Re: How to express the copyright for the debian/ sub folder?

Hi Patrick, > I: corridor source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at > line 3 > > https://github.com/adrelanos/corridor/blob/debian_new/debian/copyright > > Any idea what is wrong in the debian/copyright file? Try switching the order of the two sections, i.e. '*' first and

Bug#829205: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.3-0.1

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:42:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 x...@debian.org Sounds more like "close" to me... > >lowNMU is not meant for hostile takeovers of the package, ok?! =) > > sure, this is why only one NMU was done on your package :) I'd guess the

Bug#830489: RFS: python-qtpy/1.1.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qtpy" * Package name: python-qtpy Version : 1.1.1-1 * URL : https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtpy * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Section

Bug#830489: RFS: python-qtpy/1.1.1-1

Hang on there is a mistake left to fix. Will report when done. Ghis

Re: How to express the copyright for the debian/ sub folder?

That worked, thank you! Cheers, Patrick

combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries permissible?

Hi! Would a combined manpage, i.e. 'man corridor', symlinked to the individual command names (corridor-init-forwarding, corridor-init-snat, ...) be acceptable by Debian policy and otherwise or should a separate man page per binary be provided? Cheers, Patrick

Bug#829456: marked as done (RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:41:08 + (UTC) with message-id <759704638.6348258.1467967268968.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829456: RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #829456, regarding RFS:

Bug#829205: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.3-0.1

control: owner -1 x...@debian.org Hi Dimitri! >lowNMU is not meant for hostile takeovers of the package, ok?! =) sure, this is why only one NMU was done on your package :) >And I have accepted some patches from you, not all, and I did respond >to you about that. > >The urgency about the

Re: Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

* HAYASHI Kentaro , 2016-07-08, 18:28: https://github.com/debexpo/debexpo/pull/35 Not a regression, but instead of: "upstreams web site" it should be: "upstream's web site" or maybe: "upstream web site" Perhaps also s/web site/website/. -- Jakub Wilk

Re: How to express the copyright for the debian/ sub folder?

Hi, On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 12:23 +, Patrick Schleizer wrote: > Hi! > > I: corridor source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph > at line 3 > > https://github.com/adrelanos/corridor/blob/debian_new/debian/copyright > > Any idea what is wrong in the debian/copyright file? From

Bug#830236: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

> >Besides, it'd be appreciated if you also can setup DM upload >permission of this package for me, after this upload. >Thank you! https://launchpadlibrarian.net/271663979/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.libcork_0.15.0+ds-4_BUILDING.txt.gz the multiarch stuff is broken in yakkety now. G.

Bug#829205: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.3-0.1

Hello, On 6 July 2016 at 11:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, >>Have you coordinated with Dimitri? When the regular maintainer is active, > >>NMUs are appropriate for urgent changes, not for regular work. Ie,

How to express the copyright for the debian/ sub folder?

Hi! I: corridor source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 3 https://github.com/adrelanos/corridor/blob/debian_new/debian/copyright Any idea what is wrong in the debian/copyright file? Cheers, Patrick

Bug#830494: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qtawesome" * Package name: python-qtawesome Version : 0.3.3-2 Upstream Author : The Spyder Development Team * URL : https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtawesome

Bug#830489: RFS is reopened.

On 08/07/16 14:50, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Hang on there is a mistake left to fix. Will report when done. Ghis The mistake is fixed on mentors. Sponsorship can resume. Thanks, Ghis

Bug#830236: marked as done (RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library)

Your message dated Fri, 08 Jul 2016 16:28:54 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library has caused the Debian Bug report #830236, regarding RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple,

Bug#830494: marked as done (RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-2)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:19:48 + (UTC) with message-id <747869746.6858389.1467994788130.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830494: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #830494, regarding RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-2 to be marked as

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >Thanks for all your help reviewing my package! the package is quite simple, but I would appreciate something more verbose when calling it with wrong parameters. e.g. sct sct -h sct -v sct 10 sudo sct 10 sudo sct 14 all gives no output. After

Bug#830489: RFS: python-qtpy/1.1.1-1

On 08/07/16 17:23, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: e.g. qtpy/_patch/qcombobox.py qtpy/uic.py Thomas Robitaille Fixed in mentors. Cheers, Ghis

Bug#830489: RFS: python-qtpy/1.1.1-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qtpy" missing copyrights: e.g. qtpy/_patch/qcombobox.py qtpy/uic.py Thomas Robitaille other stuff LGTM G.

