Re: RFS: augeas/0.10.0-0.1 [NMU]
Hi there, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Igor Pashev pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote: 17.04.2012 20:46, Nicolas Valcárcel пишет: Yes, i got contacted and i +1'd the upload, but i don't work for canonical anymore so my e-mail is not that one, so if you can please update my e-mail to nvalcar...@gmail.com that'll be great. Also about the -1 remove about naturaldocs you'll need to talk to raphael (CC'ing him) he was the one that did that changed and it depended on a specific version, not sure if the -1 is indeed needed. If you mean the dependency on the specific -1 revision of naturaldocs 1:1.5.1, then it should be safe to remove it. Other than that i'm ok with the upload. (I actually sent a RFS a while ago IIRC) Thanks for reply and sorry for rushing :-) Here is updated package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/augeas I've changed your email. There are some ohter issues (vim addons, standard version, splitting (#641842)), but it requires more thoughtful treatment. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caf4wo9emxa_xzyc5hectvakypuwgz5nii+qg1ir3jjaqaoh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Agreed. Vladimir, this long thread highlights the fact that you need to find a community for this code *first*, and fix many of the bugs that would be found that way, before presenting it as a package for inclusion in Debian. I believe due to this long thread all those bugs (or rather security vulnerability), apart from last only about using $RANDOM are fixed. At same time I think this small utility has less significant, and less bugs then most software already included in Debian has. And finally the Debian BTS is best way to fix such bugs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGFYYi99M2xTvLtLOoneWZSUNyu+RyXBb_mmsvs1a3qSNB=w...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#669209: RFS: yp-svipc/0.13-1 [ITP] -- System V InterProcess Communication for Python/Yorick
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package yp-svipc * Package name: yp-svipc Version : 0.13-1 Upstream Author : Matthieu Bec * URL : https://github.com/frigaut/yorick-svipc/ * License : GPL-3 Section : Python, Science Programming Lang: C, Yorick, Python Description : System V InterProcess Communication for Python/Yorick ITP : http://bugs.debian.org/668841 It builds those binary packages: python-svipc - interprocess communication (shared memory...) for Python yorick-svipc - interprocess communication (shared memory...) for Yorick To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/yp-svipc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yp-svipc/yp-svipc_0.13-1.dsc When the two packages are installed, they can be tested with: - yorick-only multiprocess computing: yorick -i /usr/share/doc/yorick-svipc/examples/timing-demo.i - yorick/python communication: yorick -i /usr/share/doc/yorick-svipc/examples/ping.i I have not been able to make it work under python3 so far (on Linux: it works on a Mac). Regards, Thibaut Paumard. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator
Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com writes: I believe due to this long thread all those bugs (or rather security vulnerability), apart from last only about using $RANDOM are fixed. At same time I think this small utility has less significant, and less bugs then most software already included in Debian has. And finally the Debian BTS is best way to fix such bugs. Your presumption, that the people and resources of the Debian project are the appropriate place to conduct this no matter how much of those resources you consume in the process, is inconsiderate and rude. Please, demonstrate that you intend to be a good maintainer for this work by taking care of it *outside* Debian for a community of users whom you attract through the merits of the work itself, before consuming more of Debian's resources. -- \ “If you can do no good, at least do no harm.” —_Slapstick_, | `\ Kurt Vonnegut | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5ptckpx@benfinney.id.au
Bug#668966: RFS: dparser-1.16-1 [ITP] -- a scannerless GLR parser generator
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-04-16, 23:35: * Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch, 2012-04-16, 07:45: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dparser/dparser_1.26-1.dsc One more thing: pyversions -vr debian/control could be (more conventionally and more succinctly) written as: pyversions -vr -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120418151112.ga2...@jwilk.net
Re: Can't upload to mentors.debian.net
