Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

[Lucas Castro]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm"

* Package name: lsm
  Version : 1.0.4-1
  Upstream Author : Mika Ilmaranta 
* URL : http://lsm.foobar.fi/
* License : GPL-2
  Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

lsm   - Link connectivity monitor tool

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/lsm


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lsm/lsm_1.0.4-1.dsc




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

[Peter Colberg]

Hi Harlan,

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:24:55PM -0400, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> It seems that there's a new upstream version that's a couple newer --
> .51.  Is that something worth updating to before you get sponsored?

You can upload the current git HEAD as is; as I wrote earlier the
Debian package already contains all security and important bug fixes
backported from version 0.0.51. Thanks!

Regards,
Peter

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

[Harlan Lieberman-Berg]

Peter Colberg  writes:
> Is there anybody among you who would have time to sponsor acmetool?

Hi Peter!

It seems that there's a new upstream version that's a couple newer --
.51.  Is that something worth updating to before you get sponsored?

Sincerely,
-- 
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman

Bug#823849: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.2.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

[Jakub Wilk]

* Giulio Paci , 2016-05-09, 17:40:

git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git


Let me see:


+  * Import Upstream version 1.2.2.
+(Closes: #707826)


This sounds as if #707826 was a request to package new upstream release.


+- replace automake1.13 with automake


This is inaccurate: the previous version has build-depends on 
automake1.11.


+  * Refresh 1005_fix_libraries_linking.patch and 
+1002_remove_bashisms.patch.


I wouldn't call changes to 1002_remove_bashisms.patch a "refresh". The 
content of the patch is now radically different.



+  * Drop 1003_fix_spelling.patch and 1004_fix_ngram_h_file.patch.


If you are dropping them because they were applied upstream, then please 
say so explicitly.



+  * Change Section from text to science.


Note that updating d/control is not enough to convince dak that the 
package is in the new section. After the upload, you'll have to file a 
bug against ftp.d.o to update it. (Use "reportbug ftp.debian.org", then 
choose "override".)



+ Running tests in parallel with make resulted in many tests
+ failure, due to several file access race conditions. This


Typo: failure -> failures

Typo in NEWS:
Compatability -> Compatibility

--
Jakub Wilk

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

[Nicholas D Steeves]

On 9 May 2016 at 13:18, Gianfranco Costamagna  wrote:
>>Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848
>>"as an RC bug on the package".
>
> I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for
> the maintainer opinion, this is a binary without source.

Thank you.

>>I did two runs of license-reconsile, after fixing the MIT/X11 license
>>issue for config/install-sh.  In the first run I kept the existing
>>GPL-2+ designations; wc -l returned 212 lines.  For the second run I
>>changed most instances of GPL-2+ to GPL-2; wc -l returned 126.  Based
>>on this, and the fact that the official btrfs-progs*/COPYING file
>>states:
>
> I see README.md saying this is GPL-2, so you might want to change to GPL-2
> and list all the GPL-2+ files explicitly.

Done.  I did a couple of nme runs in a sid chroot, and then fixed
lintian errors.  It might be possible to compact the debian/copying
stanza, but my goal was maximum correctness so I didn't take any
risks.  Lintian said that copyright entries for config/* weren't
necessary.  Is this true?  I removed them on the assumption that they
were.

>>Thank you for notifying me of this Gianfranco.  It also affects>oldstable and
>>stable.  Is this an RC/serious level bug for all affected versions?
>
> BTW this might be RC, but I'm not sure it is worth fixing it in stable.
>
> I'll wait for some more appropriate answer here maybe :)

Ok, I'll wait too. :-)

Updated package has been uploaded to the same location.  If
successfully completing a license review/update isn't on a
debian-mentorship checklist, then it really ought to be!  Thank you
for the opportunity to learn something of fundamental importance to
the Debian-way of doing things.

One more concern:  E - Package closes bugs in a wrong way.  Bug
#801192 does not belong to this package.  I know this is a "teaching
moment."  What is the correct way to tag #801192 (owned by
btrfs-tools) so that it can be closed by btrfs-progs?  I'd like to
send the email to control@ myself, and I suspect this needs to be done
before you upload this package. ;-)

Cheers,
Nicholas

Bug#813603: RFS: libcxl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- libcxl -- Coherent accelerator shared library

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi, the package is already in Ubuntu, did you try to look at the packaging and 
see if it was similar?