Bug#830489: marked as done (RFS: python-qtpy/1.1.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:29:16 + (UTC) with message-id <670594526.6863725.1467998956526.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830489: RFS: python-qtpy/1.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #830489, regarding RFS: python-qtpy/1.1.1-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

control: retitle -1 RFS: setcolortemperature/1.3-1 ITP On 07/08/2016 12:29 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > the package is quite simple, but I would appreciate something more > verbose when calling it with wrong parameters. > e.g. > sct > sct -h > sct -v > sct 10 > sudo sct 10 > sudo sct

Re: combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries across packages: how to do?

On 07/08/2016 10:47 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Patrick Schleizer , 2016-07-08, 14:18: >> Would a combined manpage, i.e. 'man corridor', symlinked to the >> individual command names (corridor-init-forwarding, >> corridor-init-snat, ...) be acceptable by Debian policy

Re: combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries permissible?

* Patrick Schleizer , 2016-07-08, 14:18: Would a combined manpage, i.e. 'man corridor', symlinked to the individual command names (corridor-init-forwarding, corridor-init-snat, ...) be acceptable by Debian policy Yes, this is fine. -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#830236: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: >>> >> >>>Besides, it'd be appreciated if you also can setup DM upload >>>permission of this package for me, after this upload.

Re: combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries across packages: how to do?

On 8 July 2016 at 23:53, Christian Seiler wrote: > - If I use dh_installman's ".so" feature to do automatic linking, >dh_installman will not replace the manpage with a link, because >it also doesn't see the link target. In that case, I get a >plain text file

Re: combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries across packages: how to do?

On 2016-07-08 23:53 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > If I may piggy-back off here: what's the best way to achieve that if > this crosses binary-package boundaries? > > While packaging open-isns [1], I had the following problem: upstream > ships a man page isns_config.5, which covers

Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

X-Debbugs-CC: codeh...@debian.org, jw...@debian.org, locutusofb...@debian.org Hi, Thanks everyone for the feedback and comments, especially the explanations regarding symbol versionning. Sorry for the time it took to reply in here, DebConf kept me away from my inbox (though I got quite a lot of

Bug#829205: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.3-0.1

Hi Dimitri! On 8 July 2016 at 05:27, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 6 July 2016 at 11:17, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: >> Hi, >>>Have you coordinated with Dimitri? When the regular maintainer is active, >> >>>NMUs are appropriate for urgent

Bug#829205: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.3-0.1

Hi Adam, On 8 July 2016 at 08:58, Adam Borowski wrote: > Might be RC but certainly isn't urgent. I don't see Nicholas pointing any > of the upstream changes as immediately important (and I _do_ read > linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org); debian/copyright changes are hardly ever >

Re: Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

Hello, Thank you for your patience with trying to improve mentors, Kentaro :) On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:48:18AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Or to see if the changelog contains only one single entry (but this isn't > error-prone > because many people are bumping changelog without

Bug#830528: RFS: clutter-gesture/0.0.2.1-7.1 [NMU, RC] -- Open GL based interactive canvas library Gesture framework

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: block 811585 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of clutter-gesture, fixing a stretch RC bug (older than 7 days and no maintainer activity). I have verified this NMU in the following ways: - fixes the bug: builds

Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

Hi, all About 2 month ago, I wrote a small patch for mentors.debian.net (debexpo) Here is the actual pull request for it. https://github.com/debexpo/debexpo/pull/35 This PR is written to solve some glitches about RFS template. I'm happy if this PR is merged because it is useful for user of

Re: wrong version number ?

* Herbert Fortes , 2016-07-07, 15:30: I am doing a QA for dvbackup package. I do not need a Sponsor. debian/changelog: dvbackup (1:0.0.4-8) unstable; urgency=low ( I am doing ) dvbackup (1:0.0.4-7) unstable; urgency=low ( current version ) After 'debuild':

Re: wrong version number ?

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:01:03PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I guess a filename containing ":" character might be problematic in linux > (not techically problematic, but better to avoid escapes) : is AFAIK supported by all Linux filesystems, although in some cases it comes at the cost

Re: Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

Hi, >This PR is written to solve some glitches about RFS template. another feature request: the template has also the subject, e.g. ITP, NMU, RC, QA, and so on, but there seems to be one missing entry for "regular update" it would be nice to use rmadison to see if the package is already on

Bug#830236: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> > >>Besides, it'd be appreciated if you also can setup DM upload >>permission of this package for me, after this upload. >>Thank you! > > >

Bug#830417: RFS: django-setuptest/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-setuptest" * Package name: django-setuptest Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Praekelt Consulting