Re: RFS: homebank (updated package)

dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/homebank/homebank_4.4-0.1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. What is reason for NMU without closing single bug report on the package? Also NMU is not expected to make such invasive changes as changing sourc

Re: RFS: debsigs (updated, DMUA candidate :)

, I'd be grateful if a kind mentor would set > the DM-Upload-Allowed flag before uploading :) Sorry not for now, I need more than one upload to do this :-). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gpick

ted to binutils upgrade, for details, please see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/02/msg00011.html http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Manual usage of quilt does not work any more

uot;--no-timestamps --no-index" > QUILT_REFRESH_ARGS="--no-timestamps --no-index" > QUILT_PATCH_OPTS="--unified-reject-files" And you should disable this line as this is the one causing your troubles... (for long story, read patch changelog) -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: discount - Implementation of Markdown markup language in C

ackage for me. Looks good, uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: monit (updated package)

Hi Dne Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:56:23 +0300 Sergey B Kirpichev napsal(a): > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > There is /usr/share/doc/monit/monit.html . It might have same > > content as man page, but I still think it is worth registering it in

Re: RFS: monit (updated package)

definitely should go upstream. > > > I: monit: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration > > There is no documentation, except manpage. There is /usr/share/doc/monit/monit.html . It might have same content as man page, but I still think it is worth registering it into doc-base. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: monit (updated package)

is good idea as well. You might consider reporting typos to upstream. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: LeechCraft

d if something breaks, you will get a bug report :-). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: git (updated package)

to fix them. > > Gerrit is on vacation (see debian-private) so again I am counting on > you. > > The package can be found at the usual place. > - git://repo.or.cz/debian-git/jrn.git squeeze-urgent > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git/git_1.7.2.3-2.2.dsc &

Re: RFS: sima (autoqueue MPD client, find similar artists to queue)

Hi Dne Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:55:49 +0100 Geoffroy Youri Berret napsal(a): > Le 12/11/2010 10:55, Michal Čihař a écrit : > > Dne Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:30:51 +0100 > > Geoffroy Youri Berret napsal(a): > > > >> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > &g

Re: RFS: sima (autoqueue MPD client, find similar artists to queue)

_installexamples (or debian/examples) not by debian/docs. Why you manually compress changelog in debian/rules? You should rather use dh_installchangelogs for installing it. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Time of a package to be processed by FTP-masters

you supposed to ask them what's the problem > after some time? You get a REJECT notification or even just a question to clarify some things. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: nanoblogger (updated package)

Hi Dne Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:37:17 + "William Vera" napsal(a): > Sure I have enough time for the package! :) Okay, I hope it will end up better now :-). Both packages uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: nanoblogger (updated package)

d after you being inactive for some time.) > The SNV headers was removed from control files and both packages are > re-uploaded to mentors.d.n Okay. PS: No need to CC me on reply. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: nanoblogger (updated package)

n collab-maint svn, so either please use that svn and use Vcs-* headers for it, or completely remove current ones (the same applies to nanoblogger-extra package). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: matrixssl

Hi please keep the discussion on the list. Dne Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:45:32 -0400 z...@gnu.org napsal(a): > Michal Čihař writes: > > Hi! > > > It would be great if you've mentioned some other details in the RFS > > email - It is new package? Are you adopting it? W

Re: RFS: matrixssl

n libmatrixssl3.1-dev libmatrixssl3.1 libmatrixssl3.1-doc I: matrixssl source: missing-debian-source-format W: matrixssl source: changelog-should-not-mention-nmu I: matrixssl source: debian-watch-file-is-missing -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Four days

be improved by treating mentoring tasks > as bugs. Well it would be definitely useful having better tracked package reviews and problems found on earlier upload, so that it is clearly visible if there are still some not fixed issues. [1]:http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/07/ms

Re: RFS: pstotext

> I do not believe that the small reenable/re-enable typo (in comment!) is worth > patching and I cannot make up non-existent upstream changelog, so I did not > utilize the last two hints. But you can tell upstream about that. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.ciha

Re: RFS: mpg321 (new upstream release with AudioScrobbler & FFT support)

't mention LGPL in debian/copyright what is license of getopt -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: pstotext

missing P: pstotext: no-upstream-changelog I: pstotext: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/pstotext reenable re-enable -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package with AudioScrobbler & FFT support, DM-Upload-Allowed flag removed, 2nd try)

pstream release? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Packages with DMUA but no DM (was: Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package with AudioScrobbler support))

Hi Dne Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:57:22 +0200 Pietro Battiston napsal(a): > Il giorno lun, 28/06/2010 alle 11.44 +0200, Michal Čihař ha scritto: > > [...] I > > just did not expect somebody would add DMUA while not being DM ... > > lesson learned. > > > > Ju

