Hi,
the installation/compilation instructions for some proftp modules [1] say:
"To install mod_proxy, go to the third-party module area in the proftpd
source code and unpack the mod_proxy source tarball:
$ cd proftpd-dir/contrib/
$ tar zxvf /path/to/mod_proxy-version.tar.gz
after unpacking
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi Andreas,
This lead to the trail:
> : error: 'pvmd' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /build/pvm-3.4.6/src/ddpro.c:1031:14: note: in expansion of macro 'PVMDPATH'
> 1031 | pvmdpath = PVMDPATH;
> | ^~~~
Definition of PVMDPATH and friends
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 09:01:07AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 09:33:31AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >...
> >c -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2
> >-fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
> >-Werror=format-security -DSIMDE_ENABLE_OPENMP
Thanks. I've setup pbuilder, re-built (without issue), and uploaded the
signed package again with dput.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:04 AM Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 8/12/20 7:22 AM, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> > It builds and rebuilds for me on two different clean Debian
>
Hi Stephen,
On 8/12/20 7:22 AM, Stephen Dennis wrote:
> It builds and rebuilds for me on two different clean Debian environments. I
> have never gotten the '/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lmux' error. Adam hasn't
> responded in two days and is probably waiting for me to fix an error I
> cannot
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:53:24AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Try the attached patch.
Thanks, this works
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
HI Andreas,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:10 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I've fixed part of the problem in Git[1]. Unfortunately there is a
> remainig "multiple definition" issue where I have no idea how to fix it:
Try the attached patch.
--
Regards
Andreas Tille writes:
> while I do not intend to maintain pvm personally some Debian Med package
> depend from it. Thus I like to see bug #957717 fixed but I need help.
Do people still use PVM for parallel computing? I thought it was
replaced by MPI decades ago.
If use of PVM is optional, I
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 09:33:31AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi,
>
>while the package libssw builds nicely on most architectures on armel,
>mips64el and mipsel there is a linking issue[1]:
>
>...
>c -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.
>-fstack-protector-strong
Hi,
while the package libssw builds nicely on most architectures on armel,
mips64el and mipsel there is a linking issue[1]:
...
c -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -DSIMDE_ENABLE_OPENMP
-fopenmp-simd -O3
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I think I've fixed part of the problem in Git[1]. Unfortunately there is a
remainig "multiple definition" issue where I have no idea how to fix it:
ex.o f2jmain.o symtab.o codegen.o vcg_emitter.o dlist.o typecheck.o optimize.o
globals.o f2jmem.o
Hi,
while I do not intend to maintain pvm personally some Debian Med package
depend from it. Thus I like to see bug #957717 fixed but I need help.
I commited some general packaging changes so you can find the last
packaging state in Git[1]. When building this I get the following
output:
cc
12 matches
Mail list logo
