.0 +0100
+++ backintime-1.2.1/debian/changelog 2021-05-31 15:14:50.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+backintime (1.2.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Cherry-pick patch for #946349 from upstream Git repository
+(Closes: #946349).
+
+ -- Fabian Wolff Mon, 31 May 2021 15:14:50 +0200
+
On 1/11/21 3:45 AM, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>> In any case, I've changed my upload to a QA upload now and reuploaded
>> it to Salsa and Mentors.
>
> I see bartm beat me to uploading it.
Are you sure? I didn't receive any emails about an upload, and the
tracker doesn't say anything about a recent
Hi Stuart,
thanks for having a look at the package!
But no, I do not currently intend to adopt this package. I just
thought I'd try and help with the freeze preparation by fixing the RC
bug in this package.
The reason I created the repository in the Science Team area is that I
have write access
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: woj...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a non-maintainer upload for the 'xylib'
package.
The package currently suffers from RC bug #975672; in the bug
discussion, the current package maintainer has pointed out
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the 'smlnj' package.
The Debian package has not been updated in four years except for minor
maintenance work. I have now packaged the latest upstream version,
110.98.1, which, most
On 3/30/20 7:19 PM, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Does it seem you already got access?
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pulseaudio-dlna/-/commit/61d6ee13c13eb76cb6b70b6b50c2fb5efe04dc7f
Yeah, somebody (probably Adam -- thanks!) created the repository and gave
me the necessary access permissions
Hi Adam and Muammar,
thanks for your quick replies! Adam, thank you for looking over my changes and
sponsoring the upload.
One more thing: As I said in my original email, I have a Git repository set up
for this package, but I don't have the necessary permissions to create a
repository in the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: muam...@debian.org, sergi...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the 'pulseaudio-dlna' package.
The package has been removed from testing because it's still using Python 2,
and there seems to be no recent
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: bba...@mit.edu, sergi...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an upload of the 'dafny' package.
There have been new upstream releases, I have fixed the two open RC
bugs for this package, enabled autopkgtest package
On 11/24/19 7:13 PM, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
> As the current maintainer, I definitely do not object to this NMU (or
> any other NMUs associated with this package). Sponsors, please feel free
> to upload without delay.
Thanks. One more question: Upstream has switched to the Expat ("MIT/X11")
On 11/16/19 8:39 PM, Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 19-11-16 19:00:26, Fabian Wolff wrote:
>> It's 'wolff-guest'. (And please CC me in your replies, as I'm not
>> subscribed to debian-mentors.)
>
> I've created the repo, and gave you Maintainer access. Let me know if
&g
to make the new version build.
* Enable autopkgtest package testing, and add mccarthy-{91,92} tests.
* Update Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser fields in debian/control.
-- Fabian Wolff Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:16:48 +0100
The current maintainer is looking for someone to adopt the package (#903142
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:01:13 +, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19-11-13 23:38:46, Fabian Wolff wrote:
> > I am currently working on the boogie package. There has been a new
> > upstream release which I'm trying to package; I'm not very familiar
> > with Mono and
Dear mentors,
I am currently working on the boogie package. There has been a new upstream
release which I'm trying to package; I'm not very familiar with Mono and CLI
packaging, but I'll see how far I can get.
In any case, I would like to maintain my (and others') work in a repository
on Salsa
19 9:48 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Fabian!
>
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 06:28:26PM +0100, Fabian Wolff wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for an upload of the 'backintime' package.
>> [...]
>
> I would be happy to sponsor this, just
/copyright (Closes: #941984, #942155).
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.1 (no changes).
* Add additional backintime-qt_polkit.1.gz symlink to backintime.1.gz
to silence the binary-without-manpage Lintian warning.
-- Fabian Wolff Sat, 19 Oct 2019 23:21:22 +0200
The package
de --allow z3
> Uploading commands file to ssh.upload.debian.org (incoming:
> /srv/upload.debian.org/UploadQueue/)
> Picking DM Fabian Wolff with fingerprint
> 4C22AB203E83493607A16E4480AD73734275BDAF
> SCP is deprecated. Please consider upgrading to SFTP.
