vedran.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Upstream Author : Kernc
The mail address seems ... wrong.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/lddm.1004060814.1...@t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.6-1
of my package "evilvte". (Programming language: C)
It builds the binary package: evilvte
The package is lintian clean.
Note: bug #576624 is vte's bug, not evilvte's.
evilvte (0.4
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Vedran Furač wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logkeys". I would also note
that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I already
maintain a couple of packages in debian and hopefully I haven't made any
errors when packaging th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gkrellexec".
Package name: gkrellexec
Version : 1.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Leandro Penz
URL : http://github.com/lpenz/gkrellexec
License : GPL 2
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages:
gkrel
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Josue Abarca wrote:
>> Why does the -dev package depend on libc-dev?
...
> Is this wrong (or deprecated)?
No, I was just trying to clarify it, since I wasn't aware of that suggestion.
--
bye,
pabs
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Le Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:17:49PM +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
>
> On buildds binary-arch is called if it exists. Otherwise, binary is
> used.
That is very kind of them, as Policy § 4.9 specifies anyway that “Both the
binary-arch and binary-indep targets must exist”.
Have a nice day,
--
Charl
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:05:52AM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> As the original poster of that question on debian-mentors, I would
> like to ask anyone who has access to a Debian/kFreeBSD installation to
> test if fuse-convmvfs from sid works there (provided that fuse4bsd is
> installed). My
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.2.2-1
of my package "duply".
It builds these binary packages:
duply - easy to use frontend to the duplicity backup system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mento
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:14:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> A review:
Thanks for your review,
>
> The first 3 symbols in the symbols file look like they might be
> internal symbols that should not be exported, is that the case?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
It seems tha the whole fil
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot
> > > migrate to testing. T
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:57:17AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks. I am rethinking few things.
>
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:07:34PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'll try to make myself clearer:
> >
> > the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never
Hi,
Thanks. I am rethinking few things.
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:07:34PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll try to make myself clearer:
>
> the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never called on
> a binary independent package, assume a PHP app.
Aside from the iss
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:30:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The commands listed below are run twice, once with the "-a" option (in
> > binary-arch) and once with the "-i" option (in binary-indep):
>
> Actually, it doesn't. dh binary just runs whatever sequence is necessary
> for t
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 09:48:13PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:37:41AM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> > today, I have a question regarding the maintainers guide, which says:
>
> You must be reading one from squeeze or subversion one which
Hi,
I'll try to make myself clearer:
the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never called on
a binary independent package, assume a PHP app.
When using
%:
dh $@
it is clear that if dh doesn't call it, then nobody will, however the
policy manual says:
binary may be (and
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:37:41AM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> today, I have a question regarding the maintainers guide, which says:
You must be reading one from squeeze or subversion one which is enen
newer.
> "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary"
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdevilspie".
* Package name: gdevilspie
Version : 0.31-2
Upstream Author : Islam Amer
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gdevilspie/
* License : GPLv2
Section : gnome
It builds these binary pack
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdevilspie".
* Package name: gdevilspie
Version : 0.31-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section : gnome
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clamz".
* Package name: clamz
Version : 0.2-3
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section : utils
It builds
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clamz".
* Package name: clamz
Version : 0.2-3
Upstream Author : Benjamin Moody
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/clamz/
* License : GPLv3
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages:
clamz
Hi,
the error has been resolved by adding
mandir=$(CURDIR)/debian/antennavis/usr/share/man to make
install line in debian/rules
as you commented.
Package has been uploaded again to debian.mentors.net.
Thanks in advance,
Chris.
On 4/4/2010 19:52, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logkeys". I would also note
that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I already
maintain a couple of packages in debian and hopefully I haven't made any
errors when packaging this one.
* Package name: logkeys
Version
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gatling".
* Package name: gatling
Version : 0.11-1
Upstream Author : Felix von Leitner
* URL : http://www.fefe.de/gatling/
* License : GPLv2
Section : net
It builds this binary package:
gatlin
A review:
The first 3 symbols in the symbols file look like they might be
internal symbols that should not be exported, is that the case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
The SONAME should not be added to the -dev or utils packages. I'd
recommend naming the utils package smf-utils
Why does th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsmf".
* Package name: libsmf
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Edward Tomasz Napierała
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libsmf/
* License : BSD-licensed
Programming Lang: C
Description
25 matches
Mail list logo