Gianfranco

On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:53:47 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna 
 wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi,
> 
> control: std-version 3.9.7
> copyright: please don't mix GPL and Apache, or other people won't be able to 
> forward patches upstream.
> 
> outfile <-- remove?
> 
> rules:
> 
> make --> $(MAKE) please
> 
> mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/$(LIBDIR) $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include
> cp libcxl.a libcxl.so.$(VERS_LIB) $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/$(LIBDIR)
> cp libcxl.h $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include
> cd $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/$(LIBDIR) && ln -sf libcxl.so.$(VERS_LIB) 
> libcxl.so.1
> cd $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/$(LIBDIR) && ln -sf libcxl.so.1 libcxl.so
> 
> 
> this should be handled by upstream makefile, there is no good reason for 
> doing it
> in rules (and other linux distro won't benefit from it)
> 
> check-all-the-things:
> $ flawfinder -Q -c .
> $ codespell --quiet-level=3
> 
> the other stuff looks good to me, but I didn't try to build it yet.
> 
> 
> 
> Il Mercoledì 3 Febbraio 2016 16:15, Frederic Bonnard 
>  ha scritto:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcxl"
> 
> Package name: libcxl
> Version : 1.3-1
> Upstream Author : CAPI team
> URL : https://github.com/ibm-capi/libcxl
> License : Apache-2.0
> Section : libs
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
>   libcxl-dev - Coherent accelerator shared library development files
>   libcxl1- Coherent accelerator shared library
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
> URL:
> 
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcxl
> 
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
> dget -x 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcxl/libcxl_1.3-1.dsc



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

[Peter Colberg]

Dear Debian Let’s Encrypt team,

Is there anybody among you who would have time to sponsor acmetool?

The package has already been reviewed by Harlan Lieberman-Berg,
so all that is left to do for now is the actual upload.

https://bugs.debian.org/817091#47

Thanks,
Peter

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi,




>Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848
>"as an RC bug on the package".


I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for
the maintainer opinion, this is a binary without source.
>I did two runs of license-reconsile, after fixing the MIT/X11 license
>issue for config/install-sh.  In the first run I kept the existing
>GPL-2+ designations; wc -l returned 212 lines.  For the second run I
>changed most instances of GPL-2+ to GPL-2; wc -l returned 126.  Based
>on this, and the fact that the official btrfs-progs*/COPYING file
>states:


I see README.md saying this is GPL-2, so you might want to change to GPL-2
and list all the GPL-2+ files explicitly.


>Thank you for notifying me of this Gianfranco.  It also affects>oldstable and 
>stable.  Is this an RC/serious level bug for all
>affected versions?  I will open the bug for this once I've patched all
>affected versions, since it's something I'm now already working on :-)
>Might as well fix them all at the same time, right!  Please confirm
>that I'm not mistaken in my conclusions regarding the licensing of
>this package.


I think you are right, but please note that you should mention all
the GPL-2+ files too.

BTW this might be RC, but I'm not sure it is worth fixing it in stable.

I'll wait for some more appropriate answer here maybe :)

G.

Bug#823851: marked as done (RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 17:11:11 + (UTC)
with message-id <1511057546.2069104.1462813871694.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823851: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian)
has caused the Debian Bug report #823851,
regarding RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823851: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823851
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qdacco"

 * Package name: qdacco
   Version : 0.8.2-2
   Upstream Author : Carles Pina i Estany 
 * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dacco/files/qdacco/
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : text

  It builds those binary packages:

libqdaccolib-dev - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (devel)
 libqdaccolib0.7 - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (runtime)
 qdacco - offline Dacco Catalan <-> English dictionary frontend (qt)

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/qdacco


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qdacco/qdacco_0.8.2-2.dsc


  Changes since the last upload:

   * Update to Standards-Version 3.9.8:
 - Update to debhelper 9.0: add build dependencies
   in debian/control.
 - Update debian/compat file to 9.
 - Update debian/copyright head.
   * Add the hardering flags to debian/rules.
 - Add dpkg-dev in build depends field in debian/control.
   * Add section field for libqdaccolib0.7 package in debian/control.
   * Remove debian/menu file by the tech-ctte decision on #741573.
   * Update years in debian/copyright file.
   * Update debian/watch file.
   * Update debian/libqdaccolib0.7.symbols file (LP: #935394).
   * Add Keywords field in desktop file (whit .pacht file).
   * Add Vcs fields in debian/control.


