date:20160506

Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2016 05:43:38 +0200
with message-id <20160507034338.ga28...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#823650: RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.1.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #823650,
regarding RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823650
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 822667 by -1

Dear mentors,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gcc-6-doc. (ITP: #822667)

* Package name: gcc-6-doc
  Version : 6.1.0-1
  Upstream Author : FSF
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GFDL-1.3+, with invariant sections
  Programming Lang: Texinfo
  Description : documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++)

This package contains manual pages and documentation in info, html,
and pdf format, for the GNU compilers.

This documentation is licensed under the terms of the GNU Free
Documentation License, and contains invariant sections, so it can't be
part of Debian main.

(See gcc-5-doc as an example.)

  It builds those binary packages:

 cpp-6-doc  - documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
 gcc-6-doc  - documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++)
 gccgo-6-doc - documentation for the GNU Go compiler (gccgo)
 gcj-6-doc  - documentation for the GNU Java tools (gcj, gij)
 gfortran-6-doc - documentation for the GNU Fortran Compiler (gfortran)
 gnat-6-doc - documentation for the GNU Ada Compiler (gnat)

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-6-doc


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/gcc-6-doc/gcc-6-doc_6.1.0-1.dsc


Thanks,
Yixuan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:03:27PM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gcc-6-doc. (ITP: #822667)

I so needed this!  Thanks!
Uploaded, should hit NEW soon.

-- 
A tit a day keeps the vet away.--- End Message ---

Bug#823650: RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-05-06 Thread 郭溢譞

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 822667 by -1

Dear mentors,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gcc-6-doc. (ITP: #822667)

* Package name: gcc-6-doc
  Version : 6.1.0-1
  Upstream Author : FSF
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GFDL-1.3+, with invariant sections
  Programming Lang: Texinfo
  Description : documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++)

This package contains manual pages and documentation in info, html,
and pdf format, for the GNU compilers.

This documentation is licensed under the terms of the GNU Free
Documentation License, and contains invariant sections, so it can't be
part of Debian main.

(See gcc-5-doc as an example.)

  It builds those binary packages:

 cpp-6-doc  - documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
 gcc-6-doc  - documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++)
 gccgo-6-doc - documentation for the GNU Go compiler (gccgo)
 gcj-6-doc  - documentation for the GNU Java tools (gcj, gij)
 gfortran-6-doc - documentation for the GNU Fortran Compiler (gfortran)
 gnat-6-doc - documentation for the GNU Ada Compiler (gnat)

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-6-doc


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/gcc-6-doc/gcc-6-doc_6.1.0-1.dsc


Thanks,
Yixuan

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

2016-05-06 Thread lumin

Hi,

I've split the caffe-cpu package and the caffe-cuda package,
and I'd like to first handle the cpu version, leaving the CUDA
version pending at debian/science/caffe-contrib.
The updated cpu version has been uploaded to mentors:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe

This update involves fix on multiarch, removal of caffe-cuda,
and removal of libproto.a .

However I found that hardening-no-fortify-functions is still
unsolved, and the upstream CMakeFiles.txt seems not to be
the trouble maker, as it contains this line
```
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -fPIC -Wall")
```
and I really see the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 option added in the
verbose gcc command line.

On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 08:03 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> >set(CFLAGS ...) which should be replaced by set(CFLAGS $(CFLAGS) ...)
> >
> >An upstream classic unfortunately.
> 
> 
> as upstream I did this once, and the side effect was something weird.
> 
> when you run multiple times cmake .. the cflags gets appended multiple times, 
> so you might
> end up in a really weird CMakeCache.txt and with really long build lines.
> 
> I'm not sure which way is the best one, but cmake should provide something 
> different from CFLAGS.
> 
> e.g.
> CMAKE_C_FLAGS
> CMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE
> CMAKE_C_FLAGS_DEBUG
> CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS
> CMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS
> 
> and so on.
> that way they will be appended to current CFLAGS without having to override 
> them manually.
> 
> (thanks again for your nice reviews!)
> 
> g.

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Adam,



>What's the problem?


none, you are right!
I read again your previous mail, and yes, there is no conflict assuming we use 
GPL2 only.

I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to tell 
ftpmasters
where to look in the mail list for the license change.

Anyway, Fernando, please tell me when you want a new check :)

cheers,

G.

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

Hi Balint, so I presume you want to set yourself as owner of this bug, right?


thanks for your work!

Gianfranco


Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 23:40, Balint Reczey  ha 
scritto:
Control: reopen -1

Luckily the upload got rejected, thus I did not interfere with the RFS
process.

Cheers,
Balint

On Fri, 6 May 2016 23:28:46 +0200 Balint Reczey 
wrote:
> Hi Giulio and All,
> 
> I'm sorry, but I have uploaded the package after a review but before
> I checked this RFS bug's progress. I have not received the follow-up
> emails.
> 
> The version uploaded is latest master at:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/irstlm.git
> 
> 56c3947 (HEAD, origin/master, master) Updated changelog.
> 
> I hope it won't cause too much inconvenience to import 6.00.05-2
> to Debian Science instead of this version.
> 
> Thanks,
> Balint

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

2016-05-06 Thread Balint Reczey

Control: reopen -1

Luckily the upload got rejected, thus I did not interfere with the RFS
process.

