Bug#907192: pre-RFS: tensorflow/1.10.0+dfsg-A1 [ITP] -- debian archve += 1 million lines of code

Some updates about this pre-RFS: Summary: 1. The README.Debian file is totally invalidated. Please don't review the repo. 2. I switched to use python plus ninja for building Debian's TF, which may have a chance to evolve into the final solution. On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 22:58 Lumin wrote

Bug#907192: pre-RFS: tensorflow/1.10.0+dfsg-A1 [ITP] -- debian archve += 1 million lines of code

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Control: blocks -1 by 906646 894411 Control: blocks 804612 by -1 Hi Mentors and d-Science Team, **Many thanks** to Aron Xu for his sponsorship with a 512GB-RAM builder.

Bug#906646: Acknowledgement (RFS: double-conversion/3.0.0+git20180802.4e8b3b5-1 [ITA, tensorflow deps])

Hi mentors, I've tested building all double-conversion's reverse dependencies including libqt5core5a in unstable, none of them was broken. Test platform is ppc64el instead of amd64.

Bug#907021: RFS: sleef/3.3.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sleef" * Package name: sleef Version : 3.3.1-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] *

Bug#907018: RFS: hepmc/2.06.09-3 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hepmc" * Package name: hepmc Version : 2.06.09-3 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL

Bug#907012: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-6

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-6 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#895729: RFS: mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency (amd64 specific)

10:16:17AM +0000, Lumin wrote: > > * Package name: mkl-dnn > >Version : 0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1 > >Upstream Author : intel > > Alas, the build flags use -march=native -mtune=native which is a big no-no. > The first makes the package crash on any

Bug#906646: RFS: double-conversion/3.0.0+git20180802.4e8b3b5-1 [ITA, tensorflow deps]

n/d/double-conversion/double-conversion_3.0.0+git20180802.4e8b3b5-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from 1. salsa git repo [branch: lumin/3.0.0 instead of master] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/double-conversion 2. dom-amd64 build for sid/experimental http://debom

Bug#906425: RFS: sleef/3.3-1 [ITP] -- vectorized math library, pytorch deps.

et/package/sleef Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sleef/sleef_3.3-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from 1. git repo: https://salsa.debian.org/lumin-guest/sleef 2. dom-

Bug#906206: RFS: chafa/0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-3 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chafa" * Package name: chafa Version : 0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-3 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

RFS: hepmc -- [RC] on behalf of multiarch-support removal

Hi, Can anybody sponsor my team upload for "hepmc"? Thanks. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hepmc - commit: cb8aa811bb7e8b5be46107ca9992a5ad58df73cb - upload: unstable changes: hepmc (2.06.09-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Team Upload. * Replace B-D-I:texlive-math-extra with

Bug#905970: RFS: chafa/0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chafa" * Package name: chafa Version : 0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams

Bug#905884: closed by Adam Borowski (Re: Bug#905884: RFS: chafa/0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-1 [ITP])

On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 11:00:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 06:26:46AM +0000, Lumin wrote: > > > > * Package name: chafa > >Version : 0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-1 > > * URL : https://hpjansso

Bug#905884: RFS: chafa/0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chafa" * Package name: chafa Version : 0.9.0+git20180731.5ddfe4c-1 Upstream Author : Hans Petter Jansson * URL : https://hpjansson.org/chafa/ * License

Nonlinear git-buildpackage workflow?

Hi mentors, I'm one of the julia package maintainers and I encountered a temporary non-linear workflow problem. Julia released two stable releases in parallel, 0.7 and 1.0 . I uploaded 0.7 to unstable and planned to upload 1.0 to exp. After a round of bug fix in the future the 1.0 release should

Bug#895729: RFS: mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency (amd64 specific)

control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:01:10PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:16:17AM +0000, Lumin wrote: > > * Package name: mkl-dnn > >Version : 0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1 > >Upstream Author : intel > >

Bug#895729: RFS: mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency (amd64 specific)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Disclaimer: Intel made some confusing naming. I should point out that mkl-dnn is a free software, which can be independently compiled and used without any component from intel-mkl . Without linking against intel-mkl, we would get a

Bug#905612: RFS: nsync/1.20.1-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nsync" * Package name: nsync Version : 1.20.1-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] *

Bug#905582: RFS: nsync/1.20.1-1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nsync", which is a tensorflow dependency. * Package name: nsync Version : 1.20.1-1 Upstream Author : google * URL

Bug#905053: RFS: trojan/1.5.1-1 [ITP]