Re: Packages with DMUA but no DM (was: Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package with AudioScrobbler support))

7;t a DM according to [1] and [2], which makes me > wonder why Michal sponsored an upload that sets the field. I really did not check whether he is DM, sorry. I've already uploaded few version of mpg321 and though it would be okay to keep DMUA there. I just did not expect somebody would add

Re: RFS: egroupware (fixes critical bug)

to this check mostly because of security reasons. Also checks for debian/copyright are much stricter these days than it used to be in past, so for any new package (what egroupware in fact is), you need to pay lot of attention when collecting this data. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: egroupware (fixes critical bug)

urces: no-upstream-changelog P: egroupware-sambaadmin: no-upstream-changelog P: egroupware-sitemgr: no-upstream-changelog P: egroupware-timesheet: no-upstream-changelog P: egroupware-tracker: no-upstream-changelog P: egroupware-wiki: no-upstream-changelog N: 8 tags overridden (1 error, 7 warn

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

ery much something that should have been done via mailing to > BTS and not via debian/changelog. I think it's perfectly fine to close the bug when it can not be reproduced anymore. Doing it using separate mail would be probably cleaner, but I don't think it hurts that much. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

in/m/mpg321 > - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-3.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Looks good, upl

Re: openssl and MIT license ?

kaging under same license as upstream uses. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

Hi Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:23 +0100 Giovanni Mascellani napsal(a): > On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > No, please read: > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps > > > > The problem is that

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:09:50 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in > > Build-Depends

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > >> The package is lintian clean and needs freehep-xml and > >> freehep-grap

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:35 +0100 Michal Čihař napsal(a): > > http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2.dsc > > http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-1.dsc &g

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

d like to use .install or dh_install but they don't rename > files. Possibly without "install -d/install" stuff. > And sweethome3d.jar was also feeling alone under /usr/share/sweethome3d ;) Okay, this is just matter of preferen

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked say > > so). Pl

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

e: Why is needed 01noMacOSX? All MacOSX code seems to be behind if, so it should be safe to stay, or am I wrong? Why do you install startup script to usr/share/sweethome3d and create symlink in usr/bin? I think it should be directly in usr/bin. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://bl

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

ng deprecated dh_installmanpages, or completely migrate to dh). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

Hi Dne Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:25:26 +0200 Nanakos Chrysostomos napsal(a): > On 25/1/2010 16:10, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > > Your patch: > > > > ++//tempsample = mad_f_mul(*left_ch++, options.volume); > > ++tempsample = (mad_fixed_t) ((*left_

Re: RFS: slimrat

Hi Dne Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:14:43 -0200 "Nelson A. de Oliveira" napsal(a): > Hi! > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > You should use ${source:Version} for arch:all packages as these can not > > be binnmued. > > This is true whe

Re: RFS: parcellite (updated package)

Hi Dne Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:44:53 -0500 Andrew SB napsal(a): > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > override_dh_installchangelogs is not needed in your case > > For some reason, in the past (my old rules file) dh_installchangelogs > hadn't automatic

Re: RFS: slimrat

ontrol file to be updated for every build? You should use ${source:Version} for arch:all packages as these can not be binnmued. PS: no need to CC me on reply. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

ume); ++tempsample = (mad_fixed_t) ((*left_ch++ * (double)options.volume)/MAD_F_ONE); Seems obviously wrong, because one of key features of mpg321 is that it uses just fixed-point calculation, while you introduce floating point arithmetic by this patch. - -- Michal Čiha

Re: RFS: parcellite (updated package)

rcellite/parcellite_0.9.2-1.dsc > > I would be ever so glad if someone uploaded this package for me. override_dh_installchangelogs is not needed in your case Otherwise the package looks good and thus I've uploaded it. Thanks -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: slimrat

ht... upload it? debian/clean content is wrong, please consult dh_clean(1) do not use ${binary:Version} for arch:all packages -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: slimrat

stead. Lintian does complain: W: slimrat: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man8/slimrat-gui.8.gz W: slimrat: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man8/slimrat.8.gz -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

Hi Dne Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:22:15 +0100 Thibaut GRIDEL napsal(a): > * Michal Čihař: > > > - depend on libtool (>=2.2.6) which is said not to present rpath quirks > > > and run autoreconf to update auto-tools files from the orig > > You should also clean generated

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

Hi Dne Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:43:56 +0100 Thibaut GRIDEL napsal(a): > * Michal Čihař: > > E: giflib-tools: > > binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/gif2epsn /usr/lib > > ... for (probably) all binaries > Thanks for reporting this, which I was unaware of as I build fo

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

Hi Dne Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:02:25 +0800 Paul Wise napsal(a): > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > Also please don't write your surname in capitals, I see no reason for > > that. > > There was a short conversation about this practice on pkg

