Bug#965968: closing 965968

close 965968 thanks I've just uploaded the package, built from source using the repo in salsa cheers -- IRC: gfa GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5 OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333

Bug#965968: RFS: ipcalc-ng/0.4.1-2 -- parameter calculator for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

Hello On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:08:46PM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: Hi Em 22/07/2020 18:38, gustavo panizzo escreveu: Hi On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:34:41PM +0200, gustavo panizzo wrote: Hi thanks for this package :) I'm willing to sponsor this upload, but please add

Bug#965968: RFS: ipcalc-ng/0.4.1-2 -- parameter calculator for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

Hi On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 01:52:04PM -0300, Fabio Augusto De Muzio Tobich wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipcalc-ng": * Package name: ipcalc-ng Version : 0.4.1-2 Upstream Author :

Bug#965968: RFS: ipcalc-ng/0.4.1-2 -- parameter calculator for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

Hi On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:34:41PM +0200, gustavo panizzo wrote: Hi thanks for this package :) I'm willing to sponsor this upload, but please add the wording change in d/control to the changelog. also please add that the wording on the patch 030_disable-few-tests.patch was changed

Taking over a package from an active DD

Hello There is a package of my interest maintained by an active (with other packages) DD, that person is also the upstream maintainer of the package. I NMU'ed the package in the past and it was recently removed from testing. I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package and

Re: How to get debian ci test passed for proxy application

Hello On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 02:00:00AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: Dear mentors list, I maintain a proxy application, shadowsocks-libev. I want to let it pass debian ci test. And I already confirm the test all passed on my local environment, and debomatic [0]. However it failed on debian ci

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:38:58PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: Hi, On 07/16/2017 05:28 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: [...] but i've removed those files from the archive for now, patched the relevant testscripts and created a bug report to create the testdata from source [0] cool, excelent please add

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:52:12PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: On 06/29/2017 05:35 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: Hello, apologies for the late response no worries, as you can see i'm not very fast myself oke, so... On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: d/copyright - please set

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hello, apologies for the late response On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:49:51PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: Hi, On 06/18/2017 11:23 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: - src/Tests/USB/data/0001.bin src/Tests/UseCase/DummyDevices/root.tar.xz what's the source of that file? please regenerate them at build

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard" d/copyright - please set the years to include 2016, 2017. there are some files owned by RH which are copyright

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hi I'll review the package this weekend On June 14, 2017 6:51:06 PM GMT+08:00, Muri Nicanor <m...@immerda.ch> wrote: >control: tags -1 - moreinfo > >hi, > >On 06/01/2017 12:07 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: >> the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i t

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

On June 1, 2017 6:13:06 PM GMT+08:00, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log: SKIP UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh >(exit status: 77) >No, it's a bad idea to do things requiring root during tests, >especially >modprobe/rmmod Maybe those tests can be run

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to build using sbuild. FAIL UseCase/001_cli_policy.sh (exit status: 1) some tests are skipped, i feel they should run perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?

Bug#863278: RFS: usbguard/0.7.0-1

Hello On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote: * New upstream version 0.7.0 This release contains a backwards incompatible change because it changes how the device hash is computed for Linux root hub devices How is it handled for users that already have a

tool to rebuild all build-deps of a package

Hello Is there any tool I can use to rebuild all packages which B-D/D on my package? i want to do a local test before bumping it on the archive Extra points for running the autopkgtests (if any) thanks! PS: pkg is python-pytest-timeout -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

Re: Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 09:06:36PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, I'm sponsoring in deferred/5 to let the current one migrate > > > I'm also not really sure about the move from contrib to main, because one > (alternate) > runtime dependency is in contrib > > quoting control file: >

Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:05:50PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > can you please rebase on top of 8.11-2 version? done, source can be found on https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ora2pg/ora2pg_17.6-1.dsc or https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ora2pg.git > > thanks

Bug#846546: RFS: ora2pg/17.6-1 [RC] [QA]

Add gbp.conf -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:13:21 +0800 the source can be found at https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/ora2pg.git and https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ora2pg/ora2pg_17.6-1.dsc thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: st

when salvage a package?

Hello I was tempted to do a QA upload for ora2pg [0], which is nice software because helps people to move out from Oracle DB, but the popcon value is very low (< 12) [1] and the package has only one bug open, an automatic RC bug [2], that shows that doesn't have many users out there. The

Re: can't upload to mentors

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > On 2016-11-24 11:21+0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote: > > can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads? > > > > i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue > > (after rem

Re: can't upload to mentors

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:24:31AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > > >can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads? > > > >i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue > >(after removing > >.buildinfo from .changes) > > > knowing that

Re: can't upload to mentors

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:57:50PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > At the end, it seems that there was an (unknown and not fixed) bug in debexpo. > > The workflow that worked was: > - do a source-only build of the package can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads? i did a lot of

Re: can't upload to mentors

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:54:20PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > After all it does not seem that it has been uploaded... > > I may have typed to fast "dput patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes" without > mentioning mentors. Anyway, it seems like the package is uploaded ftp-master > UploadQueue... Is it

Re: can't upldoad to mentors

Remove the buildinfo line from the changes file, sign, and upload again On November 16, 2016 12:53:46 AM GMT+08:00, "Félix Sipma" wrote: >Hi! > >It seems like I can't upload to mentors anymore... Do you think there >is a >problem on my side? > >$ dput mentors

Re: debexpo bug on upload

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 01:20:46AM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote: > Unfortunately, I spoke too soon.. the .buildinfo upload failed with 403 > Forbidden again :( Remove the .buildinfo line from the .changes file, then sign and upload. mentors.d.n does not accept .buildinfo files yet > > Would you

Re: How long to wait between RFA and QA upload?

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 06:38:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: ... > > Orphaned packages are up for grabs the moment the O is filed. thanks to Adam, Paul, and Gianfranco for your responses, I'll start to work on the QA upload asap cheers! -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

How long to wait between RFA and QA upload?

Hello Recently I NMU'ed tsocks, as the shape of the package wasn't good [1] in the RFS email I said that I'd try to get the package orphaned so I can do a proper QA upload. The maintainer orphaned the package 2 days ago, #842555. I don't want to adopt the package, but I do use it so I want to

Bug#842318: RFS: tsocks/1.8beta5-9.5 [NMU] [RC]

). + * Enable host name resolution on /etc/tsocks.conf at configure time, +it was intended to be enabled in previous releases, but a bug in the +configure script disabled it (Closes: #823330). + + -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:33:56 +0800 + tsocks (1.8bet

Bug#841928: RFS: fprintd/0.6.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

at, but $ grep -- '--' debian/changelog -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:40:42 +0800 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org> Wed, 08 Jun 2016 21:32:01 +0200 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org> Wed, 06 May 2015 18:17:08 +0200 -- Didier Raboud <o...@debi

Bug#841928: RFS: fprintd/0.6.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

/changelog 2016-10-24 20:40:42.0 +0800 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +fprintd (0.6.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add intltool to build-dep, preparing for the deprecation of gnome-common, +Fixes FTBFS. (Closes: #837823). + + -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Mon,

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:43:31PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2016, 14:15 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > > > > > Please fix the lintian error, the

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:35:42AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > Please fix the lintian error, the d/copyright and then I'll upload. > The *.la can be fixed in a subsequent upload, but maybe you can include > it already in the revised packages. I've pushed to alioth, please take a look

Bug#840500: RFS: asciinema/1.3.0-2 [RC]

-3+ (Closes: #840134). * Relicense the debian directory to GPL-3+ * Use upstream manpage * Run the test suite, as it does not get run by default * Store the generated tarball using pristine-tar -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:28:07 +0800 git repo can be

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:57:30AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Could you please add option to run it in foreground? Runit init > system, which I package exect services to be foreground processes. uptimed -f makes uptimed to run in foreground -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

on debconf when reducing MAX_RECORDS (Closes: #573232) * Add pristine-tar to git repo -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:58:19 +0800 git repo can be found here git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint/uptimed.git built package can be found on mentors https://mentors.debi

Bug#838617: RFS: python-socketpool_0.5.3-3 [RC] -- upload or nmu

status. It does includes changes made by Ondřej Nový Changelog python-socketpool (0.5.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=low [ gustavo panizzo ] * Non-maintainer upload. * Patch setup.py to use codecs module to read unicode, Fixes FTBFS (Closes: #835682) (Closes: #834920). * Fix

Bug#838217: RFS: license-reconcile/0.12+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

.dsc Changes since the last upload: license-reconcile (0.12+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low [ gustavo panizzo ] * Non-maintainer upload. * Update test cases to match licensecheck output. Thanks Petter Reinholdtsen for the patches, Fix FTBFS (Closes: #832840). [ gregor herrmann

Bug#837887: RFS: xautolock/2.2-5.1 [NMU] [RC]

/xautolock/xautolock_2.2-5.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: xautolock (1:2.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * This update allows one to build against glibc >= 2.24. Thanks Aurelien Jarno <aure...@debian.org> for the patch (Closes: #833971). -- gustav

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:00:55AM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote: > Please wait, I missed an update to debian/watch. Now git repo is ready to be reviewed -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

Please wait, I missed an update to debian/watch. On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:55:40AM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:26:52AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi > > > > >ohhh, totally get it. thanks for spotting it > >

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:26:52AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi > > >ohhh, totally get it. thanks for spotting it > > > thanks for getting it ;) > > is the only way i found to silence lintian about non-encrypted Vcs- urls > > >

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:35:37PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Gustavo > > > >> INSTALL_REQUIRES = ['restkit==4.2.2', 'watchdog==0.6.0'] > > >> why is restkit manually listed in runtime dependencies? > > > >that's for setuptools, I could patch it out, but why? > > > please read

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 03:23:58 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > >I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package couchapp > > > some questions before sponsoring or giving you DM > > 1) > > INSTALL_REQUIRES =

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

Gianfranco I didn't forget about this, I'm in the middle of a peak of work, I'll get it done in the next few days. thanks! -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package couchapp This package contains a new upstream release and other packaging changes couchapp (1.0.2+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * Removed non-free bytes. *

Bug#835559: RFS: python-jsmin/2.2.1-1

> > 3) you are adding entries to a previous changelog entry > + * Add pristine-tar to source VCS. > > > (this appears to be a change in *this* release) > > > 4) and changing one signature date of some old release > > - -- Gustavo Panizzo <

Bug#835559: RFS: python-jsmin/2.2.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello I'm looking for an sponsor for my updated package python-jsmin It builds python-jsmin and python3-jsmin This package contains a new upstream release. python-jsmin (2.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release * Bump

Bug#835081: RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

+ * Standards version 3.9.6 no changes needed. + * Re-tab plugins/15-ip4tables and plugins/25-ip6tables + + [ gustavo panizzo ] + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Starts netfilter-persistent service before network-pre.target, +as suggested by systemd upstream. Thanks to Patrick Schleizer +(Closes

Bug#835081: RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 08:58:26AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, Hello > +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat2016-08-21 > 07:05:06.0 +0200 > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -7 > +9 > (this is usually wrong without bumping

Bug#835081: RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

network-pre.target, as suggested by systemd +upstream. (Closes: #829640). + + -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:05:39 +0800 + iptables-persistent (1.0.4) unstable; urgency=medium * [d52b9e] During flush, set policy before flushing rules (Closes: #749790) dif

iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC]

-pre.target, as suggested by systemd +upstream. (Closes: #829640). + + -- gustavo panizzo <g...@zumbi.com.ar> Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:05:39 +0800 + iptables-persistent (1.0.4) unstable; urgency=medium * [d52b9e] During flush, set policy before flushing rules (Closes: #749790) diff -Nru ip

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:22:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > >Gianfranco, i've uploaded version 1.3.0-1 to mentors, would you sponsor it? > > > >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciinema/asciinema_1.3.0-1.dsc > > > uploaded with one change: > Vcs-Browser:

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:26:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >PS: can I ping you when I have the new asciinema package? > > > I'm not a go developer, so somebody from your team might be better suitable > to look at the packages, but you can count on me as a backup

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:13:16PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > Gianfranco Upstream went back to Python, so I won't upload this version or its needed dependency, i if you are interested in golang-github-creack-termios, you can take the package from alioth, its ready IMHO, only

Re: [RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:04:02AM +0200, Daniele Tricoli wrote: > Hello Gustavo, > > On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 03:17:29 PM gustavo panizzo wrote: > > I'm the maintainer of asciinema, a while ago upstream decided to rewrite > > it in Go, previously it was a Python app. &

[RFS] I need an sponsor for 2 Go packages

Hello I'm the maintainer of asciinema, a while ago upstream decided to rewrite it in Go, previously it was a Python app. I've made a package for it, and the 2 dependencies that were missing in the archive, one of those dependencies was already sponsored/uploaded, but the sponsor has no time to

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

On 2015-07-21 19:02, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting gustavo panizzo (gfa) (2015-07-21 08:05:47) On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote: crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking for a way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote: crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking for a way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64. But crossbuilding from linux (which I'll just assume Daniel runs on their host) to

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

On 06/24/2014 09:41 AM, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm i'm a lilyterm user, i offer my help to co-maintain the package -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

Re: unable to upload on mentors after dput failure

wait until the incomplete upload gets deleted on mentors.debian.net. typically, an hour -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 sent from mobile bilibop project quid...@safe-mail.net wrote: Hi, I wanted to upload a new version of my package on mentors.debian.net today.

