Bug#1054419: RFS: go-mode.el/3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1 [RC] [Team] -- Emacs mode for editing Go code

2023-10-25 Thread Xiyue Deng
Xiyue Deng  writes:

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":
>
>  * Package name : go-mode.el
>Version  : 3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1
>Upstream contact : Dominik Honnef 
>  * URL  : https://github.com/dominikh/go-mode.el
>  * License  : BSD-3-clasue
>  * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/go-mode.el
>Section  : lisp
>
> The source builds the following binary packages:
>
>   elpa-go-mode - Emacs mode for editing Go code
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
> URL:
>
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/go-mode.el/
>
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
>
>   dget -x 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go-mode.el/go-mode.el_1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1.dsc
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
>  go-mode.el (3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Team upload.
>* Sync to latest upstream head (8dce1e3).
>* Apply patch to drop duplicated test (Closes: #1052922).
>* Drop Built-Using which should not be used on an "arch:all" package.
>* Add DEP5 headers for fix-test-path.patch.
>* Update year and add Upstream-Contact in d/copyright.
>* Use git mode and fix lintian warnings in d/watch.
>
> Regards,

The previous uploads had a typo in the version number.  This has been
fixed in the latest upload.

-- 
Xiyue Deng



Bug#1054419: RFS: go-mode.el/3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1 [RC] [Team] -- Emacs mode for editing Go code

2023-10-23 Thread Xiyue Deng
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":

 * Package name : go-mode.el
   Version  : 3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1
   Upstream contact : Dominik Honnef 
 * URL  : https://github.com/dominikh/go-mode.el
 * License  : BSD-3-clasue
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/go-mode.el
   Section  : lisp

The source builds the following binary packages:

  elpa-go-mode - Emacs mode for editing Go code

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/go-mode.el/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go-mode.el/go-mode.el_1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 go-mode.el (3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Sync to latest upstream head (8dce1e3).
   * Apply patch to drop duplicated test (Closes: #1052922).
   * Drop Built-Using which should not be used on an "arch:all" package.
   * Add DEP5 headers for fix-test-path.patch.
   * Update year and add Upstream-Contact in d/copyright.
   * Use git mode and fix lintian warnings in d/watch.

Regards,
-- 
Xiyue Deng



Bug#1008930: RFS: go-junit-report/1.0.0-1 -- Convert go test output to junit xml (program)

2022-04-05 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:32:31 -0300 "Gabriel M. Dutra"  
wrote:

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-junit-report":

* Package name : go-junit-report
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : TODO
* URL : https://github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report
* License : Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/go-junit-report
Section : golang

The source builds the following binary packages:

go-junit-report - Convert go test output to junit xml (program)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


https://mentors.debian.net/package/go-junit-report/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go-junit-report/go-junit-report_1.0.0-1.dsc


Changes for the initial release:

go-junit-report (1.0.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium


Please address unstable or experimental with a new package upload.


.
* Initial release (Closes: TODO)


You have to file an ITP first and fill the TODO.

Please untag moreinfo from this bug when you are done.



Bug#1008930: RFS: go-junit-report/1.0.0-1 -- Convert go test output to junit xml (program)

2022-04-04 Thread Gabriel M. Dutra

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-junit-report":

* Package name : go-junit-report
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : TODO
* URL : https://github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report
* License : Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/go-junit-report
Section : golang

The source builds the following binary packages:

go-junit-report - Convert go test output to junit xml (program)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


https://mentors.debian.net/package/go-junit-report/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go-junit-report/go-junit-report_1.0.0-1.dsc


Changes for the initial release:

go-junit-report (1.0.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium



Bug#1008035: marked as done (RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.3.0-1 -- Command line utility to send messages or files using XMPP)

2022-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:41:18 +0100
with message-id <80cc6c68-0480-0f73-bc4c-ceda794a9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.3.0-1 -- Command line utility to send 
messages or files using XMPP
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008035,
regarding RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.3.0-1 -- Command line utility to send messages or 
files using XMPP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1008035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008035
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-sendxmpp":

 * Package name: go-sendxmpp
   Version : 0.3.0-1
   Upstream Author : Martin Dosch 
 * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/mdosch/go-sendxmpp
 * License : BSD-2-clause
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/go-sendxmpp
   Section : golang

The source builds the following binary packages:

  go-sendxmpp - Command line utility to send messages or files using XMPP

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/go-sendxmpp/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go-sendxmpp/go-sendxmpp_0.3.0-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 go-sendxmpp (0.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.

