I have an upstream source that was not really designed for Linux builds, (the
author is primarily interested in Windblows, but he has GPLed the source), but
can be made to work with some adjustments. (Like move or rename a bunch of
files, or unpack some nested tarballs.) What is the standard
Hello there,
I got the following situation:
Upstream of a software package releases only a .zip-File containing only
both source and binaries. So, I need to build my own orig.tar.gz .
Now, if i build my orig-Tarball and exclude the binaries, do I have to
append something to the version string
Hi!
* Stefan Denker stefan+deb...@dn-kr.de [110623 10:03]:
Upstream of a software package releases only a .zip-File containing only
both source and binaries. So, I need to build my own orig.tar.gz .
Now, if i build my orig-Tarball and exclude the binaries, do I have to
append something to
Le jeudi 23 juin 2011 10:03:15, Stefan Denker a écrit :
Hello there,
I got the following situation:
Upstream of a software package releases only a .zip-File containing only
both source and binaries. So, I need to build my own orig.tar.gz .
Now, if i build my orig-Tarball and exclude the
Hi!
* Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr [110623 11:37]:
Now, if i build my orig-Tarball and exclude the binaries, do I have to
append something to the version string to mark that I modified the
source tarball?
Usually we use upstreamversion+dfsg1-1.
dfsg is used when the tarball was
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:37:18 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Le jeudi 23 juin 2011 10:03:15, Stefan Denker a écrit :
Now, if i build my orig-Tarball and exclude the binaries, do I have to
append something to the version string to mark that I modified the
source tarball?
Usually we use
Le Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:03:15AM +0200, Stefan Denker a écrit :
if i build my orig-Tarball and exclude the binaries, do I have to
append something to the version string to mark that I modified the
source tarball?
Dear Stefan,
please note the other recommendations when repacking upstream
Le jeudi 23 juin 2011 11:44:17, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :
Hi!
* Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.fr [110623 11:37]:
Now, if i build my orig-Tarball and exclude the binaries, do I have to
append something to the version string to mark that I modified the
source tarball?
Hi again,
to give an update to this problem:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:37:00AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:02:56PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
The problem is that libdl.so has been moved
Build finished at 20110623-1433
Finished
E: Build failure (dpkg-buildpackage died)
┌──┐
│ Cleanup
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Paul Elliott
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote:
I have an upstream source that was not really designed for Linux builds, (the
author is primarily interested in Windblows, but he has GPLed the source), but
can be made to work with some adjustments. (Like move
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.22.2-1
of my package roxterm.
It builds these binary packages:
roxterm- Multi-tabbed GTK/VTE terminal emulator
The package appears to be lintian clean.
This release is to fix a bug with compositing/colormaps. See:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:36:38 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.5-5
of my package pacpl.
Unfortunately the packages does not build here (full build log
attached).
No big surprise, looking at the diff (against -3):
debian/changelog:
+ *
On 06/23/2011 14:36:38, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
Hi !
[...]
Unfortunately the packages does not build here (full build log
attached). You can use tools like sbuild or pbuilder to make sure
your
package builds fine with just your build-depends around.
Yes, I made a little lack of
close 630167 2.8.4+dfsg.1-5
thanks
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 23 Birželis 2011 14:20:59 Andreas Tille wrote:
I tried to rebuild gofigure2 (which is affected by #629815) now I do
not get the
No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by
`lib/libvtkRenderingAddOn2.so.0.8'
any
Hi!
Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes:
On 06/23/2011 14:36:38, Christoph Egger wrote:
Unfortunately the packages does not build here (full build log
attached). You can use tools like sbuild or pbuilder to make sure
your
package builds fine with just your build-depends around.
Yes, I
On 06/23/2011 23:46:59, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
Hi,
[...]
Here, you can find a new revision of pacpl :
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl/pacpl_4.0.5-6.dsc
with a new bug fixed (was reported lately) :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1~r230-1
of my package flvmeta.
This is the experimental package from the most recent
version source from upstream svn.
It builds these binary packages:
flvmeta- Metadata injector for FLV video files
The package appears to be
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package bakefile.
* Package name: bakefile
Version : 0.2.9-1
Upstream Author :Vaclav Slavik vaclav.sla...@matfyz.cz
* URL : http://www.bakefile.org/index.html
* License : mit-like
Section : devel
It
19 matches
Mail list logo
