Re: RFS: ibus-unikey

2011-09-28 Thread Aron Xu
Looks fine to me, uploaded. To Lê Quốc Tuấn: Please CC. pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org next time when you are seeking for sponsor of input method related packages. Some people in pkg-ime aren't subscribed to debian-mentors (like me), :-) On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 13:52, Thomas Goirand

Re: RFS: gimp-gap: fix FTBFS, libjpeg transition

2011-09-28 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Dear Ansgar, thanks for having looked at the package. I have re-uploaded it on mentors. It would be great if you could review the changes: Le 27/09/11 10:47, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : Hi, Thibaut Paumard paum...@users.sourceforge.net writes: gimp-gap - animation package for the GIMP

RFS: lebiniou (already in Debian, new upstream version: 3.11)

2011-09-28 Thread Olivier Girondel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lebiniou. Package name: lebiniou Version : 3.11-1 Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel oliv...@biniou.info URL : http://biniou.net License : GPLv2

Re: RFS: lebiniou (already in Debian, new upstream version: 3.11)

2011-09-28 Thread Kilian Krause
Salut Olivier, On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 11:21 +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package lebiniou. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lebiniou/lebiniou_3.11-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Rebuilt using the official

duke University contact

2011-09-28 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Hello I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke university by a PhD student named William T. Rankin / wran...@ee.duke.edu. the software is dpmta[1] but as you can see all the links are broken. when I look into the code, there is no LICENSE file but the header of the files in

Re: duke University contact

2011-09-28 Thread Nick Leverton
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Hello I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke university by a PhD student named William T. Rankin / wran...@ee.duke.edu. the software is dpmta[1] but as you can see all the links are broken. You

RFS: dfa-programmer

2011-09-28 Thread Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dfu-programmer. * Package name: dfu-programmer Version : 0.5.4-2 Upstream Author : Weston Schmidt weston_schm...@alumni.purdue.edu * URL : http://dfu-programmer.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2+

Re: duke University contact

2011-09-28 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:17:07 +0100, Nick Leverton n...@leverton.org a écrit : On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Hello I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke university by a PhD student named William T. Rankin /

Re: RFS: bino

2011-09-28 Thread Dominique Dumont
Le Wednesday 14 September 2011 06:44:11, Daniel Schaal a écrit : I uploaded an updated package to http://mentors.debian.net/package/bino Here are some comments: - debian/copyright: In fact the simple All-Permissive License you mention is very close to BSD 2-clause license [1]. To respect

RFH: libapache2-mod-socket-policy-server (an Apache2 module for serving Adobe socket policy files)

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Kauffman
The libapache2-mod-socket-policy-server package has been reviewed and Thomas Goirand has offered to sponsor it, however, both he and I would appreciate another set of eyes (does not have to be a DD) looking it over before upload. The package is an Apache2 module for serving Adobe socket

Re: What to do about the situation with id3v2

2011-09-28 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 25.09.2011 18:12, schrieb Stefan Ott: I'm asking because I think it's going to be non-trivial to find people who are willing to test a new tool that solves a problem which, for many people, doesn't seem to be extremely urgent. Anyway, if somebody on this list is interested in trying it out,

Re: RFS: bino

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Schaal
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 17:22:35 schrieb Dominique Dumont: Le Wednesday 14 September 2011 06:44:11, Daniel Schaal a écrit : I uploaded an updated package to http://mentors.debian.net/package/bino Here are some comments: Thanks for the review. - debian/copyright: In fact the

Re: duke University contact

2011-09-28 Thread Steven
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 16:09 +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Le Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:17:07 +0100, Nick Leverton n...@leverton.org a écrit : On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Hello I try to find the licences of a software developped at

Re: Heimdall

2011-09-28 Thread Russ Allbery
810d4rk 810d...@gmail.com writes: Is anyone interested in uploading heimdall version 1.1.1 to the repos? Heimdall is a cross-platform open-source tool suite used to flash firmware (aka ROMs) onto Samsung Galaxy S devices.(http://www.glassechidna.com.au/products/heimdall/) That's an

What version of debian to develop debian packages?

2011-09-28 Thread Paul Elliott
What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages? mentors.debian.net complains about my standards version: W: libswe source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2) But if I set this version 3.9.2 on the control file Then lintian on my local debian 6.0

At what point do I create a seperate -doc package for a library?

2011-09-28 Thread Paul Elliott
lintian -i -I is complaining about architecture-independent data: I: libswe-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2121kB 78% N: N:The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data N:(over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the package) in /usr/share N:but is

Re: What version of debian to develop debian packages?

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Gilbert
Paul Elliott wrote: What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages? mentors.debian.net complains about my standards version: W: libswe source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2) But if I set this version 3.9.2 on the control file Then lintian

Re: What version of debian to develop debian packages?

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Shuler
On 09/28/2011 08:54 PM, Paul Elliott wrote: What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages? All package uploads go into unstable (Sid), so all new packaging development should also be done on Sid. You might wish to look into pbuilder, cowbuilder, or a simple dev chroot made

Re: At what point do I create a seperate -doc package for a library?

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Gilbert
Paul Elliott wrote: lintian -i -I is complaining about architecture-independent data: I: libswe-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2121kB 78% N: N:The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data N:(over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the package)

Re: What version of debian to develop debian packages?

2011-09-28 Thread Daniel Kauffman
On 09/28/2011 06:54 PM, Paul Elliott wrote: What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages? The short answer: sid. The longer answer is that you can develop on stable, build in a sid chroot using pbuilder from stable, and run lintian from backports. But you still need to

reportbug: support for mentors.debian.org pseudo package

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Gilbert
package: reportbug version: 6.2.1 severity: wishlist Hi, I've written a patch to tentatively support a mentors.debian.org pseudo package (in order to better track and support the incredible volume of sponsorship requests and such). Note that there is still ongoing discussion about the right way