Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

2016-04-05 Thread Sérgio Benjamim
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hey dear mentors! I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "libretro-genesisplusgx" Genesis Plus GX is a Sega 8/16-bit emulator focused on accuracy and portability. The source code, originally based on Genesis Plus 1.3 by Charles MacDonald, has

Bug#820164: RFS: libretro-mupen64plus/2.0+git20160207+dfsg.1 [ITP]

2016-04-05 Thread Sérgio Benjamim
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hey dear mentors! I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "libretro-mupen64plus" This is the libretro port of Mupen64Plus, the Nintendo 64 emulator. It's a fork of the original project to fit better with the libretro API, so it's not possible to

Re: Obsolete NEWS -- delete or append?

2016-04-05 Thread Ben Finney
Sean Whitton writes: > The upstream of a package I maintain, propellor, recently released > version 3.0.0. Upgrading one's configuration to 3.0.0 from a version > older than 2.17.2 (the version immediately prior to 3.0.0) required an > additional step to avoid a problem, so I created a debian/NEW

Obsolete NEWS -- delete or append?

2016-04-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, The upstream of a package I maintain, propellor, recently released version 3.0.0. Upgrading one's configuration to 3.0.0 from a version older than 2.17.2 (the version immediately prior to 3.0.0) required an additional step to avoid a problem, so I created a debian/NEWS file explaining the

Bug#820029: RFS: grip/4.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-04-05 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Hi Mattia, As the new version of "python-responses" has hit unstable, the test were enabled with the following patch: http://paste.debian.net/424537/ The "--ignore=tests/test_cli.py" argument was added because this file consists of functional tests (DEP-8) that should not run on build time. The

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

2016-04-05 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, On 05/04/16 16:28, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote: > Ok, nearly there... thanks for the help, still struggling on one > thing, here is the term log but basically the deb sig doesn't match > the other two and i'm not sure why. i even tried replacing it: > > [10:18:21 main]$ debsigs -si

Bug#816396: RFS: vizigrep/1.3-1 ITP

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo hi, lets review: please use the new dh call sequencer (rules) std-version is 3.9.7 no need probably to force python as runtime dependency having a setup.py might be better check-all-the-things $ find -type f -iname '*.desktop' -exec desktop-file-val

Re: Bug#800406: RFS sayonara/0.8.2

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, lets review: (thanks Ross for the nice feedback, I'm adding something more on top of your work) no orig tarball, please upload to mentors or push tags please run wrap-and-sort std version is 3.9.7 libqt5core5a, libqt5dbus5, libqt5network5, libqt

Bug#807432: RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.1-1 [ITP]

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, lets review check-all-the-things: $ codespell --quiet-level=3 $ pyflakes . $ pyflakes3 . $ pep8 --ignore W191 . one license seems missing ./.run_with_env.cmd::: License: CC0 1.0 Universal: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ p

Bug#816192: RFS: python-proselint/0.3.5-1 [ITP] -- A prose linter

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, do you plan to fix the stuff already reviewed, also please fix lintian http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/python-proselint/0.3.5-1/lintian X: python3-proselint: library-package-name-for-application usr/bin/proselint I think p

Bug#820122: marked as done (RFS: nd/0.8.2-8)

2016-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:27:10 + (UTC) with message-id <1757904485.5603978.1459884430517.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820122: RFS: nd/0.8.2-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #820122, regarding RFS: nd/0.8.2-8 to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#819850: RFS: passwordsafe/0.98.1+dfsg-2

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
sponsored thanks! g. Il Martedì 5 Aprile 2016 21:06, Bill Blough ha scritto: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:17:18PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Bill, unfortunately your package fails to build from source with > -Wl,--as-needed flags > (the default e.g. in Ubuntu). > > the attached

Bug#819850: RFS: passwordsafe/0.98.1+dfsg-2

2016-04-05 Thread Bill Blough
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:17:18PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Bill, unfortunately your package fails to build from source with > -Wl,--as-needed flags > (the default e.g. in Ubuntu). > > the attached patch fixes the issue, please let me know if I can upload it on > Debian (of cours

