Bug#724807: RFS: yt/2013.09.28-1 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Javier P.L.
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal whislist I am looking for a sponsor for my package yt * Package name: yt Version : 2013.09.28-1 Upstream Author : Rich Wareham rj...@cantab.net * URL : https://github.com/rjw57/yt * License : MIT Section

Bug#724757: RFS: dxsamples/4.2.0-2 [ITA] -- Sample programs for the OpenDX Data Explorer

2013-09-28 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: owner -1 ! On 27-09-13 17:09, Graham Inggs wrote: * Package name: dxsamples Version : 4.2.0-2 Could you please tag bug 412811 (new upstream version) as wont-fix if you still believe it is not fixable (please check). And could you please at least comment on bug 173709

Bug#721080: RFS: vpcs/0.5b0-1 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Juhani Numminen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:52:38 +0100 Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk kirjoitti: I managed to my own question in the end regarding DESTDIR, thanks to the following post on the list http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/03/msg00127.html

Bug#721839: RFS: musl/0.9.13-2 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Kevin, I uploaded it. Please, consider migrating VCS on alioth. Thanks for work. Cheers, Anton 2013/9/28 Kevin Bortis p...@bortis.ch: I have packed the newest upstream version 0.9.14 It builds those binary packages: musl - standard C library musl-dev - standard C library

Re: Bug#724757: RFS: dxsamples/4.2.0-2 [ITA] -- Sample programs for the OpenDX Data Explorer

2013-09-28 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Paul Could you please tag bug 412811 (new upstream version) as wont-fix if you still believe it is not fixable (please check). I did check on this with the previous maintainer and I intend to get the opinion of debian-legal on how to proceed. It may be possible to simply remove the

Bug#724807: RFS: yt/2013.09.28-1 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Tobias Frost
Hallo Rich, A short review: (I am not a DD/DM, so I cannot upload.) I think yt as a package name is too short and well can cause collisions down the road, please consider renaming it (and the executeable) How about youtube-cli? Your package has linitian warnings, please fix them. You should

Bug#715023: RFS: bitz-server/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Uditha Atukorala
Hi mentors, I have uploaded a new version of my package bitz-server and looking for a sponsor. * Package name: bitz-server Version : 0.1.6-1 Upstream Author : Uditha Atukorala * URL : https://github.com/uditha-atukorala/bitz-server * License : GPLv3+ Section

Improving RFS Visibility

2013-09-28 Thread Dave Steele
To test the theory that RFS activity may be limited more by accessibility than interest, I've made a sortable RFS table[1] showing RFS age, last comment age, number of comments, and a guess as to whether the RFS is waiting for reviewers or not. That should make it easier to identify requests most

Bug#724807: RFS: yt/2013.09.28-1 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Javier P.L.
Hi Tobias, Thanks for your feedback, I've rename it yt to youtube-cli, hopefully it will help to avoid collisions in the future. Most lintian warnings are gone now (except the one refering to a missing watch file, which I find hard to implement right now, a -get-orig-source- target has been

Re: Package review for autolatex

2013-09-28 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:42:28 +0200 Stéphane GALLAND gall...@arakhne.org wrote: I written a set of packages for the AutoLaTeX building tool (http://www.arakhne.org/autolatex/). The packages are written and tested on Ubuntu. They are available from

Re: Bug#724807: RFS: yt/2013.09.28-1 [ITP]

2013-09-28 Thread Dominik George
Dear mentors, I have worked closely together with Javier on fixing issues with his youtube-cli (formerly yt) package. It appears to be of good quality now, and I found Javier to be a good teamplayer and accepting and reacting to criticism really well, so I'd consider him fit for maintainership of