Cheers,
Balint

On Fri, 6 May 2016 23:28:46 +0200 Balint Reczey 
wrote:
> Hi Giulio and All,
> 
> I'm sorry, but I have uploaded the package after a review but before
> I checked this RFS bug's progress. I have not received the follow-up
> emails.
> 
> The version uploaded is latest master at:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/irstlm.git
> 
> 56c3947 (HEAD, origin/master, master) Updated changelog.
> 
> I hope it won't cause too much inconvenience to import 6.00.05-2
> to Debian Science instead of this version.
> 
> Thanks,
> Balint

Bug#823521: marked as done (RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 23:28:46 +0200
with message-id <572d0c8e.5000...@balintreczey.hu>
and subject line Re: Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language 
Modeling Toolkit
has caused the Debian Bug report #823521,
regarding RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823521: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823521
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: rbal...@debian.org

Dear Balint,

I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "irstlm"

 * Package name: irstlm
   Version : 6.00.05-1
   Upstream Author : Marcello Federico 
 * URL : https://github.com/irstlm-team/irstlm/
 * License : LGPL-2.1
   Programming Lang: C++, Perl, Bash
   Description : IRST Language Modeling Toolkit
   Section : misc

This package includes latest upstream releases and several package updates.

You can found the sources for the package and additional information at:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/irstlm.git/

A review of the package is more than welcome.

Regards,
   Giulio Paci
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Giulio and All,

I'm sorry, but I have uploaded the package after a review but before
I checked this RFS bug's progress. I have not received the follow-up
emails.

The version uploaded is latest master at:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/irstlm.git

56c3947 (HEAD, origin/master, master) Updated changelog.

I hope it won't cause too much inconvenience to import 6.00.05-2
to Debian Science instead of this version.

Thanks,
Balint

On Fri, 6 May 2016 13:08:06 +0200 Giulio Paci  wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 10:52, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > On 06/05/16 09:30, Giulio Paci wrote:
> >> Il 06/mag/2016 08:36, "Ghislain Vaillant"  >> > ha scritto:
> >>  > You just need to join the team
> >>  > on alioth, which will grant you access to the team's git repositories.
> >>
> >> If I remember correctly I am already part of the team, although I never
> >> contributed to package maintainance.
> >> The wiki page of the team also report me as a team member.
> > 
> > Good.
> > 
> >>  > Then, you can move the packaging repository over, change the
> >> Maintainer field to "Debian Science Maintainers  >>  > maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> >> >" and move yourself to the
> >>  > Uploaders field.
> >>
> >>  >> Regarding the tasks, I think "linguistics" is fine. In addition,
> >> what about "machine learning" and/or "statistics"?
> >>  >>
> >>  >> How can I add them to the tasks? I have found this repository
> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/blends/projects/science.git but no clear
> >> instructions.
> > 
> > You are supposed to checkout the repository with:
> > 
> >   git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/science.git
> > 
> > Edit the relevant task files, commit and push. The sentinels will
> > be refreshed accordingly on the next job.
> >
> >>  > This process is actually independent of having the package maintained
> >>  > under the DST or not. However, you need to join the team to be able to
> >>  > modify the task files.
> >>
> >> Are the task files the only files that needs to be changed? Am I
> >> expected to make the changes directly on the repository?
> > 
> > Indeed.
> 
> I have not enough permissions to push to that repository.
> So I pushed some changes to linguistics task here: 
> https://github.com/giuliopaci/science_blends.git
> 
> Can you review and import those changes into 
> git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/science.git ?
> 
> >>  > I can add the package to linguistics, machine
> >>  > learning and statistics.
> >>
> >> What I meant with my question is: are those two tasks right for this
> >> package? They are surely strongly related, probably more than
> >> linguistics, but, I do not know if the intended users of these tasks may
> >> expect to find this package on their system. Are there a description of
> >> the tasks which includes some use case description (or use case
> >> description that includes tasks suggestion)? If not, probably it would
> >> be nice to have some use case description somewhere that my help users
> >> to better understand if the task is useful for them or not and may
> >> further help us in deciding if a package is suitable for a given task.
> > --- End Message ---

Bug#823562: marked as done (RFS: zenburn-emacs/2.4-1 [ITP] -- low contrast color theme for Emacs)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 22:29:39 +0200
with message-id <20160506202939.GA30789@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#823562: RFS: zenburn-emacs/2.4-1 [ITP] -- low contrast 
color theme for Emacs
has caused the Debian Bug report #823562,
regarding RFS: zenburn-emacs/2.4-1 [ITP] -- low contrast color theme for Emacs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
823562: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823562
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package zenburn-emacs.

Zenburn for Emacs is a popular, low-contrast, easy-on-the-eyes theme I
and many others have been using for years.  I intend to maintain this as
part of the pkg-emacsen team.

* Package name: zenburn-emacs
  Version : 2.4-1
  Upstream Author : Bozhidar Batsov
* URL : http://github.com/bbatsov/zenburn-emacs
* License : GPL-3+
  Section : lisp

Download with dget:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zenburn-emacs/zenburn-emacs_2.4-1.dsc

Or build it with gbp:

gbp clone --pristine-tar 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/zenburn-emacs.git
cd zenburn-emacs
gbp buildpackage

Thanks.

-- 
Sean Whitton

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-05-06 at 20:27 (CEST), Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package zenburn-emacs.

Uploaded. Thanks.

