Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sxiv"
* Package name: sxiv
* Version : 1.3.2-2
* Upstream Author : Bert Münnich
* URL : https://github.com/muennich/sxiv
* License : GPL-2.0+
* Section
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:03:25 +0200
with message-id <20170810010325.dztfr4bbphnnk...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#871614: RFS:
rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #871614,
regarding RFS:
Your message dated Wed, 09 Aug 2017 22:20:18 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #858531,
regarding RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar"
* Package name: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
Version : 0.17.4-1
Upstream Author : David Mohammed
*
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> > Patch headers should be in the DEP-3 format (lintian tells that).
>
> Now I have to ask for the option needed for lintian to tell that.
It only tells that in the description of tag which is emitted when there
is no header at all.
Hi Fred,
> I didn't check deep but I can see that the packaging is not following
> the latest policy manual (newer-standards-version) : have a look to this
> document (
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt )
> to fix this ;
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:42:40AM +, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> The .so and .a are installed by make install, but I'm manually invoking
> dh_install to bind it to a particular package (after tip from another
> debian maintainer), in order to not need a .install-file. Is this wrong?
Yes,
The .so and .a are installed by make install, but I'm manually invoking
dh_install to bind it to a particular package (after tip from another debian
maintainer), in order to not need a .install-file. Is this wrong?
From: Andrey Rahmatullin
8 matches
Mail list logo