-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/2010 12:26 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100
Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a):
On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal ihaY wrote:
The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of the libv4l package. It produces two binary
packages: libv4l-0 and libv4l-dev.
With the latest release upstream decided to rename it to v4l-utils and
add some utilities.
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to v4l-utils.
But what actions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Dne Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:39:10 +0100
Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a):
Actual before or after our choice? We are redistributing it and we can
choose whether releasing it under version 2 or 3.
What reason for that? Why not?
Is
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:10:59 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote:
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to v4l-utils.
But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
v4l-utils in the archive?
http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
Cheers,
gregor
--
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Dominik George d...@naturalnik.de (26/02/2010):
OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a
difference to my current chown setup. dpkg-statoverride will make
sure that the permissions are set everytiem the file
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Dominik George d...@naturalnik.de (26/02/2010):
OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a
difference to my current chown setup.
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 06:43:07PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Dominik George d...@naturalnik.de (26/02/2010):
OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not
On 2010-03-02 11:14 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:10:59 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote:
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to
v4l-utils.
But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
v4l-utils in the archive?
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:57:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to
v4l-utils.
But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
v4l-utils in the archive?
http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
I don't think
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:37:25 +0200, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Dominik George d...@naturalnik.de (26/02/2010):
OK, as it is done in postinst, there does not seem to be a
difference to my current chown setup.
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:00:25PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:37:25 +0200, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:23:25AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Dominik George d...@naturalnik.de (26/02/2010):
OK, as it is done in postinst, there
Mmm, in this case by local changes we (at least I, but I assume
also KiBi and Paul Wise) mean what the sysadmin has done by hand
after installing a previous version of the package, not
what some parts of the package installation have done during
the installation itself.
I know what local
tisdag den 2 mars 2010 klockan 14:22 skrev Dominik George detta:
I know what local changes are. And I *want* any of these changes to be
lost when a package is updated.
As I mentioned in my very first mail, this is a repository of packages for
*local* deployment, to systems *I* maintain,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 03:01:24PM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
tisdag den 2 mars 2010 klockan 14:22 skrev Dominik George detta:
I know what local changes are. And I *want* any of these changes to be
lost when a package is updated.
As I mentioned in my very first mail, this is a
[Please keep CC] Following lintian warning is displayed:
$ debian -us -uc
...
W: dyndns source: native-package-with-dash-version
W: dyndns source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package
The debian/changelog line reads:
dyndns (2010.0301+gitdd160bd-1) unstable; urgency=low
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100302-1
of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info.
It builds these binary packages:
mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband service providers
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can
* Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net, 2010-03-02, 18:35:
[Please keep CC] Following lintian warning is displayed:
$ debian -us -uc
...
W: dyndns source: native-package-with-dash-version
W: dyndns source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package
The debian/changelog line reads:
dyndns
Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net (02/03/2010):
[Please keep CC]
[Done.]
Can anyone see any obvious errror, that eludes my eyes? Files
available at:
$ cat dyndns-2010.0301+gitdd160bd/debian/source/format
3.0 (native)
(Enjoy 3.0…)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- dyndns-2010.0301+gitdd160bd.orig//debian/source/format
2010-03-01 10:26:56.0 -0300
+++ dyndns-2010.0301+gitdd160bd/debian/source/format2010-03-02
13:52:57.0 -0300
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3.0 (native)
+3.0 (quilt)
Regards,
Eriberto - Brazil
2010/3/2 Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net (02/03/2010):
[Please keep CC]
[Done.]
Can anyone see any obvious errror, that eludes my eyes? Files
available at:
$ cat dyndns-2010.0301+gitdd160bd/debian/source/format
3.0 (native)
(Enjoy 3.0…)
Jakub, Cyril
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net (02/03/2010):
[Please keep CC]
[Done.]
Can anyone see any obvious errror, that eludes my eyes? Files
available at:
$ cat
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100302-1
of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info.
Done. Thanks for your work!
--
Cheers,
Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-12
of my package iptotal.
It builds these binary packages:
iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 572246 (grave). [1]
The package can
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.4-1
of my package gdisk.
It builds these binary packages:
gdisk - GPT fdisk text-mode partitioning tool
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.9-2
of my package backup-manager.
It builds these binary packages:
backup-manager - command-line backup tool
backup-manager-doc - documentation package for Backup Manager
Apart from one overridden warning, the package appears to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/2010 11:05 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
For example because GPL-3 is not compatible with GPL-2 by itself. So
once the code is under GPL-3 you can not use it in GPL-2 licensed
program.
Also I don't see reason why you should limit Debian users
Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com writes:
I'm the maintainer of the libv4l package. It produces two binary
packages: libv4l-0 and libv4l-dev.
With the latest release upstream decided to rename it to v4l-utils and
add some utilities.
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gkrellm-cpufreq.
* Package name: gkrellm-cpufreq
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Christoph Winkelmann c...@tks6.net
* URL : http://mathicse.epfl.ch/~winkelma/gkrellm2-cpufreq/
* License : GPL
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
Ok, the build is fixed (man_MANS vs dist_man_MANS in the man/Makefile.am),
and pbuilder is behaving fine on my other box. The updated .dsc is at
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1
of my package recoverjpeg.
It builds these binary packages:
recoverjpeg - tool to recover JPEG images from a filesystem image
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 572234
The package can be
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
Now I've uploaded fixed one, could you review it again?
I haven't followed this very closely but is it OK to upload the fixed
package now? I can do it (I guess that the previous pointer to the
.dsc file is the right one) but prefer asking before
31 matches
Mail list logo