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:50:36 +0100 Michal Čihař napsal(a): > > - - dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpg321/mpg321_0.2.11-1.dsc > > > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. &g

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

ration Also please don't write your surname in capitals, I see no reason for that. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

-e /usr/bin/mpg123 -a ! -L /usr/bin/mpg123 ]; then ln -s /etc/alternatives/mpg123 /usr/bin/mpg123 fi - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktLOrwACgkQ3DVS6DbnV

Re: RFS: polib

Hi Dne Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:18:31 +0100 Angel Abad napsal(a): > I fix the homepage and update watch file, the new package is in mentors. Thanks, package uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: polib

in/p/polib > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/polib/polib_0.5.1-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Otherwise it looks good. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: ocropus (updated package, 2nd try)

Hi Dne Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:51:52 +0100 Jakub Wilk napsal(a): > * Michal Čihař , 2009-11-30, 13:39: > >> Possibly this exact version is not needed. I was just following this > >> part of /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz: > >> > >> > For a

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

ould have find that one myself if not getting > beaten by the different md5 problem). Well I first download sources from the archive and then I tried dget the source you posted and dget complains if tarball has different md5. PS: Ne need to CC me. -- Michal Čihař | http://

Re: RFS: ocropus (updated package, 2nd try)

not that broken so it won't work in next version and use current automake. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: ocropus (updated package, 2nd try)

Dne Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:48:17 +0100 Jakub Wilk napsal(a): > * Michal Čihař , 2009-11-30, 09:47: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocropus/ocropus_0.3.1-1.dsc > > > >What is the reason for running autoreconf in clean? > > Upstream build system is

Re: RFS: ocropus (updated package, 2nd try)

version? It's already several months old. Also does Jeffrey know about this upload? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: ITA of giflib

> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/giflib/giflib_4.1.6-9.dsc ...and it is the reason why your tarball differs from the one in the archive: dget: removing giflib_4.1.6.orig.tar.gz (md5sum does not match) -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: xz-utils (updated package)

esses several serious bugs, including 542060, which made the > previous version impossible to install with apt-get, and 544872, which > could cause the ostensibly lossless compression to lose a few trailing > bytes in some circumstances. So naturally, I would be very happy if > someone finds

Re: RFS: python-keyring

shot? Otherwise the package looks good. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gtklp (updated package)

ogenerated from git branches > * debian/rules: call autogen.sh after applying patches > > dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtklp/gtklp_1.2.7-2.dsc Uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#543843: gqview -- simple image viewer using GTK+

ch we will integrate once geeqie will get out of beta phase. And then it will be time to drop gqview package. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gtklp (updated package)

Hi Dne Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:13:27 +0800 "Zak B. Elep" napsal(a): > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:34 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Have you considered using patch system instead of directly patching? > > > > Otherwise the package looks good (ignoring fact that I don

Re: RFS: gtklp (updated package)

ch system instead of directly patching? Otherwise the package looks good (ignoring fact that I don't like CDBS). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Package uploaded with UNRELEASED distribution.

his case it would be enough to catch mismatch in changes which did contain untable as distribution, but UNRELEASED in the changes entry. Not sure how useful such check would be though. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: libsockets++

Hi Dne Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:44:18 + Leinier Cruz Salfran napsal(a): > El mar, 18-08-2009 a las 23:30 +0200, Michal Čihař escribió: > > Dne Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:44:08 + > > Just quick review: > > > > - you add change license stuff in debian diff without any

Re: Requests to sponsor new library packages

oblem to provide all dependent packages at once for review. At least people I sponsor did not have a problem with this approach. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: libsockets++

ce: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package libsockets++2 P: libsockets++ source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system Ajp13Socket.cpp and 117 more -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: why?

f, taking some vacation around it and now we try to keep up with piles of emails that ended up in our mailboxes. And if the package does not look enough attractive, you need to be patient. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: about debian/watch

oes not seem much usable ;-). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: vera++ on debian git: collab maint

Hi Dne Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:04:11 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre napsal(a): > Just out of curiosity, is this normal if I do not see the > collab-maint/vera++ from my firefox on http://git.debian.org. It usually takes some time till the listing refreshes. -- Michal Čihař | http://cih

Re: RFS: cdash

Hi Dne Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Mathieu Malaterre napsal(a): > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Thanks for packaging cdash, I use it for quite some time, but haven't > > found time to package it. > > You seems to be a DD, I g

Re: RFS: cdash

implify debian/rules - it would be great to create database during installation using dbconfig-common - there is no need to depend on apache, any webserver with PHP support will work - why do you depend on libapache2-mod-auth-mysql? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.