Bug#820143: marked as done (RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.5.2-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change)

2016-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:35:58 + (UTC) with message-id <1851724204.5508914.1459881358442.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820143: RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.5.2-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change has caused the Debian Bug report

Bug#820143: RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.5.2-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change

2016-04-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for an update to aggressive-indent-mode. * Package name: aggressive-indent-mode Version : 1.5.2-1 Upstream Author : Artur Malabarba * URL : https://github.com/Malabarba/aggressive

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, I like changes now, and also lintian/piuparts seems happy http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1/buildlog so, please remove the moreinfo tag once you have a feedback from -boot team

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

2016-04-05 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Fixed @ same URL. Lots of beginner mistakes, plus carelessness wrt to Standards Version :-$ Whoops! Thank you for your patience. On 5 April 2016 at 13:07, Gianfranco Costamagna > BTW I'm not sure about the udeb package rename, there is no upgrade path > there, maybe you can get in touch with >

Bug#820123: marked as done (RFS: dhcpcd5/6.10.1-1 [RC] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support)

2016-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:19:52 + (UTC) with message-id <1719941716.5402079.1459876792462.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820123: RFS: dhcpcd5/6.10.1-1 [RC] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support has caused the Debian Bug report #820123, reg

Bug#820123: RFS: dhcpcd5/6.10.1-1 [RC] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support

2016-04-05 Thread Junior Santos
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package “dhcpcd5" * Package name : dhcpcd5 Version : 6.10.1-1 Upstream Author : Roy Marples * URL : http://roy.ma

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
something more: +Replaces: btrfs-tools-dbg (<< 4.4.1-1) +Breaks: btrfs-tools (<< 4.4.1-1) you missed a -dbg here +Package: btrfs-tools-dbg +Section: debug +Priority: extra +Architecture: linux-any +Depends: btrfs-progs-dbg, btrfs-progs (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends} +Description: trans

Bug#820122: RFS: nd/0.8.2-8

2016-04-05 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor of my source package "nd": Package name: nd Version : 0.8.2-8 Upstream Author : Yuuichi Teranishi URL : http://www.gohome.org/nd/ License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0 or LGP

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi >I've addressed what you asked for, except for "[dropping] the dbg >package, they are autobuilt now (you need to use the ddbg migration I >think)", because I'm not sure if how that will affect a backport to >Jessie. Jessie+backported LTS kernel+matching btrfs-progs is my >primary target and w

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]

2016-04-05 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On 4 April 2016 at 09:20, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I did a preliminary review on pkg-multimedia mail list [1] (where Nicholas > applied for the team join) > > > please address the issues I raised, and remove the moreinfo tag once done, > and I'll do another spin. > > > [1] > https://lists

Bug#819850: RFS: passwordsafe/0.98.1+dfsg-2

2016-04-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Bill, unfortunately your package fails to build from source with -Wl,--as-needed flags (the default e.g. in Ubuntu). the attached patch fixes the issue, please let me know if I can upload it on Debian (of course after changing the revision) --- passwordsafe-0.98.1+dfsg.orig/src/test/Makefile

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

2016-04-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote: > Ok, nearly there... thanks for the help, still struggling on one thing, here > is the term log but basically the deb sig doesn't match the other two and > i'm not sure why. i even tried replacing it: > > [10:18:21 main]$ debsi

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home

2016-04-05 Thread Herbert Elwood Gilliland III
Ok, nearly there... thanks for the help, still struggling on one thing, here is the term log but basically the deb sig doesn't match the other two and i'm not sure why. i even tried replacing it: [10:18:21 main]$ debsigs -sign=origin -default-key="Herb Gilliland (fed author) " fed_0.94a-1_i386.de

Bug#814064: marked as done (RFS: eoconv/1.4-1 ITP)

2016-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:38:14 + (UTC) with message-id <1000913744.4827622.1459849094725.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#814064: [RFS] eoconv -- convert text files between various Esperanto encodings has caused the Debian Bug report #814064, regarding RFS: