Bug#696385: RFS: astromenace/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities

2012-12-25 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Boris,

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal
 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org

 Hi,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my packages astromenace and 
 astromenace-data.

 Basic information:
   http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace
   http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace-data

 Direct links for download:
   
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/astromenace/astromenace_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc
   
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/astromenace-data/astromenace-data_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc

 Git repos:
   http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/astromenace.git
   http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/astromenace-data.git

IANADD, but here's a list of things that I encountered while testing
out your package.

- Since you use xz compression, please consider adding Pre-Depends:
dpkg (= 1.15.6) to debian/control (i.e. lintian tag
data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends, which I think has been
recently removed). This is more of a pedantic issue than something
strictly necessary, but it does help backporters.
- Another pedantic issue: there are 2 commas in a row in your
build-depends list for astromenace-data (i.e. debhelper (=
9),,fonts-liberation...).
- Dmitry Smirnov is listed as an Uploader for astromenace but not for
astromenace-data; is this intended?
- Please make astromenace depend on astromenace-data, not just
recommends (and have astromenace-data recommends/suggests
astromenace), as is the norm for packages which depend on a separate
-data package.
- astromenace-data FTBFS when built twice in a row:

 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -sa
dpkg-buildpackage: source package astromenace-data
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1.3.1+ds-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Boris Pek tehnic...@mail.ru
 dpkg-source --before-build astromenace-data-1.3.1+ds
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
dpkg-source: info: using options from
astromenace-data-1.3.1+ds/debian/source/options: --compression=xz
--extend-diff-ignore=(^|/)RAW_VFS_DATA/FONT/[^/]+\.ttf$
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean
   dh_testdir
   dh_auto_clean
   debian/rules override_dh_clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/astromenace-data/astromenace-data-1.3.1+ds'
dh_clean gamedata.vfs RAW_VFS_DATA/FONT
rm: cannot remove `RAW_VFS_DATA/FONT': Is a directory
dh_clean: rm -f -- gamedata.vfs RAW_VFS_DATA/FONT returned exit code 1
make[1]: *** [override_dh_clean] Error 25
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/astromenace-data/astromenace-data-1.3.1+ds'
make: *** [clean] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2

Regards,
Vincent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caczd_tddm0o6unoh9vf1upc9fzgxgazaj_zta5bzag0+jwz...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#696385: RFS: astromenace/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities

2012-12-25 Thread Boris Pek
Hi,

 IANADD, but here's a list of things that I encountered while testing
 out your package.

Thanks a lot for a review.

 - Since you use xz compression, please consider adding Pre-Depends:
 dpkg (= 1.15.6) to debian/control (i.e. lintian tag
 data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends, which I think has been
 recently removed).

Yes, I am aware of this lintian note, but I ignore it because:
1) It is useless for new packages.
2) Pre-Depends should be used sparingly, preferably only by packages whose
premature upgrade or installation would hamper the ability of the system
to continue with any upgrade that might be in progress.

You should not specify a Pre-Depends entry for a package before this has
been discussed on the debian-devel mailing list and a consensus about
doing that has been reached. [1]

[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html

 This is more of a pedantic issue than something
 strictly necessary, but it does help backporters.

There is dpkg verison 1.15.8.13 in Debian Squeeze:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/dpkg
Older releases are not supported.

 - Another pedantic issue: there are 2 commas in a row in your
 build-depends list for astromenace-data (i.e. debhelper (=
 9),,fonts-liberation...).

Thanks. I'll fix it ASAP. Hope it will be today, because since tomorrow I
will be on vacation during two weeks.

 - Dmitry Smirnov is listed as an Uploader for astromenace but not for
 astromenace-data; is this intended?

I am not sure that he want to co-maintain it. But he could add or remove
himself from uploaders list at any moment. Dmitry, could you comment this?

 - Please make astromenace depend on astromenace-data, not just
 recommends

This is bad idea because astromenace-data has build dependency from
astromenace and it FTBFS if astromenace depends from it. (Circular
dependencies.) So it should stay as is, at least for a first iteration.

 (and have astromenace-data recommends/suggests
 astromenace), as is the norm for packages which depend on a separate
 -data package.
 - astromenace-data FTBFS when built twice in a row:

Hmm, I missed this. Thanks. Will be fixed.

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3194111356430...@web13d.yandex.ru



Re: lintian warning hardening-no-fortify-functions in dualword project...

