On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:25:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
As I have never worked with the BTS control bot, I am asking for
directions. Shall this mail sent from my own address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] suffice for setting an ITA?
=== 8
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:27:52PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Hi *,
I'm packaging gnome-translate (ITP #292909), and everything builds fine. A
lintian check on the .changes file throws:
E: gnome-translate source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess
2003-07-02
What am I supposed
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:59:37PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1
of the package gthumb, which I'm adopting.
The package is not lintian clean, it has 3 overrides:
- gthumb: no-shlibs-control-file and
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:04:25PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:35:43PM +1100, David Schulberg wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue in that my Debian Linux browsers are unable to connect to
our server via SSL through stunnel.
Windows browsers, both IE and Firefox, connect fine.
I read again your post to stunnel-users. Given that your
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:12:03PM +0100, Andreas Hoenen wrote:
I don't know if there's anything on mentors.d.o that stops you from
doing this, but I'd personally say you don't need to bump versions
before the package actually gets into the archive, so you could just
stick with '-1' for a
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-3 of the wmanager
package; I am hereby attempting to adopt it, fix its two bugs
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-3 of the wmanager
package; I am hereby attempting to adopt it, fix its two bugs, and bring it
up-to-date with the Debian policy and the modern world in general
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:29:39PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On lun, 2007-12-10 at 11:35 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On dom, 2007-12-09 at 16:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
You
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:21:23PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On mar, 2007-12-11 at 08:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
(BTW. Always use the lintian from unstable to check your packages.)
I do. I've just updated lintian but it won't give me those errors even
with -i. Do
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:49:22PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
The new package is at the same place as before. It shouldn't have any
problems now.
I'll check it tonight.
Good work.
I've uploaded the package. You should receive confirmations for the
upload shortly.
Please
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On dom, 2007-12-09 at 16:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
You can find it at http://www.cmartin.tk/blam/blam_1.8.4-3.dsc
I will review your package for upload. It will take a little while,
since you
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
My usual sponsor (Amaya) is away for a while and so I've been
orphaned :(
...
Blam is a news feed reader written in C# which supports Atom and RSS.
It is already in Debian but I need a new sponsor.
You can find it at
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:09:48PM +0100, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 03:39:38 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
The new dpkg-shlibdeps is giving me tons of messages of the form
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol ui_node_remove_node used by
debian/liferea/usr/lib
The new dpkg-shlibdeps is giving me tons of messages of the form
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol ui_node_remove_node used by
debian/liferea/usr/lib/liferea/libliscrlua.so found in none of the libraries
The .so in question is a plugin meant to be dlopened by the main
program. The symbols
[English reply at the end]
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:48:02AM +0100, kingworld360 wrote:
OLA si hay alguien que no le importe ayudar
soi nuevo con este sistema operativo cuando sepa are programas y mantendre
los paquetes
Hola. Esta lista a la que escribiste se maneja en inglés y está
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:20:06AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why do you need to #define this?
Just because I dislike using magic constants.
But looking at the rest of the code, I would just use
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:52:33AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it ok with you if I upload it with a string literal instead of a
define?
Yes, no problem. Thanks
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Hi,
I've uploaded the package with those changes to the 7-day delayed queue.
Please let me know if there are any problems (I'll subscribe to the PTS,
but I don't get the reply e-mails from the upload).
Tks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just one question about this part:
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include grun2.xpm
#if defined (HAVE_GETTEXT) || defined (HAVE_CATGETS)
#include libintl.h
+#define UTF8 UTF-8
#else
#include intl/libintl.h
#endif
@@ -1107,6 +1108,7 @@ int PASCAL
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a 7 days delayed NMU of package grun.
The upload would fix these bugs: 438704
This is a long standing (but recently reported, sadly) bug that has
just become grave, because with gtk 2.12 it now results on inmediate
segfaults when using grun. The
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 08:33:16AM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Felipe Sateler wrote:
- Behave sensibly when invoked with 'start' and already running
- Behave sensibly when invoked with 'stop' and not running
So in the end I agree that would be sensible to exit with 0, if the
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:37:36AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Should I upload with just the change from (1)?