-- 
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#823470: marked as done (RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 19:38:57 +0200
with message-id <572cd6b1.8050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme 
to Phoneme conversion tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #823470,
regarding RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion 
tool
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
823470: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear all,

I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "sequitur-g2p"

 * Package name: sequitur-g2p
   Version : 0.0.r1668.r3-1
   Upstream Author : Maximilian Bisani 
 * URL : 
http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html
 * License : GPL-2
   Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

   sequitur-g2p - Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

You can download the package with git using this command:

   git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git

More information about sequitur-g2p can be obtained from 
http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html.

A package review is very welcome as well.

Regards,
 Giulio
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-05-06 01:27, Giulio Paci wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 19:07, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> In this particular case, I'd actually suggest that you stick to your
>> previous approach, and just modify it slightly:
>>
>>g2p-r1668.tar.gz => 0+r1668
>> g2p-r1668-r3.tar.gz => 0+r1668.r3 (or even just keep -r3!)
> 
> I decided to follow the suggestion from 
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/first.en.html#idp39551808 :
> 
> "You should choose the upstream version to consist only of alphanumerics 
> (0-9A-Za-z), plus (+), tildes (~), and periods (.). It must start with a 
> digit (0-9)."

And rightly so. My comment was phrased poorly -- what I meant to say was
that keeping it verbatim would technically have been legal, according to
Policy § 5.6.12. It's certainly less confusing when one avoids hyphens,
though.

Anyhoo, I just uploaded it :-)

Regards,
Christian

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#822990: RFS: hashcat/2.00-1 [ITP]

2016-05-06 Thread Daniel Echeverry

Hi Mentors!

2016-04-29 12:57 GMT-05:00 Daniel Echeverry :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hashcat"
>
> * Package name: hashcat
> * Version : 2.00-1
> * Upstream Author : Jens Steube 
> * URL : http://hashcat.net/hashcat/
> * License : Expat
> *  Section : net
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
>  hashcat- Advanced CPU-based password recovery utility
>  hashcat-data - Data files for hashcat Advanced CPU-based password
> recovery utili
>
>   To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/hashcat
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hashcat/hashcat_2.00-1.dsc
>
>   More information about hello can be obtained from 
> http://hashcat.net/hashcat/
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel Echeverry
>
>

I updated my package in mentors[1].. Could someone check it out?

Thank you very much!

[1]: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hashcat/hashcat_2.00-1.dsc

-- 
Daniel Echeverry
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://rinconinformatico.net
Linux user: #477840
Debian user

Bug#823606: RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP]


Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinxcontrib-doxylink"

* Package name: sphinxcontrib-doxylink
  Version : 1.3-1
  Upstream Author : Matt Williams
* URL : http://pythonhosted.org/sphinxcontrib-doxylink/
* License : BSD
  Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-sphinxcontrib.doxylink - Sphinx extension for linking to 
Doxygen documentation (Python 2)
  python3-sphinxcontrib.doxylink - Sphinx extension for linking to 
Doxygen documentation (Python 3)


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sphinxcontrib-doxylink

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sphinxcontrib-doxylink/sphinxcontrib-doxylink_1.3-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #823581)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

2016-05-06 Thread Giulio Paci

On 06/05/2016 10:52, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 06/05/16 09:30, Giulio Paci wrote:
>> Il 06/mag/2016 08:36, "Ghislain Vaillant" > > ha scritto:
>>  > You just need to join the team
>>  > on alioth, which will grant you access to the team's git repositories.
>>
>> If I remember correctly I am already part of the team, although I never
>> contributed to package maintainance.
>> The wiki page of the team also report me as a team member.
> 
> Good.
> 
>>  > Then, you can move the packaging repository over, change the
>> Maintainer field to "Debian Science Maintainers >  > maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> >" and move yourself to the
>>  > Uploaders field.
>>
>>  >> Regarding the tasks, I think "linguistics" is fine. In addition,
>> what about "machine learning" and/or "statistics"?
>>  >>
>>  >> How can I add them to the tasks? I have found this repository
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/blends/projects/science.git but no clear
>> instructions.
> 
> You are supposed to checkout the repository with:
> 
>   git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/science.git
> 
> Edit the relevant task files, commit and push. The sentinels will
> be refreshed accordingly on the next job.
>
>>  > This process is actually independent of having the package maintained
>>  > under the DST or not. However, you need to join the team to be able to
>>  > modify the task files.
>>
>> Are the task files the only files that needs to be changed? Am I
>> expected to make the changes directly on the repository?
> 
> Indeed.

I have not enough permissions to push to that repository.
So I pushed some changes to linguistics task here: 
https://github.com/giuliopaci/science_blends.git

Can you review and import those changes into 
git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/science.git ?

>>  > I can add the package to linguistics, machine
>>  > learning and statistics.
>>
>> What I meant with my question is: are those two tasks right for this
>> package? They are surely strongly related, probably more than
>> linguistics, but, I do not know if the intended users of these tasks may
>> expect to find this package on their system. Are there a description of
>> the tasks which includes some use case description (or use case
>> description that includes tasks suggestion)? If not, probably it would
>> be nice to have some use case description somewhere that my help users
>> to better understand if the task is useful for them or not and may
>> further help us in deciding if a package is suitable for a given task.
> 
> Linguistics sounds the most appropriate. I'd say machine-learning and
> statistics should rather be for more generic packages, since any piece
> of software which is a minimum applied (such as this one) is expected to
> use a mixture of those.

