Bug#664181: marked as done (RFS: trustmanager/3.0.5-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:32:22 + with message-id <20120722063222.ge25...@master.debian.org> and subject line closing RFS without package has caused the Debian Bug report #664181, regarding RFS: trustmanager/3.0.5-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#660314: marked as done (RFS: nbc/1.2.1.r4+dfsg-3 [ITP] -- Compiler for LEGO Mindstorms NXT bricks)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:32:22 + with message-id <20120722063222.ge25...@master.debian.org> and subject line closing RFS without package has caused the Debian Bug report #660314, regarding RFS: nbc/1.2.1.r4+dfsg-3 [ITP] -- Compiler for LEGO Mindstorms NXT bricks to be marked as d

Bug#660270: marked as done (RFS: gnonograms/0.9.6-1 [ITP] -- create and solve nonogram puzzles)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:32:22 + with message-id <20120722063222.ge25...@master.debian.org> and subject line closing RFS without package has caused the Debian Bug report #660270, regarding RFS: gnonograms/0.9.6-1 [ITP] -- create and solve nonogram puzzles to be marked as done. Th

Bug#659077: marked as done (RFS: plowshare/1+20120130-1 [NEW] -- download files from file-sharing websites utility)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:32:22 + with message-id <20120722063222.ge25...@master.debian.org> and subject line closing RFS without package has caused the Debian Bug report #659077, regarding RFS: plowshare/1+20120130-1 [NEW] -- download files from file-sharing websites utility to b

Bug#659805: marked as done (RFS: aguilas/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- A web-based LDAP user management system)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jul 2012 06:32:22 + with message-id <20120722063222.ge25...@master.debian.org> and subject line closing RFS without package has caused the Debian Bug report #659805, regarding RFS: aguilas/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- A web-based LDAP user management system to be marked as done.

Bug#661533: RFS: postfix-cluebringer/2.0.11-2 -- anti-spam plugin for Postfix

Hi Nikolai, You wrote on 19 July 2012: > I'll do the 2.10 update you wanted today How is progress on that ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://

Bug#682357: RFS: birthday/1.6.2-5 [ITA]

package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 682357 not-fit-for-wheezy stop Hi Patrick, I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-21 23:35. These are the changes you mentioned in debian/changelog : | birthday (1.6.2-5) unstable;

Processed: birthday: block ITA 673226 by RFS 682357

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 673226 by 682357 Bug #673226 [wnpp] ITA: birthday -- Display information about pending events on login 673226 was not blocked by any bugs. 673226 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 673226: 682357 > stop Stopping processing

Bug#682357: RFS: birthday/1.6.2-5 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "birthday" * Package name: birthday Version : 1.6.2-5 Upstream Author : Andy Mortimer * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/birthday/ * License :

Re: trying to FIX the bug #618388 of IPPLAN

ipplan-*/debian/postinst needs some love :-) I guess it is outdated and should be fixed. This requires knowlage of ucf and debconf (see man ucf) 2012/7/21 Gary Dale : > On 21/07/12 01:12 PM, vykuntam srinivas wrote: > > hi all, > > i am trying fix the bug #618388 of ipplan .I installed the missi

Re: need help in fixing bug #618388 of IPPLAN package

I guess, phplayersmenu has dead upstream Last files at SourceForge are from 2004: http://sourceforge.net/projects/phplayersmenu/files/phplayersmenu-devel/ 2012/7/22 vykuntam srinivas : > i do not understand why *libphp-phplayersmenu* is not being maintained? > > > can any one please explain me

Re: need help in fixing bug #618388 of IPPLAN package

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:30:45AM +0530, vykuntam srinivas wrote: > hi all,i want to fix the bug #618388 of IPPLAN package,but the previious > maintainer stated that " libphp-phplayersmenu itself is not maintained > anymore"when reporting bug #647269 please refer this link : > http://bu

Bug#679049: RFS: qpxtool/0.7.1.002-6 [QA] -- CD/DVD quality checker

package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 679049 not-fit-for-wheezy stop The package currently at mentors is the one uploaded there on 2012-06-26 00:30. I'm adding the tag not-fit-for-wheezy based on what I read in debian/changelog. qpxtool (0.7.1.002-6)

Bug#679049: RFS: qpxtool/0.7.1.002-6 [QA] -- CD/DVD quality checker

See also: https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00680.html Quotation: "I don't think targetting experimental for unmaintained packages makes sense." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: Bug#681968: RFS: scscp-imcce/0.6.4+ds-1 [ITP] -- IMCCE SCSCP C Library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 21/07/12 13:38, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : > Hello: > > On 19/07/12 16:13, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> On 18/07/12 11:22, Thibaut Paumard wrote: >>> Le 18/07/12 10:40, Jerome Benoit a écrit : I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scscp-imcce"

need help in fixing bug #618388 of IPPLAN package

hi all,i want to fix the bug #618388 of IPPLAN package,but the previious maintainer stated that " libphp-phplayersmenu itself is not maintained anymore"when reporting bug #647269 please refer this link : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647269 as i am a newbie i do not

Re: how to consult who has set usertag not-fit-for-wheezy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi again, Le 21/07/12 15:32, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit : >> Le 21/07/12 09:26, Bart Martens a écrit : >>> Is there a way to consult who has set the usertag >>> not-fit-for-wheezy for a particular RFS bug ? > You can use this : > http://bugs.debia

