Re: Q on fixed-in-experimental

2006-04-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Colin Watson wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:18:15AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:14 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: When a bug is tagged fixed-in-experimental, does that bug number still have to appear in debian/changelog for the next upload to unstable or

Re: Q on fixed-in-experimental

2006-04-20 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:14:58AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: When a bug is tagged fixed-in-experimental, does that bug number still have to appear in debian/changelog for the next upload to unstable or will the BTS be updated when the package in experimental is replaced? I know how to

Re: building rpms on debian system?

2006-04-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Ek Zindagoi wrote: I would like to build rpms on a debian system for use on a redhat system. Can I do that on a debian system ? As a short-term solution, you can cheat by making a Debian package and using alien --to-rpm. However, if anyone tries to put your RPMs into one

RFS: drawterm

2006-04-20 Thread Nick Barkas
Hello- I have prepared a package for drawterm, and I am seeking a sponsor. Package name: drawterm License: Lucent Public License, version 1.02 Description: graphical terminal for remotely accessing Plan 9 systems drawterm is used to access a Plan 9 CPU server over the network and start up

Linda warnings about manpages in my packages

2006-04-20 Thread Marco Bertorello
Hi Folk, I've three packages: denyhosts-python2.3 denyhosts-python2.4 denyhosts-common the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common. Now, i've this linda reports: # linda -i denyhosts-python2.3_2.3-2_all.deb Linda:

Re: Linda warnings about manpages in my packages

2006-04-20 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 4/20/06, Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folk, I've three packages: denyhosts-python2.3 denyhosts-python2.4 denyhosts-common the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common. E: denyhosts-python2.3;

Re: Linda warnings about manpages in my packages

2006-04-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Marco Bertorello wrote: denyhosts-python2.3 denyhosts-python2.4 denyhosts-common the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common. Why would you have a binary in -python2.3 *and* in -python2.4 ?

RFC/RFS: paythyme and thyme, UK payroll application and supporting library

2006-04-20 Thread Tristan Hill
Hi Would appreciate any feedback on these related packages. Paythyme uses the database library and other helpers provided by thyme. Packages are lintian/linda clean and build with pbuilder. Sponsor also sought. * Package name: paythyme Version : 20050502 Upstream Author :

Re: Linda warnings about manpages in my packages

2006-04-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: denyhosts-python2.3/2.4 do contain a python module. If and when the Great Python Reorganization finally happens, this ought to be a single denyhosts package depending on python ( 2.3), python ( 2.5). This can already be done with python-support

Re: RFC: gnash (FSF Free Flash Player)

2006-04-20 Thread Miriam Ruiz
--- Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Some comments: Thanks a lot for your comments on the package, they have been really useful!! * debian/control: gnash is not binNMUable due to libgnash-dev strictly depending on libgnash0 (= ${Source-Version}). What should I do in

Re: RFC: gnash (FSF Free Flash Player)

2006-04-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 00:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: * debian/control: gnash is not binNMUable due to libgnash-dev strictly depending on libgnash0 (= ${Source-Version}). What should I do in this case? just depend on libgnash0 without the version? wasn't they going to solve

Re: RFC: gnash (FSF Free Flash Player)

2006-04-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:49:35AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * debian/control: about mozilla-dev, generally, xulrunner is being moved to these days, is that something that is possible for the plugin? I'd love to be able to try this in galeon/epiphany.