Hi GreaterFire, Thank you for the package. I'm not sponsoring this package but I have some comments about it. You can feel free to omit the comments tagged "recommended". 1. Why is dh_auto_test noopped? The following tests FAILED: 1 - LinuxSmokeTest-basic (Failed) As the software

Bug#904229: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-5 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-5 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#902412: RFS: sodalite/0.14.2-1 [ITP]

Hi Heiko Nickerl, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sodalite". Thank you for this package. I'm not sponsoring this package, but I have some comments: 1. debian/copyright: OK 2. postinst: Printing something unecessary to screen during postinst looks unusual. I believe the

Bug#901958: RFS: lsmount/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- output /proc/mounts formatted

Hi Andreas Schwarz, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsmount" Thank you for this package. I'm not sponsoring it but here are some comments: 1. debian/copyright: OK 2. debian/rules: MINOR The debhelper compat level is set to 11. That means --parallel is default. So you don't

Bug#902577: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-4

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-4 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#901304: RFS: python-cytoolz/0.9.0.1-1 [ITP, spaCy deps]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 882725 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cytoolz" * Package name: python-cytoolz Version : 0.9.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Erik Welch * URL :

Bug#901235: RFS: python-thinc/6.11.2-1 [ITP, spaCy deps]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 901231 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-thinc" * Package name: python-thinc Version : 6.11.2-1 Upstream Author : github.com/explosion * URL :

Bug#901204: RFS: python-plac/0.9.6-1 [ITP, spaCy deps]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-plac" plac is one of spaCy dependencies: [✓] cython>=0.24,<0.28.0 [✓] pathlib [✓] numpy>=1.7 [*] cymem>=1.30,<1.32 # ITP/RFS [*]

Bug#900978: RFS: python-murmurhash/0.28.0-1 [ITP, spaCy deps]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: blocks 900977 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-murmurhash" * Package name: python-murmurhash Version : 0.28.0-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL

Bug#900948: RFS: python-preshed/1.0.0-1 [ITP, one of spaCy deps]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 900945 by -1 Control: block -1 by 900944 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-preshed" * Package name: python-preshed Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of

Bug#900944: RFS: python-cymem/1.31.2-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 900941 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cymem" * Package name: python-cymem Version : 1.31.2-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL :

Bug#900617: RFS: ujson/1.35-3 [ITA]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 12:02:17PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > + Move Sandro Tosi to Uploaders. > > please remove me from uploaders too, thanks! Re-uploaded the package. https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/ujson/ujson_1.35-3.dsc changes: ujson (1.35-3) unstable;

Re: Re: Mysterious autopkgtest tests of ujson package

> > autodep8: /usr/share/autodep8/support/python > > BTW: codesearch.debian.net is a good place to find out this sort of thing. > Ah, here it is. Thanks!

Bug#900626: RFS: gemmlowp/0.0~git20180416.38ebac7-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gemmlowp" * Package name: gemmlowp Version : 0.0~git20180416.38ebac7-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Mysterious autopkgtest tests of ujson package

Hello mentors, I'm adopting the ujson package[1][2]. Currently there is no autopkgtest control file under the debian directory[3], but ci.d.o, to my surprise, is running autopkgtest[4] on this package. As far as I know, tests are defined in debian/tests/control when the tester is autopkgtest. No

Bug#900617: RFS: ujson/1.35-3 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, mo...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ujson" * Package name: ujson Version : 1.35-3 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] *

Bug#900407: Info received (RFS: odp-dpdk/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP])

Use this command to generate a some copyright template: licensecheck --deb-machine -r .

Bug#900407: RFS: odp-dpdk/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Hi Dmitry, Thank you for the package. It looks good except for several flaws: 1. error in postrm script, which causes error on removal update-alternatives: error: alternative name (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libodp-linux.so.119) must not contain

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 03:24:07AM +, Lumin wrote: > Please fix the aforementioned problems. Hopefully we'll have the last > round of check next time. Thank you for working on this. > > [1] > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/odp/1.19.0.1-1/buildlog

Bug#896970: Info received (Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP])

Forgot to check the copyright ... The copyright looks incomplete. A simple search on the source tree would reveal many non-Linaro copyright holders: grep -ri copyright | grep -vi linaro | grep -i copyright The package will be rejected by ftp-master if we don't fix the copyright.

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:40:48PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > 1. README.Debian > >"Library packages should contain libodp-linux.so.FOO" > >It should be "libodp-linux.so.SOVER", which is more precise. > > Hmm. I have checked buster package lists. Only blas/lapack packages >

Bug#888859: Info received (Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP])

control: noowner -1 I'm recently too busy to review and test such a complex package, hence dropping it. Currently the package can be successfully built.

