Hi guys,
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 14:24 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> I'll give it a look shortly
Thank you ;)
> probably not that one, right?
OMG, I missed that line ...
> Additionally I noticed there's already a package shipping /usr/bin/cv:
>
> > radiance: /usr/bin/cv
>
> maybe you can use
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:18 +0200, Xfennec wrote:
> Well, the best tip I can give is the following GitHut issue:
> https://github.com/Xfennec/cv/issues/8
>
> The summary of this is that I'm pleased with the current name, and
> think the name conflict is quite unlikely, and is easy to deal with
> s
retitle 779072 RFS: fortune-zh/1.11 [ITA] -- Chinese Data files for
fortune
thanks
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fortune-zh
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
I have rebuild the package cv_0.6-1, with
a working watch file, and modified Makefile,
and some other small changes.
lintian clean.
Then the last thing remains to be done upon this package
is the change of name ?
To access further infor
Hi mentors,
I'm trying to package caffe as said [1] at debian-science@ .
However I encountered a problem when writing debian/rules.
I'd like to take over the whole build process, so I wrote:
32 override_dh_auto_build: build_cpuonly
33
34 build_cpuonly: config_cpuonly
Hi,
I modified the debian/rules[1] according to
Santiago and Jakub (thank you both!),
and tested again. The result was the same.
"dh build" works while "dpkg-buildpackage" doesn't.
[1] --- the whole debian/rules
1 #!/usr/bin/make -f
2 # See debhelper(7) (
Hi mentors,
I solved this problem, after line-by-line reviewing the
screen output of those commands.
It turns out that, the "clean" target of Makefile
needs the Makefile.config too.
this rules file makes dpkg-buildpackage continue building.
(I deleted some comments )
I got it.
Thank you,
Santiago, Jakub, Johannes, Mattia and Wookey !
:)
--
Regards,
C.D.Luminate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432439429.714
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 09:27 +0200, Xfennec wrote:
> Is such a name is
> available within Debian ?
The good news is, the name "progress" as an executable is
available in Debian.
$ apt-file search progress | grep /bin
debconf: /usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress
Hi mentors,
I've been struggling with this shared library linking issue for
a while.
I scanned maint-guide, dev-ref (detail not enough),
debmake-doc (osamu's new version of maint-guide),
and a library packaging guide [1] that debmake-doc recommended.
Then I still have no idea how to handle the pro
ed that:
$ ldd caffe | grep libcaffe
libcaffe.so
=> /home/lumin/hdd/caffe/.build_release/tools/./../lib/libcaffe.so
(0x7fb4c816)
To my surprise after I installed this executable to /usr/bin:
$ ldd caffe.bin | grep libcaffe
libcaffe.so => /usr/b
Hi mentors,
>
> That's not the unusual way to link to a shared library. You should use
> something like:
>
> $(CC) -g -o hello hello.o -L../lib/ -lsharedlib
>
> (Although it would probably only work if the library had a SONAME.)
I did an experiment. Had the rpath issue fixed, the build r
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
lintian: clean
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh"
* Package name: fortune-zh
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Debian Chinese Team
* URL : http://anonsc
Hi mentors,
I encountered this trouble when making user's personal repo
on alioth.d.o according to the link below.
[https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git]
I've set up 2 repos:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/cdluminate-guest/caffe.git
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/cdluminate-guest/test.
Hi Alexander Wirt,
Thank you very much, and now it works!
On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 08:58 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I'm confused.
> And you are right to be confused. It was a bug on our (alioth) side.
>
> I fixed it and cloning is now possible.
>
> Alex
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Hi Adam,
> It does look uploadable, yeah, even though there's a bunch of issues. It's
> up to you whether you want to get it good first or to upload present state
> then improve it incrementally. Please say what you prefer.
