Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

Fixed all the bugs. Please check the package and suggest any changes. https://mentors.debian.net/package/php-mf2 Regards, Bhuvan On Sunday 06 September 2015 03:28 AM, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > Thanks a lot for reviewing the package I will do the necessary changes > as

Re: watch file mangling help

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > > * Pau Garcia i Quiles , 2015-10-17, 12:19: > >> Why are you keeping the old versioning scheme if upstream has changed > >> to a different scheme? > > Jakub's simple fix works, and I have asked

Re: watch file mangling help

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: Upstream have changed one of my package's versioning on the tarball (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/abcmidi.git). The last uploaded version was 20150908 and now there is an upstream tarball with the

Bug#801838: RFS: node-es5-shim/4.1.14+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Hi, Built, thanks for your contribution to Debian! Il Giovedì 15 Ottobre 2015 21:51, Julien Puydt ha scritto: Hi, Le jeudi 15 oct. 2015 à 08:16:24 (+), Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > as said on irc:

watch file mangling help

Hi, Upstream have changed one of my package's versioning on the tarball (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/abcmidi.git). The last uploaded version was 20150908 and now there is an upstream tarball with the version "2015.10.08". The watch file was simple: version=3

Re: watch file mangling help

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Upstream have changed one of my package's versioning on the tarball > (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/abcmidi.git). > > The last uploaded version was 20150908 and now there is an upstream > tarball with

Bug#787861: marked as done (RFS: polyml/5.5.2-1 [NMU] - interpreter and interactive compiler for Standard ML)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 07:29:22 + (UTC) with message-id <855022376.2505729.1445066962197.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml has caused the Debian Bug report #787861, regarding RFS: polyml/5.5.2-1 [NMU] - interpreter and interactive

Re: watch file mangling help

On 10/17/2015 12:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: [...] >>> The last uploaded version was 20150908 and now there is an upstream >>> tarball with the version "2015.10.08". >>> >>> The watch file was simple: >>> version=3 >>>

Bug#801650: marked as done (RFS: edgar/1.21-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:55:20 + (UTC) with message-id <312293000.2629859.1445082920900.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#801650: RFS: edgar/1.21-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #801650, regarding RFS: edgar/1.21-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This

Bug#802003: RFS: node-simple-is/0.2.0+20130421-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, same here, the debian/test/control is broken cheers, G. Il Venerdì 16 Ottobre 2015 21:27, Julien Puydt ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my

Bug#801838: marked as done (RFS: node-es5-shim/4.1.14-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:24:20 + (UTC) with message-id <1603848178.2658104.1445088260833.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #801838, regarding RFS: node-es5-shim/4.1.14-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#802001: marked as done (RFS: node-simple-fmt/0.1.0+20130419-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:37:30 + (UTC) with message-id <1947866693.2666389.1445089050693.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#802001: RFS: node-simple-fmt/0.1.0+20130419-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #802001, regarding RFS:

Bug#802003: marked as done (RFS: node-simple-is/0.2.0+20130421-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:38:01 + (UTC) with message-id <448144154.2685599.1445089081381.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#802003: RFS: node-simple-is/0.2.0+20130421-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #802003, regarding RFS:

Re: [jitsi-dev] Jitsi in Debian

+debian-mentors for more comments/help Hi, thanks a lot for the information and pointers! The documentation on why you're bundling various source packages is very useful. I see you also have a similar setup in https://github.com/jitsi/libjitsi/tree/master/resources/install/debian I've played

Bug#802000: marked as done (RFS: node-regenerate/1.2.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:18:48 + (UTC) with message-id <724506699.2610415.1445084328764.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#802000: RFS: node-regenerate/1.2.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #802000, regarding RFS: node-regenerate/1.2.1-1 [ITP] to be

Bug#801972: marked as done (RFS: node-es6-shim/0.33.6-1 [ITP] -- ECMAScript 6 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:16:25 + (UTC) with message-id <1911777905.2618635.1445084185137.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#801972: RFS: node-es6-shim/0.33.6-1 [ITP] -- ECMAScript 6 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines has caused the Debian Bug

Bug#801999: marked as done (RFS: node-jsesc/0.5.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:18:28 + (UTC) with message-id <1548993891.2629952.1445084308492.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#801999: RFS: node-jsesc/0.5.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #801999, regarding RFS: node-jsesc/0.5.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as

Bug#802001: RFS: node-simple-fmt/0.1.0+20130419-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, the debian/tests/control is broken (bad copy paste) (also the extended description is a little bit too short) cheers, G. Il Venerdì 16 Ottobre 2015 21:15, Julien Puydt ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests

Bug#802004: marked as done (RFS: node-stringmap/0.2.2+20130926-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:48:41 + (UTC) with message-id <1544620665.2627575.1445086121282.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#802004: RFS: node-stringmap/0.2.2+20130926-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #802004, regarding RFS:

Bug#802006: marked as done (RFS: node-stringset/0.2.1+20130926-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:48:15 + (UTC) with message-id <629136726.2672304.1445086096000.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#802006: RFS: node-stringset/0.2.1+20130926-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #802006, regarding RFS:

Bug#797766: marked as done (RFS: pac/4.5.5.5 [ITP] -- friendly greeter)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 13:25:07 + (UTC) with message-id <1600414406.2666049.1445088307544.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #797766, regarding RFS: pac/4.5.5.5 [ITP] -- friendly greeter to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#802140: RFS: django-jinja/1.4.1-2 -- Jinja2 templating integrated in Django

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-jinja" * Package name: django-jinja Version : 1.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Andrey Antukh * URL : https://github.com/niwibe/django-jinja *

Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, > I sponsored the package Thank you again for all your help. > (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is > nice to be subscribed) I have subscribed to debian-science as well. > However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing

Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >> all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script >> requires gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have >> added those as dependencies for polyml. > >

Bug#787861: review: polyml

it is fine, the first upload is always tricky, after things are easier :) cheers, G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"James Clarke" Date:Sat, 17 Oct, 2015 at 17:33 Subject:Bug#787861: review: polyml Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated

Re: [jitsi-dev] Jitsi in Debian

Hi, thank you for your time. On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > +debian-mentors for more comments/help > > Hi, thanks a lot for the information and pointers! The documentation on why > you're bundling various source packages is very useful. I see you also