For me it is a bit confusing, because I see a mixture of "use cases" vs 
"topics" in the current tasks definitions, that makes them very ambiguos in my 
mind.

linguistics is probably too generic as a topic to be able to avoid adding a lot 
of tools that are not useful to the greatest part of the users.

I would personally include many tools that are required to my work on 
linguistics that are probably not relevant to many other people working on 
linguistics.
Namely: ffmpeg, sox and sptk (among the other). Anyway I added some of these 
tools that I use very often as suggestions (transcriber, praat and wavesurfer), 
as they are
targeted to linguistics.

There are several tools that are also very relevant, like espeak or festival, 
which includes many technologies that are very handy to people doing research 
on linguistics.

Maybe I should suggest "speech technologies" task, or similar, somewhere?

Cheers,
Giulio

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2016-05-06 Thread Adam Borowski

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:55:47AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> unfortunately I'm not sure this is enough for ftpmasters...
> 
> I'm afraid we need an official tarball with the fixed licenses, otherwise
> they won't be coherent license-wise.
> 
> this seems to be a blocker for now.

What's the problem?

1. A statement from the copyright holder is enough.  The license doesn't
need to be in the tarball -- Fernando can include the statement in
debian/copyright.

2. Even without the clarification, the only thing the old licenses forbid
is putting additions (such as the packaging) under GPL3 or some other
license not compatible with GPL2-only.

3. Other than compatibility with other licenses, no one really cares about
confusion wrt GPL2 vs GPL2+.  They don't conflict, all we lose is the
permission to use the code under a higher version of GPL.  As long as
debian/copyright assumes the worse option, I don't think any ftpmaster would
reject.

(Points 2. and 3. being moot now that Alexander, the copyright holder,
spoke.)

-- 
A tit a day keeps the vet away.

Bug#823420: marked as done (Fwd: RFS: dmaths/3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1 (package already in Debian))

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 09:34:13 + (UTC)
with message-id <116372347.411083.1462527253336.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823420: Fwd: RFS: dmaths/3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1 (package 
already in Debian)
has caused the Debian Bug report #823420,
regarding Fwd: RFS: dmaths/3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1 (package already in Debian)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear mentors,


  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmaths"

 * Package name: dmaths
   Version : 3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1
   Upstream Author : Didier Dorange-Pattoret 
 * URL : http://www.dmaths.org
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : doc

  It builds those binary packages:

libreoffice-dmaths - Formula editing plug-in for LibreOffice Writer

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmaths


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1.dsc

   Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release.
   * Update debian/README.source.
   * Add changelog file to sources (text copied from the program website).
   * Update to Standards-Version 3.9.7 (no special changes required).
   * Change Priority field value to extra in debian/control.
   * Change Vcs URI to secure format.
   * Update debian/copyright file.

The last sponsor (Eriberto Mota) is busy and he can not
take over the sponsorship of this update.

Regards,

 Innocent De Marchi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, done!

g.




Il Mercoledì 4 Maggio 2016 18:03, Innocent De Marchi  
ha scritto:





Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,


I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmaths" 
* Package name   : dmaths
  Version  : 3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1
  Upstream Author : Didier Dorange-Pattoret  * URL 
: http://www.dmaths.org * License  : GPL-2+ Section  : doc It builds 
those binary packages: libreoffice-dmaths - Formula editing plug-in for 
LibreOffice Writer To access further information about this package, please 
visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmaths 
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget 
-x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.5.9.8+dfsg1-1.dsc 
Changes since the last upload: 
* New upstream release.
* Update debian/README.source.
* Add changelog file to sources (text copied from the program website).
* Update to Standards-Version 3.9.7 (no special changes required).
* Change Priority field value to extra in debian/control.
* Change Vcs URI to secure format.
* Update debian/copyright file.

The last sponsor (Eriberto Mota) is busy and he can not 
take over the sponsorship of this update.

Regards,

 Innocent De Marchi--- End Message ---

Bug#823413: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 09:38:20 + (UTC)
with message-id <141678666.386667.1462527500303.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823413: RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #823413,
regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823413
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire"

* Package name: arrayfire
  Version : 3.3.2+dfsg1-1
  Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group
* URL : http://arrayfire.com/
* License : BSD
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libarrayfire-cpu-dev - Development files for ArrayFire (CPU backend)
  libarrayfire-cpu3 - High performance library for parallel computing 
(CPU backend)

  libarrayfire-dev - Common development files for ArrayFire
  libarrayfire-doc - Common documentation and examples for ArrayFire
  libarrayfire-opencl-dev - Development files for ArrayFire (OpenCL 
backend)
  libarrayfire-opencl3 - High performance library for parallel 
computing (OpenCL backend)
  libarrayfire-unified-dev - Development files for ArrayFire (unified 
backend)
  libarrayfire-unified3 - High performance library for parallel 
computing (unified backend)


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/arrayfire

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arrayfire/arrayfire_3.3.2+dfsg1-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Refresh patch queue.
  * Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
  * d/*.lintian-overrides: simplify regexes.
  * d/rules: simplify formatting.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
hi, sponsored!

G.