I updated the package again with the following changes:
* changed Mul
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: highwayhash
Version : 0~20170419-g1f4a24f-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upst
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: 818...@bugs.debian.org, woo...@wookware.org,
da...@dannf.org, gareuselesi...@debian.org
NOTE: not approved by maintainer (Enrico Tassi) yet.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luajit"
* Package name:
you. :-)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lumin
Date: 27 April 2017 at 03:17
Subject: RFS: luajit/2.1.0~beta2+dfsg-3.1 -- [NMU,RC/experimental]
To: submit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: 818...@bugs.debian.org, woo...@wookware.org,
da...@dannf.org
s to a single patch should be more suitable even for a 0 day
> NMU,
> while changing std-version and that above stuff will probably mean:
> 1) 15 days delay for the upload
> 2) a maintainer ack.
>
> Your call :)
>
> cheers and thanks for the RFS!
>
> G.
--
Best
t symbol files
>
> one single file should be enough for every arch.
>
> G.
--
Best,
Lumin
m rules, including
the CHPL_LLVM flag which seems to be a key of one of your TODO.
This chapel 1.15 package was succesfully built on my laptop and a
simple helloworld
example is working.
--
Best,
Lumin
Hi Ben,
> We do install the Chapel modules and runtime to versioned directories
> like this:
>
> /usr/share/chapel/1.15/modules etc
>
> The documentation is installed to
>
> /usr/share/doc/chapel/1.15/rst etc
>
> Is it obviously better in your opinion to use
>
> /usr/share/chapel-1.1
On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 20:41 +, Ben Albrecht wrote:
>
> We understand that Debian plans to upgrade to Python 3. We're not
> intending to install user-visible Python scripts or modules. The
> Python code that we use is used internally by our compiler and build
> scripts. In this case, is it nece
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-cutorch"
* Package name: lua-torch-cutorch
Version : 0~20170511-g92e9c08-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Tags: morinfo
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-protobuf-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Clarification-moreinfo:
this tag is for protbuf maintainers to approve this NMU.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "protobuf"
* Package name: pr
Hi GCS,
Thank you for the quick reply.
On 6 June 2017 at 10:06, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Clarification-moreinfo:
>> this tag is for protbuf maintainers to approve this NMU.
> You misspelled the package name and the tag as well, among other things.
Sorry for the typo, I fixed that t
Hi,
On 16 June 2017 at 04:33, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> I've reviewed your package. The package looks quite good to me.
> The only thing missing is the README.source
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource
Updated the package and uploaded to mentors.
http
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ptpython"
* Package name: ptpython
Version : 0.39~20170703-1
Upstream Author : jonathanslenders
* URL : https://github.com/jonathanslenders/ptpython
* Li
ted ... ]
-> Iter 1 | loss 2.196 | Bch Train Accu 0.28
-> Iter 2 | loss 1.967 | Bch Train Accu 0.47
-> Iter 3 | loss 1.853 | Bch Train Accu 0.53
On 25 July 2017 at 13:23, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Why is this aimed at experimental?
>
> --
> WBR, wRAR
--
Best,
Lumin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses"
* Package name: lua-moses
Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-1
Upstream Author : Yonaba
* URL :http://yonaba.github.io/Moses/
* License : MIT
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses"
* Package name: lua-moses
Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-1
Upstream Author : Yonaba
* URL :http://yonaba.github.io/Moses/
* License : MIT
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: highwayhash
Version : 0~20180103-geeea446-1
Upstream Author :
* URL :
* License :
Section : science
It b
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Note: The first time upload was rejected by ftpmaster due to
license issues. I have fixed them in this version.
This ITP package will fix an RC bug of another package
lua-torch-nn, because lua-moses was added as a new dependency
by upstream.
Dear
eader File
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://salsa.debian.org/lumin-guest/nvidia-cudnn
##NOTE##
I didn't upload the package to debomatic-amd64, nor the mentors because the
source package is too large to me (~660MB). My local a
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: highwayhash
Version : 0~20180103-geeea446-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of u
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hi Félix,
Some comments on your package:
changelog
---
* One line is enough for the initial upload, e.g.
"Initial release. (Closes: #753350)"
compat & control
-
* I'd recommend to use debhelper compat level
six.py. What's the relationship between it and python3-six?