Yes. I agree with your reasoning.
Ready. The new package at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 11:11:05AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Package looks fine. I'm currently updating my local pbuilder base and
will upload when that is done.
Unfortunately, I just realised that there are a few more
So far, all discussion I've seen about whether to collapse changes
made during sponsorship review into a single debian revision for
upload have focused in the case of an initial package upload.
Does anyone have any special arguments for doing it one way or another
in the case of an upgrade?
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:03:04PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:4.20-3
of my package stunnel4.
I have some fixes/suggestions for you. Since this would be the first
package that I
My upstream's copyright statements in source files contain the old FSF
mailing address. I will contact them about this problem but, while
they react should I
a) Faithfully reproduce their copyright statement in the package's
debian/copyright and give wrong information to users, or
b) Use the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:4.20-3
of my package stunnel4.
It builds these binary packages:
stunnel- dummy upgrade package
stunnel4 - Universal SSL tunnel for network daemons
The package is lintian/linda clean. It is not piuparts clean because
it does
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Piotr O??arowski wrote:
[Adam Cécile (Le_Vert), 08.08.2007]
Could your remind me which packages have you sponsored ?
for i in list of your source packages;
do
who-uploads $i|grep naoliv echo $i
done
But, where do we find this who-uploads? If
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:08:49PM +0200, Piotr O??arowski wrote:
[Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz, 08.08.2007]
But, where do we find this who-uploads? If it's in some debian
machine, it's useless to us nonDDs.
$ apt-file search bin/who-uploads
devscripts: usr/bin/who-uploads
Duh. Sorry
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:4.20-3
of my package stunnel4.
It builds these binary packages:
stunnel- dummy upgrade package
stunnel4 - Universal SSL tunnel for network daemons
The package is lintian/linda clean. It is not piuparts clean because
it does
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:21:23PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:53:49PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:40:26 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. Since the DD/sponsor is the one who creates the uploaded
packages,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:55:01PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:51:18PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:4.20-1
of the package stunnel, which I'm adpoting.
The syntax in the debian/changelog is not correct
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:03:22PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Can mark comments as 'advocating an upload'
By the way, is there any way to make sure that the person marking a
comment as 'advocating an upload' is really a DD
Why this? If someone is a DD, and they advocate uploading a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:4.20-1
of the package stunnel, which I'm adpoting.
It builds these binary packages:
stunnel- Universal SSL tunnel for network daemons
The package is lintian/linda/piuparts clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 382099, 416955
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:47:25PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
* debian/docs: what about the documentation in Doc? You want to add it
to the pacakge, if the license allows it. Please note that latex2html is
in non-free. You may not use it or the results form it. But using latex
to create
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:59:20AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
If someone makes checking on the archive how many packages build
depends on dpatch and quit
$ grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends dpatch -sPackage
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.mx.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources|wc
-l
1461
$
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:27:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:07:28AM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
Why do you want the directory in the diff.gz? If you need it at build
time, create it in the build rules.
I just thought it was simpler if there were no build
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:43:05PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Can anybody explain how packages go into non-free? I mean: how much free
the package has to be to be considered to non-free and which issues are
blocker that would forbid the package into entering non-free?
A package can go into
stunnel (which I'm adpoting) has two mutually incompatible major
upstream versions, 3 and 4. Back when 4 was first released, the
maintainer packaged it separately, as stunnel4, to avoid the major
grief of forcing such an update on users.
Since then, stunnel4 has grown a compatibility wrapper
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work?
Would a 'review without ITS' be done by a simple reply to the RFS
without a subject marking?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 02:55:35PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
* Do not change file permissions in postinst, unless you do it with
dpkg-statoverride. In this case, given that what you want are
standard execute permissions for a binary, you just need to do it
when packaging. Which is
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:46:09PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:38:49 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Hm, could you explain that a bit more? I need the binary setuid-root,
so $USER is able to write to /sys/class/backlight/
I previously used install -M 4755
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 07:47:51PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:57:45 +0200 Evgeni Golov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package brightd.
