Mahyuddin Susanto udi...@debian-id.org writes:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package aspell-id.
* Package name: aspell-id
Version : 1.2-0-4
Upstream Author : Benitius Brevoort benitius.brevo...@kapusin.org
* URL :
to your build
dir when building the package.
Perhaps this package should Provides: aspell-dictionary? Brian Nelson
might have more advice; cc-ing him.
Yes, aspell dictionary packages should Provides: aspell-dictionary. The
dictionary packaging otherwise looks OK with a very quick glance
Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Dominique,
Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?
'-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
(e.g.
Jan Jeroným Zvánovec j...@zvano.net writes:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package aspell-hsb, aspell dictionary for
Upper Sorbian language.
* Package name: aspell-hsb
Version : 0.01.1-1
Upstream Author : Eduard Werner (Edward Wornar)
Christian Metscher hakai...@web.de writes:
Brian Nelson p...@debian.org writes:
This looks interesting for a 216-line program ;). I thought about
writing something similar a few years back but never got around to it.
I should be able to sponsor it if no one else has stepped up yet.
I
Christian Metscher hakai...@web.de writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qt-program-starter.
* Package name : qt-program-starter Version : 1.2.3-1 Upstream Author :
[Christian Metscher hakai...@web.de] * URL :
[https://launchpad.net/~hakaishi/+archive/qt-program-starter] *
ZhengPeng Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all,
I've already splited scim-brodge into scom-brodge-agent
scim-brodge-client-gtk, scim-bridge-client-qt, and scim-bridge(a
dumy package for upgrade), but now the upstream has added qt4
support, so shall I split it into five? likde
Brian Nelson helped me and uploaded it. Could someone else please
do the same this time, if Brian is not available?
Sorry for bugging, I have no idea on how to proceed.
I'm having key troubles at the moment--my key expired, and for some
reason keyring.debian.org seems to ignore my updated key
Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you might want to use the new Archticture: all packaging variant,
see for example #319675, otherwise you need to Provides:
aspell6-dictionary
aspell6a
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Re: Eddy Petrişor in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any
changes before I list it on sponsors.d.n ?
changelog:
remove the [ ] part
get an ITP and insert it here
control:
old Standards-Version
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
Hi Brian,
thanks for reply. I've rebuilt aspell-uz taking into account your
feedback. Please have a look, it is at
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/aspell/deb/
Almost there, just a few more things:
* The urgency should be
Mashrab Kuvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 08:27, Brian Nelson wrote:
* Your aspell-uz.info-aspell is not correct. See
http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/dsdt-policy.html#infofile for
more info.
I added language name in Uzbek into Language section
Mashrab Kuvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 28 July 2005 00:34, Brian Nelson wrote:
Mashrab Kuvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I added language name in Uzbek into Language section. Is it correct
now?
Well, you should also specify Casechars, Not-Casechars, and
They are optional
Mashrab Kuvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I've filed an ITP bug report #319775 for aspell-uz and uploaded the
files I've
built into http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/aspell/deb/
Could anybody please sponsor it?
No, this package is quite broken:
debian/changelog:
aspell-uz
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:51:18PM -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
Im making one package using dpatch.
I changed some binary files (images) and created one patch in
debian/patches
When I rum dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
I receive message below.
10_testpatch.dpatch is a
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:54:04PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
[...]
In summary, what I want is something like:
debian/control: Depends: ${shlibs-depends}, libfoo (= x.y)
debian/substvars: shlibs-depends: libfoo (= x.0)
= DEBIAN/control: Depends: libfoo (= x.y)
Although I didn't find
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:57:17AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
[...]
Subjects I'm going to cover are:
1. The basics of creating a deb
2. Standard package naming and file locations
3. The Debian human hierchy (from the sponsored maintainers to
ftpmasters, possibly even up to DPL, if I'll
Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:12:18 18:23 -0500]:
snip
Of course, just after sending this mail, I was directed to:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-update.en.html#s-newupstream
...which I somehow managed to miss. It's still a bit
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:15:37AM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 20:08 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
You will find the files on:
http://nico.f-451.net/debian/elizatalk/
Is the template from debian/rules really yours?