Bug#896186: Info received (Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP])

control: noowner -1 I quit reviewing this RFS, because frequent and incooperative force-{push,squash}'es drive me crazy, which makes it hard to track the changes. Any mentors interested in this package can take it over. I guess the package was nearly in shape, and the remaining reviewing work

Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP]

control: tags -1 +morefino On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:05:41AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > > d/copyright should have provided a list of removed files (see Files-Excluded). > > By the way, I have made a PR to upstream to remove ConvertUTF and it > has accepted. The next release will not affected by

Bug#900175: RFS: nltk/3.3.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nltk" * Package name: nltk Version : 3.3.0-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

Hi Yangfl, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:43:07PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > 2018-05-20 19:50 GMT+08:00 Lumin <cdlumin...@gmail.com>: > > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:37:27AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > >> control: tag -1 - moreinfo > >

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:50:57PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Hello, > > I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n. Please file another RFS bug for the odp-dpdk package since it is a different source. > 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 10:37:27AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > control: tag -1 - moreinfo > > Reuploaded. Please fix your packaging repo first: https://salsa.debian.org/chinese-team/netctl/network/master The stuff in the master branch is identical to the upstream

Bug#897238: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:49:05PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > I wonder if the simplest solution is to just have > intel-mkl Depends: libblas. i.e. use policy to simply prevent a sole > mkl installation. > > That way, the mkl alternative will always have a free BLAS to press > it's

Bug#898975: RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: ti...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses": * Package name: lua-moses Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-2 Upstream Author : * URL : * License : MIT

Bug#898484: [cdlumin...@gmail.com: RFS: nltk/3.3.0]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nltk": * Package name: nltk Version : 3.3.0 Upstream Author : NLTK project * URL : https://www.nltk.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Section : science

Bug#897238: RFS: intel-mkl/2018.2.199-1 -- ready for review

. Don't perform source-only upload since this is non-free blob. A source+amd64+i386 upload is needed. Thanks in advance. :-) Best, lumin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#897238: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

Hi Sébastien, > Using a Pre-Depends here is IMO wrong. Quoting Policy §7.2: Thanks. I didn't notice that when considering ways to avoid corner cases. > I also think that removing the Provides is not a good idea. The alternative is > provided by the package, and that should be made clear in the

Bug#897238: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

Just forgot to CC the RFS bug. - Forwarded message from Lumin <cdlumin...@gmail.com> - Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 08:29:29 + From: Lumin <cdlumin...@gmail.com> To: sebast...@debian.org Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Hig

Bug#897238: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:03:38AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 2 May 2018 at 14:41, Lumin wrote: > | Seems that things are getting more complicated. Recall that here we'are > | going to prevent users from GPL violation in situations such as this > | one: > | >

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:58:26PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > 5. Could you explain why these lines exist? Package libodp-linux-dev > > seems not exist. > > Packages libodp-linux-dev and libodp-linux119 are virtual package, > provided by different implementations of ODP API. We are

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Eremin-Solenikov <dbarysh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Followup-For: Bug #896970 > > Hi Lumin, > > I've updated ODP package on mentors.d.n, according to most of your > comments. Could you please review it? > > -- > With best wishe

Bug#897238: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

things discussed above, there is upstream confirmation to the ambiguous license declaration in several headers. See [1] The blockers are cleared. I think I'll update the package as proposed, and the copyright information as said in [1] before this weekend. [1] https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/issues/206#issuecomment-385772103 Regards, Lumin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#897238: Re: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

Hi Sébastien, > - if MKL was not already selected and the user says no, the setting > will be > left untouched (either in automatic or manual mode, depending on the > user > customization) > > - if MKL was already selected and the user says no (e.g. after a > reconfigure), > then MKL will be

Bug#897238: RFS: intel-mkl/2018.2.199-1 -- Intel Math Kernel Library (Intel MKL)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "intel-mkl" * Package name: intel-mkl Version : 2018.2.199-1 Upstream Author : Intel * URL :

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Hi Dmitry, Thank you for this package. Here are some problems found in your package: 1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev 2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g. W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic 3. debhelper compat level and

Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP]

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hi Yangfl, As discussed previously, the python script for automatically generating the files should be added in the package. -- Best,

Bug#883840: RFS: spglib/1.10.3-1 [ITP]

