Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-12-06 Thread Gunter Königsmann
On 27.06.2011 11:31, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, [...] Ok, I wouldn't bother much about the above, but one thing does stop me from uploading: why are you setting the version number in such a way that Debian is upstream? This doesn't seem to be accurate. IMHO you should be using 0.9.1-1 as

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-12-06 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Gunter Königsmann gun...@peterpall.de writes: Did try to change the version number to 0.9.1-1 - which sounded great for a non-native debian package. But this meant running into all kinds of warnings. (debuild claims my native package has a version number that contains a dash!) You

Re: RFS: git2cl

2011-12-06 Thread Benoît Knecht
Dmitry Smirnov wrote: I think while you might be right in general, in this case you're missing the point. First of all, I agree that binary packages should be rebuilt. But I disagree to classify upstream documentation in HTML as binary. Not binary, but generated from a source. PDFs can

Re: RFS: dvbackup

2011-12-06 Thread Benoît Knecht
Benoît Knecht wrote: I'll try and have a look at the rest of the package later today. Here's my long overdue review of rsbep: - The long description of the package repeats the synopsis; take a look at [1] for the best practices. [1]

Re: RFS: freefilesync (new upstream version)

2011-12-06 Thread Damien Lecan
2011/12/5 Andreas Moog am...@ubuntu.com: * Consider using dh(1) in debian/rules with some override targets. What do you mean exactly ? something like http://people.ubuntu.com/~amoog/freefilesync/rules Very interesting ! dpkg-source: error: detected 16 unwanted binary files (add them in

Access to porterboxes for Debian Maintainers?

2011-12-06 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Hello, a few days ago my key was merged into the DM keyring. I'm having an FTBFS on one of the packages I work on (kdesdk) in big endian architectures. I've prepared a fix yesterday, but I'd like to test it properly in any big endian porterbox. I already asked in our Qt/KDE team's IRC

Re: Access to porterboxes for Debian Maintainers?

2011-12-06 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi José Manuel, On 06.12.2011 19:59, José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: Could someone solve my doubts? both DMs and sponsored maintainer can get access to porter boxes. As a DM you should address your request through the NM frontdesk. The basic

Re: RFS: bibledit-xiphos (attempt 2, after 1 month)

2011-12-06 Thread Teus Benschop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thank you, Andreas, for looking into the package. I'll look into all these issues that affect Debian packaging, and also to see how the upstream code can be updated so that it compiles without warnings even with the newest gcc compiler. I do

RFS: lbzip2

2011-12-06 Thread Mikołaj Izdebski
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lbzip2. * Package name: lbzip2 Version : 2.1-2 Upstream Author : Mikołaj Izdebski zurg...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/kjn/lbzip2 * License : GPL-v3+ Section : utils It builds

Re: RFS: git2cl

2011-12-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Benoît, I appreciate your detailed explanation. I agree with everything you've sad regarding general terms. All your points are valid and well-explained. I think this discussion drifted away from particular situation. Specifically to git2cl there are still number of questions left: -- Is

Re: How to correct BTS error statistics

2011-12-06 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote: during my first bug squashing party I encountered some FTBS bugs of this kind Found in version package-a/a.a-x Fixed in version package-b/b.b-y The Bugs show up in the UDD (1); the PTS (2) is clean (now bugs are shown); new versions of

Re: RFS: dvbackup

2011-12-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Dear Benoît, I'm applauding to your extensive review and attention to details. Thank you. I don't know if I should have ever brought something so non-perfect to your pedantic attention. :) I just want to remind that I never intended to make the perfect package out of it. I merely fix some

Re: RFS: git2cl

2011-12-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: Would you please explain you decision? I think my position has been adequately explained by myself and others in this thread, but in short: Debian has made various promises to our users and the wider free software community. Among them is

Re: RFS: git2cl

2011-12-06 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 13:56:44 Paul Wise wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: Would you please explain you decision? I think my position has been adequately explained by myself and others in this thread, but in short: Debian has made various promises to

RFS: python-libmemcached (3rd try)

2011-12-06 Thread Shell Xu
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-libmemcached. * Package name: python-libmemcached Version : 0.40-1 Upstream Author : hongqn hon...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/python-libmemcached/ * License : Apache License 2.0