It seems pretty much a debhelper template and you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Jay Salzman) writes:
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 12:10 PM, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
My first package is ALMOST lintian clean. One warning:
$ lintian -i yadex_1.7.0-1_i386.deb
W: yadex
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:02:29PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Jay Salzman) writes:
On Mon 13 Dec 04, 12:10 PM, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
My first package is ALMOST lintian clean. One warning:
$ lintian -i yadex_1.7.0-1_i386.deb
W: yadex: menu-command-not-in-package /usr/lib/menu/yadex:2
x-terminal-emulator
N:
N: The menu item specifies a
Jan Alonzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
(on somewhat related topic)
I recently filed an RFP on itagalog and aspell-tl and one of the developers
said that I should consider merging both sources since they use the same word
list.
snip
way. I'd
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 07:41:30PM +1100, Jan Alonzo wrote:
Good Day! I would like to request for someone to sponsor my package for
aspell-tl.
apsell-tl contains the tagalog dictionary to spell check tagalog texts.
Currently it
contains more than 14,000 words (and increasing.
Some
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:18:22PM -0500, Jan Medlock wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
Do we need htp when there is wml?
I've not looked at wml, but even if they have the same functionality,
variety has always been a strength of Debian.
...and package bloat is a weakness of Debian...
--
For
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:18:22PM -0500, Jan Medlock wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
Do we need htp when there is wml?
I've not looked at wml, but even if they have the same functionality,
variety has always been a strength of Debian.
...and package bloat is a weakness of Debian...
--
For
Zach Garner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First:
1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of
scripts built on top of each other is really confusing.
Hm? Do you mean the debhelper scripts? Those significantly help
simplify the writing of debian/rules. Of course, if you
Zach Garner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First:
1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of
scripts built on top of each other is really confusing.
Hm? Do you mean the debhelper scripts? Those significantly help
simplify the writing of debian/rules. Of course, if you
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Okay, I've renamed this to orbitalsniper and adjusted
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Okay, I've renamed this to orbitalsniper and adjusted
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Okay, I've renamed this to orbitalsniper and adjusted the sources to
match.
One thing that stood out was that the binary isn't installed
into /usr/games/, instead
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Okay, I've renamed this to orbitalsniper and adjusted the sources to
match.
One thing that stood out was that the binary isn't installed
into /usr/games/, instead
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:49:52PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Brian,
Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project.
So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am
in the position to say, Well maybe I should just pick something easier
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:49:52PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Brian,
Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project.
So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am
in the position to say, Well maybe I should just pick something easier
I think you're missing the point. It's not that developers think this
should not be packaged. It's that packaging a web app is so difficult
to get right that only developers with a very strong personal interest
in the software would be willing to even look at it. The vast majority
will consider
I think you're missing the point. It's not that developers think this
should not be packaged. It's that packaging a web app is so difficult
to get right that only developers with a very strong personal interest
in the software would be willing to even look at it. The vast majority
will consider
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:03:09AM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my amarok package, which as you may know
is a new audio player for KDE. the package is relatively simple and
contains few if not none KDE specific issues.
I'm interested in seeing this packaged.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:03:09AM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my amarok package, which as you may know
is a new audio player for KDE. the package is relatively simple and
contains few if not none KDE specific issues.
I'm interested in seeing this packaged.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:38:15PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
I'm doing a little houskeeping before sarge releases.
Then I stumble upon this:
Rejected: jail_1.6-2_i386.deb: old version (1:1.6-1) in stable = new
version (1.6-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: jail_1.6-2_i386.deb: old
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 01:59:33AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hello Christoffer,
* Christoffer Sawicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-07 01:38]:
I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming of
the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt which is
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 01:59:33AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hello Christoffer,
* Christoffer Sawicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-07 01:38]:
I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming
of
the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt which
Kevin Glynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Metzler writes:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Kevin Glynn wrote:
I am the (new) maintainer for mozart. I have one Serious bug
outstanding:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mozart).
The bug
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug
should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or
it's not really serious.
This is not true
Kevin Glynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Metzler writes:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Kevin Glynn wrote:
I am the (new) maintainer for mozart. I have one Serious bug
outstanding:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mozart).
The bug
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug
should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or
it's not really serious.
This is not true
debian-devel would probably be a more appropriate place to ask this.
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
i subscibed to the cdbs mailinglist with the intention to support the
project a little bit. I wrote a little german documentation for cdbs:
http://www.ngolde.de/texte/cdbs.html, but
debian-devel would probably be a more appropriate place to ask this.
