Hi,
There is typo here. Try correct string:
QT += qt3support
While I have no experience with cmake I'm not sure about the difference
between += and *= I guess the vraiant with '*' was intended. In any
case I can confirm that both results in the very same build failure.
I don't
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package leechcraft.
This is repeated message. It have passed:
- 3 months from the first message (03 Oct 2011)
- 2 months from the last repeated message (05 Nov 2011)
You can look at package rules here:
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package leechcraft.
Previous message was few days ago but new stable release happened and updated
package was uploaded to m.d.n..
You can look at package rules here:
https://github.com/tehnick/leechcraft-debian/tree/master/debian/
Further
For example, that was not a very first upload (of mod_rpaf) for me.
But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made
similar experiences.
It's just too common to be the default route.
I know what you mean. I am
where can we grab the source of the sponsorship-requests Debian package ?
sponsorship-requests is a pseudo-package -- it's like a package, but
it's not actually. This is so the BTS can be used for bugs, without
actually having a package in Debian.
It's for use with
Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
to debian-mentors list?
It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
uncomfortable to people who did not setup mailing filters
Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
to debian-mentors list?
It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
uncomfortable to people who did not setup mailing
Unfortuantly, I cannot find a link to the mailinglist archive for
pkg-virtualbox-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtualbox-devel/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi everyone,
Continuing the theme of excessive noise in the mailing list, we can look at
simple statistics for the first 7 days of this month:
$ curl -q http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/maillist.html 2
/dev/null | \
grep 'listrong' | wc -l
191
$ curl
I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good
reason to filter these messages?
Try your luck: #658498
I haven't seen it. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Jerome,
does someone know Debian packages using get-orig-source in d/rules ?
For example you can look at my package:
https://github.com/tehnick/libterm-shellui-perl-debian/blob/master/debian/rules
Nothing difficult. You can add any script or list of commands to get-orig-source
section of
Hi,
Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in a version not
announced,
Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
(see my when it makes sense comment above).
But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
prefer a new version on mentors. That
Hi,
Thank you for the announcement. I am glad to see these improvements.
It is really great!
Few negative moments which I am recently faced with [1]:
1) Error Package closes bugs in a wrong way.
Your script processes wnpp pseudo-package in wrong way.
2) Package has lintian warnings:
-
Hi,
Hm, it doesn't show the error with the new uploaded version, only for the
older versions. Now it says Package closes a WNPP bug with a green colour
instead.
This was discussed yesterday:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/msg00687.html
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To
Hi,
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
Thanks a lot, this is exactly what I was looking for :)
Just for a note. It was the message with brief list of changes:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/02/msg00013.html
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi list,
I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream tarball.
This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process. Should
I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I should point to?
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream
tarball.
This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process. Should
I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I should point
to?
Well, there's nowhere in the DFSG or copyright
You need to add doxygen-latex and graphviz as build-deps.
Rather as Build-Depends-Indep.
override_dh_auto_build:
which would also run when building only the arch-dep packages. rather:
build-doc:
cd doc ;\
rm -rf html/ ;\
qmake ;\
make ;\
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qxmpp-lc.
* Package name: qxmpp-lc
Version : 0.3.61-1
Upstream Contact: Georg Rudoy 0xd34df...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/0xd34df00d/qxmpp-dev
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
package kde-gtk-config.
* Package name: kde-gtk-config
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Aleix Pol Gonzalez aleix...@kde.org
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package uhub which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The package is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package uhub which is already available in Debian.
It builds those binary packages:
uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
The package is
Hi everyone,
I have strange problem with my package eiskaltdcpp-qt.
When I compile this binary file using gcc 4.6 program works fine.
But when I compile it using gcc 4.7 program crashes at launch time.
Full backtrace from gdb shows that segmentation fault is in Qt library [1].
Bug was also
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
first, kde configuration modules are packaged as kde-config-foo
Ok, I can rename binary package to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-style for example.
Does it look good for you? Or have you another suggestion?
second, what does it do that kde-config-gtk-style doesn't do ?
It
Hi,
You could read the beginning of this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)
kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
* select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
* preview
Sorry for a broken message. Here is the correct one:
Hi,
You could read the beginning of this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)
kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
*
Hi,
Problem is solved. Thanks a lot to Pino Toscano.
Regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1164201336840...@web15e.yandex.ru
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.
Regards,
Boris
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package leechcraft.
* Package name : leechcraft
Version : 0.5.65+dfsg-1
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.
Regards,
Boris
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qxmpp-lc.