> Uploading locutus-157022
-superficial test cases.
* Add -fPIC to DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND in an attempt to fix #940266.
* Try to make the build more reproducible.
-- Fabian Wolff Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:21:54 +0200
In particular, I've introduced the new python3-z3 package, so whoever decides to
sponsor this upload
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the eqonomize package.
The only change I made has been the introduction of a new upstream version.
The package can be found on Mentors, and my changes are also in the Git
repository on
upstream moved from
Qt 4 to Qt 5. Make backintime-qt4 a transitional package.
* Drop the transitional backintime-{gnome,kde} packages
(Closes: #939139, #939140).
-- Fabian Wolff Sat, 14 Sep 2019 14:36:13 +0200
The package is available on Mentors, and I have put my changes
On 8/27/19 4:00 PM, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>> z3 (4.8.4-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> I am not a z3 dev, but the latest z3 release is 4.8.5. Is there a
> particular motivation for uploading a 4.8.4-based release?
Thanks for pointing this out; I did not notice this, because I was
using
/gbp.conf.
* Update and reorganize patches.
* Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
* Remove trailing whitespace from debian/control.
* Build-Depend on libnum-ocaml-dev (Closes: #934048).
-- Fabian Wolff Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:30:11
On 8/27/19 12:20 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Monday, August 26 2019, Fabian Wolff wrote:
>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the dbacl package.
>>
>> This upload attempts to fix a FTBFS bug (#916182), and I have also
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the dbacl package.
This upload attempts to fix a FTBFS bug (#916182), and I have also performed
some standard package maintenance tasks.
I will push to the proper repository (in the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the ffe package.
I have mainly imported a new upstream version and performed some standard
package maintenance tasks.
I will push to the proper repository (in the Debian group on Salsa)
Developer
permissions.
So, could you (or somebody else) upgrade my permissions in these three Gitlab
repositories to "Maintainer"?
On 8/26/19 1:55 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Sunday, August 25 2019, Fabian Wolff wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Fabian,
>
>>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the aj-snapshot package.
I have mainly imported a new upstream version and performed some standard
package maintenance tasks.
I will push to the proper repository (in the Debian group on
maintenance tasks (Ondřej Nový pushed one commit to the Salsa
repository a while ago, so I've kept him in the changelog):
eqonomize (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
[ Ondřej Nový ]
* d/control: Fix wrong Vcs-*
[ Fabian Wolff ]
* New upstream release
upstream release.
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
* Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.
-- Fabian Wolff Sun, 25 Aug 2019 23:56:47 +0200
These changes can be found on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doclifter
And I've also uploaded the package to Mentors
Hi,
I am currently preparing QA uploads for the 'aj-snapshot', 'dbacl', and 'ffe'
packages [0, 1, 2].
I would like to create packaging repositories for these projects in the Debian
group on Salsa [3], but since I am not a Debian Developer, I don't have the
necessary permissions on Salsa to
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 07:02:15PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> I see a few problems here; some I need you to address before moving
> forward, and others can be tackled later. Let me make a list:
>
> 1) You're basically removing functionalities from the upstream project,
> so I think
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Saturday, June 16 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote:
> > Could someone please create a 'libantlr3c' repository in the Debian
> > group on Salsa and give me (wolff-guest) write access to it? An empty
> > repos
Dear mentors,
I am currently preparing a QA upload for the libantlr3c package.
This package is currently orphaned and not maintained in any packaging
VCS repository. For this reason, I think it would be a good idea to
create a repository for this package on Salsa in the Debian group.
However,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:16:42PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Hey Fabian,
>
> Can you add yourself on d/copyright, under the entry for the "debian/*"
> files? After all, you deserve the credit as well ;-).
