Re: debian/rules stamp-* targets

2012-09-03 Thread Igor Pashev
03.09.2012 21:53, Arno Töll пишет: > Hi, > > On 03.09.2012 18:55, The Wanderer wrote: >> I have not been able to find any documentation on these stamp-* targets, >> although searching has revealed that they or something like them appear >> to be >> (or to have been) used in a number of other packa

Re: Determine DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH without requiring dpkg-dev

2012-07-25 Thread Igor Pashev
25.07.2012 12:05, Michael Wild пишет: > Hi all > > How can I reliably (from a user-program) determine the > multiarch-triplet/quadlet without depending on dpkg-dev? I found some > talk of a lsb_architecture utility, but so far have found no trace of it... # gcc -print-multiarch x86_64-linux-gnu

Re: RFS: libblocxx/544~svn-1 (2nd try + updated pkg)

2012-04-19 Thread Igor Pashev
19.04.2012 12:30, Björn Esser пишет: > Severity: wishlish > > *** UPDATE *** > New version from svn trunk (544~svn replaces 2.1.0). > Documentation (html + LaTeX) is now included in build-process. > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libblocxx". > Ha

Re: RFS: augeas/0.10.0-0.1 [NMU]

2012-04-17 Thread Igor Pashev
17.04.2012 20:46, Nicolas Valcárcel пишет: > Yes, i got contacted and i +1'd the upload, but i don't work for > canonical anymore so my e-mail is not that one, so if you can please > update my e-mail to nvalcar...@gmail.com that'll be great. Also about > the "-1" remove about naturaldocs you'll nee

Re: RFS: augeas/0.10.0-0.1 [NMU]

2012-04-17 Thread Igor Pashev
16.04.2012 15:37, Ansgar Burchardt пишет: > Please do so first, for example by asking for the new version in the > BTS. You can also include your proposed NMU diff if you want to help > the maintainer. A NMU should only be done if the maintainer is busy and > cannot react himself. I'll always c

Re: RFS: augeas/0.10.0-0.1 [NMU]

2012-04-16 Thread Igor Pashev
16.04.2012 13:52, Ansgar Burchardt пишет: > On 04/16/2012 11:20 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote: >> dget -x >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/augeas/augeas_0.10.0-0.1.dsc >> >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> augeas (0.10.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=low >> . >>* Non-maintainer u

Re: please test this code, if it is koscher

2012-02-20 Thread Igor Pashev
It's a troll. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f426f54.4070...@gmail.com

Re: Moving cron job from daily to weekly

2011-12-02 Thread Igor Pashev
02.12.2011 12:54, Tomasz Muras пишет: > Hello, > > If a package installs cronjob in (say) /etc/cron.daily but administrator > wants to move that into "weekly" job - would it be OK for him to simply > move the configuration file from /etc/cron.daily to /etc/cron.weekly? Or > do you think it may cau

Re: RFS: python-cpl

2011-11-04 Thread Igor Pashev
CPL is too short for me, and is not widely known abbreviation, I guess. I just remember of Control Panel Library :-) CPL can stand for "Crystallographic Protocol Library" too Maybe python-eso-cpl, or python-eso.cpl, or python-esocpl. 04.11.2011 13:06, Ole Streicher пишет: Hi I

Re: RFS: python-cpl

2011-11-04 Thread Igor Pashev
I think the name "python-cpl" is not descriptive enough 04.11.2011 00:07, Ole Streicher пишет: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cpl". * Package name: python-cpl Version : 0.3.5-1 Upstream Author : Ole Streicher * URL : http://w

Dependency on lib32foo vs libfoo on amd64

2011-10-14 Thread Igor Pashev
I'm building a package with: 64-bits app (foo), 64-bits lib (libfoo) and 32-bits lib (lib32foo). foo is linked with libfoo, but dependency in DEBIAN/control is set to li32foo. What's the matter? dpkg 1.16.1 DH 8.9.8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Re: RFS: gentoo (New upstream version: package already in Debian).

2011-09-13 Thread Igor Pashev
13.09.2011 18:35, Marc Haber пишет: >> gentoo - Fully GUI-configurable, two-pane X file manager > > I would strongly suggest choosing a different name, due to the > identically named Linux distribution. Gentoo is used as an example in Debian maintainer's guide :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Packaging php app/scripts

2011-09-05 Thread Igor Pashev
06.09.2011 00:44, kuLa пишет: > Hi all, > I have simple app in php and would like to package it. Source is in git > (2 branches; upstream and debian, gbp.conf is pointing into these branches). > I used dh_make to debianised package, relevant packages has been edited. > When running git buildpackage

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-04 Thread Igor Pashev
Thank you David! I was blind: build-arch <-> binary-arch :-) > Oh, and for next upload please add Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git headers Is it ok to use github or whatsoever for this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-04 Thread Igor Pashev
03.09.2011 19:22, David Bremner пишет: > On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:34:23 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: > Other architectures will be built on the autobuilder network, all going > well. For the second question, it depends how long the package takes to > pass through NEW. It is usually pretty

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-03 Thread Igor Pashev
Greate! Thank you. OA is uploaded to FTP. What about other architectures (i386, alpha, powerpc, etc)? Do I need another sponsor? :-) How much time does it take for package to appear in repo? 03.09.2011 16:37, David Bremner пишет: > On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:07:39 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: &

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-09-03 Thread Igor Pashev
I have upload new version without "./contrib" and "./src/include/xpm.h". The latter is going to be removed in upstream, that file is from very old Axiom version. "./contrib" is not used now and has unclear license mess: "./contrib/texmacs/COPYING" says about GPL-3, but sources are BSDL or GPL (1

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-08-30 Thread Igor Pashev
30.08.2011 16:03, David Bremner пишет: > On startup, I get > >(HyperDoc) read_ht_db: No ht.db file found. > > before the rest of the startup messages. > > Weirdly, the basic help commands I tried seemed to work, but I don't > really know what to expect. I saw this message after making sym

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-08-29 Thread Igor Pashev
> - The second paragraph of the long description is not helpful to the > debian user trying to decide whether to install the package; we try > not to waste space in the description because it is stored in many > places (e.g. /var/lib/dpkg/available). You are welcome to add a > README.Debia

Re: RFS: open-axiom

2011-08-28 Thread Igor Pashev
28.08.2011 19:00, David Bremner пишет: > I'm not sure if open-axiom uses this feature (and I notice sbcl itself > also has broken #! lines in it's fasl files. In your case, I suspect the > upstream build process is putting the wrong path into the #! > lines. interpsys isn't installed by debian sbcl