* Package name : qxmpp-lc
Version : 0.3.61-1
Hi,
I uploaded updated package. There are such changes in it:
* compat level and debhelper version were increased to 8
(not to 9 because I still support packages for Ubuntu Oneiric)
* debian/control was updated:
- binary package was renamed to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-styles
- binary
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package eiskaltdcpp which is already available in Debian.
Source package already has DMUA flag in Debian unstable and testing branches.
But new binary packages
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.
Regards,
Boris
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package uhub which is already available in Debian.
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
We are talking about replacing the package kcm-gtk by package
kde-gtk-config which has wider functionality.
That's debatable.
I can't agree with you: kde-gtk-config has wider functionality objectively.
As I wrote earlier, kcm-gtk does not allow to:
* select
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package psi-plus-i18n.
* Package name : psi-plus-i18n
* URL : https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n
* License : GPL-2+
Description : translation files for Psi+
Hi Stephen,
I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ?
It must have expired - I'm re-uploading it just now.
Have you received the mail with note that your package was deleted from m.d.n.?
If no it could be an imperfection of m.d.n., and it affects all of us.
Regards,
Boris
--
to check that program builds fine
on s390 and s390x before this release.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-09 21:44, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-15 11:29, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
Hi,
No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . The package is
still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten
Yes, but it can be there during months or years without any reply. There are no
RC or important bugs in this package. And it could be hard to find the sponsor
for
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.70+dfsg-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.7-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
2) Handling of the transition
I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one
.gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4
that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with
Hi,
Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh
nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs
for the GTK3
Hi,
Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh
nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs
for the GTK3
Hi,
More than 2 weeks passed without any reply.
Is here any interested in translations for Debian?
Package is very simple. It will not require a lot of time for check.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-18 22:40, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors
Hi,
Yes, but for nearly all packages, they are in the source of the package
themselves. So even if the translations are in a separate binary
package, the source is still the same as the main package. So, did you
consider including it in your psi-plus package?
Yes, most of sources comes with
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to the debian-s390 mailing list)
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package uhub [1]. Almost a month
passed without any reply.
This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
important as I see in
Hi,
Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-configsuite=experimental
And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported
architectures. So I have updated the package:
kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3)
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-)
Yes, two years passed since previous stable release of uHub.
Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor.
Unfortunately my regular sponsor (Dmitry E. Oboukhov) currently is busy.
Package is waiting for
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-science mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for the package libquantum.
It builds those binary packages:
libquantum-dev - library for the simulation of a quantum computer
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
Why don't you upload it into Debian Science instead ? (and set the
maintainer to Debian Science ?
This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
See
This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
Well, you should ask to the QA team then, no ?
Hmm, you are right. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package unadf.
It builds binary package:
unadf - Extract files from an Amiga Disk File dump (.adf)
To access further information
Hi,
Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
uploads (tested using dput).
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Processed moment ago. Thanks.
2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
uploads (tested using dput).
Best regards,
Boris
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libvisual.
It builds those binary packages:
libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework
libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sgml-data.
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for
Psi+
thanks
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libcdaudio.
It builds those binary packages:
libcdaudio-dbg - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs
(debug)
libcdaudio-dev - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sgml-data.
You say QA upload below, I guess you don't mean to adopt the package,
right?
Yes, right. That phrase is from template on m.d.n.
Thanks for taking care of this package. This upload fixes at least one
RC bug.
Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with
increasing of
version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team.
Because once the freeze is in effect only RC bug fixes are allowed in.
So the changes need to be minimal at that point. My NMU does
Hi,
I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
problem.
Yes, I've got the messages from BTS. You forgot to close bug #606038.
I'll close it.
I’ve not got the time to look at your suggested package,
As usual.
Like this, you two’ve got more time to get the package
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package sgml-data.
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of regular Cc when filing bugs:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
Yes, I didn't know about it when I sent this RFS, but I already used it in my
recent messages.
* Translation files were moved to new package
Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
Now there are only such changes:
libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Added debian/watch.
* Updated debian/control:
- added homepage field
- fixed lintian warning
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package xmhtml.
It builds those binary packages:
xmhtml1 - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (library)
xmhtml1-dev - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (development
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package qpxtool.
It builds those binary packages:
libqpx-dev - CD/DVD quality checker (development files)
libqpx0 - CD/DVD quality checker (shared libraries)
pxfw
Hi,
The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for
download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences
between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the
construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in
the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package exactimage.
It builds those binary packages:
edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer)
exactimage - fast image manipulation programs
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package lightspeed.
It builds binary package:
lightspeed - Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like
To access further information about this
Hi,
% debdiff xmhtml1_1.1.7-17_amd64.deb xmhtml1_1.1.7-18_amd64.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
2012-06-29 05:58, Nicholas Breen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:00:06PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
Now there are only such changes:
libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
Uploaded. Thank you for the QA work.