Hi, I'm experiencing the same problem since a couple of weeks ago, with exactly the same scenario: the .dsc uploaded, then for some reason I can't remember the rest of the source package did not, and now I receive a 403 forbidden. I though it was a problem on my side but I had not had time to investigate. On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: I can't upload my package (roxterm) to mentors.debian.net. I've set up my .dput.cf as suggested at http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers. If I use the HTTP method I get 403 Forbidden as soon as it tries to upload the .dsc file. The FTP method has partially succeeded but always times out (errno 110) before completing the entire set of files. Perhaps the fact that the .dsc did upload is the cause of the 403 errors because I don't have permission to overwrite existing files? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120418162002.048f3e84@tiber -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
Can't upload to mentors.debian.net
I can't upload my package (roxterm) to mentors.debian.net. I've set up my .dput.cf as suggested at http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers. If I use the HTTP method I get 403 Forbidden as soon as it tries to upload the .dsc file. The FTP method has partially succeeded but always times out (errno 110) before completing the entire set of files. Perhaps the fact that the .dsc did upload is the cause of the 403 errors because I don't have permission to overwrite existing files? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120418162002.048f3e84@tiber
Re: Can't upload to mentors.debian.net
On Wednesday 18,April,2012 11:40 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: Hi, I'm experiencing the same problem since a couple of weeks ago, with exactly the same scenario: the .dsc uploaded, then for some reason I can't remember the rest of the source package did not, and now I receive a 403 forbidden. I though it was a problem on my side but I had not had time to investigate. I have problem downloading some .dsc, it shows me: Not Found The requested URL /debian/pool/main/p/plotmtv/plotmtv_1.4.4t-11.dsc was not found on this serve Is it the same issue? Thanks, On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk mailto:h...@realh.co.uk wrote: I can't upload my package (roxterm) to mentors.debian.net http://mentors.debian.net. I've set up my .dput.cf http://dput.cf as suggested at http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers. If I use the HTTP method I get 403 Forbidden as soon as it tries to upload the .dsc file. The FTP method has partially succeeded but always times out (errno 110) before completing the entire set of files. Perhaps the fact that the .dsc did upload is the cause of the 403 errors because I don't have permission to overwrite existing files? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org mailto:debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org mailto:listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120418162002.048f3e84@tiber -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
Re: Dependencies for FastCGI
On 04/17/2012 11:43 AM, Stefan Ott wrote: Hey mentors I have a question concerning one of my packages (fookebox). It currently depends on libapache2-mod-wsgi | httpd-wsgi since it's a web application that is typically called through WSGI. As requested in #667838, I now added the configuration files required to get it to run through FastCGI with python-flup. However, I am not entirely sure how to change my dependencies to indicate that this is a possibility. Please don't be so prompt into deciding how a python code will be executed by the web server. I use, and maintain SBOX, which is a cgi wrapper, and which can run python scripts. This doesn't need at all FCGI. I'd be very surprised if WSGI was needed in this case. As I see it, one option would be to say that the package depends on either (libapache2-mod-wsgi | httpd-wsgi) or (libapache2-mod-fastcgi and python-flup). Another option is to not depend on anything, let the admin decide, and just make suggestions in the README.Debian. Another way would be to just use Suggest: or Recommends: (which isn't forcing anyone into doing what it doesn't want). Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f8ee6c9.8080...@debian.org
Re: Can't upload to mentors.debian.net
Le 18/04/2012 à 17:20, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk écrivit : I can't upload my package (roxterm) to mentors.debian.net. I've set up my .dput.cf as suggested at http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers. If I use the HTTP method I get 403 Forbidden as soon as it tries to upload the .dsc file. The FTP method has partially succeeded but always times out (errno 110) before completing the entire set of files. Perhaps the fact that the .dsc did upload is the cause of the 403 errors because I don't have permission to overwrite existing files? Hi, I just changed the logic for old file removal on mentors.debian.net. Stale files are now removed 6 hours after they are uploaded. Such a long time is needed to accomodate the upload of big packages, such as ia32-libs, as we currently have no way to know if an upload is in progress. If dput gets interrupted mid-upload, you can try the ftp method as it does not interrupt itself on a permission error (see #665986 on dput for the HTTP bug). We return a 403 error when the file already exists, this halts the http method but not ftp. You can also poke support@m.d.n if the upload still fails (the files are gone, so it shouldn't). Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gxd7zj4@poincare.home.olasd.eu