  Regards,
   Innocent De Marchi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, sponsored!

g.




Il Lunedì 9 Maggio 2016 18:06, Innocent De Marchi  ha 
scritto:



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package 
"qdacco" * Package name   : qdacco Version  : 0.8.2-2 Upstream Author : 
Carles Pina i Estany  * URL : 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dacco/files/qdacco/ * License  : GPL-3+ 
Section  : text It builds those binary packages: libqdaccolib-dev - library 
for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (devel) libqdaccolib0.7 - library for 
facilitate access to dacco dictionary (runtime) qdacco- offline Dacco 
Catalan <-> English dictionary frontend (qt) To access further information 
about this package, please visit the following URL: 
https://mentors.debian.net/package/qdacco Alternatively, one can download the 
package with dget using this command: dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qdacco/qdacco_0.8.2-2.dsc Changes 
since the last upload:

 * Update to Standards-Version 3.9.8:
- Update to debhelper 9.0: add build dependencies
in debian/control.
- Update debian/compat file to 9.
- Update debian/copyright head.
* Add the hardering flags to debian/rules.
- Add dpkg-dev in build depends field in debian/control.
* Add section field for libqdaccolib0.7 package in debian/control.
* Remove debian/menu file by the tech-ctte decision on #741573.
* Update years in debian/copyright file.
* Update debian/watch file.
* Update debian/libqdaccolib0.7.symbols file (LP: #935394).
* Add Keywords field in desktop file (whit .pacht file).
* Add Vcs fields in debian/control.


Regards,
  Innocent De Marchi--- End Message ---

Bug#823849: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.2.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

[Jakub Wilk]

Control: owner -1 !

* Giulio Paci , 2016-05-09, 17:40:

git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git

I did not realize it took me two years before reacting to your last 
email about this package... :-/


No worries. :-)

--
Jakub Wilk

Bug#823851: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian)

[Innocent De Marchi]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qdacco"

 * Package name: qdacco
   Version : 0.8.2-2
   Upstream Author : Carles Pina i Estany 
 * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dacco/files/qdacco/
 * License : GPL-3+
   Section : text

  It builds those binary packages:

libqdaccolib-dev - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (devel)
 libqdaccolib0.7 - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (runtime)
 qdacco - offline Dacco Catalan <-> English dictionary frontend (qt)

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/qdacco


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qdacco/qdacco_0.8.2-2.dsc


  Changes since the last upload:

   * Update to Standards-Version 3.9.8:
 - Update to debhelper 9.0: add build dependencies
   in debian/control.
 - Update debian/compat file to 9.
 - Update debian/copyright head.
   * Add the hardering flags to debian/rules.
 - Add dpkg-dev in build depends field in debian/control.
   * Add section field for libqdaccolib0.7 package in debian/control.
   * Remove debian/menu file by the tech-ctte decision on #741573.
   * Update years in debian/copyright file.
   * Update debian/watch file.
   * Update debian/libqdaccolib0.7.symbols file (LP: #935394).
   * Add Keywords field in desktop file (whit .pacht file).
   * Add Vcs fields in debian/control.


  Regards,
   Innocent De Marchi

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

[Nicholas D Steeves]

On 9 May 2016 at 04:31, Gianfranco Costamagna  wrote:
>>Waiting for his reply.
>
>
> this seems the most important bit, I would appreciate you opening a bug 
> report against
> the package (severity:important),  explaining why you want a version in 
> experimental,
> leaving xnox the time to answer properly, and don't forget to propose 
> yourself as
> comaintainer.

Ok, I'll do this when this package is ready to upload.

>>This was discussed with the D-I team some time ago, and they said it
>>was better to patch partman-btrfs and debian-cd.  Both have been
>>patched and are now in the archive.
>
>
> ok, so please ask ftpmasters to remove it, otherwise the old source package 
> will still be in the archive.
> (and the old binary too)
>

Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848
"as an RC bug on the package".

>>What is the convenience script used to do copyright review?  :-)  I'll
>>fix these in my next upload.
>
>
> not sure, maybe "cme fix" can work, or license-reconsile, even if I usually 
> look at the diff between the
> current version in archive and the version that I have to sponsor.