Hi,
Thanks a lot
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package awffull.
It builds binary package:
awffull - web server log analysis program
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv.
It builds binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 679049 - not-fit-for-wheezy + for-wheezy
thanks
Waiting for reply:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00308.html
(See also timestamps)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
See also:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00680.html
Quotation:
I don't think targetting experimental for unmaintained packages makes sense.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
turnserver - server for ICE/STUN/TURN, NAT traversal for SIP and Jabber
Have you asked Debian VoIP Team [1]? They might be interested in this package.
Regards,
Boris
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Forwarded from debian...@lists.debian.org :
Hi,
Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
which were waiting for a sponsor. If new version of source package available
an appropriate item was added in todo section on package page.
But now there is no
Hi,
I'm interested in making a Debian package of my own software Fortuner,
homepage https://github.com/jnumm/fortuner . The software is a
modernization of classic UNIX fortune program. I think it falls under
the games category so I'm writing on pkg-games list, too.
Should I put this package
Hi,
Unfortunately your package ... was rejected because of the following
reason:
You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: oldstable stable
unstable experimental stable-backports oldstable-backports
oldstable-backports-sloppy
oldstable-security stable-security
I need to upload updated package with Ubuntu-specific patch. This
package will be uploaded into Ubuntu by avoiding Debian archive.
Wouldn't an Ubuntu PPA be more appropriate for that use case?
Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day in
my case.
How does
Could you suggest any free hosting where I can put source package
files and they will be available using dget?
Unfortunately no, I usually just serve them off my home Internet
connection when I need to do that, but I'm also a sysadmin by trade.
I guess you don't have a personal Web site
Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day
in my case.
I assure you no one will mind having one hang around. PPAs are nice to
have around, even if you don't use them.
I have one that I use for stuff like this, it's not like it's a burden
on the system.
I
Hi,
Sounds like a good idea. Which (pbuilder or cowbuilder) would you recommend?
I recommend cowbuilder. It's much faster and it less pull a hard drive.
(Last is important for me as I use laptop)
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,
I'd like to maintain some packages, which are removed in sid now.
(scim-hangul, scim-sunpinyin, scim-pinyin, scim-array).
How should I do? Should I send a WNPP bug report as a usual new
package, or just package it, change the maintainer to me and
upload it to mentors.debian.net to
Hi,
Unfortunately my sponsor of psi-plus package still has no time for package
psi-plus-i18n (since March month) and I am looking for a sponsor for it:
http://bugs.debian.org/673457
To prevent possible questions: yes, newer translations are available in
upstream repo, but this version
Hi,
How can i exclude hurd-i386 from a build
Architecture: linux-any kfreebsd-any
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package leechcraft.
It builds those binary packages:
leechcraft - Full LeechCraft installation
leechcraft-advancednotifications - Advanced Notifications framework for
LeechCraft
leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv.
It builds one binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
Direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-6.dsc
Anyone interested?
2012-10-11 17:39, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv.
It builds one binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
Direct link for download
Hi,
I can do everything using uscan, tar, sed and wget, so I think this is not a
problem.
During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it
at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean?
Yes, only tarball should be left as a result.
See Debian Policy
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for a package matanza.
It builds binary package:
matanza - Space ascii war game
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.1-1
of my package plasma-widget-cwp.
It builds these binary packages:
plasma-widget-cwp - Customizable Weather Plasmoid (CWP)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
fields Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser
* Removed useless file README.source
So potential sponsor doesn't need to spent much time for its checking.
Also this update is quite important because it closes bugs and improves the
package quality.
Boris Pek wrote:
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor unfortunately can not upload packages at present time due to
life circumstances. So maybe someone else can sponsoring this version of
package.
There are such changes in this updated package:
eiskaltdcpp (2.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Update to stable
It builds those binary packages:
leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft
leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
[]
None of the short descriptions make any sense to me without knowing what
leechcraft is.
Thank you for interest. Of cause I can describe in more
Didn't have time for a through review yet, but a couple of things I'd
like to comment on:
Thanks a lot for your remarks. I fixed some of them.
* debian/copyright appears to be a mix between free-form and DEP-5. I
would recommend using either, but not a mix between the two, as that
looks
(Please don't CC me, when replying to list mail)
Ok, I have just read interesting document:
http://catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I have never used mailing lists befor.
It's a little bit archaic method of interaction...
It would also be nice if you'd describe how exactly the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package uhub.
uHub is a server software for Advanced Direct Connect protocol wich uses by
client's software like linuxdcpp or eiskaltdcpp (these packages are present
in Debian repo for a long time).
This package contains small count of source
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
