Gitlab API question: Fetching group ID works not reliably

Hi, I'm using the following script to fetch the group ID of a salsa team: #!/bin/sh SALSA_URL="https://salsa.debian.org/api/v4; SALSA_TOKEN="MYSECRETTOKEN" SALSA_GROUP="med-team" #SALSA_GROUP="science-team" #SALSA_GROUP="r-pkg-team" SALSA_GROUP_ID=$(curl --silent -f -XGET --header

Re: Gitlab API question: Fetching group ID works not reliably

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Any idea what might be wrong here? I thought there was a way to lookup the id for a group by querying the name. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Gitlab API question: Fetching group ID works not reliably

On 05/15/2018 08:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > If I try science-team or r-pkg-team it returns nothing. Any idea > what might be wrong here? You're not parsing the other pages of results. https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/#pagination Kind Regards, Bas

Re: Gitlab API question: Fetching group ID works not reliably

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > This would be very convenient but I have not found it. https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/groups.html#search-for-group https://salsa.debian.org/api/v4/groups?search=science-team -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Gitlab API question: Fetching group ID works not reliably

On Tue, 15 May 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the following script to fetch the group ID of a salsa team: > > #!/bin/sh > > SALSA_URL="https://salsa.debian.org/api/v4; > SALSA_TOKEN="MYSECRETTOKEN" > > SALSA_GROUP="med-team" > #SALSA_GROUP="science-team" >

Re: Gitlab API question: Fetching group ID works not reliably

Hi Paul, On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 02:25:36PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > I thought there was a way to lookup the id for a group by querying the name. This would be very convenient but I have not found it. The pagination solution is not very handy, thought. Kind regards Andreas. --

Bug#898688: RFS: deepin-image-viewer/1.2.19-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-image-viewer" * Package name: deepin-image-viewer Version : 1.2.20-1 Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd. * URL :

Bug#895812: RFS: json-editor.js/0.7.28+ds-1 [ITP]

Hi Paolo, Thanks for taking the time to review my package. Just to let you know, I am working on the things you mentioned, but have hit a roadblock when it comes to actually joining the js-team. > 3. If you wish to maintain this package within this team, I'd suggest that > you join the team !

Re: Salsa repository request (gpp)

On Tuesday, May 15 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:16:42PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Hey Fabian, >> >> Can you add yourself on d/copyright, under the entry for the "debian/*" >> files? After all, you deserve the credit as well ;-). >> >> Other than that,

Bug#895940: RFS: python-dataclasses/0.5-1 [ITP]

On Monday, May 14 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, at 6:21 PM, Joel Cross wrote: >> > Ah! Found it. It's listed in the "setup.py" file. Hmm... I wonder if >> > that's a problem, because no other file contains any kind of copyright >> > notice, and there's no LICENSE file. I'd

Bug#898773: RFS: python-fibra/0.0.17-1 [ITP 898736]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I'm on my way to become the maintainer of a couple of packages for the management of botanic collections, namely bauble and ghini.desktop. both of them rely upon fibra, and fibra wasn't yet in Debian. so I need fibra in two

Bug#898773: RFS: python-fibra/0.0.17-1 [ITP 898736]

On 2018-05-15 14:20:15 -0500 (-0500), Mario Frasca wrote: [...] > it was developed between 2008-11 (0.0.6) and 2009-8 (0.0.17) [...] The dates made me strongly suspect, but skimming the upstream source confirms, this is very much not a Py3K-ready library. Are you becoming de facto upstream for

Bug#895812: RFS: json-editor.js/0.7.28+ds-1 [ITP]

Dear reviewers, I have uploaded a new version of json-editor.js, which addresses many of Paolo's concerns. It can be downloaded from https://mentors.debian.net/package/json-editor.js, and the git repository is available at https://salsa.debian.org/joelcross-guest/json-editor.js. - Joel Cross

Re: Salsa repository request (gpp)

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:16:42PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Hey Fabian, > > Can you add yourself on d/copyright, under the entry for the "debian/*" > files? After all, you deserve the credit as well ;-). > > Other than that, it's ready for upload. Let me know when you make the >

Bug#898430: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-base/1.25.1-3 [RC])

Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2018 22:21:56 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gnustep-base/1.25.1-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #898430, regarding RFS: gnustep-base/1.25.1-3 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pygithub" * Package name: pygithub Version : 1.40a3-1 Upstream Author : Author : Adam Dangoor Vincent

Bug#895812: RFS: json-editor.js/0.7.28+ds-1 [ITP]

I'm currently out of the country for a couple weeks and have no access to a computer or my key. At a cursory glance, I see no issues. When I return, if not uploaded, I'll plan to do so. Thanks for your efforts! On Wed, May 16, 2018, 00:42 Joel Cross wrote: > Dear reviewers,

Bug#898688: closing 898688

close 898688 thanks Uploaded with new version. Thanks! -- Regards, Boyuan Yang

Bug#898773: RFS: python-fibra/0.0.17-1 [ITP 898736]

I did not notice the template Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fibra" * Package name: fibra Version : 0.0.17-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name

Bug#898773: RFS: python-fibra/0.0.17-1 [ITP 898736]

On 2018-05-15 14:20:15 -0500 (-0500), Mario Frasca wrote: [...] > it was developed between 2008-11 (0.0.6) and 2009-8 (0.0.17) > [...] The dates made me strongly suspect, but skimming the upstream source confirms, this is very much not a Py3K-ready library. Are you becoming de facto upstream for

Bug#898773: RFS: python-fibra/0.0.17-1 [ITP 898736]

I don't see any inconvenience with this what you suggest. I can import the library (with, if necessary, its history) into a new github project. I already patched upstream so it can be loaded in python3.

Bug#898773: RFS: python-fibra/0.0.17-1 [ITP 898736]

> planning to update it to > support Python 3.x in preparation for 2.7 reaching end of life? btw, since my two adopted children `bauble` and `ghini` both depend on `fibra`, and python is reaching end of life for them too, I'm afraid I will port `fibra` to python3 anyway, that it is accepted into