IANADD, so I can't sponsor you. I can, however, offer you some
comments:
* Your watch file is wrong, the line should be
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:51:17AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:58:15 +0100
Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag, 11. März 2007 schrieb Ricardo Mones:
and, also an informative hint about splitting the (large)
arch-independent portion in
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:51:06PM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
* I'm not sure the BTS is smart enough to close #278739 that appears
with a newline between it and closes:. (If I'm wrong, someone please
correct me.)
Done, but does anyone know if BTS is smart enough to handle this?
No.
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:41:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:09 -0300, Carlos Pasqualini wrote:
[ slightly confusing description ]
I do not understand the situation with this package. You do claim to
support some SPL printers, but the last sentence asks for
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:44:58PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
New, working, package at the same URL. I ended up removing the patch
from the last update, as the poster wrote later saying it didn't solve
the problems after all.
Took us a while, but it's now sorted and I've just uploaded
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
[...]
The following packages have been kept back:
liferea
I've got a question on your transition
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I suspect you need the third horseman of the package apocalypse,
Replaces
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
out a
Provides: liferea-gtkhtml
to the liferea package, with no results
My regular sponsor for this package has been busy lately. Could
someone review and do a one time sponsoring of this?
http://www.nul-unu.com/quien/rodrigo/debian/liferea/liferea_1.0.27-2.dsc
I do have an issue I need help testing before upload. If I install
etch/sid liferea + liferea-gtkhtml in a
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:23:33 +0100
Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've opened bug #394590 for about 100 days now and got no answer from
the maintainer (Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The maintainer
is known to be MIA. I have sent him an email today to explain my
intent to do a
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:46:57PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
| $ linda -i *.dsc
| W: conntrackd; Maintainer script postinst uses debhelper, but does not use
#DEBHELPER#.
I do not use any debhelper-magic in the scripts and do not understand
what linda wants me to do.
I could simply
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:37:24AM +0100, Andreas Moll wrote:
make: execvp: debian/debian-ball-install: Permission denied
make: *** [clean] Error 127
Hi,
I dont have any clue what went wrong with the permissions of this file
since I have tested the package multiple times on several
Upstream's response to #361376 is to recommend the dropping of
liferea-gtkhtml from 64bit arches. How does one go about that?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
[Summary for -release: Is removing liferea-gtkhtml too disruptive for etch?]
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:04:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:36:20PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
Upstream's response to #361376 is to recommend the dropping of
liferea
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:27:27AM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
For over 3 years now I help out on a multimedia-project named MMS
... we realy would like to see it as part of debian, as we think it's stable,
tested and well documented.
I started packaging (with the help of the web
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:35:00PM +0100, Kasper Peeters wrote:
Please post the complete URL to your .dsc file, it's easier for
potential sponsors to grab it.
http://www.aei.mpg.de/~peekas/debian/lie_2.2.2-1.dsc
FWIW: Dear DD's, pending minor comments below, I believe this package
is
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:32:06AM +0100, Kasper Peeters wrote:
Once you make these changes, repost your sponsor request.
I have made all the changes you mentioned in your two previous
emails. New files are at
http://www.aei.mpg.de/~peekas/debian/
Please post the complete URL to your
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:03:11PM +0100, Kasper Peeters wrote:
We need to see your source package to comment. Please post an URL to
the .dsc
.dsc:http://www.aei.mpg.de/~peekas/lie_2.2.2-1.dsc
.tar.gz: http://www.aei.mpg.de/~peekas/lie_2.2.2-1.tar.gz
You should not be making a native
Ok. Further comment:
debian/dirs is not needed, the build system creates the dirs anyways.
You should ship manual.dvi in /usr/share/doc/lie
Read about doc-base and register it there, too.
Upstream's readme contains only compilation instructions. These are
not needed in a debian package, and
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:04:49PM +, Loic Le Guyader wrote:
Ok, I fixed the manpage with a patch applied with dpatch. The update version
is
available on
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=harminv
One minor nitpick: Your .diff.gz contains
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Loïc Le Guyader wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package harminv.
