Bug#807432: marked as done (RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.3-1 [ITP])

2016-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:17:36 +0200 with message-id <849c1682-2989-91c9-51dd-26545be60...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#807432: RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #807432, regarding RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done.

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Shawn Sörbom
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 13:22:33 Jens Reyer wrote: > On 15.09.2016 09:21, Shawn Sörbom wrote: > > Hi > > I have run into a few projects lately that don't include .desktop files > > but > > should. my usual approach to handle this is to write a patch with quilt > > that writes a .desktop

Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

2016-09-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Boyuan, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:23:48PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Yes, they are up-to-date now. The package on debian-mentors is also > updated. Thanks. I'll get to this by Saturday at the latest. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#807432: RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-15 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Hello Gianfranco, > > a ping when the other package is renamed and in testing even better. > I'm finally making effective the ping, as the long-standing naming conflict has been solved on the latest "jellyfish" version (2.2.6-1) [1] (which entered testing on 2016-09-06) by the renaming of its

Bug#837912: marked as done (RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.3-1)

2016-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:36:57 + (UTC) with message-id <456593048.2899577.1473943017...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#837912: RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #837912, regarding RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.3-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#837912: RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.3-1

2016-09-15 Thread Tobias Winchen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" * Package name: engauge-digitizer Version : 9.3-1 Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell * URL :

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Jens Reyer
On 15.09.2016 09:21, Shawn Sörbom wrote: > Hi > I have run into a few projects lately that don't include .desktop files but > should. my usual approach to handle this is to write a patch with quilt that > writes a .desktop file to the project's root directory, then add a > corresponding line to

Bug#837899: marked as done (RFS: dh-runit/1.6.2 )

2016-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:25:11 + (UTC) with message-id <974971560.2734914.1473935111...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#837899: RFS: dh-runit/1.6.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #837899, regarding RFS: dh-runit/1.6.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#837899: RFS: dh-runit/1.6.2

2016-09-15 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit" * Package name: dh-runit Version : 1.6.2 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov * Url :

Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU --

2016-09-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Forgot lintian 9) I: libcgicc source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package libcgicc5 I: libcgicc source: quilt-patch-missing-description 0002-Non-empty-html-index.patch I: libcgicc source: quilt-patch-missing-description 003-no-old-style-config.patch W: libcgicc5:

Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU --

2016-09-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi,> * Non-maintainer upload. changes are huge, but being half mia, and on lowNMU threshold... (and too many bugs here, so lets do it) > * New upstream release (closes: #833081, #811988, #798624, #645616).> * > Updated to Standards-Version

Bug#837887: marked as done (RFS: xautolock/2.2-5.1 [NMU] [RC])

2016-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:18:00 + (UTC) with message-id <101469747.2616801.1473931080...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#837887: RFS: xautolock/2.2-5.1 [NMU] [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #837887, regarding RFS: xautolock/2.2-5.1 [NMU] [RC] to be marked as done.

Bug#837886: marked as done (RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 [ITP])

2016-09-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:16:43 + (UTC) with message-id <1921559557.2635699.1473931003...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#837886: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #837886, regarding RFS:

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Ghislain, >> your way is the best one if you also add a patch to automatically install >> the file >> inside the upstream build system. >It would be better to send upstream a patch to include the .desktop >file in their source tree and install it using their build system. If >they

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/15/2016 10:02 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 15/09/16 08:53, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>> I know this approach >>> works, but is it the "right" way? Does it matter? >> >> your way is the best one if you also add a patch to automatically >> install the file >> inside the upstream

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Shawn Sörbom wrote: > I have run into a few projects lately that don't include .desktop files but > should. my usual approach to handle this is to write a patch with quilt that > writes a .desktop file to the project's root directory, then add a > corresponding

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 15/09/16 08:53, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, I know this approach works, but is it the "right" way? Does it matter? your way is the best one if you also add a patch to automatically install the file inside the upstream build system. Otherwise you can avoid a patch and add the

Re: .desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >I know this approach >works, but is it the "right" way? Does it matter? your way is the best one if you also add a patch to automatically install the file inside the upstream build system. Otherwise you can avoid a patch and add the desktop file inside the debian directory, and ask

Bug#837886: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 [ITP]

2016-09-15 Thread Lumin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1/buildlog Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-trepl" * Package name:

Bug#837887: RFS: xautolock/2.2-5.1 [NMU] [RC]

2016-09-15 Thread gustavo panizzo
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important I'm looking for a sponsor for my NMU on xautolock It closes an RC bug, I've validated that the the fix doesn't break my machines. The debdiff is attached The package can be downloaded from -mentors

.desktop file handling

2016-09-15 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Hi I have run into a few projects lately that don't include .desktop files but should. my usual approach to handle this is to write a patch with quilt that writes a .desktop file to the project's root directory, then add a corresponding line to the debian/[package].install file. I know this

Re: schroot: 20copyfiles: cp: cannot create regular file '.../etc/resolv.conf'

2016-09-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Sean Whitton wrote on Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:40:00 -0700: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > I think that the current stable sbuild is meant to be able to build > > for unstable (pretty common use case), so if you can reproduce it, a > > stable update might be in