On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Adrian Perezadrianperez@gmail.com wrote:
The upload would fix these bugs: 329018, 398014, 409952, 412213, 491624,
515015, 516059
What about:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509880
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506027
On 10/1/07, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created a little software in Gambas which lets users query the Debian BTS
via LDAP.
Now, since it's a Debian-specific package (maybe some time later other BTS
will
be supported, but that's not for sure), I wanted to package it as a
On 10/9/07, Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, for better maintenance and making life easy for new upstream
release, I want to move to dpatch.
What are best way to do it? I have done manually with xosview (15
patches scattered in .diff.gz and reading changelog carefully, putting
On Nov 22, 2007 2:57 PM, Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there somewhat like a policy, best practises or similar about doing
this?
Not that I know of, but I've been asked this question before, so this
is my answer:
If the packaging licence allows it, you can take the package
On Feb 10, 2008 11:57 PM, Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an upload to set QA to maintainer and bring standards, et al up to
date. Package should really probably be removed but we can see if
someone adopts it first I suppose.
On 6/7/06, Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.jejik.com/files/hearts/temp/gnome-hearts_0.1.orig.tar.gz
http://www.jejik.com/files/hearts/temp/gnome-hearts_0.1-1.dsc
http://www.jejik.com/files/hearts/temp/gnome-hearts_0.1-1.diff.gz
On 6/7/06, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody is interrested in sponsoring me ?
Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons
for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean
time:
# Run scons -c for cleaning
scons
On 6/14/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The space is necessary; it tells package front-ends to not wrap the line.
See Policy 5.6.13.
I guess you are referring to:
Those starting with two or more spaces. These will be displayed
verbatim. If the display cannot be panned horizontally,
Hi!
On 6/10/06, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Margarita Manterola wrote:
Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons
for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean
time:
# Run scons -c for cleaning
scons QTDIR=/usr/share
On 8/5/06, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* don't forget to acknowledge the NMUs by closing the bugs fixed
in NMUs with the appropriate version:
This is not how it's supposed to be done now. The upload has to be
done, including the changes from the NMU. This is the duty of
On 8/14/06, Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are in BSP mode at the moment - the 7 day restriction is reduced.
During the BSP we should use a 0-Day NMU policy again, that means
uploads that fix RC bugs that are more than a week old can be uploaded
directly.
--
On 8/14/06, Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some questions I hope some of you have an answer for.
This question is more on-topic in the debian-mentors list. I'm
replying to you, and to the debian-mentors mailing list, please
follow-up there.
I intend to package a peace of
Hi!
I'm writing mainly after the experience of doing several (more than
50, I lost count) NMUs in the past weeks. It may be a bit repetitive,
but I hope you find it useful.
On 8/30/06, Dominic Hargreaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem probably doesn't qualify as more severe than normal
On 8/31/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
package description in debian/control. This information should be added
at the end of description, using the following format:
.
Homepage:
On 9/13/06, Ryan Finnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Package name: anaconda
Version : 11.1.0.50-2
Upstream Author : Jeremy Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/anaconda-installer/
* License : GPLv2
Section : misc
It builds
On 9/20/06, Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.2.dfsg-1
of my package rssreader.app.
I have the maintainer's blessing for the changes.
I wonder how it can be your package, when you are not the maintainer.
Anyway, I'm reviewing it and
On 9/20/06, Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.2.dfsg-1
of my package rssreader.app.
Ok. Some comments after having downloaded and built the -3 version
(which I manually converted into -2 again, since the -2 was never in
On 12/14/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the Lintian issua an information message of any kinf for the
Homepage: field? If it would, the maintainers could possibly pay more
attention. Not many are aware of the spcae or two space reason for
long URLs.
No. There's a proposed
Hi Michelle,
On 1/12/07, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have for example a package-1.0.0 and it compiles fine under Stable,
Testing and Unstable but the files are not binarcompatibel since they
compile different under the different releases...
No, in the mirror we will have a
Hi!
On 1/12/07, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since the maintainer of xdialog is MIA I have prepared a since 7 month
tested version 2.3.0 and uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/.
Please sponsor the upload it solvs many bugs.
Michelle, the upload might solve bugs, but none of
Hi!