Re: how to fix "dpkg-gensymbols difference on (arch)"

y be more better solution. So, how do I deal with this? Provide per architecture symbol files for symbols which differ, for example I did this recently with rpm <http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/rpm.git>. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: claws-mail-debian-spam-plugin

ght. :) No it's not blocker, uploaded. > It's just a matter of establishing a format, and I'm pretty sure ftpmasters > wouldn't bother whether I add a X-Comment or not ;) Hopefully no. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: claws-mail-debian-spam-plugin

me starts by X-. But this does not explain why do you use extra field. All examples in DEP-5 have link to license in License field. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: claws-mail-debian-spam-plugin

nd (pedantic) warning, why did you use X-Comment field? Neither DEP-5 nor the wiki page seems to mention this field. Once you will address these, I can upload it. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: cconv -- A iconv based simplified-traditional chinese conversion tool

Hi Dne Thu, 14 May 2009 21:09:03 +0800 Vern Sun napsal(a): > reuploaded. the package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cconv/cconv_0.5.2-1.dsc Uploaded, thanks. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cih

Re: RFS: cconv -- A iconv based simplified-traditional chinese conversion tool

Hi Dne Thu, 14 May 2009 19:19:19 +0800 Vern Sun napsal(a): > on 四, 2009-05-14 at 18:11 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote: > > - are all those versioned build depends really needed? > > > as you said "cconv man page is obviously generated, you should include it's > sourc

Re: RFS: cconv -- A iconv based simplified-traditional chinese conversion tool

Hi Dne Tue, 12 May 2009 23:26:40 +0800 Vern Sun napsal(a): > on 二, 2009-05-12 at 17:02 +0800, Michal Čihař wrote: > > - you should split the library to libcconv0 and rename devel package to > > libcconv-dev > > - please write useful description, pointing user t

Re: RFS: cconv -- A iconv based simplified-traditional chinese conversion tool

rces and generate it during build - README.Debian is useless - why do you install empty file NEWS? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: scmbug

Hi Dne Sun, 10 May 2009 14:34:53 -0700 Kristis Makris napsal(a): > Could you please help in trying to resolve this issues with packaging > scmbug ? > > On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 19:16 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scmbug&quo

Re: RFS: scid (updated package)

n/scid-doc.docs debian/scid2-doc.install Watch file fails: http://scid.sourceforge.net/download/ failed: 403 Forbidden -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

Hi Dne Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:13:49 +0900 Charles Plessy napsal(a): > it should probably be trivial to convert mpg321 to the non-native format, but > is this program still needed now that mpg123 is free? AFAIK there is still important difference that mpg321 does not need FPU. --

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

Hi Dne Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:46:56 +1000 Ben Finney napsal(a): > Michal Čihař writes: > > > Ben Finney napsal(a): > > > > > More directly: Why is this package given a Debian-native version > > > when it's clearly not specific to Debian systems? &g

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

Hi Dne Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:11:15 +1000 Ben Finney napsal(a): > Michal Čihař writes: > > > Elías A. M. napsal(a): > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.10.7 > > > of my package "mpg321". > > […] > > > And

Re: RFS: easytag (updated package)

e he will give the package maintainership to you. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package)

-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL And why do you add patches to native package? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: inotify-tools (adopted and updated package)

Dne Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:31:25 -0700 Ryan Niebur napsal(a): > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:21:00AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > > Please describe in more details fixed bugs in changelog, New Upstream > > Version (Closes: #494782, #458132, #520672) does not r

Re: RFS: lynis (updated package)

> contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lynis/lynis_1.2.6-1.dsc Uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: inotify-tools (adopted and updated package)

e in more details fixed bugs in changelog, New Upstream Version (Closes: #494782, #458132, #520672) does not really get idea what got fixed. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: devtodo (updated package)

nstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/devtodo/devtodo_0.1.20-5.dsc Uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: docutils-writer-manpage 0.1~svn.r5690-1

erride > it in a future release. How about writing better description instead of adding override? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)

in/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc Besides two overrides, which were already brought to attention, I don't see anything problematic in there. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpview

k look. PS: No need to CC me on replies. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpview

seem to be GPL. Build-Depends are insane, please list only things you actually need and do not list build essentials. Also debian/rules should be much cleaner, to me it looks like using one of minimal dh examples should be enough, see dh(1). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http:

Re: RFS: uncrustify (updated package)

man/man1/uncrustify.1.gz 1 more occurrences not shown W: uncrustify: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file usr/share/common-licenses/GPL I: uncrustify: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright P: uncrustify: no-upstream-changelog -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | h

Re: What to do if the original tarball contains a debian subdirectory

orig tarball. How to handle this? Probably safest way is to repackage the tarball without debian directory and ask upstream to change this practice in next versions. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

  1   2   3   >