Il Mercoledì 4 Maggio 2016 15:39, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire"

* Package name: arrayfire
   Version : 3.3.2+dfsg1-1
   Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group
* URL : http://arrayfire.com/
* License : BSD
   Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

   libarrayfire-cpu-dev - Development files for ArrayFire (CPU backend)
   libarrayfire-cpu3 - High performance library for parallel computing 
(CPU backend)
   libarrayfire-dev - Common development files for ArrayFire
   libarrayfire-doc - Common documentation and examples for ArrayFire
   libarrayfire-opencl-dev - Development files for ArrayFire (OpenCL 
backend)
   libarrayfire-opencl3 - High performance library for parallel 
computing (OpenCL backend)
   libarrayfire-unified-dev - Development files for ArrayFire (unified 
backend)
   libarrayfire-unified3 - High performance library for parallel 
computing (unified backend)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/arrayfire

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arrayfire/arrayfire_3.3.2+dfsg1-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release.
   * Refresh patch queue.
   * Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
   * d/*.lintian-overrides: simplify regexes.
   * d/rules: simplify formatting.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant--- End Message ---

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Alexander,

unfortunately I'm not sure this is enough for ftpmasters...

I'm afraid we need an official tarball with the fixed licenses, otherwise
they won't be coherent license-wise.

this seems to be a blocker for now.

g.





Il Lunedì 2 Maggio 2016 21:27, Alexander Koenig  ha scritto:
Hi there,

the release is pretty dated; for sure I had no intentions to limit 
aseqjoy to strict GPL-V2 so you can consider aseqjoy-0.0.1 to be
GPL-V2+. This applies to all copyrightable files, including the man
page.

Thanks,
Alex

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

On 06/05/16 09:30, Giulio Paci wrote:

Il 06/mag/2016 08:36, "Ghislain Vaillant" > ha scritto:
 > You just need to join the team
 > on alioth, which will grant you access to the team's git repositories.

If I remember correctly I am already part of the team, although I never
contributed to package maintainance.
The wiki page of the team also report me as a team member.

Good.

 > Then, you can move the packaging repository over, change the
Maintainer field to "Debian Science Maintainers  maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>" and move yourself to the
 > Uploaders field.

 >> Regarding the tasks, I think "linguistics" is fine. In addition,
what about "machine learning" and/or "statistics"?
 >>
 >> How can I add them to the tasks? I have found this repository
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/blends/projects/science.git but no clear
instructions.

You are supposed to checkout the repository with:

  git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/science.git

Edit the relevant task files, commit and push. The sentinels will
be refreshed accordingly on the next job.

 >
 >
 > This process is actually independent of having the package maintained
 > under the DST or not. However, you need to join the team to be able to
 > modify the task files.

Are the task files the only files that needs to be changed? Am I
expected to make the changes directly on the repository?

Indeed.

 > I can add the package to linguistics, machine
 > learning and statistics.

What I meant with my question is: are those two tasks right for this
package? They are surely strongly related, probably more than
linguistics, but, I do not know if the intended users of these tasks may
expect to find this package on their system. Are there a description of
the tasks which includes some use case description (or use case
description that includes tasks suggestion)? If not, probably it would
be nice to have some use case description somewhere that my help users
to better understand if the task is useful for them or not and may
further help us in deciding if a package is suitable for a given task.

Linguistics sounds the most appropriate. I'd say machine-learning and
statistics should rather be for more generic packages, since any piece
of software which is a minimum applied (such as this one) is expected to
use a mixture of those.

Anyway, if you can add the package to relevant tasks, I will try to
learn by example how to do that. ;-)

 > You might want to add some upstream metadata [1], so our sentinels can
 > display additional information about the software such as screenshots,
 > citations...
 > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata

I will read the page during the next few days. I think citations is
important for upstream of these packages.

It would be a nice gesture towards upstream.

Cheers,
Ghis

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]

it might be because of different compression levels, not sure sorry :(

(it happens to me too, don't worry!)





Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 10:15, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Weird, I just let `gbp buildpackage -nc -S -sa` do its magic and either
build locally with sbuild or send to debomatic. No idea why I end up
with a different orig tarball then, do you?

Ghis



On 06/05/16 09:08, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, signed and uploaded, but different orig tarball is *bad*
>
>
> cheers,
>
> G.
>
>
> Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 8:53, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
> scritto:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"
>
> * Package name: asl
> Version : 0.1.6-2
> Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific 
> * URL : http://asl.org.il
> * License : AGPL-3
> Section : science
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> libasl-dev - multiphysics simulation software (development files)
> libasl-doc - multiphysics simulation software (documentation)
> libasl0- multiphysics simulation software (shared libraries)
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
>https://mentors.debian.net/package/asl
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asl/asl_0.1.6-2.dsc
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * d/gbp.conf: use recommended DEP-14 settings:
>   - Change packaging branch to debian/master.
>   - Use upstream tag format.
> * Drop -dbg package in favor of autogenerated -dbgsym.
> * Improve generation of -doc package:
>   - Move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
>   - Use arch-indep targets to configure and install.
>   - Install examples.
> * d/rules: do not set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE explicitly.
> * d/rules: build examples and testsuite conditionally on nocheck.
> * d/rules: add missing maintainer flags.
> * Run cme fix on d/control:
>   - Fix formatting, wrap and sort.
>   - Drop versioned dependency on libvtk6-dev.
>   - Use secure VCS-Git URI.
>   - Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
> * Cherry-pick upstream fix for FTBFS error.
>   Thanks to Martin Michlmayr (Closes: 822469)
>
> Regards,
> Ghislain Vaillant
>

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !

Hi, it would be nice to avoid having a possible and problematic version even in 
experimental.
Specially because it might be source of data-losses to the end users.

BTW, please ask xnox to comaintain the package, if you really want to help in 
packaging it.




NMUs are not used to upload regardless of the maintainer opinion on a daily 
basis, even if xnox in particular
welcomes them :)

BTW how do you feel about creating a dummy btrfs-tools-udev package too? it 
seems it has been left behind on the archive
probably you want to break+replace it too, right?



and now the copyright review (partial)

+ * Copyright (C) 2012 STRATO AG.  All rights reserved.

^^ missing

many of the copyrights seems to be gpl2 only, not gpl2+


e.g. 
mds-inspect-dump-super.*
cmds-inspect-dump-tree.*
cmds-inspect-tree-stats.*

some Red Hat copyrights

and probably more.


cheers,

Gianfranco



Il Giovedì 5 Maggio 2016 5:03, Nicholas D Steeves  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfs-progs".  I've read
upstream reports of regressions in the 4.5.x series that were solved
by downgrading to 4.4.x, so I believe that it is most appropriate to
upload to experimental at this time.  When the reports of regressions
are solved in a future upstream version I will update this package and
request an upload to sid.

Package name: btrfs-progs
Version: 4.5.2-0.1~exp1
Section: admin

It builds these binary packages:

btrfs-progs - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
btrfs-progs-dbg - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (debug)
btrfs-progs-udeb - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (udeb) (udeb)
btrfs-tools - transitional dummy package
btrfs-tools-dbg - transitional dummy package

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.5.2-0.1~exp1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * New upstream release.
  * Add upstream changelog.
  * Update standards version to 3.9.8 (no changes needed).
  * Add btrfs-convert support to initramfs (Closes: #801192).
  * Divert btrfs-convert to a wrapper script that warns against its use.

Thanks again!
Nicholas

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit

2016-05-06 Thread Giulio Paci

Il 06/mag/2016 08:36, "Ghislain Vaillant"  ha scritto:
>
> On 06/05/16 02:48, Giulio Paci wrote:
>>
>> On 05/05/2016 19:45, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/05/16 17:16, Giulio Paci wrote:

 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: normal
 X-Debbugs-CC: rbal...@debian.org

 Dear Balint,

 I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package
"irstlm"

* Package name: irstlm
  Version : 6.00.05-1
  Upstream Author : Marcello Federico 
* URL : https://github.com/irstlm-team/irstlm/
* License : LGPL-2.1
  Programming Lang: C++, Perl, Bash
  Description : IRST Language Modeling Toolkit
  Section : misc

 This package includes latest upstream releases and several package
updates.

 You can found the sources for the package and additional information
at:

 https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/irstlm.git/

 A review of the package is more than welcome.

 Regards,
  Giulio Paci

>>>
>>> Hi Giulio,
>>>
>>> You might be interested to move this package to co-maintenance under the
>>> Debian Science Team [1] and integrate it to one of the tasks [2] in the
>>> future (perhaps the linguistics task [3]?).
>>
>>
>> You are right, and it is my intention to do so in future.
>> The only thing stopping me is that at the moment the sponsorhip for this
package is working and I have very scarce time, so that I had not yet
reread the rules of the team
>> (last time I read them was a few years ago).
>
>
> It is not that much overhead actually.

You are probably right, but still I think it would be nice to know the team
policy and workflows before the change.

> You just need to join the team
> on alioth, which will grant you access to the team's git repositories.

If I remember correctly I am already part of the team, although I never
contributed to package maintainance.
The wiki page of the team also report me as a team member.

> Then, you can move the packaging repository over, change the Maintainer
field to "Debian Science Maintainers  maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>" and move yourself to the
> Uploaders field.

>> Regarding the tasks, I think "linguistics" is fine. In addition, what
about "machine learning" and/or "statistics"?
>>
>> How can I add them to the tasks? I have found this repository
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/blends/projects/science.git but no clear
instructions.
>
>
> This process is actually independent of having the package maintained
> under the DST or not. However, you need to join the team to be able to
> modify the task files.

Are the task files the only files that needs to be changed? Am I expected
to make the changes directly on the repository?

> I can add the package to linguistics, machine
> learning and statistics.

What I meant with my question is: are those two tasks right for this
package? They are surely strongly related, probably more than linguistics,
but, I do not know if the intended users of these tasks may expect to find
this package on their system. Are there a description of the tasks which
includes some use case description (or use case description that includes
tasks suggestion)? If not, probably it would be nice to have some use case
description somewhere that my help users to better understand if the task
is useful for them or not and may further help us in deciding if a package
is suitable for a given task.

Anyway, if you can add the package to relevant tasks, I will try to learn
by example how to do that. ;-)

> You might want to add some upstream metadata [1], so our sentinels can
> display additional information about the software such as screenshots,
> citations...
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata

I will read the page during the next few days. I think citations is
important for upstream of these packages.

> Thanks for working on this package.

Thank you for your suggestions.

Giulio

Bug#823539: marked as done (RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.7-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 08:17:36 + (UTC)
with message-id <1597408377.314908.1462522656406.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823539: RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.7-1 -- Emacs 
minor mode that reindents code after every change
has caused the Debian Bug report #823539,
regarding RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.7-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents 
code after every change
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823539: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823539
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for an update to aggressive-indent-mode.