On 1/12/07, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that many (!!!) scripts wil break with 2.2 since boxes
like --treeview are broken and do not work with more then 3 levels.
Please note, that NOT ALL Bugs are registered @BTS.
In this case, you should file those bugs in
On 1/12/07, Carlo Segre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will use -1+b1
sarge -1~sarge1
etch-1
This can perfectly (and more clearly, from my point of view) be achieved by:
sarge: -1
etch: -1+b1
sid: -1+b2
So that when lenny is released, -1+b2 might go for lenny, and -1+b3
On 1/20/07, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that dh_python is invoked after dh_installinit and
therefore, it first tries to invoke the daemon, then to place the
python file in the right place. On install, the daemon cannot start
since python file are not
On 1/19/07, Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a package with a bunch of configuration files that are managed
by my maintainer scripts and not by dpkg.
Therefore, these configuration files are *not* conffiles. Your Subject
line was misleading (especially considering we are on
Hi Chris!
On 1/23/07, Chris Amthor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package crotch.
If you look up the definition of crotch
(http://dict.die.net/crotch/), you come up with the fact that is not a
nice word, and it can be considered offensive by a group of people.
On 1/23/07, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. Another disadvantage of making it a native package is that the
orig.tar.gz (imagine monsters here, ... OpenOffice.org comes to mind ;-) has
to be uploaded every time you change something in the package, even if this
is a change specific
Hi Székelyi,
On 1/24/07, Székelyi Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a package called morg-mailcommands that depends on Postfix.
Trying to install it with aptitude gives
(...)
You are missing some important pieces of information:
1) How you tried to install the package
2) Where is this
Hi!
On 1/28/07, Maximilian Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could simply include '#DEBHELPER#' in the scripts but I do not want any
debhelper magic to change the scripts.
dh_installinit is called with --noscripts to accomplish this.
You use dh_makeshlibs, which might be adding a call to
Hi!
On 1/29/07, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did I understand current freeze state
right that uploads to unstable will not be moved to testing automatically
any more only by manual intervention of ftpmaster or should we
rather continue with the upload to experimental target which
On 1/29/07, Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A
brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one called
ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the various
source files. Which
Hi Rasmus
On 2/5/07, Rasmus Bøg Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package name: sigit
Version : 0.3.2-1
Upstream author : Kenneth Redhead Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://www.redhead.dk/download/
License : GPLv2
Section : mail
Some comments about
Hi!
We use roundcube as our webmail in my office, so we'll be reviewing
it, and I might end up sponsoring it, I haven't yet looked at it, but
I have a couple of comments:
On 2/10/07, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version : 0.099+0.1b2.2-1
The version is the 0.1-beta2.2 I
dpkg-buildpackage -v$VERSION
One thing to remember about this option is that the .changes file is
re-done when a sponsor rebuilds a package. So, if you want your
sponsor to do this, please remind us when sending us the
to-be-sponsored package.
--
Besos,
Marga
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi!
I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
(3 out of 7).
The other 4 bugs seem quite hard to
Hi!
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:14:25 +0200, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The new package (source and binary) can be found at:
http://www.gnuservers.com.ar/~marga/debian/astyle/
Please do tell me what you think of it.
You moved to using dpatch; please mention that in the
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:38:49 +0200, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
Uploaded.
Thanks a lot! 8)
--
Besos,
Marga
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Apr 12, 2005 4:44 PM, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, but there is no point in having ./debian available upstream.
It's backwards.
It makes sense for software developers to have their own ./debian
directory so that they can use debian/rules binary to compile and test
their
On 4/13/05, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be of value to users of stable who want to make their own
package of the latest version of the software for some reason.
Then they should bug the maintainer to have it go into unstable.
??? Users of __stable__ won't ever get that
On 7/25/05, Roland Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to display a message to the user via debconf. The message should
only appear if the user upgrades from a version below a special value
(0.5.0 in my case).
Is there a standard way to get the old package version and compare it to
the
Hi!
I have prepared a package for the linsmith application. It's an
application for electrical engineers that allows to create smith
charts, and it's much better than the one already in Debian
(xsmc-calc).
