Re: RFS: trend

2009-08-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Yuri D'Eliawav...@users.sf.net wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:04 +0800 Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: IIRC debian policy recommends compiling with -Wall, but trend is not compiled that way. Should I add these flags manually in debian/rules? The usual way

Re: Automated testing for GUI programs

2009-08-16 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: One option (which I never got around to evaluating) is Dogtail: Sadly the Debian ‘python-dogtail’ package appears to be unmaintained. Latest upload 2006-12-16, and has an outstanding ‘serious’ level bug report open since 2008-06-11

Re: Automated testing for GUI programs (was: RFS: trend)

2009-08-16 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Ben Finneyben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Unfortunately no. I would have no idea how to test a 100% graphical application. One option (which I never got around to evaluating) is Dogtail: You can also use LDTP aka Linux Desktop Testing Project. Package is

Re: RFS: trend

2009-08-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Yuri D'Eliawav...@users.sf.net wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:04 +0800 Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: debian/rules doesn't handle DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt or DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N (see debian-policy). Fixed. I've also overridden CXXFLAGS, first to

Re: Automated testing for GUI programs

2009-08-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Ben Finneyben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: One option (which I never got around to evaluating) is Dogtail: Sadly the Debian ‘python-dogtail’ package appears to be unmaintained. Latest upload 2006-12-16, and has

Re: RFS: trend

2009-08-16 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Wise p...@debian.org, 2009-08-16, 14:42: debian/rules doesn't handle DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt or DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N (see debian-policy). Fixed. I've also overridden CXXFLAGS, first to enforce that -Wall is always present, and to push optimization levels to -O3 (the extra

RFS: xoscope (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread Bhavani Shankar R
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-2 of my package xoscope. It builds these binary packages: xoscope- digital oscilloscope The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

Re: RFS: xoscope (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Bhavani Shankar Rright2bh...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-2 of my package xoscope. ... The package appears to be lintian clean. It is not. Please check again. Also, remove extra blank lines in debian/control and

Re: RFS: xoscope (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread Bhavani Shankar R
Hello kart I downloaded lenny and m on a lenny system now and will use quilt patch system Thanks On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Kartik Mistry kartik.mis...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Bhavani Shankar Rright2bh...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the

Re: RFS: xoscope (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hello, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: I downloaded lenny and m on a lenny system the package should be build on unstable. To have lenny underneath is fine, but then install a chroot environment that is sid. You should also become familiar with pbuilder. now and will use quilt patch using quilt

Re: RFS: trend

2009-08-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
In article 20090816070114.ga3...@jwilk.net, Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net wrote: make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make rule. make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode. I guess it's rather an instance of this bug:

Re: Automated testing for GUI programs (was: RFS: trend)

2009-08-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
In article 85c01b290908152319ye68a74cg7afbaeb6e8f34...@mail.gmail.com, Kartik Mistry kartik.mis...@gmail.com wrote: One option (which I never got around to evaluating) is Dogtail: You can also use LDTP aka Linux Desktop Testing Project. Package is available in Debian and upstream is very

RFS: bareftp

2009-08-16 Thread debian
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bareftp. * Package name: bareftp Version : 0.2.3-2 Upstream Author : Christian Eide * URL : http://bareftp.org/ * License : GPL Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: bareftp-

RFS: gwibber (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread debian
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.0+bzr354-1 of my package gwibber. It builds these binary packages: gwibber- microblogging client for GNOME The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

RFS: subversion (updated package, bpo50, lenny-backports)

2009-08-16 Thread Michael Diers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dear mentors/backporters, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.4dfsg-1~bpo50+1 of my package subversion. It builds these binary packages: libapache2-svn - Subversion server modules for Apache libsvn-dev - Development files for

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
Dear mentors, Hi, First, thanks for the effort packaging such a beast. I didn't look at the package properly (sorry, lack of time), but I had a look at your debian/copyright which makes me think that you at least went through the code. The upload would fix these bugs: 516896 The package

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread Chow Loong Jin
Hi George, On Sunday 16,August,2009 10:30 PM, George Danchev wrote: [...] I have some questions which might need a broader discussion, before we proceed (I don't place any burden on you to answer them, of course, but your opinion would be appreciated as well): It seems like there is a

RFS: gnustep-base (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread Yavor Doganov
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19.1-1 of my package gnustep-base. Programming Lang: Objective-C It builds these binary packages: gnustep-base-common - GNUstep Base library - common files gnustep-base-doc - Documentation for the GNUstep Base Library gnustep-base-examples -

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.35

2009-08-16 Thread Reijo Tomperi
Reijo Tomperi wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package cppcheck. * Package name: cppcheck Version : 1.25-1 Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki hyd_dan...@users.sourceforge.net Reijo Tomperi aggr...@users.sourceforge.net * URL :

Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.35

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
Reijo Tomperi wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package cppcheck. * Package name: cppcheck Version : 1.25-1 Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki hyd_dan...@users.sourceforge.net Reijo Tomperi aggr...@users.sourceforge.net * URL

Re: [Fwd: Re: Denemo]

2009-08-16 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno dom, 16/08/2009 alle 18.49 +0200, Pietro Battiston ha scritto: Notice that today if a Debian user wants to use denemo, the best thing to do is certainly to use the package at [1], as far as: where [1] = http://mirror.lihnidos.org/GNU/savannah/denemo/debian/ Pietro Battiston

[Fwd: Re: Denemo]

2009-08-16 Thread Pietro Battiston
Hello, the situation of the package denemo is perfectly described in the following: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513285 Notice that today if a Debian user wants to use denemo, the best thing to do is certainly to use the package at [1], as far as: - you use i386 - you don't

RFS: convert2audio

2009-08-16 Thread Ralf Eleven
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package convert2audio. * Package name: convert2audio Version : 0.1.1-0ubuntu2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section

Re: RFS: convert2audio

2009-08-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Ralf Elevenral...@gmx.net wrote: * Package name    : convert2audio  Version         : 0.1.1-0ubuntu2 Perhaps you meant to upload this package to Ubuntu REVU instead of Debian mentors?  Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL            

Re: RFS: khdrecord

2009-08-16 Thread Mauro Lizaur
Hola Ralf, 2009-08-16, Ralf Eleven: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package khdrecord. * Package name: khdrecord Version : 0.8.0-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License

Re: RFS: khdrecord

2009-08-16 Thread Harry RIckards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Eleven wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package khdrecord. * Package name: khdrecord Version : 0.8.0-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
Hi George, Hi, On Sunday 16,August,2009 10:30 PM, George Danchev wrote: [...] I have some questions which might need a broader discussion, before we proceed (I don't place any burden on you to answer them, of course, but your opinion would be appreciated as well): It seems like

RFS: leo

2009-08-16 Thread Ville M. Vainio
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package leo. Package name: leo Version : 4.6.2 Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com URL : http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html License : MIT Section : devel It builds these

Re: RFS: khdrecord

2009-08-16 Thread Harry RIckards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote: Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3. 3.8.3 now ;) When was that updated? - -- Thanks Harry Rickards hricka...@l33tmyst.com GPG Key

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread Chow Loong Jin
Hi George, On Monday 17,August,2009 02:42 AM, George Danchev wrote: [...] I actually use a series of IDEs/editors hopping from one to another depending on my mood or purpose: emacs, geany, codelite. That is something I don't really understand, if not done for fun of course ;-)

Re: RFS: khdrecord

2009-08-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote: Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3. 3.8.3 now ;) -- Jonathan Wiltshire 1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352

Re: RFS: khdrecord

2009-08-16 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Monday 17,August,2009 03:51 AM, Harry RIckards wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote: Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3. 3.8.3 now ;) When was that updated? Taken from

Re: RFS: khdrecord

2009-08-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 08:51:33PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:59:47PM +0100, Harry RIckards wrote: Also, the current standards version 3.8.2 not 3.7.3. 3.8.3 now ;) When was that updated? Yesterday [1]. See the developers

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread George Danchev
Hi George, Hi, On Monday 17,August,2009 02:42 AM, George Danchev wrote: [...] I actually use a series of IDEs/editors hopping from one to another depending on my mood or purpose: emacs, geany, codelite. That is something I don't really understand, if not done for fun of course

Re: RFS: codelite

2009-08-16 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Monday 17,August,2009 04:46 AM, George Danchev wrote: [...] I'm not actually familiar with Code::Blocks, but I do feel that it would be nice Roughly Code::Blocks resembles MSVC face and look, and in my humble opinion intentionally targets that user base. Nothing wrong with that of

RFS: oval-interpreter (updated package)

2009-08-16 Thread Pavel Vinogradov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.5.25-1 of my package oval-interpreter. It builds these binary packages: ovaldi - Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language reference interpreter The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 539893