Regards,
--
  Martin Dosch


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Thanks for the update!--- End Message ---


Bug#1005922: marked as done (RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.2.0-1 -- Command line utility to send messages or files using XMPP)

2022-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:51:00 +0100
with message-id <42e9ebed-a61f-a408-fe74-eae234eb1...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.2.0-1 -- Command line utility to send 
messages or files using XMPP
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005922,
regarding RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.2.0-1 -- Command line utility to send messages or 
files using XMPP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1005922: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005922
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-sendxmpp":

 * Package name: go-sendxmpp
   Version : 0.2.0-1
   Upstream Author : Martin Dosch 
 * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/mdosch/go-sendxmpp
 * License : BSD-2-clause
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/go-sendxmpp
   Section : golang

It builds those binary packages:

  go-sendxmpp - Command line utility to send messages or files using XMPP

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/go-sendxmpp/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go-sendxmpp/go-sendxmpp_0.2.0-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 go-sendxmpp (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.

Regards,
--
  Martin Dosch


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Thanks for the update.--- End Message ---


Re: RFS: go

2010-03-23 Thread Adamou Nacer

Ivan Wong a écrit :

So sounds like more people prefer google-go. I just renamed it and
re-uploaded it:

- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go/google-go_2010.03.15-1.dsc

I hope someone will be interested in sponsoring this package. Any
help would be greatly appreciated.
  
I am a novice, but I would really appreciate been involved in a team 
maintaining this package!

Cheers


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba8a917.3010...@gmail.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-23 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Hola Ivan Wong!

El 21/03/2010 a las 16:42 escribiste:
 So sounds like more people prefer google-go. I just renamed it and
 re-uploaded it:
 
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
 unstable main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go/google-go_2010.03.15-1.dsc
 
 I hope someone will be interested in sponsoring this package. Any
 help would be greatly appreciated.

Version : 2010.03.15-1

Here is my quick review:

 - Version scheme is doomed to be changed in the future
 - A README.source would be nice to have.

 - copyright packaging holder says: Ivan Wong Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com,
   should be: Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com
 - go.substvars non-sense shlibs:Depends=libc6 (= 2.3.6-6~), libc6 (= 2.7)
   Is it really needed? (Please explain this in your README.source)
 - go.dehelper.log included in your src package isn't really needed.

 - Why would anyone prefer a static binary compiler in a full blown debian
   system? (lintian-overrides) (If there is a technical reason to be so please
   explain it in the README.source otherwise, generate dynamic binaries)

 - It would be preffered if the environment variables were not needed
   (that is, to run the compiler), setting a default on compile time would also
   avoid the need of the wrappers (debian/bin/*)
 - Please, provide manpages for the programs, even a simple one would help a
   lot.

A quick license review:
 - ./src/pkg/image/jpeg/idct.go: dubious license, its released under a BSD
   like license by the Go authors, but claims to be a translation from a 
non-free
   implementation

-- 
recursividad 95, 154, 156, 201, 224, 293 
-- El Lenguaje de Programacion C, pag. 293 (Kernighan  Ritchie)
Saludos /\/\ /\  `/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100323162437.gf16...@maxy.com.ar



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-21 Thread Ivan Wong
So sounds like more people prefer google-go. I just renamed it and
re-uploaded it:

- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go/google-go_2010.03.15-1.dsc

I hope someone will be interested in sponsoring this package. Any
help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
-Ivan.

Ivan Wong wrote:
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package go.
 
 * Package name: go
   Version : 2010.03.15-1
   Upstream Author : Google
 * URL : http://golang.org/
 * License : BSD Style
   Section : devel
 
 It builds these binary packages:
 go - Google's Go programming language compiler
 
 The package appears to be lintian clean.
 
