Re: |& Was: uscan & shotwell

2019-04-28 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:32:43AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > The |& is new to me. Please elaborate what it is. > > > Is it short hand notation for > > 2>&1 | > > ?? It is, and a bashism. Greetings Marc --

|& Was: uscan & shotwell

2019-04-28 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 07:46:09AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:53 PM Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > > - From where comes the http://yorba.org/download/shotwell/ ? > > Probably some sort of redirect, I suggest using `uscan --debug > --verbose |& grep -C10 yorba` to get an id

Re: uscan & shotwell

2019-04-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:53 PM Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > - From where comes the http://yorba.org/download/shotwell/ ? Probably some sort of redirect, I suggest using `uscan --debug --verbose |& grep -C10 yorba` to get an idea of where it comes from. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/Paul

Bug#927937: marked as done (RFS: scdoc/1.9.4-2 -- Simple man page generator written for POSIX systems written in C99)

2019-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 28 Apr 2019 22:57:53 +0200 with message-id <20190428205753.gb19...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#927937: RFS: scdoc/1.9.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #927937, regarding RFS: scdoc/1.9.4-2 -- Simple man page generator written for POSIX systems written in C99 to

Bug#927293: marked as done (RFS: dte/1.8.2-1 [ITP])

2019-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 28 Apr 2019 22:24:51 +0200 with message-id <20190428202451.ga17...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#927293: has caused the Debian Bug report #927293, regarding RFS: dte/1.8.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Re: Access to Porter machines as Debian Maintainer?

2019-04-28 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 28.04.2019 um 09:35 teilte Mattia Rizzolo mit: On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, I'm not aware of any welcome mail I should have received. Not sure, to which address it was sent, but the LDAP entry lists my web.de address, which is correct. I simply noticed

Bug#923683: RFS: python-pynetstring/0.1~dev2+git20180925.40cd4a61-1 [ITP] -- netstring library for Python 3

2019-04-28 Thread Benjamin Hof
Thanks for taking a look! On Tuesday, 05 March 2019, 19:25 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: >... > A finalized package should point to "unstable". I am aware and my preference would be for vcs-git to be created by the sponsor on salsa first (or be set to a different value). > 2. The debian/watch fil

uscan & shotwell

2019-04-28 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, I have a prob with uscan and shotwell and I don't found a solution. Uscan found a new source package: > uscan: Newest version of shotwell on remote site is 0.30.4, local version is > 0.30.1 > uscan:=> Newer package available from >

Bug#927293:

2019-04-28 Thread Miroslav Kratochvil
> And in this case, a larger patch that the library itself. :p > No reason to bother then, I'd say. Upstream confirms the same. (they're planning to replace the parser with a custom/better one anyway) Version with the updated copyright should appear on mentors in no time. -mk

Re: Access to Porter machines as Debian Maintainer?

2019-04-28 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 28.04.19 03:46, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 5:34 AM Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, >> I'm not aware of any welcome mail I should have received. > > No idea what went wrong but the template for it is here: > > https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/userdir-ldap/raw/master/templates

Bug#927293:

2019-04-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:55:03AM +0200, Miroslav Kratochvil wrote: > > The package seems in good shape, except for the "inih" one-file library. > > [...] Also, as it's already packaged in Debian, it might > > be better to use that copy rather than what's in tree. > > Unfortunately, it seems tha

Bug#927293:

2019-04-28 Thread Miroslav Kratochvil
> The package seems in good shape, except for the "inih" one-file library. > It's under a different license, thus it needs a separate entry in > debian/copyright. Also, as it's already packaged in Debian, it might > be better to use that copy rather than what's in tree. Hello! Thank you for check

Re: Access to Porter machines as Debian Maintainer?

2019-04-28 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:05:33AM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 26.04.19 06:13, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, 4:48 am Paul Wise wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:11 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > Hi Paul, hi Mattia, > ... server side backend stuff ... > > OK, many thank

Re: Access to Porter machines as Debian Maintainer?

2019-04-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > On 27.04.19 03:27, Paul Wise wrote: > > Hi, > > > Since you are not a Debian member, that address is not to be used. > > The welcome mail you got from DSA should have made that clear. > > > I'm not aware of any welcome mail I shoul