, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 6/11/20 1:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Just to confirm - will the certificates be automatically re-
added (assuming that users have either the automatically trust
or prompt options enabled)?
(stretch-pu report cc'ed, since same applies)
Excellent question. I be
ss 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G5"
+ "VeriSign Universal Root Certification Authority"
.
[ Gianfranco Costamagna ]
* debian/{rules,control}:
Merge Ubuntu patch from Matthias Klose to use Python3 during build.
Closes: #942915
Regards,
--
Michael Shuler
On 6/5/20 10:35 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Except for keeping debian/NEWS you were actually backporting everything
that was possible, this was not a 20161130+nmu1+deb9u2 release that
cherry-picked only one or few changes.
Given the nature of ca-certificates it was IMHO the correct decision
to backpo
On 6/5/20 4:15 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Compared to 20200601 and 20200601~deb10u1 this contains the following
additional files:
/usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/AddTrust_Low-Value_Services_Root.crt
/usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/Camerfirma_Chambers_of_Commerce_Root.crt
/usr/share/ca-certific
Root". Closes: #956411, #955038, #911289, #961907
* Fix permissions on /usr/local/share/ca-certificates when using
symlinks.
Closes: #916833
Thank you sponsor!
--
Kind regards,
Michael Shuler
ts expired "AddTrust External
Root". Closes: #956411, #955038, #911289, #961907
Thank you sponsor!
--
Kind regards,
Michael Shuler
ecurity, since
there is no secret info in here:
Forwarded Message
Subject: ca-certificates: buster-security & stretch-security (and sid)
uploads
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 22:22:47 -0500
From: Michael Shuler
To: t...@security.debian.org
Hi Security Team,
I committed ch
ge changes from 20200601
- d/control
* This security release updates the Mozilla CA bundle and blacklists
distrusted Symantec roots and the expired AddTrust External Root.
Regards,
Michael Shuler
ge changes from 20200601
- d/control; set d/gbp.conf branch to debian-buster
* This security release updates the Mozilla CA bundle and blacklists
distrusted Symantec roots and the expired AddTrust External Root.
Regards,
Michael Shuler
- "thawte Primary Root CA"
- "thawte Primary Root CA - G2"
- "thawte Primary Root CA - G3"
- "VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G4"
- "VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G5"
- "VeriSign Universal Root Certification Authority"
Regards,
Michael Shuler
"Certplus Root CA G2"
- "OpenTrust Root CA G1"
- "OpenTrust Root CA G2"
- "OpenTrust Root CA G3"
- "TÜRKTRUST Elektronik Sertifika Hizmet Sağlayıcısı H5"
- "Visa eCommerce Root"
-- Michael Shuler Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:31:31 -0600
--
Kind regards,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
are down in kernel
4.4+. Thanks for the patch, Jim Paris. Closes: #864889
-- Michael Shuler Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:17:26 -0600
The package is lintian clean with a couple pedantic warnings.
The package shows 2 warnings on the mentors site that I have not been
able to resolve (bugs with men
/patches/ifmetric.8_typo:
Fix typo in man page.
-- Michael Shuler Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:09:20 -0500
Thanks for your time!
--
Kind regards,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/03/2014 04:29 PM, T o n g wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:44:33 -0600, Michael Shuler wrote:
1) incomplete source and debian packaging (symlinked to nowhere)
2) native package (version 1.0.1 and debian/ dir should be separate from
upstream source)
Hi everyone,
I've just uploaded
On 01/03/2014 08:24 AM, T o n g wrote:
2) native package (version 1.0.1 and debian/ dir should be separate from
upstream source)
Please elaborate. I'm the packer and also the upstream author. What's the
easiest way for me to fix it?
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_differe
This has all sorts of problems.
1) incomplete source and debian packaging (symlinked to nowhere)
2) native package (version 1.0.1 and debian/ dir should be separate from
upstream source)
--
Kind regards,
Michael
mshuler@mana:~/tmp/build$ dget -xu
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/db
Hi again,
Some other things I noticed:
- no source code Copyright in d/copyright (only lists debian/*)
- is the source code to build the docs/ image files available?
- no d/watch file
- no Homepage: entry in d/control
- no Vcs-*: entries in d/control
--
Kind regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi,
Your package is built as a native Debian package, version 1.0.1 (doesn't
contain a Debian build version, i.e.: 1.0.1-1). This is the first thing
to work on.
Builds OK in a sid cowbuilder.
More TODO: :)
mshuler@mana:~/tmp/build$ lintian -I --pedantic fatcat_1.0.1_amd64.changes
I: fatcat so
On 10/22/2013 04:59 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> No, the package is so old that it doesn't even have the
> debian/source/format file. Hmmm... maybe I should start all over
> from scratch?
Perhaps.