On 23 April 2018 at 14:11, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> 6. tests: your autopkgtest testsuite failed: > > I will look into this. It is possible that I invoke the Python tests > incorrectly. Oh, I forgot to tell you that the failure is due to output to stderr. By redirecting

Bug#883840: RFS: spglib/1.10.3-1 [ITP]

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hi Andrius, Thank you for the package. Here are some nitpicking about your package: 1. There seems to be ruby binding available, why isn't it packaged? 2. control: Your -dev package should also depend on the lib package. Depends:

Bug#896186: RFS: netctl/1.16-1 [ITP]

Hi Yangfl, Some feedbacks after checking you package: 1. Vcs-* fields are missing, which makes it hard to track the changes. I'd recommend you to put the packaging work on salsa or somewhere alike. 2. lintian overrides: why do you override them? Please add the explanation as comments

Bug#895803: RFS: linuxbrew-wrapper/20180209-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Notes: I have DM permission to this package. However to fix an RC bug this package needs to go through NEW, moving from the main section to the contrib section. See the RC bug for detail. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my

Bug#895729: RFS: mkl-dnn/0.13~20180406-ga5f6077-1 [ITP] -- math kernel lib for deep neural network

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: mkl-dnn Version : 0.13~20180406-ga5f6077-1 Upstream Author : Intel * URL :

Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

for the sponsorship. Let's hope Gianfranco will find a time doing the sponsorship. Regards, On 9 April 2018 at 17:43, François Mazen <franc...@mzf.fr> wrote: > Hi Lumin, > > I just want to know if I must do something to go on with the > integration of TapTempo into Debian. >

Bug#894863: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-3 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#894671: RFS: nltk/3.2.5-2 [ITA] : natural language processing lib, popcon: ~300

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nltk" * Package name: nltk Version : 3.2.5-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL :

Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

Hi François, On 31 March 2018 at 21:59, François Mazen wrote: > > This program is useful to quickly find the tempo of a song. > The idea is to type "taptempo" in a terminal, then hit enter key at > each beat while hearing a song, and display the tempo. > > The targeted people

Bug#894197: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

Hi François, On 26 March 2018 at 19:56, François Mazen wrote: > I've manually changed the timestamp of the changelog file from the > original repo, and I haven't check that the date was wrong. I can > update the changelog file. I've seen new commits in the repo. Let's assume

Bug#894071: RFS: gemmlowp/0~20180308-gf59a96b-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gemmlowp" * Package name: gemmlowp Version : 0~20180308-gf59a96b-1 Upstream Author : google * URL : https://github.com/google/gemmlowp * License

Bug#894024: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hi François, Several questions about your package: 1. Why is the package on mentors newer than that on github repo? Could you please keep the packaging repo up-to-date? https://github.com/moleculext/taptempo 2. Where is your public key? no

Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP]

n of youtube-dl from python2 version of gui. I'm not sure whether it's possible since I didn't look into the code. Regards, Lumin. On 22 February 2018 at 09:51, Félix Sipma <felix+deb...@gueux.org> wrote: > On 2018-02-22 03:27+, Lumin wrote: >> I built the package locally, but I d

Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Feb 2018 09:11:18 + Lumin <cdlumin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> control: owner -1 ! >> control: tags -1 +moreinfo >> >> Hi Yangfl, > > Hi Lumin, > > Confused I haven't received your mail via BTS. Much thanks for your > interest and willing to sponsor. &g

Bug#891922: RFS: you-get/0.4.1040-1 [ITP]

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 at 01:46 Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > > > It would be interesting to see how this program is different from > already existing tools like youtube-dl and cclive. > > Thank you! I have noticed the existence of youtube-dl. However, the user may switch

Bug#891922: RFS: you-get/0.4.1040-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "you-get" * Package name: you-get Version : 0.4.1040-1 Upstream Author : Mort Yao * URL : https://github.com/soimort/you-get * License : MIT

Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 at 01:22 Félix Sipma wrote: > > > This part seems unrelated to auto update functionality. Would you > > mind splitting it to another patch? > > It is a part of the patch: youtube-dl-gui tries to download youtube-dl in > 'youtubedl_path', and then

Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP]

On 15 February 2018 at 15:33, Félix Sipma wrote: > I don't get the harm in having a little more verbose initial changelog, we're > talking about 10 lines there, not a whole book... Anyway, I've just kept the > attribution and a line mentioning the lack of python3 support.