>
> Other than that, it's ready for upload. Let me know when you make the
>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 08:10:24PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:33:03PM +0200, Fabian Wolff wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > > Thanks! And yeah, I'd say it's OK to just start from scracth
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:39:47PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> There is now https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpp
> Account wolff-guest has developer privilege.
>
> Take it for a spin ( slang for testdrive )
> and come with your feedback :-)
Great, thank you!
Would you, by any chance, be
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:58AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Thanks! And yeah, I'd say it's OK to just start from scracth in this
> case.
I have imported every version I found on snapshot.debian.org into the
repository, so at least some history is available now.
> Done:
>
>
Dear mentors,
I am currently preparing a QA upload for the gpp package.
The gpp package is not yet maintained in any VCS repository, so I
think it might be a good idea to create a Git repository in the Debian
group on Salsa for gpp packaging.
However, I don't have access to the Debian group on
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:38:41PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Have you considered moving this package to salsa? It'd be a shame to
> not have a VCS for it.
Sure, I can do that. The only problem is that since the Bazaar
repository is no longer reachable, I don't have the commit
changes).
* Upgrade debian/copyright to the machine-readable format.
* Delete trailing whitespace from debian/changelog in order to
silence the file-contains-trailing-whitespace Lintian tag.
* Add xmlto as a build dependency in debian/control.
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.d
ox-1.6-dev in
debian/control.
* Update debian/copyright.
* Remove trailing whitespace from debian/changelog and debian/control
in order to silence the file-contains-trailing-whitespace Lintian
tag.
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Mon, 23 Apr 2018 21:32:14 +02
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 08:27:02PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Hm, I think you forgot to push the upstream/pristine-tar branches,
> because I can't rebuild the tarball here. Could you do that, please?
Are you sure? The upstream/5.5.0 tag seems to be available in the
Salsa repository:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 01:16:04PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Thank to everybody who replied. Really appreciated.
>
> Fabian, I think it's OK if you just update the upstream project's
> copyright info, so I agree with the proposed modification you suggested
> above.
>
> Please let me
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't think you should be taking it upon yourself to add copyright
> statements regarding debian/ contents where authors have not asserted their
> copyright up front. There is precious little in debian/, outside of
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:47:12PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> I've uploaded the package now.
Great, thank you!
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:55:00PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Or you can also move the package under the Debian Python Modules Team
> umbrella, if it makes more sense. Packaging Python modules with the
> DPMT is the preferred way nowadays, but that's really up to you (and
> just to be
/control and Source field in
debian/copyright to use HTTPS.
* Remove incorrect Multi-Arch fields in debian/control.
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:35:36 +0200
I have to admit that I'm not entirely sure about the Multi-Arch fields
that I removed. Th
Dear mentors,
I am currently preparing a QA upload for the link-grammar Debian
package. The link-grammar packaging Git repository is currently still
hosted on Alioth:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/link-grammar.git
I would like to migrate the repository to Salsa, but since I am
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:58:30PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> I can help with it, but there are two things I'd like to see first.
Thank you for your review!
> 1) There are no Vcs-* fields, and it's unclear to me where the git
> repository for the package is located (I
uite field to debian/control.
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.1.4 (no changes).
* Upgrade to debhelper compat level 11 (no changes).
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:30:09 +0200
The package is available on Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:19:41PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> LGTM, Uploading!
Great, thanks!
> (The only thing you could do is to file those patches upstream to get
> them included.)
Done. I probably should have done this right away.
Best regards,
Fabian
-fix-spelling.patch.
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Mon, 02 Apr 2018 18:39:00 +0200
The package is available on Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/apparix
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apparix/apparix_11-062-1.dsc
Thank you!
Best regards,
Fabian
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 09:27:26AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Done, created empty repoisotry. (Please populate the complete history)
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/eqonomize
Great, thank you!
> Please also add an MR for the AliothRewriter @
> https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter
.
* Mark eqonomize-doc as Multi-Arch: foreign.
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Mon, 02 Apr 2018 14:43:28 +0200
The package is available on Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/eqonomize
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eqonomize/eqonomize_1.2.0-1.dsc
Thank you!