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
i subscibed to the cdbs mailinglist with the intention to support the
project a little bit. I wrote a little german documentation for cdbs:
http://www.ngolde.de/texte/cdbs.html, but
Nathaniel W. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
Nathaniel W. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Nahmias) writes:
Hello Chirag,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote:
Hi!
I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.
I took a look at your package, a few issues:
0) For some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Nahmias) writes:
Hello Chirag,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote:
Hi!
I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.
I took a look at your package, a few issues:
0) For some
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And while I'm at it: the behaviour change is not really dangerous, but
can cause people to get more spam. (Background: postgrey changed from
--lookup-by-host to --lookup-by-subnet in Version 1.14) So, is a
debconf notice even
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And while I'm at it: the behaviour change is not really dangerous, but
can cause people to get more spam. (Background: postgrey changed from
--lookup-by-host to --lookup-by-subnet in Version 1.14) So, is a
debconf notice even
Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would
Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would
Ervin Hearn III [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
It's been a month since I've last poked at this thread, but I
would once more like to ask if anyone would take a look at my
PennMUSH package and possibly consider sponsoring it. I have
kept it up to date with upstream releases, and thanks to
Ervin Hearn III [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
It's been a month since I've last poked at this thread, but I
would once more like to ask if anyone would take a look at my
PennMUSH package and possibly consider sponsoring it. I have
kept it up to date with upstream releases, and thanks to
Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:13:32PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
So: I suggest you submit it for addition to renameutils.
As a side effect, renameutils and your package get a comaintainer.
Hmmm. Maybe you should see if the renameutils
Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:13:32PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
So: I suggest you submit it for addition to renameutils.
As a side effect, renameutils and your package get a comaintainer.
Hmmm. Maybe you should see if the renameutils
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello.
I've got question related to closing bugs.
Let's say I adopted some package, and with the new upstream version
I should close some outstanding bugs. And I did it in 1.1-1 version.
Then I ask previous maintainer to upload it, and he
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This led to non-closed bugs which are fixed in fact.
What now? Should I close those bugs manually, or is it correct way to
upload another version (1.1-3) including changelogs from 1.1-1 to 1.1-3?
Just
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello.
I've got question related to closing bugs.
Let's say I adopted some package, and with the new upstream version
I should close some outstanding bugs. And I did it in 1.1-1 version.
Then I ask previous maintainer to upload it, and he
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This led to non-closed bugs which are fixed in fact.
What now? Should I close those bugs manually, or is it correct way to
upload another version (1.1-3) including changelogs from 1.1-1 to 1.1-3?
Just
A few more minor problems:
* In interface.fl:163:
callback {system(xterm -e zless /usr/share/doc/stripclub/readme.txt.gz);}
You can't rely on xterm being available unless you depend upon it, and
even still, that's bad practice. Instead, you should use
/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator.
*
Matt Brubeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am adding a menu icon to my audacity package, built with CDBS. Can
anyone suggest the best way to install the icons (which are not part of
the original source)? Currently I am using the following lines in
debian/rules:
ICONS = debian/audacity.xpm
Matt Brubeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am adding a menu icon to my audacity package, built with CDBS. Can
anyone suggest the best way to install the icons (which are not part of
the original source)? Currently I am using the following lines in
debian/rules:
ICONS = debian/audacity.xpm
A few more minor problems:
* In interface.fl:163:
callback {system(xterm -e zless /usr/share/doc/stripclub/readme.txt.gz);}
You can't rely on xterm being available unless you depend upon it, and
even still, that's bad practice. Instead, you should use
/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator.
*
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
this is put together correctly, so here goes.
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
reader and archiver. It supports the vast majority of webcomics
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
this is put together correctly, so here goes.
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
Jepri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a
Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll
be sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just
that. Perhaps I
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
this is put together correctly, so here goes.
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
Jepri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a
Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll
be sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just
that. Perhaps I
Benjamin Cutler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure
this is put together correctly, so here goes.
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic
reader and archiver. It supports the vast majority of webcomics
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such
situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive?
Since you are the only one using I
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
i found a spelling mistake in the german translation of the new
maintainers guide.
i wrote a patch for this bug. the patch is in the attachment of this mail.
please fix it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/privat/Doku/debian/maint-guid] $ md5sum
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such
situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive?