I did two runs of license-reconsile, after fixing the MIT/X11 license
issue for config/install-sh.  In the first run I kept the existing
GPL-2+ designations; wc -l returned 212 lines.  For the second run I
changed most instances of GPL-2+ to GPL-2; wc -l returned 126.  Based
on this, and the fact that the official btrfs-progs*/COPYING file
states:

GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
   Version 2, June 1991

I believe this package was wrongly designated as GPL-2+ in
debian/copyright quite some time ago...  I've attached the output of
those license-reconsile runs.

Thank you for notifying me of this Gianfranco.  It also affects
oldstable and stable.  Is this an RC/serious level bug for all
affected versions?  I will open the bug for this once I've patched all
affected versions, since it's something I'm now already working on :-)
 Might as well fix them all at the same time, right!  Please confirm
that I'm not mistaken in my conclusions regarding the licensing of
this package.

Kind regards,
Nicholas


with_GPL2.xz
Description: application/xz


with_GPL2+.xz
Description: application/xz

Bug#823849: RFS: opengrm-ngram/1.2.2-1 -- opengrm n-gram library

[Giulio Paci]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: jw...@debian.org

Dear Jakub and mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of the package "opengrm-ngram"

 * Package name: opengrm-ngram
   Version : 1.2.2-1
   Upstream Author : Brian Roark 
 * URL : http://www.openfst.org/twiki/bin/view/GRM/NGramLibrary
 * License : APACHE-2.0
   Section : libs

It builds those binary packages:

 libngram-dev - opengrm n-gram library (development)
 libngram-tools - opengrm n-gram library (tools)
 libngram1  - opengrm n-gram library (runtime)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following Vcs URL:

 git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/opengrm-ngram.git

I did not realize it took me two years before reacting to your last email about 
this package... :-/
I am sorry about that.

Bests,
Giulio.

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

yes, thanks Alexander for your effort, I personally don't like restricting 
licenses,
specially when they are just an honest upstream mistake!

Gianfranco





Il Lunedì 9 Maggio 2016 16:59, Fernando Toledo  ha 
scritto:
El 07/05/16 a las 08:31, Alexander Koenig escribió:

> On Fri, May 06, 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> <..>
>> I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to 
>> tell ftpmasters
>> where to look in the mail list for the license change.
> 
> OK, to settle this I created a new aseqjoy release, that should remove all 
> license
> ambiguities.
> 
> http://terminatorx.org/files/aseqjoy-0.0.2.tar.gz
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
Great news! thanks Alexander!

I will build the package from that tarball and upload to mentors ASAP!

Saludos!

-- 
Fernando Toledo
Dock Sud BBS
http://bbs.docksud.com.ar
telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

[Fernando Toledo]

El 07/05/16 a las 08:31, Alexander Koenig escribió:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> <..>
>> I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to 
>> tell ftpmasters
>> where to look in the mail list for the license change.
> 
> OK, to settle this I created a new aseqjoy release, that should remove all 
> license
> ambiguities.
> 
> http://terminatorx.org/files/aseqjoy-0.0.2.tar.gz
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
Great news! thanks Alexander!

I will build the package from that tarball and upload to mentors ASAP!

Saludos!

-- 
Fernando Toledo
Dock Sud BBS
http://bbs.docksud.com.ar
telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar

Bug#823838: marked as done (RFS: pyzo/4.1-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 14:17:21 + (UTC)
with message-id <1420024820.1841489.1462803441783.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823838: RFS: pyzo/4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #823838,
regarding RFS: pyzo/4.1-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823838: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823838
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo"

* Package name: pyzo
  Version : 4.1-2
  Upstream Author : Almar Klein 
* URL : http://www.pyzo.org/
* License : BSD
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  pyzo  - interactive editor for scientific Python
  pyzo-doc   - documentation for Pyzo

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyzo

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyzo/pyzo_4.1-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Use system famfamfam-silk icons.
  * d/copyright: list famfamfam-silk icons explicitly.

Regards,
Ghis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sponsored!

cheers,

G:





Il Lunedì 9 Maggio 2016 15:57, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo"

* Package name: pyzo
   Version : 4.1-2
   Upstream Author : Almar Klein 
* URL : http://www.pyzo.org/
* License : BSD
   Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

   pyzo  - interactive editor for scientific Python
   pyzo-doc   - documentation for Pyzo

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyzo

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyzo/pyzo_4.1-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * Use system famfamfam-silk icons.
   * d/copyright: list famfamfam-silk icons explicitly.