Bug#890379: RFS: python-jsonrpc/1.10.8-1 [ITP]

Hi, On 15 February 2018 at 13:52, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >> 1. please fix the following copyright issue: > I will update d/copyright accordingly. >> 2. This package failed to build when python2 version of sphinx exists: > > I don't care to be honest. > > It builds fine

Bug#886827: Fwd: Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP]

-- Forwarded message -- From: Lumin <cdlumin...@gmail.com> Date: 15 February 2018 at 14:51 Subject: Re: Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP] To: Félix Sipma <felix+deb...@gueux.org> Hi, On 15 February 2018 at 09:41, Félix Sipma <felix+deb...@gueux.org> w

Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP]

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 +moreinfo Hi Yangfl, * URL : http://www.iolang.com Are you sure this URL is correct? Thank you for your work. Here are some comments on your package. * -dfsg: would you please explain what is removed from original source in README.source? * please fix

Bug#890379: RFS: python-jsonrpc/1.10.8-1 [ITP]

There is six.py. What's the relationship between it and python3-six? My preliminary guess is that upstream just copied that file to their project. 2. This package failed to build when python2 version of sphinx exists: make[2]: Entering directory '/home/lumin/packages/sponsor/python-jsonrpc-1.10.8/docs

Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP]

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hi Félix, Some comments on your package: changelog --- * One line is enough for the initial upload, e.g. "Initial release. (Closes: #753350)" compat & control - * I'd recommend to use debhelper compat

Bug#889800: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180103-geeea446-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180103-geeea446-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#887728: RFS: nvidia-cudnn/7.0.5~cuda9.0-1 [ITP / ppc64el help needed]

eader File To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://salsa.debian.org/lumin-guest/nvidia-cudnn ##NOTE## I didn't upload the package to debomatic-amd64, nor the mentors because the source package is too large to me (~660MB). My local a

Bug#887699: RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Note: The first time upload was rejected by ftpmaster due to license issues. I have fixed them in this version. This ITP package will fix an RC bug of another package lua-torch-nn, because lua-moses was added as a new dependency by upstream.

Bug#887683: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180103-geeea446-1 [RC/experimental]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180103-geeea446-1 Upstream Author : * URL : * License : Section : science It

Bug#870127: RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-1 -- [ITP] Utility library for functional programming in Lua

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses" * Package name: lua-moses Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-1 Upstream Author : Yonaba * URL :http://yonaba.github.io/Moses/ * License :

Bug#870125:

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses" * Package name: lua-moses Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-1 Upstream Author : Yonaba * URL :http://yonaba.github.io/Moses/ * License :

Bug#869664: RFS: ptpython/0.39~20170703-1 [ITP]

2 | loss 1.967 | Bch Train Accu 0.47 -> Iter 3 | loss 1.853 | Bch Train Accu 0.53 On 25 July 2017 at 13:23, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote: > Why is this aimed at experimental? > > -- > WBR, wRAR -- Best, Lumin

Bug#869664: RFS: ptpython/0.39~20170703-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ptpython" * Package name: ptpython Version : 0.39~20170703-1 Upstream Author : jonathanslenders * URL : https://github.com/jonathanslenders/ptpython *

Bug#849273: RFS: gemmlowp/0~20170407-g719389f-1 [ITP]

Hi, On 16 June 2017 at 04:33, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > I've reviewed your package. The package looks quite good to me. > The only thing missing is the README.source > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource Updated the package and

Bug#864271: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#864271: RFS: protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU]

Hi GCS, Thank you for the quick reply. On 6 June 2017 at 10:06, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> Clarification-moreinfo: >> this tag is for protbuf maintainers to approve this NMU. > You misspelled the package name and the tag as well, among other things. Sorry for the

Bug#864271: RFS: protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Tags: morinfo X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-protobuf-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Clarification-moreinfo: this tag is for protbuf maintainers to approve this NMU. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "protobuf" * Package name:

Bug#863229: RFS: lua-torch-cutorch/0~20170511-g92e9c08-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-cutorch" * Package name: lua-torch-cutorch Version : 0~20170511-g92e9c08-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill

Bug#833193: RFS: chapel/1.15-1 [ITP]

On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 20:41 +, Ben Albrecht wrote: > > We understand that Debian plans to upgrade to Python 3. We're not > intending to install user-visible Python scripts or modules. The > Python code that we use is used internally by our compiler and build > scripts. In this case, is it

Bug#833193: RFS: chapel/1.15-1 [ITP]

Hi Ben, > We do install the Chapel modules and runtime to versioned directories > like this: > > /usr/share/chapel/1.15/modules etc > > The documentation is installed to > > /usr/share/doc/chapel/1.15/rst etc > > Is it obviously better in your opinion to use > >

  1   2   3   >