Hi,
Here is the link for the .dsc file in mentors.debian ->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2493-1.dsc
P.S. sorry for the previous html message, I sent it by mistake.
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Standards-Version
I've checked and the current Standards-Version is the latest: 4.0.0
> Also, could you make the debian/watch file work please ?
The watch file is working now. I uploaded the package to debian/mentors
again after these changes.
Hi,
The latest version of this package fix the issues pointed in the
previous comment, as well as other points made in mentors.debian.
Here is the link to the .dsc ->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2554-1.dsc
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
Hi,
We've made a new upload. Please, consider this .dsc ->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2560-1.dsc
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
Hi Andrey,
We've made some changes and uploaded it again, here is the link ->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2520-1.dsc
About the "non-free", how does it work? I mean, we have to change some
file in specific? (i.e. debian/control)
Than
ge can be auto-built. So, should we send this
email right now or wait for this process of sponsorship?
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
528-1.dsc
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
Those are the previous names for the cxlflash packages, which could
exist on a machine.
> Why libcflsh_usfs-0.so exports symbols from libc?
The usfc software has been removed, so there are no symbols related with
libcflsh_usfs-0.so anymore.
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
e/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2528-1.dsc
We uploaded the package to mentors.debian again. Please, consider this
link now ->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2531-1.dsc
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
Hi,
This upload has the changes pointed by Michael in the previous message
->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2533-1.dsc
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
the error, please?
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
s don't have debhelper markers.
> Why are you skipping dh_testroot?
> debian/source/include-binaries lists files that don't exist, doesn't it?
> How are you going to handle soname changes if you ship shared libs in a
> non-lib package?
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
Policy 6.6.4 says that, when unpacking an upgraded package
... A directory will never be replaced by a symbolic link to a
directory or vice versa; instead, the existing state (symlink or not)
will be left alone and dpkg will follow the symlink if there is one.
Which means that, when naively
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
pts, my qa page) show liferea as having 1 open rc bug.
--
To
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
Because it's not -done.
Thanks, I get it now.
Finally, if you don't know why it's not being
at 12:19:04PM +, Rodrigo
Tavares wrote:
Hello,
When I run the command below, come this error
message:
mypc:~/script-1.4# dh_gencontrol
dh_gencontrol: Compatibility levels before 4 are
deprecated.
dpkg-gencontrol: error: control file must have at
least one binary package
Hello,
I made a dowanload proftpd (apt-get source proftpd)
In debian/config, I excute this script, then happen a
screen with Dialog. After i excute again e isn't
happen nothing.
debconf: field template unknow '_description', na
stanza #2 de ./proftpd.templates.
Then i remove _ about
ello,
I belive that there is a error with command with my
debconf, see the results about a commands :
skyline:~/start-debconf-1.4/debian# debconf -f dialog
postint
Can't exec postint: File or directory not found at
/usr/share/perl/5.8/IPC/Open3.pm line 168.
open2: exec of postint failed at
Hello,
I make download source proftpd.
I run the debian/proftpd.config and the dialog message
happen. When I try run again come this error :
debconf: field template unknown'_choices', na stanza
#1 de ./debian/proftpd.templates
debconf: field template unknown '_default', na stanza
#1 de
> > Xml-core itself needs a rewrite especially to separate the catalogs per
> > apps, add tests etc.
> > There was a RFH about it a few years back FYI.
>
> Exactly, see #660687 which was the original RFH.
> Nowadays there is only one open bug report which could really do with a
> fix for example.
Hi, thanks for your questions. :)
I will reply your questions, in the reverse order.
> This is a native package, so really "Adopting" it also means taking care
> of the (little) code there is inside. Therefore, turning it into a 3.0
> (quilt) package is most probably not an appropriate action.
lper to 10
* debian/control: Added homepage
* debian/source/format: update to use quilt
Regards,
Rodrigo Siqueira
noopt in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
* No stripping on building package. Patch by Helmut Grohne.
(Closes: #883530).
Regards,
--
Rodrigo Carvalho
with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vtun/vtun_3.0.4-2.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Fix HAVE_WORKING_FORK configure check. Patch by Sylvain Rochet.
(Closes: #943436).
Regards,
--
Rodrigo Carvalho
bian/rules: remove unnecessary dh argument
* debian/control:
- remove obsolete VCS URLs (anonscm no longer exists,
we should create a VCS on salsa).
- Standards-Version: 4.5.0.
OBS: There is a maintainer swap. Rodrigo Siqueira have already agreed.
CC Siqueira who can
confirm, if
A new version was uploaded. Thanks Adam!
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kworkflow"
* Package name: kworkflow
Version : 20191112-1
Upstream Author : Rodrigo Siqueira
* URL : https://github.com/kworkflow/kworkflow
Hi Adam!