Regards,
Ghis--- End Message ---

Bug#823821: marked as done (RFS: sympow/1.023-7 [SeriousBugFix] mathematical program for SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 14:01:17 + (UTC)
with message-id <1243935506.1871315.1462802477370.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823821: RFS: sympow/1.023-7 [SeriousBugFix] 
mathematical program for SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func
has caused the Debian Bug report #823821,
regarding RFS: sympow/1.023-7 [SeriousBugFix] mathematical program for 
SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823821: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823821
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5

Dear Sponsors,

I am looking for a Sponsor for the package sympow, this is a 
mathematical
package needed by Sage, a kind of Computer Algebra System (CAS) bunch.
This very package fixes a Serious bug and (persistant) reproducible 
issue.

Thanks in advaance,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sympow.git

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, sponsored!

cheers,

G.



Il Lunedì 9 Maggio 2016 12:57, Jerome Benoit  ha scritto:



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5

Dear Sponsors,

I am looking for a Sponsor for the package sympow, this is a mathematical
package needed by Sage, a kind of Computer Algebra System (CAS) bunch.
This very package fixes a Serious bug and (persistant) reproducible issue.

Thanks in advaance,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sympow.git

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)--- End Message ---

Bug#823838: RFS: pyzo/4.1-2

[Ghislain Vaillant]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo"

* Package name: pyzo
  Version : 4.1-2
  Upstream Author : Almar Klein 
* URL : http://www.pyzo.org/
* License : BSD
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  pyzo  - interactive editor for scientific Python
  pyzo-doc   - documentation for Pyzo

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyzo

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyzo/pyzo_4.1-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Use system famfamfam-silk icons.
  * d/copyright: list famfamfam-silk icons explicitly.

Regards,
Ghis

Bug#823837: RFS: haproxy-log-analysis/2.0~b0-1

[Christopher Baines]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for "haproxy-log-analysis"

 * Package name: haproxy-log-analysis
   Version : 2.0~b0
   Upstream Author : Gil Forcada 
 * URL : https://github.com/gforcada/haproxy_log_analysis
 * License : GPLv3
   Section : Python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-haproxy-log-analysis - generate aggregate statistics from
HAProxy HTTP logs (Python 2)
  python3-haproxy-log-analysis - generate aggregate statistics from
HAProxy HTTP logs (Python 3)
  haproxy-log-analysis - analyse the HTTP logs generated by HAProxy

It is available on git.debian.org:


https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/haproxy-log-analysis.git/

Thanks,

Chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#823681: marked as done (RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 13:25:56 +
with message-id <20160509132556.gh16...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#823681: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #823681,
regarding RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823681: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823681
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":

* Package name: hoteldruid
  Version : 2.1.4-2
  Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.1.4-2.dsc


More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from 
http://www.hoteldruid.com.


Changes since the last upload:

  * debian/control: adopted new php packaging names. (Closes: #821503)
  * debian/control: added new dependency on php-xml and suggest firefox.
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version (no change needed).

Regards,
Marco M. F. De Santis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 03:14:03PM +0200, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:
> Il 08/05/2016 11:42, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto:
> > the thing is fine, but the changelog message about firefox is very
> > incomprehensible.  I'd use something like "swap suggestion on iceweasel
> > with firefox".
> > Also, why do you need a new dependency on php-xml so suddenly?  There
> > are no code changes, so I'd expect a reason why you need it.  Probably
> > it was missing before?  Then I'd like to read "Add missing dependency
> > on php-xml".
> 
> Hello Mattia, I've updated the changelog to make it clearer:
> 
>   * debian/control: adopted new php packaging names. (Closes: #821503)
>   * debian/control: added new dependency on php-xml, previously
> included in core php packages.
>   * debian/control: swapped suggestion on iceweasel with firefox.
>   * debian/control: updated Standards-Version (no change needed).

uploaded ;)

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#823681: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-2

[Marco M. F. De Santis]

Il 08/05/2016 11:42, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto:

the thing is fine, but the changelog message about firefox is very
incomprehensible.  I'd use something like "swap suggestion on iceweasel
with firefox".
Also, why do you need a new dependency on php-xml so suddenly?  There
are no code changes, so I'd expect a reason why you need it.  Probably
it was missing before?  Then I'd like to read "Add missing dependency
on php-xml".