Re: Can't upload to mentors.debian.net
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:52:47 +0200 Nicolas Dandrimont nicolas.dandrim...@crans.org wrote: Le 18/04/2012 à 17:20, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk écrivit : I can't upload my package (roxterm) to mentors.debian.net. [Snip] You can also poke support@m.d.n if the upload still fails (the files are gone, so it shouldn't). Thanks. I've managed to upload it by HTTP now, although the server still seems very sluggish. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120418200507.1519d560@tiber
Bug#667092: marked as done (RFS: tcng/10b-4 [RC, QA])
Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:11:18 +0200
with message-id 1334790678.6334.28.camel@LAPJFS
and subject line RFS: tcng/10b-4: uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #667092,
regarding RFS: tcng/10b-4 [RC, QA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
667092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi, it turns out the person who wants to adopt this package is alive after
all, but won't have time soon. Thus, I'm making a last upload, orphaning
the package, fixing the new FTBFS and doing some minor clean-up.
The changelog entry:
tcng (10b-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Add textlive-latex-recommended to Build-Depends, needed for url.sty
(Closes: #666336).
* Bump standards to 3.9.3 (no changes), debhelper to 8 (dh_prep).
* Fix CFLAGS and LDFLAGS being ignored, get them from dpkg-buildflags.
* Implement missing build-{arch,indep}.
* Orphan the package.
Dgettable URL:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tcng/tcng_10b-4.dsc
Popcon: 235 inst, 32 vote.
If someone could sponsor this, it'd be nice.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package uploaded - thanks!
Best regards,
Johann Felix Soden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---
Processed (with 1 errors): retitle 669167
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 669167 RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Financial accounting and Bug #669167 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- Financial accounting and ERP program Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Financial accounting and' from 'RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- Financial accounting and ERP program' ERP Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 669167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13347927701902.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#669167: New experimental LedgerSMB package, 1.3.15-2
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 19:28 -0400, mentors.debian.net wrote: Your upload of the package 'ledgersmb' to mentors.debian.net was successful. Others can now see it. The URL of your package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.15-2.dsc A new experimental LedgerSMB package, version 1.3.15-2, is now available. From debian/changelog: ledgersmb (1.3.15-2) experimental; urgency=low * Rewrite LedgerSMB README.Debian, including database related information. * Correct debconf variable lsmb_debconf to debconf_install in debian/postinst. * Changes for debian/patches/*: - Renumber 15_httpdconf.patch as 10_httpdconf.patch. - Add 15_UI-setup-credentials.patch to set 'ledgersmb' as the default database superuser for setup.pl. RJ Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1334793270.5509.24.camel@svrpc
Processed: retitle 669167
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 669167 RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Financial accounting, ERP Bug #669167 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Financial accounting and Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Financial accounting, ERP' from 'RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- Financial accounting and' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 669167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13347934164607.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: RFS: pidgin-privacy-please
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:34, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-privacy-please. * Package name : pidgin-privacy-please Version : 0.7.1-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Ott * URL : http://pidgin-privacy-please.googlecode.com/ * License : GNU GPLv3 Section : net It builds those binary packages: pidgin-privacy-please - plugin for enhanced privacy in pidgin To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pidgin-privacy-please Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-privacy-please/pidgin-privacy-please_0.7.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Anyone? -- Stefan Ott http://www.ott.net/ You are not Grey Squirrel? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOk=tPRqHWY-aTxZ2O0SVXc+rk1=vxsjpplxewdwn1gxmzx...@mail.gmail.com