> The package was removed because the upstream was long gone. I want
> to pick it up and become the upstre
On 10/22/2013 03:45 PM, Tong Sun wrote:
> I got an old Debian source package that is no longer exist in the
> repo any more, and want to pick up from there. I.e., apply all the
> patches then remove them for debian/patches. That's what I did, but
> when I tried to build it via pbuilder, I get:
>
>
/2013 04:51 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
>
> Here's the mentors URL:
>http://mentors.debian.net/package/ifmetric
>
> Here's the dget command:
>dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ifmetric/ifmetric_0.3-3.dsc
>
> And here are the collab-maint
On 09/20/2013 10:06 AM, Dave Steele wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:18:18AM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
>>> I'm not sure we are clear with terms here. The newbie is the upstream,
>>> and he has chosen to include the debian directory in
src/ifmetric.c for s/Recieved/Received/ typo.
* Add debian/upstream_changelog from homepage News section.
* Add patch to fix "NETLINK: Packet too small or truncated!" error.
Thanks to Benedek László for the patch. Closes: #514197, LP: #896584
--
Kind regards,
Michael Shuler
sign
I meant to include a comment in the original RFS about #661591:
#661591 "packages providing ifupdown scripts must have those scripts
fixed if needed"
I have not fully tested exit codes, but the ifmetric if-up script should
cleanly exit 0 or 1. Once I have tested it out, I will removed ifmetric
f
I am not a friendica user, but I took a quick look for some feedback on
packaging:
1) successfully builds in a sid cowbuilder - ok.
2) lintian wishlist: font-in-non-font-package
usr/share/friendica/view/theme/vier/font/fontawesome-webfont.ttf - this
should go in a fonts- package and depend on it?
On 09/18/2012 02:13 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
> I use pbuilder to build packages in a clean minimal sid chroot
> (cowbuilder is another well used tool). This has many advantages such as
> build dependency checking, automated package signing, and more. You can
> also use the chroot for
many advantages such as
build dependency checking, automated package signing, and more. You can
also use the chroot for installation QA and other things.
--
Kind regards,
Michael Shuler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
tificates.git;a=shortlog
It does take a little time, but the history may be valuable at some
point. Commit times of the imports don't really matter.
--
Kind regards,
Michael Shuler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On 04/04/2012 04:10 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:51:16PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, what were your problems with d-i, that couldn't have
>> been fixed via patches to d-i, that could only be solved by writing a
>
> First was software raid restri
On 01/03/2012 11:38 AM, fre...@free.fr wrote:
> What's the way to take, to test the presence of a list of packages
> and to install one package or more in case where none are already
> installed ?
This is handled by declaring package relationships via Depends:,
Recommends:, etc.
http://www.debian
On 12/12/2011 10:41 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> Is it possible to correct an incomplete or bad package description
> for an existing package on mentors.debian.net?
Those are pulled from the package, itself, so just re-upload :-)
--
Kind regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On 09/28/2011 08:54 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages?
All package uploads go into unstable (Sid), so all new packaging
development should also be done on Sid. You might wish to look into
pbuilder, cowbuilder, or a simple dev chroot made
On 08/01/2011 07:23 AM, Wojciech Szaranski wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smarty".
>
> * Package name: smarty
> Version : 3.0.8-5
> Upstream Author : Monte Ohrt , Uwe Tews
> * URL : http://www.smarty.net/
> * License : LGP
On 01/22/2011 09:50 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
Thanks.
Thank you for the updates, Tony. I've been happily using the i386
experimental build for the last several days. Two custom profile
configs "Just Work" on upgrade from the squeeze version.
--
Kind regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On 11/24/2010 05:31 PM, jos...@photosessionsltd.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdkindle". Please note that I
am not currently a subscriber to the debian-mentors mailing list.
and please, do not CC me, I read the list :)
* Package name: pdkindle
Version :
On 10/26/2010 09:28 AM, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 10/26/2010 09:22 AM, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 10/26/2010 08:48 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
On 10/26/2010 08:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Just for the records, Ubuntu has a ubiquity source package already
(it's
the d-i frontend), so if y
On 10/26/2010 08:48 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
On 10/26/2010 08:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Just for the records, Ubuntu has a ubiquity source package already (it's
the d-i frontend), so if you're interested in having such package in
Ubuntu too, you should consider using a different source nam
On 10/26/2010 09:22 AM, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 10/26/2010 08:48 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
On 10/26/2010 08:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Just for the records, Ubuntu has a ubiquity source package already (it's
the d-i frontend), so if you're interested in having such package in
On 06/23/2010 05:16 PM, Eric Cooper wrote:
I maintain both the upstream and Debian version of a program in a git
repo, using "upstream" and "master" branches, git-buildpackage, etc.
Occasionally I forget which branch I'm on and commit upstream changes
to the master branch by mistake.
Is there a
e uploaded this package for me.
--
Kind regards,
Michael Shuler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bab83a8.4030...@pbandjelly.org
On 10/27/2008 11:12 AM, GouNiNi wrote:
Someone know why qmail is not packaged to provide binary?
ITP for qmail is out there:
http://bugs.debian.org/457318
--
Kind Regards,
Michael Shuler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
legal issues, but those calls will need to
be made by you and your boss.
--
Kind Regards,
Michael Shuler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
42 matches
Mail list logo