Lintian tag.
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:15:13 +0200
The package is available on Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ffe
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/ffe/ffe_0.3.8-1.dsc
Thank you!
Best regards,
Fabian
Dear mentors,
I am currently preparing a QA upload for the eqonomize Debian package.
I have based my work on top of the existing packaging Git repository,
which is currently still hosted on Alioth [0].
However, with Alioth being replaced by Salsa, I think it would be a
good idea to migrate the
).
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.1.3 in debian/control (no changes).
* Add build dependency on libncurses-dev (Closes: #646734).
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Sat, 31 Mar 2018 21:59:24 +0200
The package is available on Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/dbacl
in debian/control (no changes).
* Remove fixman.patch (fixed upstream).
* Add 00-fix-long-options.patch (Closes: #715625).
-- Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de> Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:09:03 +0200
The package is available on Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/aj-snapshot
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:02:05PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> just a question, why aren't you packaging the Python2 version?
> (the question is that I would like to avoid another binNEW queue in case some
> other people asks for it)
In this document
age/libtcod
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libt/libtcod/libtcod_1.6.1+dfsg-1.dsc
Regards,
Fabian Wolff
python-picklable-itertools_0.1.1-1.dsc
Regards,
Fabian Wolff
Control: reopen -1
I have
- added Breaks + Replaces in debian/control
- fixed the copyright information for hamiltonian.py
- enabled most tests
- enabled hardening flags
This should address the remaining issues the two of you found in the
previous package.
Wilk wrote:
> Hi Fabian!
>
> I don't intend to sponsor this upload, but here's a quick review:
>
> * Fabian Wolff <fabi.wo...@arcor.de>, 2016-07-09, 16:14:
> > * Add patch fix-dotnet-version.patch (Closes: #808695).
>
> This gives me no clue what the patch is about.
, but I think
closing the four RC bugs has a higher priority right now.
The package is available on Mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/z3
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/z3/z3_4.4.1-0.1.dsc
Regards,
Fabian Wolff
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:29:33PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >Done. I removed the override in debian/rules.
>
> wonderful
>
> >I went with a mixture of both patches you proposed. I also forwarded>the
> >patches to upstream & removed the now useless exports in
>
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:59:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I don't see why it can't be patched to work like almost every other tool
> that uses a build system, but I don't care a lot about upstream.
>
> The (possible) issue I foresee is: somebody updates the upstream build system
>
Thanks for the review. I'm glad you liked it!
> 1) why an empty dh_[auto_]install override?
dh_auto_install does not do anything useful here: `make install` for
some reason does not actually install anything but just compiles some
examples (that won't be part of the Debian package) and then
Thank you very much for the review! And sorry for the additional work that I
caused you.
> I also tweaked the changelog to be a little bit more verbose, and probably
> something more
> I put this on deferred/15, and I'm attaching it to this email or you can dget
> from there
>
nge listed as the third bullet point was necessary to fix a
certain Lintian warning. This did indeed change the soname, but since
aiksaurus currently has no reverse dependencies, I do not think that
this is a problem.
Regards,
Fabian Wolff
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:27:37AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> I'm afraid that it builds only on 64-bit architectures (I tried amd64 and
> arm64), on 32-bit ones (x32 armhf i386) it fails with:
>
> [...]
>
> Also, it'd be nice if you added --parallel to the dh call, it massively
> speeds up
Hi everyone,
thanks for the reviews!
> Fabian, why are you trying to package an upstream snapshot?
> (not asking to package 1.5.1, I'm just wondering about why a new library
> should
> eventually enter Debian in a snapshot form)
I'm not packaging a random snapshot. I have based the package on
n/pool/main/libt/libtcod/libtcod_1.6.0~pre1+dfsg-1.dsc
More information about libtcod can be obtained from
https://bitbucket.org/libtcod/libtcod
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release. Closes: #704587
Regards,
Fabian Wolff
72 matches
Mail list logo