 The upload would fix these bugs: 574371
 
 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
 unstable main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go/go_2010.03.15-1.dsc
 
 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
 
 Rgrds,


-- 
Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com
GPG: 1024D/40510AB7: 88BF A832 50D7 30F0 3850  DE17 049D A727 4051 0AB7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba5dc11.7080...@gmail.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
David Baird dhba...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go google-go,
 and if another implementation is ever created, it could be called
 something-else-go.

or as short version:  ggo

Fondest regards,
 Joachim Wiedorn



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: RFS: go

2010-03-19 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday 18 March 2010 16:50:03 Brian Nelson wrote:
 '-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
 (e.g. texlive-lang-*).  I actually prefer the google-go suggestion
 since I think that's the least ambiguous.

Good point.

Going back to the package description, I see that this package provides a 
compiler. 

How about naming this package go-compiler ? 

This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a 
computer language is implicit.

HTH 


Dominique
--
http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003190909.17877.dominique.dum...@hp.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
 On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
  * Package name: go

  It builds these binary packages:
  go - Google's Go programming language compiler
 
 Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the 
 venerable go game.

In a software distribution, computer languages should get strong priority
over games.  You don't say C-lang or perl-lang.

-- 
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
//  Never attribute to stupidity what can be
//  adequately explained by malice.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100319090836.ga26...@angband.pl



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-19 Thread Pietro Battiston
Il giorno ven, 19/03/2010 alle 10.08 +0100, Adam Borowski ha scritto:
 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
  On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
   * Package name: go
 
   It builds these binary packages:
   go - Google's Go programming language compiler
  
  Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the 
  venerable go game.
 
 In a software distribution, computer languages should get strong priority
 over games. 

I don't see why. If I really had to point a general rule of thumb to
evaluate popularity of words in the computer world, it would be the
number of pages found searching on a search engine.

 You don't say C-lang or perl-lang.

C and perl bring no ambiguity (oh, and there is no C package).

My opinion is that go-compiler makes sense.

Pietro


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1268992642.2576.51.ca...@vousci



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-19 Thread Andreas Bombe
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:09:17AM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
 How about naming this package go-compiler ? 
 
 This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a 
 computer language is implicit.

The problem with not tying it to Google is when someone decides to
package the compiler for the entirely unrelated Go! language by Frank
McCabe.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100319155716.ga7...@bombe-desk.opditex



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-19 Thread David Baird
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dominique Dumont
dominique.dum...@hp.com wrote:
 How about naming this package go-compiler ?

 This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a
 computer language is implicit.

I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go google-go,
and if another implementation is ever created, it could be called
something-else-go.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/440abda91003191149s3ceb59b1r432bb6c282425...@mail.gmail.com



RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Ivan Wong
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package go.

* Package name: go
  Version : 2010.03.15-1
  Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://golang.org/
* License : BSD Style
  Section : devel

It builds these binary packages:
go - Google's Go programming language compiler

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 574371

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go/go_2010.03.15-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Rgrds,
-- 
Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com
GPG: 1024D/40510AB7: 88BF A832 50D7 30F0 3850  DE17 049D A727 4051 0AB7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba20004.4080...@gmail.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com wrote:
 I am looking for a sponsor for my package go.
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go/go_2010.03.15-1.dsc

Hi,

Thanks a lot for your work. I was looking at 'go' from long time and
wondering when it will come to Debian.

How about forming team to maintain it? I'll look at package in 1/2
days if no one steps in to see :)

-- 
 Cheers,
 Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
 Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Identica: @kartikm
 Blogs: {ftbfs, kartikm}.wordpress.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/85c01b291003180414n44a16e95xf20ceb0221631...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Just FYI:

dh_strip -Xusr/lib/go/pkg -Xgoinstall -Xgodoc -Xgoyacc -Xhgpatch
-Xcgo -Xebnflint -Xgofmt
strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note
--strip-unneeded
/tmp/go-2010.03.15/debian/go/usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_386/libcgo.so
strip: '/tmp/go-2010.03.15/debian/go/usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_386/libcgo.so':
No such file
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error
exit status 2

Here is my system:

$ uname -a
Linux gotlib 2.6.30-bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Aug 17 08:42:50 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/Linux


On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package go.

 * Package name    : go
  Version         : 2010.03.15-1
  Upstream Author : Google
 * URL             : http://golang.org/
 * License         : BSD Style
  Section         : devel

 It builds these binary packages:
 go         - Google's Go programming language compiler

 The package appears to be lintian clean.