* Package name: aggressive-indent-mode
  Version : 1.7-1
  Upstream Author : Artur Malabarba 
* URL : https://github.com/Malabarba/aggressive-indent-mode
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : lisp

Changes since the last upload:

  * Package new upstream release.

Download with dget:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aggressive-indent-mode/aggressive-indent-mode_1.7-1.dsc

Or build it with gbp:

gbp clone --pristine-tar 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/aggressive-indent-mode.git
cd aggressive-indent-mode
gbp buildpackage

Thanks.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
done.

g.





Il Giovedì 5 Maggio 2016 21:54, Sean Whitton  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for an update to aggressive-indent-mode.

* Package name: aggressive-indent-mode
  Version : 1.7-1
  Upstream Author : Artur Malabarba 
* URL : https://github.com/Malabarba/aggressive-indent-mode
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : lisp

Changes since the last upload:

  * Package new upstream release.

Download with dget:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aggressive-indent-mode/aggressive-indent-mode_1.7-1.dsc

Or build it with gbp:

gbp clone --pristine-tar 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/aggressive-indent-mode.git
cd aggressive-indent-mode
gbp buildpackage

Thanks.

-- 
Sean Whitton--- End Message ---

Bug#823576: marked as done (RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 08:09:37 + (UTC)
with message-id <431576168.307152.1462522177759.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823576: RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #823576,
regarding RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--
823576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft"

* Package name: nfft
Version : 3.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts
* URL :http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

libnfft3-2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier transforms
libnfft3-dbg - debugging symbols for the NFFT library
libnfft3-dev - development files for the NFFT library
libnfft3-doc - documentation for the NFFT library
libnfft3-double2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier
transforms (double prec
libnfft3-long2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier transforms
(long-double
libnfft3-single2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier
transforms (single prec

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/nfft

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nfft/nfft_3.3.1-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

* d/gbp.conf: switch packaging branch to debian/master (DEP-14).
* d/gbp.conf: disable patch numbering with gbp-pq.
* Update patch queue:
- Drop Use-configured-libdir-in-pkgconfig-file.patch, applied upstream.
- Drop Disable-slow-tests.patch, fixed upstream.
* Simplify install and lintian-overrides regexes.
* d/rules: fix buggy clean target.
* d/rules: detect long-double availability with pkg-config.
* d/rules: enable testsuite for single and long-double precisions.
* d/rules: s/COMMON_BUILD_OPTIONS/BUILD_OPTIONS.
* d/rules: simplify call to doc target.
* d/rules: comment out DH_VERBOSE.
* d/control: add mips64el to list of architectures supporting
long-double.

* d/control: fix formatting of long description.
* Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, signed and uploaded.

Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 8:51, Ghislain Vaillant ha
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft"

* Package name: nfft
Version : 3.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts
* URL :http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/nfft

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nfft/nfft_3.3.1-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]


Weird, I just let `gbp buildpackage -nc -S -sa` do its magic and either
build locally with sbuild or send to debomatic. No idea why I end up
with a different orig tarball then, do you?

Ghis


On 06/05/16 09:08, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

Hi, signed and uploaded, but different orig tarball is *bad*


cheers,

G.


Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 8:53, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"

* Package name: asl
Version : 0.1.6-2
Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific 
* URL : http://asl.org.il
* License : AGPL-3
Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

libasl-dev - multiphysics simulation software (development files)
libasl-doc - multiphysics simulation software (documentation)
libasl0- multiphysics simulation software (shared libraries)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

   https://mentors.debian.net/package/asl

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asl/asl_0.1.6-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

* d/gbp.conf: use recommended DEP-14 settings:
  - Change packaging branch to debian/master.
  - Use upstream tag format.
* Drop -dbg package in favor of autogenerated -dbgsym.
* Improve generation of -doc package:
  - Move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
  - Use arch-indep targets to configure and install.
  - Install examples.
* d/rules: do not set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE explicitly.
* d/rules: build examples and testsuite conditionally on nocheck.
* d/rules: add missing maintainer flags.
* Run cme fix on d/control:
  - Fix formatting, wrap and sort.
  - Drop versioned dependency on libvtk6-dev.
  - Use secure VCS-Git URI.
  - Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
* Cherry-pick upstream fix for FTBFS error.
  Thanks to Martin Michlmayr (Closes: 822469)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]

Hi, signed and uploaded, but different orig tarball is *bad*


cheers,

G.


Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 8:53, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"

* Package name: asl
   Version : 0.1.6-2
   Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific 
* URL : http://asl.org.il
* License : AGPL-3
   Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

   libasl-dev - multiphysics simulation software (development files)
   libasl-doc - multiphysics simulation software (documentation)
   libasl0- multiphysics simulation software (shared libraries)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/asl

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asl/asl_0.1.6-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * d/gbp.conf: use recommended DEP-14 settings:
 - Change packaging branch to debian/master.
 - Use upstream tag format.
   * Drop -dbg package in favor of autogenerated -dbgsym.
   * Improve generation of -doc package:
 - Move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
 - Use arch-indep targets to configure and install.
 - Install examples.
   * d/rules: do not set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE explicitly.
   * d/rules: build examples and testsuite conditionally on nocheck.
   * d/rules: add missing maintainer flags.
   * Run cme fix on d/control:
 - Fix formatting, wrap and sort.
 - Drop versioned dependency on libvtk6-dev.
 - Use secure VCS-Git URI.
 - Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
   * Cherry-pick upstream fix for FTBFS error.
 Thanks to Martin Michlmayr (Closes: 822469)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#823575: marked as done (RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC])

Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 08:08:30 + (UTC)
with message-id <1563003465.321147.1462522110405.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #823575,
regarding RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"

* Package name: asl
  Version : 0.1.6-2
  Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific 
* URL : http://asl.org.il
* License : AGPL-3
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libasl-dev - multiphysics simulation software (development files)
  libasl-doc - multiphysics simulation software (documentation)
  libasl0- multiphysics simulation software (shared libraries)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/asl

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asl/asl_0.1.6-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * d/gbp.conf: use recommended DEP-14 settings:
- Change packaging branch to debian/master.
- Use upstream tag format.
  * Drop -dbg package in favor of autogenerated -dbgsym.
  * Improve generation of -doc package:
- Move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
- Use arch-indep targets to configure and install.
- Install examples.
  * d/rules: do not set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE explicitly.
  * d/rules: build examples and testsuite conditionally on nocheck.
  * d/rules: add missing maintainer flags.
  * Run cme fix on d/control:
- Fix formatting, wrap and sort.
- Drop versioned dependency on libvtk6-dev.
- Use secure VCS-Git URI.
- Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
  * Cherry-pick upstream fix for FTBFS error.
Thanks to Martin Michlmayr (Closes: 822469)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---


done


Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 10:08, Gianfranco Costamagna 
 ha scritto:
Hi, signed and uploaded, but different orig tarball is *bad*


cheers,

G.



Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 8:53, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"

* Package name: asl
   Version : 0.1.6-2
   Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific 
* URL : http://asl.org.il
* License : AGPL-3
   Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

   libasl-dev - multiphysics simulation software (development files)
   libasl-doc - multiphysics simulation software (documentation)
   libasl0- multiphysics simulation software (shared libraries)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/asl

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asl/asl_0.1.6-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * d/gbp.conf: use recommended DEP-14 settings:
 - Change packaging branch to debian/master.
 - Use upstream tag format.
   * Drop -dbg package in favor of autogenerated -dbgsym.
   * Improve generation of -doc package:
 - Move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
 - Use arch-indep targets to configure and install.
 - Install examples.
   * d/rules: do not set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE explicitly.
   * d/rules: build examples and testsuite conditionally on nocheck.
   * d/rules: add missing maintainer flags.
   * Run cme fix on d/control:
 - Fix formatting, wrap and sort.
 - Drop versioned dependency on libvtk6-dev.
 - Use secure VCS-Git URI.
 - Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
   * Cherry-pick upstream fix for FTBFS error.
 Thanks to Martin Michlmayr (Closes: 822469)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant--- End Message ---

Bug#823576: RFS: nfft/3.3.1-1


Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft"

* Package name: nfft
  Version : 3.3.1-1
  Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts 
* URL :http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libnfft3-2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier transforms
  libnfft3-dbg - debugging symbols for the NFFT library
  libnfft3-dev - development files for the NFFT library
  libnfft3-doc - documentation for the NFFT library
  libnfft3-double2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier 
transforms (double prec
  libnfft3-long2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier transforms 
(long-double
  libnfft3-single2 - library for computing non-uniform Fourier 
transforms (single prec


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/nfft

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nfft/nfft_3.3.1-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * d/gbp.conf: switch packaging branch to debian/master (DEP-14).
  * d/gbp.conf: disable patch numbering with gbp-pq.
  * Update patch queue:
- Drop Use-configured-libdir-in-pkgconfig-file.patch, applied upstream.
- Drop Disable-slow-tests.patch, fixed upstream.
  * Simplify install and lintian-overrides regexes.
  * d/rules: fix buggy clean target.
  * d/rules: detect long-double availability with pkg-config.
  * d/rules: enable testsuite for single and long-double precisions.
  * d/rules: s/COMMON_BUILD_OPTIONS/BUILD_OPTIONS.
  * d/rules: simplify call to doc target.
  * d/rules: comment out DH_VERBOSE.
  * d/control: add mips64el to list of architectures supporting 
long-double.

  * d/control: fix formatting of long description.
  * Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#823575: RFS: asl/0.1.6-2 [RC]


Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"

* Package name: asl
  Version : 0.1.6-2
  Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific 
* URL : http://asl.org.il
* License : AGPL-3
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libasl-dev - multiphysics simulation software (development files)
  libasl-doc - multiphysics simulation software (documentation)
  libasl0- multiphysics simulation software (shared libraries)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/asl

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asl/asl_0.1.6-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * d/gbp.conf: use recommended DEP-14 settings:
- Change packaging branch to debian/master.
- Use upstream tag format.
  * Drop -dbg package in favor of autogenerated -dbgsym.
  * Improve generation of -doc package:
- Move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
- Use arch-indep targets to configure and install.
- Install examples.
  * d/rules: do not set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE explicitly.
  * d/rules: build examples and testsuite conditionally on nocheck.
  * d/rules: add missing maintainer flags.
  * Run cme fix on d/control:
- Fix formatting, wrap and sort.
- Drop versioned dependency on libvtk6-dev.
- Use secure VCS-Git URI.
- Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required.
  * Cherry-pick upstream fix for FTBFS error.
Thanks to Martin Michlmayr (Closes: 822469)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#823521: RFS: irstlm/6.00.05-1 -- IRST Language Modeling Toolkit