IANADD, so I can't sponsor, but I have reviewed your package and have
the following comments:
$ lintian -I
W: libharminv: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink
What does one do with an inactive unreproducible important bug? (#368546)
Close it? After how long?
Last mail from submitter was four months ago. No one else has ever
seen it, either in Debian or in upstream mailing list.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 03:36:41PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
The check is done on the source package - .orig.tar.gz+diff. The
problem is in the .orig.tar.gz, so clean target has no chance to
correct it.
Yes, that's what I was
I'm getting the following linda error:
linda -i ../result/keytouch_2.2.2-1_i386.changes
E: keytouch; Package contains autoconf-generated files.
The package contains the file shown above, which is generated by
autoconf. This may confuse the buildd's, and should be removed by the
clean target of
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
If copyright has been asserted on the file then it
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 10:32:29PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
* You ship an empty /tmp/ in the deb, please drop this.
Personalbackup depends on the existence of the /tmp folder...so is it ok
to just assume that it is always there ?
Other packages assume it is there I guess, but I
I'm making a package for internal use, but want to get it right in
case I decide to try to get it uploaded.
Some of the upstream code has the license quoted at the end. That
license IMHO makes the code not only non-free but actually not
source-distributable. However, that code is unmaintained
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:27:43PM +0200, kku wrote:
You are programaticaly managing a configuration file in /etc. You
should look into using ucf, that already handles this.
I've had a look at ucf, but I do not think it fits my need (unless I have
overlooked something).
I have a template
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:01:47AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:27:43PM +0200, kku wrote:
Now to detect that the user did (not) change the conf file, I check the
md5sum of the content
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package personalbackup.
IANADD, so I can't sponsor. But my comments, anyways:
You should not depend in postgresql, since that is just a transitional
package. Depend on an specific version, or on several.
In a related note, should you depend on
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:40:23PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
I have split my package since the last upload. Therefore two of
the packages I have to test are not known to apt-get, only one is.
Therefore, piuparts won't do the upgrade test. Is there a way I can get
it to do this test? (I can
Upon completing a piuparts run I get
7m19.8s ERROR: Package purging left files on system:
/etc/xml
/usr/share/applications
owned by: gnome-terminal-data, gnome-menus, desktop-file-utils,
capplets-data
/usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
/var/log/scrollkeeper.log
None of those
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:58:25PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
Charles Fry wrote:
A package I am creating from scratch is giving me the lintian warning
binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath.
I've looked for this kind of answer before - it's not as simple as it
appears. rpath arises from
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:05:36PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
So, my questions are: Have I succesfully identified the currently
accepted ways of fixing this warning?
Depends. Does it actually fix the warning?
Yes, but it also broke my binary, which can no longer find the needed
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
So is the lintian test wrong? Should it only be checking for rpaths that
aren't system directories?
good question!
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description:
Having recently taken over maintaining sawfish, I ran lintian -I on it
and got
I: sawfish: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 4848kB 90%
which refers me to
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices#s-bpp-archindepdata
... However, if the size of the data is
I another thread I said:
Having recently taken over maintaining sawfish, I ran lintian -I on it
and got
I: sawfish: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 4848kB 90%
and said also that I'll work on splitting that off.
So ... do I just move /usr/share/* to the _all.deb package? Obviously
not, since
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:07:10PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:46:37AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
sawfish, a window manager implemented in lisp, has been orphaned by its
previous maintainer (#373702)
I would like to adopt it,
I may help
sawfish, a window manager implemented in lisp, has been orphaned by its
previous maintainer (#373702)
I would like to adopt it, but I would require help and an sponsor. sawfish
does not appear to be heavy on maintenance (upstream CVS shows 37
commits over the last year, there are 26 normal and 20
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:09:04PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Kevin Bube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I uploaded a new package version to mentors.debian.net. The changelog
file lists all changes done. I think I addressed all problems which
still remained.
83 matches
Mail list logo
