also sprach Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.14.2154 +0200]:
Along this trivial patch as this one is not a subject of any kind
of authors right (according to Polish law regulations). So it's
public domain, isn't it?
As Steve already wrote, it's about crediting, not law. Whenever
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package throttle.
* Package name: throttle
Version : 1.1-1
Upstream Author : James Klicman james at klicman dot org
* URL : http://klicman.org/throttle/
* License: GPL 2 or later
Section : utils
It
I think it is about time that I changed the way I handle one element of
my sponsoring: I think that trying to retain the same Debian version
during the entire sponsorship process is prone to error and teaches bad
habits. In future, I think it is easier for everyone if every change
during
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Kel Modderman wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:00:44 am Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:31:29 +0200
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Is this a result of the need to allow repeated
also sprach Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.15.1133 +0200]:
I think it is about time that I changed the way I handle one element of
my sponsoring: I think that trying to retain the same Debian version
during the entire sponsorship process is prone to error and teaches bad
habits. In
Hi, Adeodato.
Thanks for your answer.
On Jul 08 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:55:52 -0300]:
Besides that, what do you mean with these characteristics? That it
is an intrusive patch?
Intrusive, wishlist.
Would there then, be the possibility of having
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 10:33 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I think it is easier for everyone if every change
during sponsorship gets a new Debian version, so if you need me to
sponsor packages, each upload to mentors.debian.net must use a new
Debian version.
That makes debian/changelog written
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 11:45 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I make use of
the new ~ character in version strings. Even more my own packages,
I'll release
1.0-1~unreleased.1
1.0-1~unreleased.2
1.0-1~unreleased.3
until it's final and I can release 1.0-1, for which I merge the
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:23:48 +0200
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 10:33 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I think it is easier for everyone if every change
during sponsorship gets a new Debian version, so if you need me to
sponsor packages, each upload to
Hi,
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Bart Martens wrote:
Or is this over the top? Maybe it needlessly complicates things for
newbie packagers...
Non-DD's are also welcome to comment !
a good approach in my opinion, it's:
1.0-1~rfs.1
1.0-1~rfs.2
1.0-1 version and revision for
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:23:48 +0200
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 10:33 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I think it is easier for everyone if every change
during sponsorship gets a new Debian version, so if
Hi,
IMHO it's a good idea to follow the requirements of ftp-master, it's a
good practice that get used the new devoloppers to made the things in
the right way, I understand the issues of this in the changelogs, but I
think it's funny to see after many years the mistakes made attempting to
made my
Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:23:48 +0200
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 10:33 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I think it is easier for everyone if every change
during sponsorship
Bart Martens wrote:
It's not a huge problem, but it's not so nice to have all beginners
mistakes logged forever for the whole world to see.
Speaking as someone in NM, that is an important point.
I don't use mentors for my uploads, I either use my own web space or a
system put in place by my
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
--cut--
Something like this ?
packagename (0.1.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated debian/watch to recognize both .tar.gz and .tar.bz2,
now revealing the real latest upstream release.
also sprach Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.15.1241 +0200]:
When the .orig.tar.gz needs repackaging, then this happens:
1.0~rfs.2-1~rfs.1
1.0~rfs.3-1~rfs.1
This should not need to happen. The orig.tar.gz should hardly ever
be repacked.
--
Please do not send copies of list
also sprach Colin Tuckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.15.1501 +0200]:
1) I don't want my failed attempts seen forever.
2) it's a lot of unneeded and irrelevant information. (it's about the
packaging *attempt* not about the packaging).
You may have missed my point about merging the
martin f krafft wrote:
You may have missed my point about merging the changelog entries
when preparing the final version. Until then, having changelog
entries for mentee changes is rather helpful to the sponsor,
I think.
No, I saw it and assumed that is what would happen in the case where
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 16:47 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
--cut--
Something like this ?
packagename (0.1.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated debian/watch to recognize both .tar.gz
also sprach Colin Tuckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.15.1618 +0200]:
No, I saw it and assumed that is what would happen in the case
where the uploads use ~r1 etc and the final upload to Debian by
the sponsor deleted the extra part of the revision.
It's having all the changelog entries for
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ftpsync.
* Package name: ftpsync
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : me - Julian Andres Klode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://jak-linux.org/projects/ftpsync/
* License : GPL
Section : net
It
On Sunday 15 July 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Colin Tuckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.15.1618 +0200]:
No, I saw it and assumed that is what would happen in the case
where the uploads use ~r1 etc and the final upload to Debian by
the sponsor deleted the extra part of the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dir2ogg.
* Package name: dir2ogg
Version : 0.10-1
Upstream Author : me - Julian Andres Klode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://jak-linux.org/projects/dir2ogg/
* License : GPL
Section : sound
It
Yes, exactly. Each packaging attempt gets a separate changelog entry
and when it's final, you merge them all, effectively erasing the
history.
If I understand you correctly you mean a progress as follows:
=== Day 1 ===
Day 1 is probably a bit confusing here. A new revision every
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:32:23 +0300
On Sunday 15 July 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
Yes, exactly. Each packaging attempt gets a separate changelog entry
and when it's final, you merge them all, effectively erasing the
history.
Martin - my only problem with this collapsing of the changes is
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:23:48PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 10:33 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I think it is easier for everyone if every change
during sponsorship gets a new Debian version, so if you need me to
sponsor packages, each upload to mentors.debian.net must
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:41:16PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 11:45 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I make use of
the new ~ character in version strings. Even more my own packages,
I'll release
1.0-1~unreleased.1
1.0-1~unreleased.2
1.0-1~unreleased.3
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:31:29AM +0200, I wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Just had a problem with a package for sponsoring that, AFAICT, could
not happen with other repositories that I use, so I'm a tad concerned
about how it happened on m.d.n.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:41:57 +0200
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:31:29AM +0200, I wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
However, the .dsc file uploaded to m.d.n references a
different .orig.tar.gz:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:13:58PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ftpsync.
Any major feature improvements over sitecopy?
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:41:57PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
I have no good explanation for the situation Neil mentioned though. The
package maintainer must have uploaded a package with an orig tarball.
But then the orig tarball was changed and an upload without an orig
tarball was done
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package warsow.
These include some corrections needed in order for warsow to be
accepted, as noted by this email.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-games-devel/2007-July/003982.html
* Package name: warsow
Version :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package funguloids.
* Package name: funguloids
Version : 1.06-1
Upstream Author : Mika Halttunen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://funguloids.sourceforge.net/
* License : zlib/libpng
Section :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Charles Plessy, 14.07.2007 14:15 |=-
In the meantime, the discussion continued in the BTS where I got an
answer and was informed that Jose made a package which will be uploaded
this week-end.
How does it work with the NEW queue, will the
34 matches
Mail list logo