2012-12-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:40:54PM +0300, Alexander Busorguin wrote:
 It was caused by calls to Festival functions, for example: void
 festival_tidy_up();
(because -lFestival is static-only)

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#696385: RFS: astromenace/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities

2012-12-25 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:06:54 Boris Pek wrote:
  - Since you use xz compression, please consider adding Pre-Depends:
  dpkg (= 1.15.6) to debian/control (i.e. lintian tag
  data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends, which I think has been
  recently removed).
 
 Yes, I am aware of this lintian note, but I ignore it because:
 1) It is useless for new packages.
 2) Pre-Depends should be used sparingly, preferably only by packages whose
 premature upgrade or installation would hamper the ability of the
 system to continue with any upgrade that might be in progress.
 
 You should not specify a Pre-Depends entry for a package before this
 has been discussed on the debian-devel mailing list and a consensus about
 doing that has been reached. [1]
 
 [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html

Perhaps it was me who ignored this lintian warning first. :)
This warning doesn't make sense for Debain any more.
I completely agree with Boris on this. 


  - Dmitry Smirnov is listed as an Uploader for astromenace but not for
  astromenace-data; is this intended?
 
 I am not sure that he want to co-maintain it. But he could add or remove
 himself from uploaders list at any moment. Dmitry, could you comment this?

Boris picked up the packaging where I left it. In the beginning both packages 
[astromenace,astromenace-data] were generated from single source. It was good 
enough as proof of concept. I was not following on development since Boris 
continued it but I trust Boris and I'm sure he knows what he is doing. :)

As the moment I have other priorities so I can't co-maintain astromenace-data 
yet. I'd probably stay a bit longer as astromenace uploader until I decide 
whenever remove or add myself as uploader of astromenace-data. 

Thanks, Boris.
Thanks Vincent.

Cheers,
Dmitry.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201212252241.42800.only...@member.fsf.org



Bug#696600: Sponsoring sun - schedule tasks at sunrise/set

2012-12-25 Thread Steffen Vogel
Hi Paul's :-)

Im very glad you want to sponsor my package!

Some more thoughts about an appropriate packagename:
I'm currently not clear about the future development of the sun tool.
There are several features which might extend the tool in future
releases:
- add muslimic prayer times: http://www.nabkal.de/namazrech.html
- add calculations for the sun position
- add calculations for sun eclipses

As I'm not willing to change the packagename, once its in the archive, I
think it's important the choose a suitable name which also covers these
new features.

Here are my proposals:

sun - fits calculations related to the planet sun

suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
Determination of the sun position in coordinates is not covered.

ephemeris - fits calculations for positions of arbitrary celestial
objects (sun, moon, planets, stars ..)

Regards,
  Steffen

-- 
Steffen Vogel
Robensstraße 69
52070 Aachen

Mail: p...@steffenvogel.de
Mobil: +49 176 34911387
Web: http://www.steffenvogel.de
Jabber: st...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ: 236033


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Bug#696600: Sponsoring sun - schedule tasks at sunrise/set

2012-12-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 04:02:58PM +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
 As I'm not willing to change the packagename, once its in the archive, I
 think it's important the choose a suitable name which also covers these
 new features.
 
 Here are my proposals:
 
 sun - fits calculations related to the planet sun
 
 suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
 Determination of the sun position in coordinates is not covered.
 
 ephemeris - fits calculations for positions of arbitrary celestial
 objects (sun, moon, planets, stars ..)

I'd say, let's try insisting on the name sun for a bit, for reasons I
mentioned earlier.  It's short and sweet, you have a legitimate stake for
it, and contrary to appearances, the FTPmasters are not evil.

-- 
How to squander your resources: those silly Swedes have a sauce named
hovmästarsås, the best thing ever to put on cheese, yet they waste it
solely on mere salmon.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121225154601.ga13...@angband.pl



Bug#696600: Sponsoring sun - schedule tasks at sunrise/set

2012-12-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:02:58 +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:

 Here are my proposals:
 
 sun - fits calculations related to the planet sun
 
 suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
 Determination of the sun position in coordinates is not covered.

Depends on if you expand cal to calendar or calculation(s) :)
(Maybe suncalc would be clearer for the latter.)
 
Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Pink Floyd: Comfortably Numb


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#696600: Sponsoring sun - schedule tasks at sunrise/set

2012-12-25 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 05:27:28PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
 On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:02:58 +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
 
  Here are my proposals:
  
  sun - fits calculations related to the planet sun
  
  suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
  Determination of the sun position in coordinates is not covered.
 
 Depends on if you expand cal to calendar or calculation(s) :)
 (Maybe suncalc would be clearer for the latter.)