Since you are the only one using I
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
i found a spelling mistake in the german translation of the new
maintainers guide.
i wrote a patch for this bug. the patch is in the attachment of this mail.
please fix it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/privat/Doku/debian/maint-guid] $ md5sum
Soumyadip Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm packaging the bengali wordlist for aspell, for Debian. During
dpkg-buildpackage i get the following errors:
modak:/home/soumyadip/Debian/aspell/aspell-bn-0.50-1# dpkg-buildpackage
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is aspell-bn-0.50
Soumyadip Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm packaging the bengali wordlist for aspell, for Debian. During
dpkg-buildpackage i get the following errors:
modak:/home/soumyadip/Debian/aspell/aspell-bn-0.50-1# dpkg-buildpackage
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is aspell-bn-0.50
Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:52:08PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
* The patch that changes 0's to NULL's is pointless. In C++, NULL is
just #define NULL 0.
Definitely true. I preferred QA's patch over upstream's patch since
for me 'NULL' just makes
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I have plans for packaging a little www-based package. It uses PHP and
MySQL, over Apache.
In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:52:08PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
* The patch that changes 0's to NULL's is pointless. In C++, NULL is
just #define NULL 0.
Definitely true. I preferred QA's patch over upstream's patch since
for me 'NULL' just makes
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I have plans for packaging a little www-based package. It uses PHP and
MySQL, over Apache.
In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources
with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I would
Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well, OK, I take it nobody is interested in this package at all, as I
haven't even recieved negative response so far... ;)
I'll continue to maintain my version of the package until someone
steps forward I can hand it over to who has / doesn't need a
John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Adam Kessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-07 16:35:14 -0700]:
It's definitely a scratch an itch type program.
So's emacs. For that matter, so's the kernel itself. :)
I'm wondering if something relatively simple (the script is about 340
lines of
John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Adam Kessel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-07 16:35:14 -0700]:
It's definitely a scratch an itch type program.
So's emacs. For that matter, so's the kernel itself. :)
I'm wondering if something relatively simple (the script is about 340
lines of
Dominik Stadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I started working on a debian-package. The application uses the Qt-Library as
basis (no KDE). During startup, the application looks in a directory
/usr/etc/settings/ for system-wide settings for the application. This is
not coded inside the
Dominik Stadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I started working on a debian-package. The application uses the Qt-Library as
basis (no KDE). During startup, the application looks in a directory
/usr/etc/settings/ for system-wide settings for the application. This is
not coded inside the
Dominik Stadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why Qt should look in /usr/etc? Configure your program with
--sysconfdir=/etc flag and everything should be OK.
Thanks for the hints, but the problem is that the application does not use
autoconf/automake/configure, but the build-tool qmake. Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Rodrigues) writes:
Anyone interested in sponsoring my slimp3[1] package and its companions,
libmp3-tag-perl[2] and libaudio-wav-perl[3] ?
Packages have already been scrutinized by my sponsor Salvador Abreu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED
Brian Pellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Commercialization of this product is prohibited without notifying the
Department of Energy (DOE) or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL).
This seems to me to conflict with the GPL, and I'd like confirmation
on
Brian Pellin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Commercialization of this product is prohibited without notifying the
Department of Energy (DOE) or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL).
This seems to me to conflict with the GPL, and I'd like confirmation
on
Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recently had a bug (193950) filed against one of my packages because the
shared libraries had undefined non-weak symbols - libstdc++ was not being
linked in. I resolved it with what I consider a gruesome hack. I discovered
that forcing libtool to use
Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recently had a bug (193950) filed against one of my packages because the
shared libraries had undefined non-weak symbols - libstdc++ was not being
linked in. I resolved it with what I consider a gruesome hack. I discovered
that forcing libtool to use
Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recently adopted several packages (jade, openjade, opensp) and several of
the open bugs were fixed by NMUs, so they have fixed tags. I think all I
need to do is send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that says, This bug
was fixed in the NMU of version
Neil Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recently adopted several packages (jade, openjade, opensp) and several of
the open bugs were fixed by NMUs, so they have fixed tags. I think all I
need to do is send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that says, This bug
was fixed in the NMU of version
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
Colin Watson wrote:
I actually don't see how dpkg-buildpackage's
sign-immediately-after-build defaults ever make sense (except when
dpkg-buildpackage was originally written, when debsign didn't yet
exist). Why would you want to waste time signing a
Matthias Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
Please send only plain text email to the mailing list.
what can I do?
I think this means that you need (a more recent version of) GNU
automake.
What version do you have, if any?
I have
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
