On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 08:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 17:49 -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
>
> > I imagine I'm missing something simple wrt pbuilder.. any ideas
> > where
> > to look?
>
> Are you getting any errors from the pbuilder update command?
No, however..
> Are you
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 00:32 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Any clues out there?
The Debian mentors site only verifies against the OpenPGP keys that
have been registered on the mentors site for each individual user.
So login to your mentors account, update the key there and reupload.
If you still
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 17:49 -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> I imagine I'm missing something simple wrt pbuilder.. any ideas where
> to look?
Are you getting any errors from the pbuilder update command?
Are you updating the same chroot as you are building with?
You can also add a hook that does apt
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 09:52 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> How would I do that in autopkgtest? Can I uninstall and reinstall the
> package in question while an autopkgtest is running?
Sounds like you want the breaks-testbed and needs-root restrictions:
Am 14.07.22 um 23:30 schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
frer/*.sh are BSD-3-clause licensed. Please add the license to d/copyright.
Interestingly, frer/*.sh are not intended to be distributed by the
Debian package. The repository grew from a bunch of shell scripts to
being dominated by a C program which
Dear list,
I have recently become a DM for some packages. In the process I had to
create a new 4096-bits gpg key since the one I have used earlier was
just 2096 bits. So, I have basically one "old" 2096 bits key and a "new"
4096 bits one.
I now need to upload to mentors, a package I'm not
Hi,
I'm using `gbp buildpackage` with pbuilder, and I'm running into an
issue that I've seen a few times. The build fails because the build
dependencies cannot be satisfied; looking at the failure:
Err http://deb.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 python3-django all
2:4.0.5-2
404 Not Found
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:52:51 +0200
Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ ... ]
>
> But due to the criticality of the package, I need to test package
> installation in both cases, with and without ucf. [ ... ]
>
> How would I do that in autopkgtest? Can I uninstall and reinstall the
> package in
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:44:23PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:55:06 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > * Package name: isochron
> >Version : 0.9~rc4-1
> >Upstream Author : Vladimir Oltean
> > * URL :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:55:06 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
* Package name: isochron
Version : 0.9~rc4-1
Upstream Author : Vladimir Oltean
* URL : https://github.com/vladimiroltean/isochron
* License : GPL-2
* Vcs :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Please create a binary package for the documentation.
Your pristine-tar branch holds a tar.xz file that is not downloaded via uscan.
Most probably it is a gbp-generated tarball.
Please do not repack upstream's tarballs if there is no need for it.
Please recreate the
Hi,
for adduser (which is Priority: important and installed on nearly every
Debian system alive), I would like to use ucf to manage adduser.conf in
the future. I would not like to add ucf as a dependency though.
I am therefore planning to use ucf in Recommends or Suggests and to
scaffold the ucf
12 matches
Mail list logo