My preliminary guess is that upstream just copied that file to their
project.
2. This package failed to build when python2 version of sphinx exists:
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/lumin/packages/sponsor/python-jsonrpc-1
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi Yangfl,
* URL : http://www.iolang.com
Are you sure this URL is correct?
Thank you for your work. Here are some comments
on your package.
* -dfsg: would you please explain what is removed
from original source in README.source?
* please fix
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lumin
Date: 15 February 2018 at 14:51
Subject: Re: Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP]
To: Félix Sipma
Hi,
On 15 February 2018 at 09:41, Félix Sipma wrote:
> Changelog: is there a problem with being more verbose? I like writing ab
Hi,
On 15 February 2018 at 13:52, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
>> 1. please fix the following copyright issue:
> I will update d/copyright accordingly.
>> 2. This package failed to build when python2 version of sphinx exists:
>
> I don't care to be honest.
>
> It builds fine on a clean chroot with
On 15 February 2018 at 15:33, Félix Sipma wrote:
> I don't get the harm in having a little more verbose initial changelog, we're
> talking about 10 lines there, not a whole book... Anyway, I've just kept the
> attribution and a line mentioning the lack of python3 support.
>
>> OK. You can overri
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 at 01:22 Félix Sipma wrote:
>
> > This part seems unrelated to auto update functionality. Would you
> > mind splitting it to another patch?
>
> It is a part of the patch: youtube-dl-gui tries to download youtube-dl in
> 'youtubedl_path', and then launches "youtubedl_path/youtu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "you-get"
* Package name: you-get
Version : 0.4.1040-1
Upstream Author : Mort Yao
* URL : https://github.com/soimort/you-get
* License : MIT
Se
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 at 01:46 Alex Mestiashvili
wrote:
>
>
>
> It would be interesting to see how this program is different from
> already existing tools like youtube-dl and cclive.
>
> Thank you!
I have noticed the existence of youtube-dl. However, the user may switch
to you-get when youtube-dl
Control: owner -1 w...@debian.org
Hi,
I'm releasing the ownership of this bug since I'm not able to deal with
it due to work in real life.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
On 22 February 2018 at 16:05, Yangfl wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 0
mple way to use
python3 version of youtube-dl from python2 version of gui.
I'm not sure whether it's possible since I didn't look into the code.
Regards,
Lumin.
On 22 February 2018 at 09:51, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2018-02-22 03:27+, Lumin wrote:
>> I built the package lo
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hi François,
Several questions about your package:
1. Why is the package on mentors newer than that on github repo?
Could you please keep the packaging repo up-to-date?
https://github.com/moleculext/taptempo
2. Where is your public key? no such
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: highwayhash
Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upst
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gemmlowp"
* Package name: gemmlowp
Version : 0~20180308-gf59a96b-1
Upstream Author : google
* URL : https://github.com/google/gemmlowp
* License
Hi François,
On 26 March 2018 at 19:56, François Mazen wrote:
> I've manually changed the timestamp of the changelog file from the
> original repo, and I haven't check that the date was wrong. I can
> update the changelog file.
I've seen new commits in the repo. Let's assume it's the latest vers
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: highwayhash
Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upst
Hi François,
On 31 March 2018 at 21:59, François Mazen wrote:
>
> This program is useful to quickly find the tempo of a song.
> The idea is to type "taptempo" in a terminal, then hit enter key at
> each beat while hearing a song, and display the tempo.
>
> The targeted people are mainly musicians
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nltk"
* Package name: nltk
Version : 3.2.5-2
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [f
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: highwayhash
Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-3
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upst
ept for waiting for the sponsorship.
Let's hope Gianfranco will find a time doing the sponsorship.
Regards,
On 9 April 2018 at 17:43, François Mazen wrote:
> Hi Lumin,
>
> I just want to know if I must do something to go on with the
> integration of TapTempo into Debian.
> Shou
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: mkl-dnn
Version : 0.13~20180406-ga5f6077-1
Upstream Author : Intel
* URL : https:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Notes:
I have DM permission to this package. However to fix an RC bug this
package needs to go through NEW, moving from the main section
to the contrib section. See the RC bug for detail.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packag
Hi Yangfl,
Some feedbacks after checking you package:
1. Vcs-* fields are missing, which makes it hard to track
the changes. I'd recommend you to put the packaging
work on salsa or somewhere alike.
2. lintian overrides: why do you override them? Please add
the explanation as comments
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hi Andrius,
Thank you for the package. Here are some nitpicking about your package:
1. There seems to be ruby binding available, why isn't it packaged?
2. control: Your -dev package should also depend on the lib package.
Depends: ${misc:Depends}
On 23 April 2018 at 14:11, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> 6. tests: your autopkgtest testsuite failed:
>
> I will look into this. It is possible that I invoke the Python tests
> incorrectly.
Oh, I forgot to tell you that the failure is due to output to stderr.
By redirecting
the stderr to e.g. stdout,
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hi Yangfl,
As discussed previously, the python script for automatically
generating the files should be added in the package.
--
Best,
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for this package. Here are some problems found in your package:
1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev
2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g.
W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic
3. debhelper compat level and the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "intel-mkl"
* Package name: intel-mkl
Version : 2018.2.199-1
Upstream Author : Intel
* URL : https://software.i
Hi Sébastien,
> - if MKL was not already selected and the user says no, the setting
> will be
> left untouched (either in automatic or manual mode, depending on the
> user
> customization)
>
> - if MKL was already selected and the user says no (e.g. after a
> reconfigure),
> then MKL will be unse
ng on system.
Apart from all things discussed above, there is upstream confirmation
to the ambiguous license declaration in several headers. See [1]
The blockers are cleared. I think I'll update the package as proposed,
and the copyright information as said in [1] before this weekend.
[1] https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/issues/206#issuecomment-385772103
Regards,
Lumin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
at 22:21 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Followup-For: Bug #896970
>
> Hi Lumin,
>
> I've updated ODP package on mentors.d.n, according to most of your
> comments. Could you please review it?
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
&g
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:58:26PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > 5. Could you explain why these lines exist? Package libodp-linux-dev
> > seems not exist.
>
> Packages libodp-linux-dev and libodp-linux119 are virtual package,
> provided by different implementations of ODP API. We are p
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:03:38AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 2 May 2018 at 14:41, Lumin wrote:
> | Seems that things are getting more complicated. Recall that here we'are
> | going to prevent users from GPL violation in situations such as this
> | one:
> |
Just forgot to CC the RFS bug.
- Forwarded message from Lumin -
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 08:29:29 +
From: Lumin
To: sebast...@debian.org
Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04
Hi Sébastien,
> Using a Pre-Depends here is IMO wrong. Quoting Policy §7.2:
Thanks. I didn't notice that when considering ways to avoid corner
cases.
> I also think that removing the Provides is not a good idea. The alternative is
> provided by the package, and that should be made clear in the d
P.S. Don't perform source-only upload since this is non-free blob.
A source+amd64+i386 upload is needed.
Thanks in advance. :-)
Best,
lumin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nltk":
* Package name: nltk
Version : 3.3.0
Upstream Author : NLTK project
* URL : https://www.nltk.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : science
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: ti...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses":
* Package name: lua-moses
Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-2
Upstream Author :
* URL :
* License : MIT
Section
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:49:05PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> I wonder if the simplest solution is to just have
> intel-mkl Depends: libblas. i.e. use policy to simply prevent a sole
> mkl installation.
>
> That way, the mkl alternative will always have a free BLAS to press
> it's preferen
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:37:27AM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> control: tag -1 - moreinfo
>
> Reuploaded.
Please fix your packaging repo first:
https://salsa.debian.org/chinese-team/netctl/network/master
The stuff in the master branch is identical to the upstream branch.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:50:57PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n.
Please file another RFS bug for the odp-dpdk package since it is a
different source.