 The upload would fix these bugs: 574371

 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
 unstable main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go/go_2010.03.15-1.dsc

 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

 Rgrds,
 --
 Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com
 GPG: 1024D/40510AB7: 88BF A832 50D7 30F0 3850  DE17 049D A727 4051 0AB7


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba20004.4080...@gmail.com





-- 
Mathieu


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/bf0c3b3f1003180430h196556fco6dd142927f844...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
 * Package name: go
   Version : 2010.03.15-1
   Upstream Author : Google
 * URL : http://golang.org/
 * License : BSD Style
   Section : devel
 
 It builds these binary packages:
 go - Google's Go programming language compiler

Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the 
venerable go game.

May be this package should be named google-go or better go-lang (inspired from  
the web site name)

HTH

Dominique
--
http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003181325.21192.dominique.dum...@hp.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Donnerstag, 18. März 2010, Dominique Dumont wrote:
 Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the
 venerable go game.

Me too. I didnt notice until your mail

 May be this package should be named google-go or better go-lang (inspired
 from the web site name)

go-lang sounds good/better to me too.


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Ivan Wong
Hi Mathieu,

Thanks very much for letting me know about the problem. I have just
fixed it.

Thanks,
-Ivan.

Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
 Just FYI:
 
 dh_strip -Xusr/lib/go/pkg -Xgoinstall -Xgodoc -Xgoyacc -Xhgpatch
 -Xcgo -Xebnflint -Xgofmt
 strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note
 --strip-unneeded
 /tmp/go-2010.03.15/debian/go/usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_386/libcgo.so
 strip: '/tmp/go-2010.03.15/debian/go/usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_386/libcgo.so':
 No such file
 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error
 exit status 2
 
 Here is my system:
 
 $ uname -a
 Linux gotlib 2.6.30-bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Aug 17 08:42:50 UTC 2009
 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
 
 On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package go.

 * Package name: go
  Version : 2010.03.15-1
  Upstream Author : Google
 * URL : http://golang.org/
 * License : BSD Style
  Section : devel

 It builds these binary packages:
 go - Google's Go programming language compiler

 The package appears to be lintian clean.

 The upload would fix these bugs: 574371

 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
 unstable main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go/go_2010.03.15-1.dsc

 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

 Rgrds,
 --
 Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com
 GPG: 1024D/40510AB7: 88BF A832 50D7 30F0 3850  DE17 049D A727 4051 0AB7


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba20004.4080...@gmail.com


 
 
 


-- 
Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com
GPG: 1024D/40510AB7: 88BF A832 50D7 30F0 3850  DE17 049D A727 4051 0AB7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba23142.3050...@gmail.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Ivan Wong
Hi Dominique,

Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?

Thanks,
-Ivan.

Dominique Dumont wrote:
 On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
 * Package name: go
   Version : 2010.03.15-1
   Upstream Author : Google
 * URL : http://golang.org/
 * License : BSD Style
   Section : devel

 It builds these binary packages:
 go - Google's Go programming language compiler
 
 Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the 
 venerable go game.
 
 May be this package should be named google-go or better go-lang (inspired 
 from  
 the web site name)
 
 HTH
 
 Dominique
 --
 http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
 http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont


-- 
Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com
GPG: 1024D/40510AB7: 88BF A832 50D7 30F0 3850  DE17 049D A727 4051 0AB7


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba23274.9050...@gmail.com



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010, Ivan Wong a écrit :
 Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
 like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
 golang? Any other suggestions?

go-lang, for me. golang gives the impression that it is a software
called Golang.

-- 
Tanguy Ortolo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Brian Nelson
Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com writes:

 Hi Dominique,

 Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
 like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
 golang? Any other suggestions?

'-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
(e.g. texlive-lang-*).  I actually prefer the google-go suggestion
since I think that's the least ambiguous.

-- 
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hp9zl1w@bignachos.net



Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Brian Nelson p...@debian.org wrote:
 Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
 like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
 golang? Any other suggestions?

 '-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
 (e.g. texlive-lang-*).  I actually prefer the google-go suggestion
 since I think that's the least ambiguous.

google-go sounds better.

-- 
 Cheers,
 Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
 Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Identica: @kartikm
 Blogs: {ftbfs, kartikm}.wordpress.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/85c01b291003181004t56bec3d2oae622b2cad5a1...@mail.gmail.com