No response to any of the bugs and only one upload by the maintainer ever.
I would suggest sending a mail to the maintainer and CC the sponsor
(run who-uploads premake), wait for a some time (perhaps a month) and
then file an ITA bug. After that do the usual stuff; update the
package, find a spons
Hi Tobias:
I'll sponsor it.
Carlo
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Tobias Stefan Richter wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nexus"
* Package name: nexus
Version : 4.3-svn1863-1
Upstream Author : ne...@nexusforma
Hi,
I'm interested in adopting the premake package in Debian, I think it's been
orphaned but it's not in the orphaned list. The current packaged version is
3.7 and the current upstream release is 4.4-beta4. Version 3.7 was released
in 2008, 4.4-beta4 came out 8 months ago. It doesn't look like it'
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nexus"
* Package name: nexus
Version : 4.3-svn1863-1
Upstream Author : ne...@nexusformat.org
* URL : http://www.nexusformat.org
* License : LGPL
Section
Il 17/12/2012 22:55, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
> man/Makefile sets LANG=C in attempt to ensure the C locale. However, this is
> not necessarily sufficient, as LANG can be overridden by various LC_*
> variables. The correct
> way to sanitize locale settings is to set LC_ALL=C.
Done.
> Are /usr/lib/
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:49:59 +
with message-id <20121218164958.ga5...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: prime-phylo/1.0.10-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #694632,
regarding RFS: prime-phylo/1.0.10-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:21:07 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1 mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #693330,
regarding RFS: mathjax/2.1+20121028-1 mathjax-docs/2.1+20121030-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:21:08 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: x52pro/0.1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677379,
regarding RFS: x52pro/0.1.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:21:08 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: m2m-aligner/1.1-1 [ITP] -- many-to-many
alignments for string transduction
has caused the Debian Bug report #663455,
regarding RFS: m2m-aligner/1.1-1 [ITP] -- many-to-many alignments for string
trans
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Thanks and uploaded.
Thanks a lot.
>
> BTW, in the Debian Med team we did not formalised the sponsering process
> via filing RFS bugs (for no specific reason - it just worked without
> this.)
Good to know.
> PS: Please let us know whether
Hi Erik
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:18:26PM +0100, Erik Sjölund wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Sometimes it is hard to
> > describe things which are clear to the people who are comfortable with
> > the procedure to describe it for newcomers - so any hint is welc
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Sometimes it is hard to
> describe things which are clear to the people who are comfortable with
> the procedure to describe it for newcomers - so any hint is welcome.
I understand. I'll think about it...
>
> If you ask me I would
> simply
Hi Andrew,
First of all, I want to mention that I've received a mail from one of
MathJax developers where he was asking me to split the fonts package
out. I will do that, so please don't upload mathjax now. The
discussion is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/12/.
On Mon, Dec
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:29:15 +0100
with message-id <20121218132915.ga30...@earth.ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#695986: RFS: mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #695986,
regarding RFS: mediawiki/1:1.15.5-2squeeze4.1 [NMU] [RC]
to be mark
Hi Erik,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Erik Sjölund wrote:
> I think the documentation
>
> http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html
>
> was not so clear about how to handle a new upstream release. Anyway
> when I also found
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Games/VCS/git#Addin
Hi Paul,
Please copy me on answers, as I'm not subscribed to this list.
I've not sent yet the unblock request as I'm still waiting for an uploader.
A first upload was rejected by RT because it includes many modifications. I
just dropped these modifications in order to keep the most important
I think the documentation
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html
was not so clear about how to handle a new upstream release. Anyway
when I also found
http://wiki.debian.org/Games/VCS/git#Adding_a_new_upstream_release
I came to the conclusion that I needed to run
"git import-ori
17 matches
Mail list logo