A agree, suncal isn't bad, but what's neat about sun is how the command
invocation flows:

$ sun rise $FOO
$ sun set $FOO

So, my money is on atsun just do to:

$ atsun rise $FOO
$ atsun set $FOO

Or, see if you can barter with the FTP folks to keep `sun'

  
 Cheers,
 gregor
  
 -- 
  .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
  : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
  `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`-   NP: Pink Floyd: Comfortably Numb


-T


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#696600: Sponsoring sun - schedule tasks at sunrise/set

2012-12-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Paul,

you may also sponsor the package if you want to. I am still busy with
kismet :).

Cheers,

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121225164425.ga17...@physik.fu-berlin.de



Bug#696600: Sponsoring sun - schedule tasks at sunrise/set

2012-12-25 Thread Steffen Vogel
Am Dienstag, den 25.12.2012, 11:35 -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
 Or, see if you can barter with the FTP folks to keep `sun'

Jup, I agree. I think, we should just try to get 'sun' into the
archives. It's still worth the try, than continue discussing... ;-)

If the name gets rejected, we could even choose between:
- suncal
- atsun
- suncalc

  suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
  Determination of the sun position in coordinates is not covered. 
  Depends on if you expand cal to calendar or calculation(s) :)
  (Maybe suncalc would be clearer for the latter.)
 A agree, suncal isn't bad, but what's neat about sun is how the
command
 invocation flows:
 
I would prefer 'suncalc'. Just to keep more options open.

Regards,
  Steffen
-- 
Steffen Vogel
Robensstraße 69
52070 Aachen

Mail: p...@steffenvogel.de
Mobil: +49 176 34911387
Web: http://www.steffenvogel.de
Jabber: st...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ: 236033


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#696385: RFS: astromenace/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities

2012-12-25 Thread Boris Pek
Hi,

 - Another pedantic issue: there are 2 commas in a row in your
 build-depends list for astromenace-data (i.e. debhelper (=
 9),,fonts-liberation...).

Fixed.

 have astromenace-data recommends/suggests astromenace

Done.

 - astromenace-data FTBFS when built twice in a row:

Fixed.

Thanks again for review.

Direct links for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/astromenace/astromenace_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/astromenace-data/astromenace-data_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3777631356473...@web12g.yandex.ru



Re: Interested in adopting the premake package

2012-12-25 Thread Cameron Hart
On 25 December 2012 17:06, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote:

 First of all, thanks for volunteering to package and maintain
 premake4! One of my packages (0ad) actually uses an embedded copy of
 premake, which I would like to switch to using a system version if
 possible, but of course premake4 isn't yet available in Debian...

You're welcome, I think it might get used a bit more with an up to
date version. Hopefully we can get some of your patches applied.

 Wow, premake4 itself embeds a copy of lua.

This is probably more for the benefit of Windows and Mac, The current
Premake Debian package links against the installed version of Lua
rather than building the embedded version.

 I would also suggest to upload premake 4 as source premake4 and binary
 premake4, probably before wheezy is released. The premake
 source/binary packages can be removed after the release or later if
 needed.

This sounds like the easiest way to proceed to me. Should I open a new
ITP bug for Premake4 or rename the current Premake ITA bug? Should I
make any changes to the existing Premake, there are a few bugs logged
against it although most should be addressed by creating a Premake4
source. Also should I base a Premake4 source off of the Premake source
package (e.g. keep the Debian changelog etc.) or start afresh.

Feels like I'm getting close to actually making the package now :)

 nyquist and ode embed premake4.exe (WTF?) and have a premake4.lua

It looks like a few packages are using premake for generating their
Windows build configurations but not necessarily other platforms.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caekwfc7hkucayqo2m9l6gtae50adazm+ouucbybssy6ty5t...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Interested in adopting the premake package

2012-12-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Cameron Hart wrote:

 This is probably more for the benefit of Windows and Mac, The current
 Premake Debian package links against the installed version of Lua
 rather than building the embedded version.

Ick. Its a bit sad that folks have to reinvent packages and
repositories poorly for the sake of those platforms.

 This sounds like the easiest way to proceed to me. Should I open a new
 ITP bug for Premake4 or rename the current Premake ITA bug? Should I
 make any changes to the existing Premake, there are a few bugs logged
 against it although most should be addressed by creating a Premake4
 source. Also should I base a Premake4 source off of the Premake source
 package (e.g. keep the Debian changelog etc.) or start afresh.

If you want to maintain both premake 3 and premake4 for a period of
time then file a new ITP.

If you want to maintain just premake4 then retitle the ITA to ITP: premake4...