Bug#679049: RFS: qpxtool/0.7.1.002-6 [QA] -- CD/DVD quality checker

package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 679049 - not-fit-for-wheezy + for-wheezy thanks Waiting for reply: https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00308.html (See also timestamps) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.deb

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

Hi KURASHIKI Satoru, As I commented earlier for your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-06-28 00:14, detailed information on how the repackaged source was obtained, and on how this can be reproduced should be provided in debian/copyright. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-referen

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experimental)

That is only there because the file has been created using Adobe Illustrator. It has nothing to do with the copyright of the actual artwork (unless, of course, the original author did not have a license to use the product in the first place). Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-r

Re: trying to FIX the bug #618388 of IPPLAN

On 21/07/12 01:12 PM, vykuntam srinivas wrote: hi all, i am trying fix the bug #618388 of ipplan .I installed the missing package ( libphp-phplayersmenu which was mentioned in the bug),After that i had installed ipplan.At the tim

trying to FIX the bug #618388 of IPPLAN

hi all, i am trying fix the bug #618388of ipplan .I installed the missing package ( libphp-phplayersmenu which was mentioned in the bug),After that i had installed ipplan.At the time of installation a blue window appeared and prompted

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experimental)

Hi Michael, I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-19 13:36. The file doc/manual/figures/TU_Signet_CMYK.eps contains "Copyright(C)2000-2006 Adobe Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved" and I don't find a corresponding license to redistribute in debian/copyright. Regards, B

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

Hi Bart, many thanks for your revision and for your time. I'll update debian/copyright soon. On Saturday 21 July 2012 16:41:15 Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Francesco, > > I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-14 11:00. > The information in debian/copyright is yet not co

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

Hi Francesco, I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-14 11:00. The information in debian/copyright is yet not complete. One example is that the copyright and license of the file test/manuals/res_all/mini_ker/Linking-rule.html are not yet included in debian/copyright. R

Bug#677347: RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:04:18AM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: > hi, > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > >> > In that case I close this RFS now because there is currently no package > >> > to > >> > sponsor. You can reopen this RFS or submit a new one after wheezy >

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 679344 Bug #679344 {Done: Bart Martens } [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA] Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #679344 to the same values previously set > package sponsorship-requests Limit

Re: how to consult who has set usertag not-fit-for-wheezy

Hi, Le samedi 21 juillet 2012 10:20:53, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 21/07/12 09:26, Bart Martens a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > Is there a way to consult who has set the usertag not-fit-for-wheezy for > > a particular RFS bug ? > > > > For normal tags like "patch", "upstream", "moreinfo" and so

Bug#677347: marked as done (RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt/0.18-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:42:51 + with message-id <20120721114251.gb10...@master.debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#677347: RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt has caused the Debian Bug report #677347, regarding RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt/0.18-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#677347: RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt

hi, On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? This package is NEW, and there is no hope to be included in wheezy. So, as suggested, I try to tag this bug as not-for-wheezy and delete package from mentors. # but I failed to

Re: Bug#681968: RFS: scscp-imcce/0.6.4+ds-1 [ITP] -- IMCCE SCSCP C Library

Hello: On 19/07/12 16:13, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Dear Mentors: On 18/07/12 11:22, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le 18/07/12 10:40, Jerome Benoit a écrit : Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scscp-imcce" [...] SCSCP stands for Sy

Re: how to consult who has set usertag not-fit-for-wheezy

Le 21/07/12 09:26, Bart Martens a écrit : > Hello, > > Is there a way to consult who has set the usertag not-fit-for-wheezy for a > particular RFS bug ? > > For normal tags like "patch", "upstream", "moreinfo" and so on, there are > links > to the messages sent to cont...@bugs.debian.org on the

Re: packaging C interpreter

Hi, Just FYI, a C/C++ interpreter called CINT [1] is embeded in CERN ROOT ('root-system' package in Debian) [2-3]. [1] http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint [2] http://root.cern.ch/ [3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/root-system.html Regards, Lifeng On 11:40 Sat 07/21/12 Jul , Rustom M

how to consult who has set usertag not-fit-for-wheezy

Hello, Is there a way to consult who has set the usertag not-fit-for-wheezy for a particular RFS bug ? For normal tags like "patch", "upstream", "moreinfo" and so on, there are links to the messages sent to cont...@bugs.debian.org on the bug log, but for usertags I don't see such links. Regards,

Bug#677347: RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt

Hello KURASHIKI Satoru, The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677347 http://mentors.debian.net/package/rt-extension-jsgantt Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Bug#679344: marked as done (RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:09:38 + with message-id <20120721070938.gd21...@master.debian.org> and subject line RFS: bzr-email has caused the Debian Bug report #679344, regarding RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: packaging C interpreter

Tiny CC can act as interpreter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8wJfRwjHcFPyy0w4JXww3TJ8Lp5BLNX=jZ0ai6UR=1...@mail.gmail.com

Re: packaging C interpreter

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:40:52AM +0530, Rustom Mody wrote: > I use and am interested in packaging the C interpreter > http://www.linuxbox.com/tiki/node/149 > > Before spending significant time on it, I thought I would ask if this would > be acceptable as a debian package > Some possible issues: