Il 14/08/2011 01:13, Ben Finney ha scritto:
Antonio Valentino antonio.valent...@tiscali.it writes:
The dataset needed for automatic testing in a satellite image.
It is part of a sample/demo dataset provided by the European Space
Agency.
Please show us the URL to inform the discussion
Le Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:26:04AM +0200, Antonio Valentino a écrit :
Uhm, how much is it important to test the package at build time?
Dear Antonio,
I have experience distributing a completely broken package for weeks or monthes
without anybody noticing, so I would recommend to run the
Antonio Valentino antonio.valent...@tiscali.it writes:
the url of the product to be downloaded for test is
http://earth.esa.int/services/sample_products/meris/LRC/L2/MER_LRC_2PTGMV2620_104318_0104X000_0_0_0001.N1.gz
Thanks.
Uhm, how much is it important to test the package
Hello!
I have a question about my package retext.
Upstream tarball provides executable retext.py and wpgen.py files
which are currently dh_install'ed to /usr/bin/retext and
/usr/bin/wpgen.
- Should dh_python2 be used in this case (and how to use it)?
Dependencies auto-detect is not needed since
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Don't be. That's not a reason to avoid distributing it in Debian, if
it's useful overall to Debian recipients to do so.
The question remains about getting a free-software license to do so, but
you're aware of
Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com writes:
And one off-topic question: when Debian will provide Python 3 packages
for modules supporting it?
The question seems to have a false assumption: There's nothing
preventing such packages. There are many Python 3 packages for libraries
that support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 13.08.2011 18:16, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
... still points to old package!
Seems like the transition to the new system was done in a hurry...
One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a
new package with the
On 13.08.2011 18:16, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
... still points to old package!
One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a
new package with the same Debian version to official archives either.
That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to the
On 2011-08-14 07:37, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to the
iterative process of review then. I've always been told (and it has
been repeatedly mentioned on this very list) that packages should only
bump their version numbers for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14.08.2011 13:37, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to the
iterative process of review then.
I sort of agree, although I wasn't involved at all in this part of Expo.
We certainly
Hi!
Please Cc me on answers as I only read -mentors aoccasionally, thanks!
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by writes:
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package 'bmake'.
* Package name: bmake
Version : 20110622-1
Upstream Author : Simon J. Gerraty
* Dmitry Shachnev mity...@gmail.com, 2011-08-14, 13:24:
I have a question about my package retext.
Upstream tarball provides executable retext.py and wpgen.py files which
are currently dh_install'ed to /usr/bin/retext and /usr/bin/wpgen.
- Should dh_python2 be used in this case
If you case
Hi!
Could someone please point me to documentation that explains how to download
source packages from mentors.debian.net?
I've tried adding:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian/ unstable main
to sources.list, but 'apt-get update' returns:
W: Failed to fetch
Hi,
you can use
dget sourcepackage.dsc
Regards, Tobias
Am 14.08.2011 14:30, schrieb Torquil Macdonald Sørensen:
Hi!
Could someone please point me to documentation that explains how to
download source packages from mentors.debian.net?
I've tried adding:
deb-src
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com writes:
I've always been told (and it has been repeatedly mentioned on this
very list) that packages should only bump their version numbers for
versions that actually entered the official archives.
There are some sponsors who prefer what you say
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:00:50PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
... still points to old package!
Seems like the transition to the new system was done in a hurry...
One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a
new package with the same Debian version to official
On 14/08/11 14:30, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
Hi!
Could someone please point me to documentation that explains how to
download source packages from mentors.debian.net?
Strangly, I seem to not be able to find any such documentation. Am I
overlooking something obvious? :-)
I
On 14/08/11 14:40, Tobias Hansen wrote:
Hi,
you can use
dget sourcepackage.dsc
Regards, Tobias
Thanks! This works when the *dsc is an internet address.
Torquil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:51:45PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
In fact, until very recently we had no support to upload the same source
package several times at all, so the status quo is already an
improvement. As far as I can tell, there are the following problems with
(multiple) uploads of the
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:57:30PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com writes:
I've always been told (and it has been repeatedly mentioned on this
very list) that packages should only bump their version numbers for
versions that actually entered the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stanislav,
On 14.08.2011 15:18, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
But *you* provided the function in the web interface to delete the
uploaded package.
FTR: I didn't.
You shold have asked for external testing and help *BEFORE* switching
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
On 14.08.2011 15:18, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
But *you* provided the function in the web interface to delete the
uploaded package.
FTR: I didn't.
That you above supposed to mean people who care about debexpo and
take
On 14/08/11 at 17:07 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Well, then it is a shame that the system has not been given even a
slight test since all these years...
On 14/08/11 at 17:18 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
You shold have asked for external testing and help *BEFORE* switching
Excerpts from Torquil Macdonald Sørensen's message of Sun Aug 14 08:30:18 -0400
2011:
Hi!
Could someone please point me to documentation that explains how to download
source packages from mentors.debian.net?
I've tried adding:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian/ unstable main
On 14/08/11 22:58, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Excerpts from Torquil Macdonald Sørensen's message of Sun Aug 14 08:30:18 -0400
2011:
Hi!
Could someone please point me to documentation that explains how to download
source packages from mentors.debian.net?
I've tried adding:
deb-src
Hi,
New upstream version was released, so I made a new Debian package of it.
I'm again looking for a sponsor for it.
It is lintian clean and builds with cowbuilder.
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
Hello,
when I try to build mathgl in my build environment (not within a clean
chroot), it fails with message
checking hdf5.h usability... no
checking hdf5.h presence... no
checking for hdf5.h... no
Please install hdf5 headers
although /usr/include/hdf5.h header is present because
27 matches
Mail list logo