> 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov :
> > I will make
Hi Yangfl,
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:43:07PM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> 2018-05-20 19:50 GMT+08:00 Lumin :
> > control: tag -1 +moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:37:27AM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
> >> control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> >>
> >> Reupload
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nltk"
* Package name: nltk
Version : 3.3.0-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License
control: tags -1 +morefino
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:05:41AM +0800, Yangfl wrote:
>
> d/copyright should have provided a list of removed files (see Files-Excluded).
>
> By the way, I have made a PR to upstream to remove ConvertUTF and it
> has accepted. The next release will not affected by this
control: noowner -1
I quit reviewing this RFS, because frequent and incooperative
force-{push,squash}'es drive me crazy, which makes it hard to track the changes.
Any mentors interested in this package can take it over. I
guess the package was nearly in shape, and the remaining reviewing work
sh
control: noowner -1
I'm recently too busy to review and test such a complex package,
hence dropping it.
Currently the package can be successfully built.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:40:48PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > 1. README.Debian
> >"Library packages should contain libodp-linux.so.FOO"
> >It should be "libodp-linux.so.SOVER", which is more precise.
>
> Hmm. I have checked buster package lists. Only blas/lapack packages
> u
Forgot to check the copyright ... The copyright looks incomplete. A
simple search on the source tree would reveal many non-Linaro copyright
holders:
grep -ri copyright | grep -vi linaro | grep -i copyright
The package will be rejected by ftp-master if we don't fix the
copyright.
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 03:24:07AM +, Lumin wrote:
> Please fix the aforementioned problems. Hopefully we'll have the last
> round of check next time. Thank you for working on this.
>
> [1]
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/odp/1.19.0.1-1/buildlog
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for the package. It looks good except for several flaws:
1. error in postrm script, which causes error on removal
update-alternatives: error: alternative name
(/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libodp-linux.so.119) must not contain '
Use this command to generate a some copyright template:
licensecheck --deb-machine -r .
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, mo...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ujson"
* Package name: ujson
Version : 1.35-3
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* UR
Hello mentors,
I'm adopting the ujson package[1][2]. Currently there is no autopkgtest
control file under the debian directory[3], but ci.d.o, to my surprise,
is running autopkgtest[4] on this package.
As far as I know, tests are defined in debian/tests/control when the
tester is autopkgtest. No
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gemmlowp"
* Package name: gemmlowp
Version : 0.0~git20180416.38ebac7-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstre
>
> autodep8: /usr/share/autodep8/support/python
>
> BTW: codesearch.debian.net is a good place to find out this sort of thing.
>
Ah, here it is. Thanks!
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 12:02:17PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > + Move Sandro Tosi to Uploaders.
>
> please remove me from uploaders too, thanks!
Re-uploaded the package.
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ujson/ujson_1.35-3.dsc
changes:
ujson (1.35-3) unstable; urgency=mediu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 900941 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cymem"
* Package name: python-cymem
Version : 1.31.2-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 900945 by -1
Control: block -1 by 900944
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-preshed"
* Package name: python-preshed
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of u
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: blocks 900977 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-murmurhash"
* Package name: python-murmurhash
Version : 0.28.0-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-plac"
plac is one of spaCy dependencies:
[✓] cython>=0.24,<0.28.0
[✓] pathlib
[✓] numpy>=1.7
[*] cymem>=1.30,<1.32 # ITP/RFS
[*] preshed>=1.0.0,<2.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 901231 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-thinc"
* Package name: python-thinc
Version : 6.11.2-1
Upstream Author : github.com/explosion
* URL : https://github.co
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 882725 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cytoolz"
* Package name: python-cytoolz
Version : 0.9.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Erik Welch
* URL : https://github.com/pyt
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
* Package name: highwayhash
Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-4
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upst
Hi Andreas Schwarz,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsmount"
Thank you for this package. I'm not sponsoring it but here are some
comments:
1. debian/copyright: OK
2. debian/rules: MINOR
The debhelper compat level is set to 11. That means --parallel is
default. So you don't h
101 - 200 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