Personally I would just leave premake orphaned and remove it after the
wheezy release, so option 2.

Personally I would base premake4 off the premake source package. Just
rename stuff as needed.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6gypo5kpef0vdur2bo6zpvgedtf3fj-0epc3hasqge...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#696388: marked as done (RFS: kde-style-qtcurve/1.8.14-2)

2012-12-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2012 04:20:28 +
with message-id e1tnitk-00018z...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: kde-style-qtcurve/1.8.14-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #696388,
regarding RFS: kde-style-qtcurve/1.8.14-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
696388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Fathi Boudra f...@debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package kde-style-qtcurve. I have tried
to contact with previous sponsor 3 times, but there are no replies still.
(Last email I sent on 30 October 2012)

Basic information:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-style-qtcurve

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-qtcurve/kde-style-qtcurve_1.8.14-2.dsc

Git repo:
  https://github.com/tehnick/kde-style-qtcurve-debian

Changes in the package:

kde-style-qtcurve (1.8.14-2) experimental; urgency=low

  * Rename package qtcurve-i18n to qtcurve-l10n.
New package provides virtual package qtcurve-i18n for smooth transition.
  * Fix get-orig-source section in according with Debian Policy §4.9.
  * Remove obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Also it would nice if someone could update my DMUA flags for packages
kde-style-qtcurve and gtk2-engines-qtcurve in according with new
procedure:
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html

Best regards,
Boris

-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/BorisPek
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package kde-style-qtcurve version 1.8.14-2 is in NEW now,
and the package at mentors is not newer (2012-10-24) than the package in NEW 
(2012-10-24),
so there is currently no package to sponsor.

http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/kde-style-qtcurve_1.8.14-2.html
http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-style-qtcurve

Please remove the package from mentors or mark it needs sponsor = no.
If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW,
then you can upload an updated package to mentors
and feel free to reopen this RFS 696388 or open a new RFS.---End Message---


Bug#670176: marked as done (RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1~experimental.1 [ITA])

2012-12-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2012 06:40:37 +
with message-id 20121226064037.ga32...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1~experimental.1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #670176,
regarding RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1~experimental.1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
670176: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670176
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package kismet

 * Package name: kismet
 Version : 2011.03.R2-1
 Upstream Author : Mike Kershaw drag...@kismetwireless.net
 * URL : http://www.kismetwireless.net/download.shtml
 * License : GPL/BSD/permissive
 Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

  kismet - Wireless sniffing and monitoring - core
 kismet-plugins - Wireless sniffing and monitoring - plugins

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/kismet


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kismet/kismet_2011.03.R2-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.


Changes since the last upload:

* New upstream release (Closes: #534884, #558773, #572593, LP: #407972)

* New maintainer
* Updated build dependencies in control file (Closes: #618940)
* The source package is split in two packages
  + Details documented in README.Debian (Closes: #416106)
  + Updated descriptions in control (Closes: #455213, LP: #70015)
* Kismet no longer uses /var/{log,lib} folders. Removed mentions in postrm,
  kismet.dirs
* Kismet allows for suid/priv dropping configured via debconf
  + Available debconf options are speciified in the templates file
  + postrm creates the kismet user group if necessary and postrm removes it
   on package purge
* Replaced su-to-root with gksudo in kismet.menu and kismet.desktop
* Patches
  + Removed gcc-4.3 and wsp100_support patches since they are included
upstream.
  + 80_fix_gpsmap_bashism: Fixes a bashism in multi-gpsmap example
(Closes: #530111)
* Removed unnecessary link /etc/others-menu/_kismet.desktop
  (Closes: #563264)
* Converted package to CDBS
  + Simplificaton of rules file
  + Specified debhelper version 7 in compat file
  + Added 3.0 (quilt) in source/format
* Added full support for po-debconf
  + config and templates files
  + po/POTFILES.in translation templates
  + biuld dependency to po-debconf
* Added RELEASENOTES.txt in docs
* Updated the watch file
  + URL can now include versions after 2009
  + Mangling in order to use dots instead of dashes in the version
* Copyright file
  + Updated in dep5 format
  + Extended packaging copyright
  + Extended source copyright
* Package maintenance
  - Bumped standars version to 3.9.2 in control
  - Added project homepage in control file


Regards,
 Nick Andrik


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

I see that kismet 2011.03.R2-1 is in NEW now :
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/kismet_2011.03.R2-1.html

I'm closing this bug now since there is currently no package to sponsor.

Please remove kismet 2011.03.R2-1~experimental.1 from mentors.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/kismet

Regards,

Bart Martens---End Message---