

Bug#823606: RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP]

2016-05-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, signed and uploading shortly! BTW it fails to build on ubuntu wily. of course not an issue at all, but you might want to look at the failure. Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 15:33, Ghislain Vaillant ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear

Bug#823806: RFS: mongo-cxx-driver-legacy/1.1.1-1 -- MongoDB C++ Driver

2016-05-09 Thread Giulio Paci
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear all, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mongo-cxx-driver-legacy" * Package name: mongo-cxx-driver-legacy Version : 1.1.1-1 Upstream Author : MongoDB community * URL

Bug#823606: marked as done (RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP])

2016-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 09:10:00 + (UTC) with message-id <1276965472.1443105.1462785001013.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823606: Info received (Bug#823606: RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP]) has caused the Debian Bug report #823606, regarding RFS:

Re: package stuck in unstable after switching to AutomaticDebugPackages

2016-05-09 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 05/08/2016 09:00 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 19:57 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg >>> packages: >>> >>>

Re: package stuck in unstable after switching to AutomaticDebugPackages

2016-05-09 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 05/08/2016 11:55 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:40:02PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >> James Cowgill: >>> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages:

Bug#823821: RFS: sympow/1.023-7 [SeriousBugFix] mathematical program for SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func

2016-05-09 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Dear Sponsors, I am looking for a Sponsor for the package sympow, this is a mathematical package needed by Sage, a kind of Computer Algebra System (CAS) bunch. This very package fixes a Serious

Bug#823681: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2

2016-05-09 Thread Marco M. F. De Santis
Il 08/05/2016 11:42, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto: the thing is fine, but the changelog message about firefox is very incomprehensible. I'd use something like "swap suggestion on iceweasel with firefox". Also, why do you need a new dependency on php-xml so suddenly? There are no code changes, so

Bug#823681: marked as done (RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2)

2016-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 13:25:56 + with message-id <20160509132556.gh16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#823681: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #823681, regarding RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#823837: RFS: haproxy-log-analysis/2.0~b0-1

2016-05-09 Thread Christopher Baines
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "haproxy-log-analysis" * Package name: haproxy-log-analysis Version : 2.0~b0 Upstream Author : Gil Forcada * URL :

Bug#823838: RFS: pyzo/4.1-2

2016-05-09 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo" * Package name: pyzo Version : 4.1-2 Upstream Author : Almar Klein * URL : http://www.pyzo.org/ * License : BSD Section

Bug#823821: marked as done (RFS: sympow/1.023-7 [SeriousBugFix] mathematical program for SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func)

2016-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 14:01:17 + (UTC) with message-id <1243935506.1871315.1462802477370.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823821: RFS: sympow/1.023-7 [SeriousBugFix] mathematical program for SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func has caused the Debian Bug

Bug#823838: marked as done (RFS: pyzo/4.1-2)

2016-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 14:17:21 + (UTC) with message-id <1420024820.1841489.1462803441783.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823838: RFS: pyzo/4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #823838, regarding RFS: pyzo/4.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2016-05-09 Thread Fernando Toledo
El 07/05/16 a las 08:31, Alexander Koenig escribió: > On Fri, May 06, 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > <..> >> I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to >> tell ftpmasters >> where to look in the mail list for the license change. > > OK, to settle this I

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2016-05-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
yes, thanks Alexander for your effort, I personally don't like restricting licenses, specially when they are just an honest upstream mistake! Gianfranco Il Lunedì 9 Maggio 2016 16:59, Fernando Toledo ha scritto: El 07/05/16 a las 08:31, Alexander Koenig escribió:

Bug#823849: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.2.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

2016-05-09 Thread Giulio Paci
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: jw...@debian.org Dear Jakub and mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of the package "opengrm-ngram" * Package name: opengrm-ngram Version : 1.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Brian Roark

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

2016-05-09 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On 9 May 2016 at 04:31, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Waiting for his reply. > > > this seems the most important bit, I would appreciate you opening a bug > report against > the package (severity:important), explaining why you want a version in > experimental, >

Bug#823851: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian)

2016-05-09 Thread Innocent De Marchi
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qdacco" * Package name: qdacco Version : 0.8.2-2 Upstream Author : Carles Pina i Estany * URL :

Bug#823849: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.2.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

2016-05-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
Control: owner -1 ! * Giulio Paci , 2016-05-09, 17:40: git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git I did not realize it took me two years before reacting to your last email about this package... :-/ No worries. :-) -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#823851: marked as done (RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian))

2016-05-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 17:11:11 + (UTC) with message-id <1511057546.2069104.1462813871694.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#823851: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian) has caused the Debian Bug report #823851, regarding RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

2016-05-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848 >"as an RC bug on the package". I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for the maintainer opinion, this is a binary without source. >I did two runs of license-reconsile, after fixing

Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

2016-05-09 Thread Peter Colberg
Dear Debian Let’s Encrypt team, Is there anybody among you who would have time to sponsor acmetool? The package has already been reviewed by Harlan Lieberman-Berg, so all that is left to do for now is the actual upload. https://bugs.debian.org/817091#47 Thanks, Peter

Bug#813603: RFS: libcxl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- libcxl -- Coherent accelerator shared library

2016-05-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, the package is already in Ubuntu, did you try to look at the packaging and see if it was similar? Gianfranco On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:53:47 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > control:

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

2016-05-09 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On 9 May 2016 at 13:18, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848 >>"as an RC bug on the package". > > I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for > the maintainer opinion, this is

Bug#823849: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.2.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

2016-05-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Giulio Paci , 2016-05-09, 17:40: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git Let me see: + * Import Upstream version 1.2.2. +(Closes: #707826) This sounds as if #707826 was a request to package new upstream release. +- replace automake1.13

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

2016-05-09 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Peter Colberg writes: > Is there anybody among you who would have time to sponsor acmetool? Hi Peter! It seems that there's a new upstream version that's a couple newer -- .51. Is that something worth updating to before you get sponsored? Sincerely, -- Harlan

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

2016-05-09 Thread Peter Colberg
Hi Harlan, On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:24:55PM -0400, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > It seems that there's a new upstream version that's a couple newer -- > .51. Is that something worth updating to before you get sponsored? You can upload the current git HEAD as is; as I wrote earlier the Debian