Re: Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

On 11/11/2013 11:45 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: This work is less useful for Daily developers, since schroot can do what docker does just fine (e.g. for sbuild, etc), but docker is going to be a huge win for a cluster of build nodes for debile. i don't care for it to build packages, i'm

Re: Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

On 11/11/2013 08:36 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use Docker. I've got it packaged and it'll be in Debian soon. do you have a package, even preview quality, to use it? i would check git.d.o but is down :( -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717

Bug#703638: ITP: cloudfuse -- FUSE filesystem for Swift object storage.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar * Package name: cloudfuse Version : git20130124.809b07e Upstream Author : Michael Barton m...@weirdlooking.com * URL

Re: fix for rc bug #665199

Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote: hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix the bug #665199 Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the changelog note is not really descriptive

Re: Bug#665199: fix for rc bug #665199

On 11/03/2012 04:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote: updated package can be found at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send

openldap: diff for NMU version 2.4.31-1.1

upgrading, the script +failed to regenerate the database. Closes: #665199. + + -- gustavo panizzo g...@zumbi.com.ar Thu, 03 Nov 2012 02:11:45 -0300 + openldap (2.4.31-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release.

fix for rc bug #665199

hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix the bug #665199 debdiff output $ debdiff slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have different names, permissions or

asking for package removal

hello i was going through the list of rc bugs for wheezy and i found #687579. while i think the package should be removed (dead upstream, doesn't work with wheeze version of it's dependencies) i'm not the maintainer. how long do i have to wait to maintainer to reply before ask to ftp team to

Re: New Maintainer Question: Upgrade to Sid?

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:04:04PM -0700, Eric wrote: How would I build a package without a .dsc file using cowbuilder? 2 ways: - dpkg-source -b on parent dir - pdebuild on the sources dir i found pdebuild+cowbuilder a very nice combination -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C

Re: [RC-FIX] RFS: canna

i forgot to mention i need an sponsor to upload this fix. thanks On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:11:54AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote: hello i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756. changes since last upload: * QA upload. * Fix bug in postrm scripts

Re: [RC-FIX] RFS: canna

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:34:39AM +0900, d...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:11:54AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote: i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/canna/canna_3.7p3-10.dsc thank

[RC-FIX] RFS: canna

hello i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756. changes since last upload: * QA upload. * Fix bug in postrm scripts (Closes: #681756). * Fix a dangling symlink (/usr/bin/chmoddic - catdic) on canna package. dsc file could be found on mentors

Re: Any script to populate debian/copyright file ?

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to use as a reference, cd /usr/share/doc find . -name copyright |xargs grep 'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/' -- 1AE0

Re: Any script to populate debian/copyright file ?

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.arwrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package

how often should ask for upload?

hi after getting my first pkg in debian, i wonder how often should i prepare new revisions of it and ask to potential sponsors to upload it to the archive? should i wait until the pkg has a many bugs? or each bug deserves an upload? thanks -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C

Re: how often should ask for upload?

Did you receive a notification for the comment that was added on this page ? http://mentors.debian.net/package/vavoom no i've added what was missing to the changelog (DEP-5, DEP-3, wrap-and-sort,etc) i thought that kind of changes were not necesary to be added to changelog, policy disagrees

Re: Seeking advice on automounter-like daemon starting at boot

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 07:13:52PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote: Hello, mentors disclaimer: i'm not a DD/DM I could make udisks-glue run as another user (say, nobody), but that would mean that the default config would not be able to mount devices. That's because PolicyKit will only allow

Re: Seeking advice on automounter-like daemon starting at boot

d) Create an user udisks, add a PolicyKit rule to allow it to mount device files, use that for the init script (not even sure it's possible) how would it leave the file permissions on the mounted filesystems? Would them be readable/writable by local users? i was referring to option D if

RFS: bareftp (NMU, RC bugfix)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.4-1.1 of my package bareftp. It builds these binary packages: bareftp- FTP client for GNOME The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 598284 security related bug, CVE-2010-3350 The package

creating a manpage from a GFDL text

Hi folks, i would like to create a man page for vavoom, based on a wiki page licensed as GNU Free Documentation License 1.2. What can i do? GFDL is not free for debian, and my pkg is for main. thanks! -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: creating a manpage from a GFDL text

am i reading this correctly? http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 is possible to include documentation licensed as GFDL 1.2 :) On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:17:06PM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote: Hi folks, i would like to create a man page for vavoom, based on a wiki page licensed

RFS: vavoom

://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vavoom/vavoom_1.32-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards gustavo panizzo -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 signature.asc Description

RFS: kismet (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2010-07-R1-4.2 of my package kismet. It builds these binary packages: kismet - Wireless 802.11 monitoring tool The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 530111, 558773, 572593 The package can be