The packages are located at:
http://www.marga.com.ar/~marga/debian/linsmith/
They are
They are lintian clean, and they build fine inside a pbuilder. I'd
need someone to please sponsor the upload. Thank you.
Your .diff is 844K, for a 1.4MB .orig. Surely this is a mistake. I'm
retrieving a copy now for further inspection.
No, unfortunately, it's not a mistake.
The package
Okay, its a uuencoded PDF file. Remove that and the .diff.gz is only
26KB. You'll want to generate the PDF from source, if at all
possible. Where are you getting the ./debian/manual.pdf.uu? Is it an
updated copy? Why isn't it distributed with upstream?
I have already answered this in the
On 12/15/05, Alexei Chetroi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Googling, I found that AS_FOR_TARGET must be changed to GAS_FOR_TARGET,
in configure.in but that raise another question. I cannot use
dpatch to fix configure.in and changing it from $(PACKAGE).diff.gz is
not recommended. How it is
Hi, sorry for the OT, but I didn't know where it would be on-topic.
I'll be in Bariloche, Patagonia, Argentina during the next week (till
January 21st). If there's someone that's travelling there and is
interested in keysigning, please send me a mail and we'll arrange it.
--
Love,
Marga
On 2/12/06, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The package can be found at http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/~shevek/sdljump/.
It's actually at http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/~shevek/debian/sdljump/
The package is in very good state, it's lintian clean (although linda
issues a warning). I have some
On 2/13/06, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A small problem with it though: When I put all architecture independant data
in its own package, lintian starts complaining that the binary lacks a
manpage. For the moment, I moved the manpage back in the arch:any package
(it's small anyway),
On 2/15/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please send in your comments, so that I can improve it.
There's a small typo in the README.Debian file: you can also sue the
... it should be you can also use the ... :)
Also, it seems you've written quite a long manpage... It would be nice
On 2/16/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, is this a python module or a python program ? It looks
like a python program to me, and therefore it does not need to be
called python2.3-harvestman but rather harvestman -1.0 and
harvestman-1.1 or something like that. The
On 2/17/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, since the code is written in DOS mode, can I run dos2unix on the
code? Otherwise, python2.4 seems to give some warnings:
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/HarvestMan/connector.py:72:
DeprecationWarning: Non-ASCII character '\xe5' in file
In 2/17/06, Jonathan Niehof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Since updated packages go into unstable, presumably they should be
tested in an unstable environment. But they also want to percolate
into testing, so they shouldn't break or be broken by testing. So I
presume it's best to have an
On 2/17/06, Torsten Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm searching for sponsors for the above-mentioned packages. ElementTree and
cElementTree are already in Debian and just have new versions/revisions.
All the packages are missing the stupid space befor the homepage, as
documented in:
On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded the new package, renamed as harvestman, to
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs/
Now, the bug I have filed (#352012) calls the package as
python-harvestman; what do I do about the bug report? Also, do the
mentors need
On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it is there! However, I have not generated the link:
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs/harvestman_1.4.6.orig.tar.gz
Well, I'm looking at it. I see that you decided to stay with the 2.3
version, but the description is not
On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs
As they are built using pdebuild, I guess this would be really all
right.
Ok, it had only a very small problem: it used DH_COMPAT=5, and the
debhelper dependecy said = 4, I bumped this to 5 and
On 2/10/06, Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As usual the source package can be found at mentors.debian.net .[1]
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xshisen/
Zak, I've been looking at the package. It looks quite good.
However, I found that at the changelog you close many
Some comments about beef:
* E: There's no ITP. According to [1], you should submit your ITP
and then close the bug in the Initial Release line of the changelog.
Please do that.
[1]: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-newpackage
* W: You are using compat with
Hi!
I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in
August. I need a sponsor to upload it.
In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply
with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs
(3 out of 7).
The other 4 bugs seem quite hard to
Hi!
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:14:25 +0200, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The new package (source and binary) can be found at:
http://www.gnuservers.com.ar/~marga/debian/astyle/
Please do tell me what you think of it.
You moved to using dpatch; please mention that in the
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:38:49 +0200, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time.
Uploaded.
Thanks a lot! 8)
--
Besos,
Marga
59 matches
Mail list logo
