$ dget -q
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
dget: curl dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc
failed
I confirm that behaviour. Maybe it's in the
for me. This will hopefully be
my
first package update, so please be patient in case I made any mistakes. Thanks
for
your time.
Kind regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - gpg 58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - gpg 58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Innocent De Marchi tangram.pe...@gmail.com, 2012-01-15, 17:12:
Here you have the link again!
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4.2+dfsg1-1.dsc
s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog.
I have a feeling that the new description is not
Make sure the .orig.tar.gz and .debian.tar.gz are correctly named, and if you
are just doing a debian update (e.g. upstream.version-2) make sure to build the
package with dpkg-buildpackage -sa. Then, dput mentors *.changes should do the
trick.
Alex Mestiashvili a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de wrote:
Original Message
From: Daniel Martí danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com
Sent: Sun Jan 15 17:49:03 GMT+01:00 2012
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xfonts-bolkhov.
Package name: xfonts
I was not aware of such packaging team, thanks for the tip.
Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Martí
danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xfonts-bolkhov.
Since this is a font package I
Wow, thanks for that work.
Michael Stummvoll mich...@stummi.org wrote:
Hi mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my fresh adopted package
suckless-tools.
* Package name: suckless-tools
Version : 39-1
Upstream Author : Serval (look at the projects in the URL for more
info)
*
.dsc
The update closes the RFA bug, as well as another two bugs by adding their
patches. Some lintian cleaning took place as well.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital
with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for your quick reply, Arno.
Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix
thanks
Hi Daniel,
On 02.02.2012 23:45, Daniel Martí wrote:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc
First let
Orphan it again. Regarding this bug you can either close it or we
reassign to ftpmaster and ask them for a package removal.
Orphaning again, OK.
And as far as this bug, I'll leave it up to you :-)
Yes, I understood. However, times change as do packaging styles and
available technologies. This
I *suggested* that to you. It's your or anyone else's decision whether
or not to maintain a particular package. If people including you find
it interesting enough, feel free to maintain it.
*I* wouldn't bother - if you do, that's fair enough.
Oh, don't take me wrong - You pointed it out, I
retitle 658306 RFS: preload [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
thanks
Just a little fix on that subject style. Nothing important.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ptop/ptop_3.6.2-5.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
My apologies, I've by mistake left some fields blank.
Upstream author: PostgreSQL team
URL: http://ptop.projects.postgresql.org/
License: BSD
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
close 658530
thanks
Bas van den Dikkenberg wants to be the new maintainer, thus why I'm removing
my package from mentors and closing this bug.
Cheers!
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Also, might I ask why are there three changelog entries? Or has there been
*three* uploads in a two day period?
Cheers!
know how to make that work with debian/watch?
Thank you.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
license
should I refer to when I don't know which one to choose? (GPL-[123])
Thanks for your time,
Daniel
PS: Still looking for a sponsor, thus I would really appreciate it if someone
helped me through this adoption :-)
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital
rather than to the GPL symlink.
* Bumped debhelper compatibility up to level 9.
The package can be found at mentors, as usual:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc
Would anyone be willing to upload?
Thank you!
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
://mentors.debian.net/package/prelink
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí
as usual:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I'd be very grateful if somebody uploaded this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
I would very much appreciate it if anyone had a quick look at them. Thanks for
your time!
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/identicurse/identicurse_0.9+dfsg0-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
P.S. There's a debian/collab-maint git site, should I push once the package has
been
Why did I file the RFS as ITP? :) Thanks for the correction, Benoît.
I'll have to start doing the block # with # thing as well.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I already downloaded and analyzed the source code so I want to start
working on it. Also, what does maintaining means? Just correcting
bugs
or improving it? Like UI or something?
Maintaining a package is to do all the work of taking a non-Debian work
and making it a Debian package,
of specific help and I have absolutely no idea as to how to
solve this issue.
I'm obviously open to more suggestions, and welcome any patience you put in
this :-)
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
I'd be very grateful if you could review it and upload it.
Thank you both for your time, much appreciated.
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, but as far as I know the correct thing to do is to remove
the orig part.
What do you think about it?
If you think I should've left the orig tarball intact anyway, please do tell
me. I'll re-upload the package to mentors.debian.net since 3.9.3 has been
released, as well.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí
,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
give extra work), I've sent a mail to Jakub about the
subject. I'll wait a week or two for his answer. For the time being, the newer
upload seems to be fine apart from those two warnings.
I'd be very glad if someone sponsored this package for me.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc
.
* debian/copyright now refers to GPL-2 rather than to the GPL symlink.
* Bumped debhelper compatibility up to level 9.
* Bumped standards version to 3.9.3.
I'd be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Thank you,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
version to 3.9.3.
* debian/copyright:
- Switched to DEP-5 format 1.0.
* Added status support to its init.d script.
* Bumped debhelper compatibility level to 8.