Em sex., 27 de dez. de 2019 às 19:17, Adam Borowski
escreveu:
>
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 01:12:26AM -0300, Rodrigo Carvalho wrote:
> > * Package name: kworkflow
> >Version : 20191112-1
>
> > Changes since the last upload:
> >
> >
? If it's in some debian
machine, it's useless to us nonDDs.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:08:49PM +0200, Piotr O??arowski wrote:
[Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz, 08.08.2007]
But, where do we find this who-uploads? If it's in some debian
machine, it's useless to us nonDDs.
$ apt-file search bin/who-uploads
devscripts: usr/bin/who-uploads
Duh. Sorry
will be glad if someone uploads this package for me.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the current address, at the cost of not using upstream's
licence statement verbatim.
?
Thanks,
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
?
Thanks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:03:04PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:4.20-3
of my package stunnel4.
I have some fixes/suggestions for you. Since this would be the first
package that I
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 11:11:05AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Package looks fine. I'm currently updating my local pbuilder base and
will upload when that is done.
Unfortunately, I just realised that there are a few more
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:37:36AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Should I upload with just the change from (1)?
Yes. I agree with your reasoning.
Ready. The new package at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 08:33:16AM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Felipe Sateler wrote:
- Behave sensibly when invoked with 'start' and already running
- Behave sensibly when invoked with 'stop' and not running
So in the end I agree that would be sensible to exit with 0, if the
would be glad if someone uploaded this package to the delayed-7
queue for me.
Thank you,
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just one question about this part:
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include grun2.xpm
#if defined (HAVE_GETTEXT) || defined (HAVE_CATGETS)
#include libintl.h
+#define UTF8 UTF-8
#else
#include intl/libintl.h
#endif
@@ -1107,6 +1108,7 @@ int PASCAL
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:20:06AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why do you need to #define this?
Just because I dislike using magic constants.
But looking at the rest of the code, I would just use
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:52:33AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it ok with you if I upload it with a string literal instead of a
define?
Yes, no problem. Thanks
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Hi,
I've uploaded the package with those changes to the 7-day delayed queue.
Please let me know if there are any problems (I'll subscribe to the PTS,
but I don't get the reply e-mails from the upload).
Tks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
ones.
[Pointers to the website and to the spanis user and devel lists]
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that and passing
-Wl,-soname -Wl,libliscrlua.so
to the final linker line.
Any suggestions?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:09:48PM +0100, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 03:39:38 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
The new dpkg-shlibdeps is giving me tons of messages of the form
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol ui_node_remove_node used by
debian/liferea/usr/lib
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
My usual sponsor (Amaya) is away for a while and so I've been
orphaned :(
...
Blam is a news feed reader written in C# which supports Atom and RSS.
It is already in Debian but I need a new sponsor.
You can find it at
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On dom, 2007-12-09 at 16:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
You can find it at http://www.cmartin.tk/blam/blam_1.8.4-3.dsc
I will review your package for upload. It will take a little while,
since you
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:29:39PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On lun, 2007-12-10 at 11:35 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On dom, 2007-12-09 at 16:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
You
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:21:23PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On mar, 2007-12-11 at 08:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
(BTW. Always use the lintian from unstable to check your packages.)
I do. I've just updated lintian but it won't give me those errors even
with -i. Do
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:49:22PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
The new package is at the same place as before. It shouldn't have any
problems now.
I'll check it tonight.
Good work.
I've uploaded the package. You should receive confirmations for the
upload shortly.
Please
:)
I will review your package. You made quite a few changes, so it might
take me several days.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
liked it.
In the end, as that thread concluded, all this is highly a matter of
sponsor taste.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-3 of the wmanager
package; I am hereby attempting to adopt it, fix its two bugs
problem seems
to have more to do with the browser than with stunnel, it's not much
of a surprise you got no answers there. You'll probably be better
served by going to a mailing list related to the browser itself.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:04:25PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:27:52PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Hi *,
I'm packaging gnome-translate (ITP #292909), and everything builds fine. A
lintian check on the .changes file throws:
E: gnome-translate source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess
2003-07-02
What am I supposed
package wnpp
retitle 465910 ITA: nec -- NEC2 Antenna Modelling System
owner 465910 !
quit
=== 8
Yes, it would.
You don't actually need the 'quit', but it hurts noone.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49
.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/u/ is currently empty.
Huh?
mentors.debian.net just changed server/implementation/you-name-it. Users need to
re-register and re-upload their packages.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:07:10PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:46:37AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
sawfish, a window manager implemented in lisp, has been orphaned by its
previous maintainer (#373702)
I would like to adopt it,
I may help
binary packages certainly has some sort of cost (The
size of the packages file, at least). How do I estimate those costs?
How do I estimate the savings gained from splitting?
(number of archs) * (size of _all.deb)?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318
to separate them, even though they clearly are
arch-indep files.
And, another question, should the -indep package Depend: on the -dep
one? Its files are, on the whole, useles without it, but I don't
really understand if it's right to have such interdependency.
Thanks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG
. But
this case is easy, because it's only put in one place (by rep-config)
and I checked manually that everything still compiles/runs afterwards.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
library. Any suggestions? Is rpath okay in this case? The needed library
is coming from /usr/lib/courier-authlib.
