On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:49:35AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * debian/control: about mozilla-dev, generally, xulrunner is being
> > moved to these days, is that something that is possible for the
> > plugin? I'd love to be able to try this in galeon/epi
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 00:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > * debian/control: gnash is not binNMUable due to libgnash-dev
> > strictly depending on libgnash0 (= ${Source-Version}).
>
> What should I do in this case? just depend on libgnash0 without the version?
> wasn't they going to
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:34:04PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > denyhosts-python2.3/2.4 do contain a python module. If and when the Great
> > Python Reorganization finally happens, this ought to be a single denyhosts
> > package depending on python
--- Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Some comments:
Thanks a lot for your comments on the package, they have been really useful!!
> * debian/control: gnash is not binNMUable due to libgnash-dev
> strictly depending on libgnash0 (= ${Source-Version}).
What should I do in
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> denyhosts-python2.3/2.4 do contain a python module. If and when the Great
> Python Reorganization finally happens, this ought to be a single denyhosts
> package depending on python (>> 2.3), python (<< 2.5).
This can already be done with python-support
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:30:52PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Marco Bertorello wrote:
> > denyhosts-python2.3
> > denyhosts-python2.4
> > denyhosts-common
> > the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common
> > to alla packages) is stored in denyhos
Hi
Would appreciate any feedback on these related packages. Paythyme uses
the database library and other helpers provided by thyme. Packages are
lintian/linda clean and build with pbuilder. Sponsor also sought.
* Package name: paythyme
Version : 20050502
Upstream Author : Thyme
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Marco Bertorello wrote:
> denyhosts-python2.3
> denyhosts-python2.4
> denyhosts-common
>
> the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common
> to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common.
Why would you have a binary in -python2.3 *and* in -python
On 4/20/06, Marco Bertorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folk,
>
> I've three packages:
>
> denyhosts-python2.3
> denyhosts-python2.4
> denyhosts-common
>
> the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common
> to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common.
>
> E: denyhost
Hi Folk,
I've three packages:
denyhosts-python2.3
denyhosts-python2.4
denyhosts-common
the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common
to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common.
Now, i've this linda reports:
# linda -i denyhosts-python2.3_2.3-2_all.deb
Linda: Run
Hello-
I have prepared a package for drawterm, and I am seeking a sponsor.
Package name: drawterm
License: Lucent Public License, version 1.02
Description: graphical terminal for remotely accessing Plan 9 systems
drawterm is used to access a Plan 9 CPU server over the network and
start up
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Ek Zindagoi wrote:
I would like to build rpms on a debian system for use on a redhat
system. Can I do that on a debian system ?
As a short-term solution, you can cheat by making a Debian package and
using alien --to-rpm. However, if anyone tries to put your RPMs into one
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:14:58AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> When a bug is tagged "fixed-in-experimental", does that bug number still
> have to appear in debian/changelog for the next upload to unstable or
> will the BTS be updated when the package in experimental is replaced?
>
> I know how t
13 matches
Mail list logo