I would be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
close 661988
thanks
I submitted this RFS since I thought the ITA bug had been abandoned, but it
seems like for some reason the package is being left aside for now. Closing
this bug.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
fixed.
Regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/copyright is now in DEP-5 format version 1.0.
I'd be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be very glad if someone were to upload this package for me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to me, at least as far as I can tell.
That being said, just wanted to thank everyone who is involved in this
mentoring project. Really helpful.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
# Re-orphaning.
submitter 658426 !
owner 658426 !
close 658426
thanks
I wish to re-orphan this package. The changes are minimal, plus the
package is pretty old and unpopular.
Cheers,
Dan
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpwpdTVPorfU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
It has been a while since I first uploaded this package, so I thought a
bump wouldn't hurt. This is a pretty popular piece of software; I'd be
very grateful if anyone considered uploading it for me.
Kind regards,
Daniel Martí
seem to make much sense. Where does burp come in here?
Unless you've packaged the wrong debian/control file, I can't understand
why would it warn about burp's build-depends if it's neither any of the
packages nor in any of their depends.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
suppose renaming it to prelink-20111012.orig.tar.bz2
would be enough? All the patching is done via *.debian.tar.gz as usual.
Thanks for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpJfavEg2O7W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
O/ITA bug, because this upload might be a
NMU after all. Once it's decided, I'll fix this issue and re-upload to
mentors.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgp866Mw7f9oq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bart,
Thanks for the QA upload. I'll repack my ITA as NMU and retitle this bug
now. If I understand the process correctly, I should put the QA team as
its maintainer, but leave myself in the changelog entry for this NMU,
right?
Thank you.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
I'm waiting for -3 to hit Unstable to repackage my version from scratch
as a QA upload. This latest revision includes the patches in -2, I
suppose.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpfZ7YvO7L4J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
assuming
some change took effect between revisions 1 and 4 that broke this
package for quilt, but apparently not for dpatch.
Any clues?
P.S. I tried once again, now deleting debian/patches completely. 3.0
without patches fails, but 1.0 succeeds both with and without patches.
--
Daniel Martí - mv
they exist in the upstream, the can just be dropped.
Best wishes,
Mike
I did remove them before running deb3, that's not the problem. Moreover,
building 20111012-1 *without* any patches fails both with the old
compat level 5 and with any newer compat level.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG
Hmm, my bad. Taking a closer look at the deb3 script, it does change
debian/rules. So much for that.
That was the problem. Sorry for bothering you. Will upload soon.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpyKdrKCluKn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- postrm uses set -e in its body rather than in #!
* Bumped standards version to 3.9.3.0. No changes needed.
I'd very much appreciate if anybody could review this package and upload
it for me.
Thank you for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpTCUwYJsUKe.pgp
Description
://bugs.gentoo.org/204502?id=204502
I'll look into it.
This problem used to happen back in 2003, we are obviously doing
something wrong.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpenyeJgGwSe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I hope to somehow guide you in the
right direction.
Hmm, right. A quick google search brought up threads almost ten years
old, but now that I take a closer look at your links this is rather new.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpQwiISvWb9P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to any of the
two, I suppose it would need a quilt pach.
Anyhow, for now this is as far as I've gotten.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpHvvJ74anfo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://mentors.debian.net/package/heybuddy
Alternatively, here is its .dsc file ready to be downloaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
I'd very much appreciate it if anyone took the time to review this
package.
With kind regards,
Daniel Martí
--
Daniel Martí - mv
.
A new .dsc file is up at mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
Thanks for your help, Jakub.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpaRRmAl2IrJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
complaints by adding the Debian build flags.
Regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpo53gpW3Dai.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is
carefully made, since not only the licenses must be listed but the
copyright owners too.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpIzbnj93WY9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and
was quite old. The package is lintian clean and fixes the CC-BY-SA + GPLv3
issue the 0.2.3 release had.
Regards,
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgptSHUgtdQ01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello, my name is Daniel and I've recently filed an ITA against the RFA bug for
xeji (wnpp list). I've gone though most part of the new maintainer's guide, as
well as the packaging basics. I do know how to make a package from scratch and
build it, but I am having more trouble with creating a
Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
* Daniel Martí danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com [22 20:40]:
Hello, my name is Daniel and I've recently filed an ITA against the
RFA bug for xeji (wnpp list). I've gone though most part of the new
maintainer's guide, as well as the packaging
you know if there's anything new.
Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using
collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org for its packaging right away?
On a side note, I'm neither a DD nor a DM yet - a sponsor would be needed.
Thank you for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:56:12PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:12:45AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote:
Is there any packaging team I should
/1/15 Arno Töll a...@debian.org
Sorry for the hijack of your RFS, I'm testing our new mail filter.
Please ignore me :)
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpC6ejxKbOoy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
there's no further
need for this patch. (Closes: #537043)
* Fixed vorbisgain.1 to make the use of -r clearer. (Closes: #698253)
Thank you for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpxLLTnuC21R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
67 matches
Mail list logo