In this case, I believe it is correct. rpath is bad when it points to
a system dir such as /usr/lib. Is good when it points to an
application private dir.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
So is the lintian test wrong? Should it only be checking for rpaths that
aren't system directories?
good question!
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description
files or packages are mine.
I have added those files as -i options and completed the run that
way. The question is, should I file bugs against those packages?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
setup a small repository if necessary).
Yep, that's the way. I used reprepro, but any way of creating it
should work, then added the deb line to the chroot's
/etc/apt/sources.list Use --keep-sources-list and a prebuilt base.tgz
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49
.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
upgrading that dpkg normally
provides for conffiles.
...
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:01:47AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:27:43PM +0200, kku wrote:
Now to detect that the user did (not) change the conf file, I check the
md5sum of the content
on them. USE
* THIS VERSION WITH CARE. THIS VERSION VERY LIKELY WILL KILL ANY POTENTIAL
* FOR LATER COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE SOFTWARE.]
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
for long.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
information and
quote the author's mail in there.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
package.
Any hints?
[1] I need to override because the error could only be *fixed* by
repackaging the .orig.tar.gz, which I don't want to do for so little a
thing, when the problem can be adequately worked around.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9
wording. lintian's
wording is clear enough IMHO, I'll suggest they copy that one.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
What does one do with an inactive unreproducible important bug? (#368546)
Close it? After how long?
Last mail from submitter was four months ago. No one else has ever
seen it, either in Debian or in upstream mailing list.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Loïc Le Guyader wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package harminv.
IANADD, so I can't sponsor, but I have reviewed your package and have
the following comments:
$ lintian -I
W: libharminv: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink
libharminv.postinst.debhelper
libharminv.postrm.debhelper
libharminv.substvars
from the previous version, I guess. Please remove those.
I've now checked the copyright file too, and it seems to be completely fine.
Dear sponsors, I believe this package is ready for your revision and upload.
--
Rodrigo
-depends on bison.
debian/rules:
- Remove commented out lines
I'll probably have further comment, as soon as my local mirror stops
sulking and it lets me upgrade my pbuild chroot :-/
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Billboard billboard burning
, and seeing the way the program
seems to use them, the whole /usr/share/LiE dir should move to /usr/lib
---
Once you make these changes, repost your sponsor request.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199
by your install.
And, a final comment, please give some license statement concerning
the packaging itself, in the copyright file.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Billboard billboard burning bright / in my windshield every night.
Lead me
in a Debian system.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Billboard billboard burning bright / in my windshield every night.
Lead me to a decent joint / where I can stop and get a bite.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and some maintainers of VDR)
but
am new to packaging at all ;)
I am not a DD, but I can help you get your package in a good enough
shape for you to request a sponsor.
Please send the URL to your source package's .dsc file so I can have a
look at it.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81
Upstream's response to #361376 is to recommend the dropping of
liferea-gtkhtml from 64bit arches. How does one go about that?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
[Summary for -release: Is removing liferea-gtkhtml too disruptive for etch?]
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:04:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:36:20PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Upstream's response to #361376 is to recommend the dropping of
liferea
computers by
calling
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
It never showed me an error like this before.
I'd guess it's because the debian .diff does not preserve execute
permissions in files. Maybe, if you want to keep using that file, you
could chmod it in debian/rules *before* calling it.
--
Rodrigo
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:46:57PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
| $ linda -i *.dsc
| W: conntrackd; Maintainer script postinst uses debhelper, but does not use
#DEBHELPER#.
I do not use any debhelper-magic in the scripts and do not understand
what linda wants me to do.
I could simply
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:23:33 +0100
Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've opened bug #394590 for about 100 days now and got no answer from
the maintainer (Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The maintainer
is known to be MIA. I have sent him an email today to explain my
intent to do a
My regular sponsor for this package has been busy lately. Could
someone review and do a one time sponsoring of this?
http://www.nul-unu.com/quien/rodrigo/debian/liferea/liferea_1.0.27-2.dsc
I do have an issue I need help testing before upload. If I install
etch/sid liferea + liferea-gtkhtml
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
out a
Provides: liferea-gtkhtml
to the liferea package, with no results
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I suspect you need the third horseman of the package apocalypse,
Replaces
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
[...]
The following packages have been kept back:
liferea
I've got a question on your transition
it.
I've just received the confirmation mail.
Thank you.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:41:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:09 -0300, Carlos Pasqualini wrote:
[ slightly confusing description ]
I do not understand the situation with this package. You do claim to
support some SPL printers, but the last sentence asks for
this?
No.
devref 5.8.4:
Technically speaking, the following Perl regular expression describes
how bug closing changelogs are identified:
/closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+)*/ig
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia
/*
to a debian/mms-common-data dir.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
for your package.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
#s10.9
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:46:09PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:38:49 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Hm, could you explain that a bit more? I need the binary setuid-root,
so $USER is able to write to /sys/class/backlight/
I previously used install -M 4755
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