Hello Mattia, I've updated the changelog to make it clearer:

  * debian/control: adopted new php packaging names. (Closes: #821503)
  * debian/control: added new dependency on php-xml, previously
included in core php packages.
  * debian/control: swapped suggestion on iceweasel with firefox.
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version (no change needed).

Thank you,
Marco

Bug#823821: RFS: sympow/1.023-7 [SeriousBugFix] mathematical program for SYMmetric POWer elliptic curve L-func

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5

Dear Sponsors,

I am looking for a Sponsor for the package sympow, this is a 
mathematical
package needed by Sage, a kind of Computer Algebra System (CAS) bunch.
This very package fixes a Serious bug and (persistant) reproducible 
issue.

Thanks in advaance,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sympow.git

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Re: package stuck in unstable after switching to AutomaticDebugPackages

[Alex Mestiashvili]

On 05/08/2016 11:55 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:40:02PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> James Cowgill:
>>> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
 gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages:

  https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gearmand
>>>
>>> It's not migrating because the old dbg packages are still in sid.
>>
>> The note from testing.pl is (now) just an informational message.  Have a
>> look at [1], which notes the following items of interest:
> 
> In general, testing.pl is imho more confusing than anything else.  And
> really reading the message in tracker.d.o is usually more than enough to
> understand what's wrong.  Not in this case, but here testing.pl didn't
> either...
> 
>>> Usually stuff like this is removed automatically by dak's auto
>>> decrufter but apparently not this time.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, apparently the auto-decrufter thinks that the removal of
>> libgearman7-dbg would break libgearman-dbg.  I suspect part of the issue
>> is that libgearman-dbg is an arch:all package (which has a different
>> heuristic for depending when it should be decrufted).
>>
>>> If you file a NBS removal bug against ftp.debian.org then the package
>>> should migrate after the dbg packages are removed manually.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>
>> I agree that it would probably help. :)
> 
> I agree that a NBS removal for libgearman-dbg should be enough.
> Then the autodecrufter will be able to remove libgearman7-dbg, and then
> gearmand will be able to migrate.
> 

Thank you for the details, I am preparing a new upload fixing a couple
of minor issues and will file the NBS removal bug.

Best regards,
Alex

Re: package stuck in unstable after switching to AutomaticDebugPackages

[Alex Mestiashvili]

On 05/08/2016 09:00 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 19:57 +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg
>>> packages:
>>>
>>>  https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gearmand
>>>
>>> The debug packages were removed after switching to automatic debug
>>> packages [0].
>>>
>>> How do I force the migration ?  What is the right way to switch to
>>> automatic -dbgsym packages ?
>>
>> It's not migrating because the old dbg packages are still in sid.
>> Usually stuff like this is removed automatically by dak's auto
>> decrufter but apparently not this time.
>>
>> If you file a NBS removal bug against ftp.debian.org then the package
>> should migrate after the dbg packages are removed manually.
> 
> And you also should have a call to dh_strip --dbgsym-migration in your
> debian/rules (see dh_strip(1)). This wont prevent testing migration
> though.
> 
> James
> 

I see, thanks for the hint!

Best regards,
Alex

Bug#823606: marked as done (RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2016 09:10:00 + (UTC)
with message-id <1276965472.1443105.1462785001013.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#823606: Info received (Bug#823606: RFS: 
sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP])
has caused the Debian Bug report #823606,
regarding RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
823606: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823606
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinxcontrib-doxylink"

* Package name: sphinxcontrib-doxylink
  Version : 1.3-1
  Upstream Author : Matt Williams
* URL : http://pythonhosted.org/sphinxcontrib-doxylink/
* License : BSD
  Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-sphinxcontrib.doxylink - Sphinx extension for linking to 
Doxygen documentation (Python 2)
  python3-sphinxcontrib.doxylink - Sphinx extension for linking to 
Doxygen documentation (Python 3)


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sphinxcontrib-doxylink

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sphinxcontrib-doxylink/sphinxcontrib-doxylink_1.3-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #823581)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
closing.



Il Lunedì 9 Maggio 2016 11:09, Debian Bug Tracking System 
 ha scritto:
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
Debian Mentors 

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 823...@bugs.debian.org.

Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

-- 
823606: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823606
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems--- End Message ---

Bug#823806: RFS: mongo-cxx-driver-legacy/1.1.1-1 -- MongoDB C++ Driver

[Giulio Paci]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear all,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mongo-cxx-driver-legacy"

 * Package name: mongo-cxx-driver-legacy
   Version : 1.1.1-1
   Upstream Author : MongoDB community 
 * URL : https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-cxx-driver
 * License : Apache-2.0 and AGPL-3 and Zlib and Expat and BSD-3-clause 
and Loki-library and public-domain
   Section : devel

It builds these binary packages:

mongo-cxx-driver-legacy-dev - MongoDB C++ Driver (development)
libmongoclient0 - MongoDB C++ Driver (runtime)


You can download the package with git using this command:

   git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/mongo-cxx-driver-legacy.git

More information about the software can be obtained from 
https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-cxx-driver/wiki/.

The software is very similar to libmongoc [1] (the only difference being the 
target language).

I wonder if it would be better to follow libmongoc naming and description, 
rather than current naming and description (that mimic upstream words).

A package review is very welcome.

Regards,
 Giulio

[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libm/libmongoc.html

Bug#823606: RFS: sphinxcontrib-doxylink [ITP]

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi, signed and uploading shortly!

BTW it fails to build on ubuntu wily.
of course not an issue at all, but you might want to look at the failure.





Il Venerdì 6 Maggio 2016 15:33, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinxcontrib-doxylink"

* Package name: sphinxcontrib-doxylink
   Version : 1.3-1
   Upstream Author : Matt Williams
* URL : http://pythonhosted.org/sphinxcontrib-doxylink/
* License : BSD
   Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

test_parser (unittest.loader._FailedTest) ... ERROR

==
ERROR: test_parser (unittest.loader._FailedTest)
--
ImportError: Failed to import test module: test_parser
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/unittest/loader.py", line 153, in loadTestsFromName
module = __import__(module_name)
File 
"/tmp/sphinxcontrib-doxylink-1.3/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_3.5/build/tests/test_parser.py",
 line 3, in 
from sphinxcontrib.doxylink import parsing
File "/tmp/sphinxcontrib-doxylink-1.3/sphinxcontrib/doxylink/__init__.py", line 
1, in 
from doxylink import *
ImportError: No module named 'doxylink'


(probably an old python?)


sponsoring in a few hours!

Gianfranco

   python-sphinxcontrib.doxylink - Sphinx extension for linking to 
Doxygen documentation (Python 2)
   python3-sphinxcontrib.doxylink - Sphinx extension for linking to 
Doxygen documentation (Python 3)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sphinxcontrib-doxylink

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sphinxcontrib-doxylink/sphinxcontrib-doxylink_1.3-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * Initial release. (Closes: #823581)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#823474: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.2-0.1~exp1

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hi Nicholas,


>I agree, however, upstream's official recommendation is to use a

>version of btrfs-progs at least as new as the kernel.  Every release
>fixes some bugs, sometimes serious.  For example, btrfs-progs-4.5
>fixes "subvol sync: fix crash, memory corruption", but the whole 4.5
>series is implicated in the bug reports I've read.  I'm closely
>following the associated threads on the linux-btrfs mailing list.
>It's possible that the reports are due to buggy hardware, something in
>the md layer of the kernel, or something in LUKS.  I plan to repackage
>for sid after these issues are resolved.  In the meantime isn't
>experimental the best way to honour upstream intent/recommendations,
>while insulating users by keeping it out of the normal upgrade stream
>for all dists?


well, it makes sense this way

>Waiting for his reply.


this seems the most important bit, I would appreciate you opening a bug report 
against
the package (severity:important),  explaining why you want a version in 
experimental, leaving xnox
the time to answer properly, and don't forget to propose yourself as 
comaintainer.
>This was discussed with the D-I team some time ago, and they said it
>was better to patch partman-btrfs and debian-cd.  Both have been
>patched and are now in the archive.


ok, so please ask ftpmasters to remove it, otherwise the old source package 
will still be in the archive.
(and the old binary too)

>What is the convenience script used to do copyright review?  :-)  I'll
>fix these in my next upload.


not sure, maybe "cme fix" can work, or license-reconsile, even if I usually 
look at the diff between the
current version in archive and the version that I have to sponsor.

>Thanks again for the review!


thanks to you, waiting for your feedback then :)

Gianfranco